Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Gunman Kills Eight Children in Louisiana Mass Shooting

Eight children aged between one and 14 have been killed in a shooting in Shreveport, Louisiana, in what police say began as a domestic-related incident.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

Authorities said a single gunman shot 10 people early in the morning before fleeing the scene in a stolen vehicle. Police later pursued the suspect and fatally shot him.

The attack, which unfolded across several locations in the same neighbourhood, has been described by city officials as one of the worst tragedies in the city’s history.

Early morning shooting

Police said the incident began at around 05:00 local time (10:00 GMT).

Officers responding to reports of gunfire found multiple crime scenes, including two homes on the same block on West 79th Street and another residence on nearby Harrison Street.

Shreveport Police Corporal Chris Bordelon said officers arrived at one home shortly before 06:00 and discovered several victims.

“All of the deceased in this case are juveniles,” Bordelon told reporters.

Investigators believe the shooting was domestic in nature. Some of the children killed were related to the suspected gunman, according to police.

Officials said one person who had been shot at the original residence managed to flee to a nearby home, creating an additional crime scene.

Authorities have not released the names of the victims or the suspect while family members are being notified.

Suspect killed after pursuit

Police said the suspected gunman fled the area after the shootings and carjacked a vehicle to escape.

Officers pursued the vehicle into another neighbourhood, where they confronted the suspect. During the encounter, police fired at the man, who died at the scene.

Further details about the circumstances of the confrontation have not yet been released.

Investigators from Shreveport Police are working with Louisiana State Police and several other agencies as they seek to determine what led to the shooting.

Police Chief Wayne Smith said authorities would continue investigating until they had answers.

“We are going to be working diligently however long it takes to get some answers to what has taken place,” he said.

Community mourning

Shreveport Mayor Tom Arceneaux said the incident had deeply affected the city.

“We have hurting families, we have hurting police officers, coroners’ personnel,” he said. “This affects the entire community, so we all mourn with these families.”

He described the event as possibly the most tragic incident the city has experienced.

“This is a tragic situation — maybe the worst tragic situation we've ever had in Shreveport,” he said, urging people to keep the families and the city in their prayers.

Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry said he and his wife were “heartbroken over this horrific situation” and offered prayers for those affected.

He also thanked emergency responders working at the scene.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, who represents Louisiana’s Fourth District, also expressed condolences, calling the shooting a “heartbreaking tragedy”.

He said his thoughts were with the victims, their families and the wider Shreveport community.

Deadliest US mass shooting in over a year

According to the Gun Violence Archive (GVA), a nonprofit organisation that tracks gun violence across the United States, the incident is the deadliest mass shooting in the country since January 2024.

In that case, eight people were killed in Joliet, Illinois.

The organisation defines a mass shooting as an incident in which four or more people are shot, excluding the suspected attacker.

Investigators say they are continuing to gather evidence and interview witnesses as they try to establish the full sequence of events that led to the killings.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 20 April 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

digger70 Ruby Member

digger70

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, bannork said:

You can't compare guns and cars.

A car's primary function is to transport people from A to B which is what happens in nearly every instance. Any accident is indeed that, an accident ( except for madmen) and is not the main purpose of a car.

A gun's primary function however, is to harm or kill an individual or animal. That is its purpose. Not the same as a car.

It's not the guns purpose it's the Stupid People that are the problem .

Guns can't kill it's the people who use them .

LosLobo Platinum Member

LosLobo

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Slowhand225 said:


The murder rate only drops for the first year, then it grows to more deaths than there were before the ban, with few exceptions.


I find that hard to believe—do you have any evidence to support that claim?

LosLobo Platinum Member

LosLobo

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, fredwiggy said:

Guns are necessary for many things. if you mean in anyone's hands besides the police and armed forces, then it comes down to guns should only be in the hands of responsible citizens. The trouble with that is that they aren't being totally responsible if they just leave them around for a child to find, a teen to use in shootings, or someone to steal for criminal acts. A lot of the shootings can be curtailed by that alone, along with arming people in all schools, which would stop all shootings before they start, or before many are killed.

The more responsible, legitimate gun owners there are, the less random shootings will take place, as most gun owners in the west are hunters and target shooters, and it's rare for one of them to go and shoot innocents. If a criminal thinks someone is armed, especially in a house, the less chance they'll try anything, even though some don't care.


'Guns should only be in the hands of responsible citizens'.

How is that going—and when will it change unless US citizens like you do something about it?

But as you well know as a past gun dealer, it seems there are vested interests in prolonging this abomination for power, politics, and money.

Firearms are now the leading cause of death for children and teens in the US, with roughly 4,000–5,000 deaths per year and about 20,000–30,000 non-fatal injuries.

By comparison, in Australia, firearm deaths among children and teens are rare (typically a handful per year), firearms are not a leading cause of death or injury in any youth group.

The difference isn’t just rhetoric—it’s reflected in the outcomes.

bannork Star Member

bannork

Newsman
2 hours ago, digger70 said:

It's not the guns purpose it's the Stupid People that are the problem .

Guns can't kill it's the people who use them .

A stupid person can kill with a knife but....... at a much slower rate than with a gun.

A gun enables a stupid person to kill many more people.

fredwiggy Star Member

fredwiggy

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, LosLobo said:


'Guns should only be in the hands of responsible citizens'.

How is that going—and when will it change unless US citizens like you do something about it?

But as you well know as a past gun dealer, it seems there are vested interests in prolonging this abomination for power, politics, and money.

Firearms are now the leading cause of death for children and teens in the US, with roughly 4,000–5,000 deaths per year and about 20,000–30,000 non-fatal injuries.

By comparison, in Australia, firearm deaths among children and teens are rare (typically a handful per year), firearms are not a leading cause of death or injury in any youth group.

The difference isn’t just rhetoric—it’s reflected in the outcomes.

People don't own guns for political or power purposes, besides those who are already controlling personalities that join the police force or military. Most are for hunting. Target shooting is fun and many also do that. The rest are wanting for self defense, as they have saved many lives when a citizen has one and a criminal attacks. Responsible means exactly that. Knowing your firearm, keeping it out of reach of anyone else, and using it properly when it's needed, hoping it never will be. In the wrong hands is where things go wrong, along with those hell bent on suicide.No one will ever take away American's guns, so it's up to the owners and judges to keep things from getting out of hand.

LosLobo Platinum Member

LosLobo

Advanced Member
39 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

People don't own guns for political or power purposes, besides those who are already controlling personalities that join the police force or military. Most are for hunting. Target shooting is fun and many also do that. The rest are wanting for self defense, as they have saved many lives when a citizen has one and a criminal attacks. Responsible means exactly that. Knowing your firearm, keeping it out of reach of anyone else, and using it properly when it's needed, hoping it never will be. In the wrong hands is where things go wrong, along with those hell bent on suicide.No one will ever take away American's guns, so it's up to the owners and judges to keep things from getting out of hand.


Obviously, logic is not one of your stronger points—your straw man fallacy, red herring, anecdotal reasoning, overgeneralisation, false equivalence, category error, selection bias, and unfalsifiable claim did not go unnoticed.

Brandolini’s Law (the Bull*** Asymmetry Principle) suggests:

'The amount of energy needed to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude larger than to produce it'.

So I will leave it there.

Enjoy the rest of the day.

fredwiggy Star Member

fredwiggy

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, LosLobo said:


Obviously, logic is not one of your stronger points—your straw man fallacy, red herring, anecdotal reasoning, overgeneralisation, false equivalence, category error, selection bias, and unfalsifiable claim did not go unnoticed.

Brandolini’s Law (the Bull*** Asymmetry Principle) suggests:

'The amount of energy needed to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude larger than to produce it'.

So I will leave it there.

Enjoy the rest of the day.

I'm wondering if some learn assuming from others here. You know nothing about me but this logic isn't one of my strong points is an ignorant thing to say seeing you don't know me. That you're prejudiced against guns is obvious, but that you haven't any logical answers also is. Is this only because you are against guns and I'm for them?

I have given sound reasons for the ownership of guns, and provided what might help lower the amount of deaths, and have done this all along. That I sold guns has me understand full well what they're all about, as well as using them for over 50 years with no accidents.

When you try and use words, it's best to make sure they match the situation, much as a certain troll does here , using the same words to describe people that disagree with him, with none being accurate.

I haven't distorted anything here but stated facts.

Personal experiences are indeed factual data, so you can't dismiss them.

I never say always when it comes to gun use, as people are individuals and some aren't capable of being responsible gun owners.

Keeping them out of those types hands is the problem, and always will be, no matter if all legal guns were banned or not.

Where am I comparing apples to oranges , or false equivalence as you stated?

Again, I stated ways to make guns safer. If you want to add your reasoning how that can happen in the US, let us know, as there are millions of gun owners who are waiting, and they'll never be banned there. Otherwise you're pissing in the wind.

11 minutes ago, LosLobo said:


KhunLA Star Member

KhunLA

Advanced Member

There is a system in place, that 'may' have prevented the murders. Also a hole in the system, as Louisiana doesn't mandate voluntary mental assistance to be reported, to prevent firearm possession, only if court appoint mental treatment.

Wife should have reported treatment to officials, ASAP, as the shooting occurred the day before divorce court hearing.

Someone should have seen this one coming ... oops. From AI ...

image.png

image.png

Jim Blue Platinum Member

Jim Blue

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, KhunLA said:

There is a system in place, that 'may' have prevented the murders. Also a hole in the system, as Louisiana doesn't mandate voluntary mental assistance to be reported, to prevent firearm possession, only if court appoint mental treatment.

Wife should have reported treatment to officials, ASAP, as the shooting occurred the day before divorce court hearing.

Someone should have seen this one coming ... oops. From AI ...

image.png

image.png

The commies would have put him in a Gulag !

1tooth Silver Member

1tooth

Advanced Member

america is a horrible culture, with horrible people.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.