Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

French Police Watch as 1000 Illegal Migrants Head for UK

A fresh flotilla of migrants set off for Britain from northern France, with provisional estimates overnight suggesting up to 1,000 people may have attempted the crossing on one of the busiest Channel days this year.

The move came a day after Prime Minister Andy Burnham said Labour’s approach to illegal migration was “working”, as figures for daily crossings were expected to be published later.

Gendarmes Told People Not To Intervene

Footage and reporting from the Opal Coast near Neufchâtel-Hardelot, south of Calais, described chaotic scenes after a dinghy carrying about 60 migrants, including children, ran aground close to shore.

Some passengers pushed at the boat to get it into deeper water, and fighting broke out as people struggled for space. Videos and witnesses said men pulled each other’s hair, and one person whipped others using a belt. Several migrants were also described as becoming aggressive towards journalists and members of the public.

Reporters said around ten to 12 gendarmes watched from the shallow area without moving into the water to intervene. One officer was recorded saying: “Our order is to let them go”, while another reportedly told those nearby that officers could only warn people that it was dangerous.

Labour ministers have previously said they persuaded French authorities to ease rules to allow officers to seize migrants in the shallows, and the Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has linked further funding to new enforcement tactics. Under a payment-by-results agreement announced for France, UK payments can be withheld if police fail to deliver value.

Crossings Drop But Volume Remains High

The last time the daily number of Channel crossings reached four figures was last October, when 1,075 people crossed. More than 13,007 migrants have reached the UK by small boat this year, down 45% on the same period in 2025, according to official totals cited in reporting.

In addition to Neufchâtel-Hardelot, other attempts were described elsewhere along the coast. At Wimereux, reporters said around 100 migrants arrived at about 05:30 local time to try to board a larger vessel waiting offshore after being taken out by smaller RIBs; roughly 80 then got on board while others, including two women and three children, were forced back to shore.

At Gravelines, reports said about 100 migrants scrambled along the sand to board a dinghy, with French authorities in a rescue lifeboat appearing to hand out life jackets.

Further north, at Berck-sur-Mer, the day’s attempt followed days after a Sudanese man was stabbed to death near Berck-sur-Mer before a separate dinghy carrying a record 165 people sailed for Kent. Prosecutors in France have not confirmed a motive for the stabbing, and a murder investigation continues.

Home Office Response To Claims Of Weak Enforcement

Reacting to a video posted by Conservative shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp, the UK Home Office said it was aware of claims that French law enforcement had failed to prevent crossings.

It said UK-French co-operation had stopped more than 46,000 attempted Channel crossings since the election and that in May 65% of small-boat events were prevented despite higher temperatures. The Home Office added that removals of small boat migrants were at record levels and that asylum claims were down 12%.

It also said almost 70,000 people who were in the UK illegally had been removed or deported, an increase of 41% year-on-year, and that the Government was “going further” to remove incentives drawing migrants to Britain.

The Home Office said a landmark payment-by-results deal has been signed with France to boost enforcement on beaches and target people smugglers.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

30 July 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Deleted123 Ruby Member

Deleted123

Advanced Member
(edited)
4 hours ago, John Drake said:

Didn't Nigel Farage run Rupert Lowe out of Reform because Lowe wanted deportations and Farage didn't?

No,

Lowe was really going to extremes and wanting families out for the transgressions of their offspring, many of which were born in the UK.

One of Lowe's most controversial positions was that, in the context of the grooming gangs scandal, he wanted to deport:

  • foreign nationals involved in the crimes;

  • dual nationals involved, by stripping their British citizenship where legally possible; and

  • in some circumstances, relatives or wider communities who knew what was happening and failed to act.

  • Lowe himself defended this position after Farage referred to it.

He was considered as going too far with his views, some of his expulsion ideas were thought to be bordering illegal or unlawful.

Edited by Scouse123

Deleted123 Ruby Member

Deleted123

Advanced Member
23 minutes ago, Jimbolkb said:

is it too difficult for politicians ?

stop any form of aid, financial, housing, healthcare for illegals or people that never contributed to the economy... the end

That would go one hell of a long way to helping the situation, and making all businesses pay heavily for employing them cheaply and illegally in the gig economy.

Deleted123 Ruby Member

Deleted123

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, sammieuk1 said:

The deimigrunter is missing in action, 1487 invaders in a week nothing from the PM other than it's down on last year and your tax will go up🤔

Labour at its finest....🤑😨

Geoff914 Gold Member

Geoff914

Advanced Member
20 hours ago, worgeordie said:

I believe we are giving France millions and millions ,don't know if pounds or euros ,

to stop migrants getting in rubber dinghies and landing in the UK ,if these folk are

refugees , stay in France you are safe there ,I think the majority that are coming

are financial migrates ,coming for work , hopefully , or hand outs , like someone

has told them the streets are paved with gold,

regards worgeordie

Yep we give the bone idle froggies half a billion pounds to sit on their fat gaulic arses.

John Drake Diamond Member

John Drake

Advanced Member
18 hours ago, Scouse123 said:

in some circumstances, relatives or wider communities who knew what was happening and failed to act.

Anybody who kept quiet and hid crimes they knew to be taking place by their families are co-conspirators. They should be deported.

ravip Star Member

ravip

Advanced Member

What's so incredibly attractive in the UK for these illegal migrants? Why not set up camp in France or Belgium? The UK at any cost?

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
16 hours ago, Geoff914 said:

Yep we give the bone idle froggies half a billion pounds to sit on their fat gaulic arses.


You can blame Farage for that. He spent years insulting them in the European parliament (whilst taking as much money out as he possibly could), he helped orchestrate Brexit which was a massive two fingers to France and the whole of Europe (as well as being a categorically stupid and self harming exercise and one of the major causes of this asylum problem). Then he expects them to do everything they can to stop the boaties leaving for England.

Admit it, if it was the other way round you would not want your government to stop asylum seekers who were actively trying to leave your country would you? Especially when you have no obligation to as the place they are going to is the very country that left your Union with all its controls and insulted you repeatedly. The French also have their JonnyF's and Les BarraMarras you know.

Hypocrites.

Deleted123 Ruby Member

Deleted123

Advanced Member
45 minutes ago, ravip said:

What's so incredibly attractive in the UK for these illegal migrants? Why not set up camp in France or Belgium? The UK at any cost?

Access to the benefits systems

brewsterbudgen Star Member

brewsterbudgen

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Scouse123 said:

Access to the benefits systems

Illegal migrants do not get access to benefits.

Geoff914 Gold Member

Geoff914

Advanced Member
33 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Illegal migrants do not get access to benefits.

They do if you are using the word benefit in the more general sense and not the specific social security sense.

Geoff914 Gold Member

Geoff914

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, josephbloggs said:


You can blame Farage for that. He spent years insulting them in the European parliament (whilst taking as much money out as he possibly could), he helped orchestrate Brexit which was a massive two fingers to France and the whole of Europe (as well as being a categorically stupid and self harming exercise and one of the major causes of this asylum problem). Then he expects them to do everything they can to stop the boaties leaving for England.

Admit it, if it was the other way round you would not want your government to stop asylum seekers who were actively trying to leave your country would you? Especially when you have no obligation to as the place they are going to is the very country that left your Union with all its controls and insulted you repeatedly. The French also have their JonnyF's and Les BarraMarras you know.

Hypocrites.

We should blame Farage for giving half a billion pounds to the French? Surely it was the previous Government and the present one that has kept up the arrangement.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Geoff914 said:

We should blame Farage for giving half a billion pounds to the French? Surely it was the previous Government and the present one that has kept up the arrangement.

He's not to blame for that, no, but he is largely responsible for the problem in the first place and certainly has some responsibility for the French apathy towards things.

Why would the French go out of their way to stop a problem that is leaving their shores and heading towards the shores of a country that denigrated their union, left it for personal political gain, continually insulted them etc. We would do the same, wave the problem bye bye.

When we were partners, allies, it was very different. Treat them with disdain and reap what you sow.

Geoff914 Gold Member

Geoff914

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Admit it, if it was the other way round you would not want your government to stop asylum seekers who were actively trying to leave your country would you? Especially when you have no obligation to as the place they are going to is the very country that left your Union with all its controls and insulted you repeatedly. The French also have their JonnyF's and Les BarraMarras you know.

Actually we do. Refugees that go from Northern Ireland to the ROI were promptly send back by the ROI and we accepted them, unlike the French. This was before the stupid one in one out agreement.

Geoff914 Gold Member

Geoff914

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

He's not to blame for that, no, but he is largely responsible for the problem in the first place and certainly has some responsibility for the French apathy towards things.

Why would the French go out of their way to stop a problem that is leaving their shores and heading towards the shores of a country that denigrated their union, left it for personal political gain, continually insulted them etc. We would do the same, wave the problem bye bye.

When we were partners, allies, it was very different. Treat them with disdain and reap what you sow.

I don't get the point that you are trying to make. Yes the french are passing their scum onto the UK. The UK are too stupid to send them back. It is paying them half a billion pounds to sit on their fat gaulic arses and do eff all I don't get.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Scouse123 said:

What are these if not benefits?

They then go work in the ' gig ' economy.

They should be behind barbed wire in basic, and I mean basic, accommodation and deported as soon as their fake asylum claims fail.

Migrants arriving without authorization who claim asylum gain temporary access to basic state support while their cases are processed: temporary housing, a small cash allowance, and essential medical care. They do not receive standard public welfare benefits or an automatic right to work. [1, 2, 3, 4]

State Support and Housing

  • Accommodation: Basic housing such as initial processing centres, designated hotels, or hostels is provided while claims are reviewed, as individuals cannot choose where they live. [1, 2, 3]

  • Financial Allowance: A standard weekly allowance of £49.18 per person (or less if meals are provided in full-board accommodation) is loaded onto an ASPEN card to buy essentials like food, clothing, and toiletries. [1]

Healthcare and Education

  • Medical Care: Free access to emergency and necessary medical treatment through the National Health Service (NHS), including doctor consultations.

  • Education: Children aged 5 to 17 are required and given the right to attend local free state schools


So you don't think children should have the right to attend school? Sub human children scum.

And you don't think basic subsistence is a human right? £49 a week has to include food. If the temporary accommodation includes food then the allowance is £9.95 a week. They are hardly living the life of riley.

Oh, and by the way, fake applicants are deported.

SingAPorn Gold Member

SingAPorn

Advanced Member

Another situation that shows how the european union scheme has reached it's limits since Von der Leyen took over. The EU is bound to break up hopefully, as the dogmatic governance from Bruxelles is creating much havoc amongst western european nations.

What is highly disgraceful is how all those humanitarian ships who pick up the migrants at sea, are actually well coordinated with the mafia human trafickers and the humanitarian organisations who pick them up and exploit the loopholes of the European Union laws. No wonder there was a Brexit. No wonder people like Trump get elected. Because the regular Joe Soap's are, rightfully, just fed up with their respective governances in western Europe.

But let's also point out how Italy is giving out on Spain but not so long ago, Meloni legalized around 500'000 illegals and immigration workers to enter. Because all the farms and other low paid services in Italy is run by the illegals and migrants. The solution ? Wait and develop Ai and robotics to replace these menial jobs that will stop having to discreetly depend on the illegal workforce to run western economies.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
41 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Tax payers (the Govt) are already in debt, they can't afford, and are now suppose to borrow more money (raise the deficit) to accomodate non citizens.

You'll self destruct, be unable to support your own, but trying to save the world. People, tax payers, govts, need to live within their means. They are not, and the debt is unsustainable already. Adding to it, is suicidal.


So you would let them starve and punish their children by denying them basic human rights such as education? Says a lot about you, but you're a Trumpist so it makes sense.

I assume you have never heard of the UN Declaration of Human Rights.

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

roo860 Star Member

roo860

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, Geoff914 said:

Exactly, how can that not be benefits. It is like the anal people who persist and say the state pension is a benefit and not a pension. The Government has for its own reason chosen within the DWP systems to redefine the state pension as a benefit when we all know what it is pension. Let us normal people who have grown up with the English language use it in the general sense and not have the definition police dictate what words mean.

benefit /bĕn′ə-fĭt/

noun

  1. Something that promotes or enhances well-being; an advantage.

  2. Help; aid.

  3. A payment made by a government agency or insurance company to qualifying persons in time of need.

And as a 'benefit ' should be tax exempt.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.