Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Hamas Accused of Systematic Sexual Violence in Oct 7 Attacks

An independent Israeli investigation has presented extensive evidence alleging that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups carried out widespread sexual violence during the 7 October 2023 attacks in Israel and against hostages held in Gaza.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The 300-page report by the Civil Commission describes rapes, sexual assaults and sexual torture that it says were used deliberately to inflict maximum harm on victims. Researchers conclude that sexual violence was employed as a tactic during the assault.

The findings draw on hundreds of survivor and witness testimonies as well as thousands of photographs, videos and official records gathered from attack sites.

The Hamas-led attacks killed around 1,200 people in Israel and saw 251 individuals taken hostage, marking the deadliest day in the country’s history.

Evidence from survivors and footage

The commission said its investigation included 430 filmed interviews with survivors and witnesses and analysis of more than 10,000 images and videos, including material filmed by attackers themselves.

Accounts in the report describe scenes of violence at several locations targeted during the assault, including the Nova music festival, where more than 370 people were killed.

Witnesses cited in the report describe hearing and seeing gang rapes during the attack at the festival. One male survivor recounted being abused by attackers. The report also records instances where victims who were raped or sexually assaulted were later shot.

Investigators documented recurring descriptions from multiple sites, including kibbutzim and military bases that were overrun, where bodies of women were reportedly found without underwear or with signs of genital mutilation.

The commission concluded that sexual and gender-based violence formed part of the attacks and described what it called the “weaponisation of sexual violence”.

Allegations of abuse in captivity

The report also states that sexual violence continued during captivity for some hostages held in Gaza, affecting both women and men.

Several former hostages have publicly spoken about abuse they say occurred while they were held, including Amit Soussana, Arbel Yehud, Romi Gonen, Rom Braslavski and Guy Gilbol Dalal. Other accounts cited in the report were shared privately with medical staff, therapists and investigators.

Among the claims detailed in the investigation is an allegation that two young relatives were forced by captors to perform sexual acts on each other. The report describes this as part of a pattern of violence that targeted family members and exploited relationships to instil fear.

The commission says the acts documented in its findings could amount to war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocidal acts under international law.

Evidence gathered by the investigation has been placed in a secure archive and may be used in future legal proceedings.

Disputed claims and verification efforts

Hamas has repeatedly denied that sexual or gender-based violence occurred during the attacks or against hostages.

Previous investigations have also examined the issue. A report by the United Nations Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict said there were “reasonable grounds to believe” that sexual violence, including gang rape, had taken place during the attacks.

Researchers involved in the Israeli investigation said they took additional steps to verify evidence because some early claims circulated by Israeli officials after the attack were later shown to be inaccurate. In addition, some forensic material was lost when first responders quickly cleared attack sites.

To preserve independence, the commission said it did not rely on statements obtained during Israeli interrogations of detained suspects.

The report’s authors said the project was intended not only to collect evidence for potential prosecutions but also to document events for the historical record.

Many victims of sexual violence during the attacks were killed, while others remain traumatised, the commission said. It added that the investigation aimed to ensure their experiences are recorded and not dismissed or forgotten.

The October 2023 assault triggered Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, which has since killed 72,742 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. The United Nations considers the ministry’s casualty figures broadly reliable.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 May 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
34 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

He came up with 14 rapes by the IDF, and equated that to thousands of murders, and tens of thousands of rapes that were committed by the people he supports and makes excuses for.

Obviously, human beings are just numbers to you. Rape is rape. Murder is murder. Nobody should be let off the hook. How many actual Hamas killed in Gaza among those 72,000???

richard_smith237 Star Member

richard_smith237

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

I think you'll see those same flag-wavers in Israel. Nationalism is a curse on mankind.

If Hamas fighters are hiding, what exactly is Mossad doing to find them?

And then, what will the IDF do to root them out one-by-one?

Shouldn't be too hard to find in the rubble or sheltering in tents.

Ah, or maybe Israel should just kill 'em all and let Yahweh sort 'em out.

Some valid points - the nationalism point cuts both ways. Hamas runs on nationalist and religious ideology too, so applying that critique only to Israel doesn't hold up.

On Mossad: their track record on targeted killing spans decades and multiple countries. The problem in Gaza isn't locating people in principle. It's tunnels, dense urban areas, and civilian cover making surgical operations genuinely hard, even for a capable service.

The sarcastic "kill 'em all" line implies you believe Israel's approach is purely indiscriminate. That's a contested claim, not a settled one. The civilian casualty figures are real and serious. So is the documented reality that Hamas deliberately embeds in civilian infrastructure - so the black and white, good vs evil binary overview is flawed.

Really the question should be....

"what does an effective, proportionate response to October 7 actually look like?"

"Find all the Hamas fighters one by one in the rubble" ????..... sounds reasonable until reality kicks in.

In practice it's brutally difficult, even for the most capable militaries in the world.

richard_smith237 Star Member

richard_smith237

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Obviously, human beings are just numbers to you. Rape is rape. Murder is murder. Nobody should be let off the hook. How many actual Hamas killed in Gaza among those 72,000???

How do you ever really know?

I've passed through area's that had a serious terrorist problem years previously. Driving through, looking out through blacked out windows, I wondering about the faces I saw. How many had actively supported a terrorist cause? How many had gone further than that and taken part? And what had actually changed for them since the movement collapsed?

Had they genuinely walked away from it? Been quietly rehabilitated? Or had most of them just melted back into ordinary life, keeping their heads down and their views to themselves? or had the hardliners been forced into other nations?

It's not a comfortable thing to sit with. Defeat doesn't necessarily mean conversion.

Nick Carter icp Star Member

Nick Carter icp

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Obviously, human beings are just numbers to you. Rape is rape. Murder is murder. Nobody should be let off the hook. How many actual Hamas killed in Gaza among those 72,000???

Usual reply : Civilians get killed in all wars .

JBChiangRai Diamond Member

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Because many of the Palestinians celebrated these actions - so indoctrinated are the peoples of Palestine, they are truly believe Israel is the Enemy, rather than that Israel is targeting the Hamas who hide amongst them within the Gaza.

https://www.civilc.org/silenced-no-more/executive-summary

Then there are clips of Palestinians, women even, praising Hamas and the actions of the Oct 7th massacre.

The indoctrination of hate is no different to the hate Israeli's feel for Palestinians. The Palestinians fight because they were evicted from their land which has been stolen. It's a simple matter, undo the wrong that has been done.

riclag Star Member

riclag

Advanced Member
On 5/13/2026 at 8:47 AM, JonnyF said:

Of course. It was absolutely disgusting. I'm not sure why the word accused is used though, they proudly claimed the attack.

People try to brush it off as "that hamas thing" (Gary Lineker) or deny it completely but that's what started the war and now they are playing the victim because they are getting smashed to pieces.

Cry me a river.

Never forget what they did to the innocent & how the left sympathized the tragedy .Remember foreigners of over 70 countries.

Thailand , USA, UK ,Ukraine and others.

“In total, 1,195 people were killed by the attacks:[22][e][f] at least 828 civilians[22][23] (including 36 children[24] and 71 foreign nationals)”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_7_attacks

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
15 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Obviously, human beings are just numbers to you. Rape is rape. Murder is murder. Nobody should be let off the hook. How many actual Hamas killed in Gaza among those 72,000???

Why the incessant lying? Rape is, wrong, and rapists should be punished.

Are 1,000 rapes worse than one rape?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
15 hours ago, couchpotato said:

Mmmm--bit of Poetic Licence there old chap..maybe not quite so much embellishment in the future.

How many was it? Women gang-raped, many to death. Many while held hostage.

Ten guys raping a women every day for a month only counts as one rape?

CG1 Blue Gold Member

CG1 Blue

Advanced Member
On 5/13/2026 at 5:57 AM, spidermike007 said:

Quite the opposite. Likely an Israeli cover up and deflection, as they are experts at this kind of thing.

Charlie Stadtlander said Kristof "is a two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who has reported on sexual violence for decades, and is widely regarded as one of the world's best on-the-ground reporters documenting and bearing witness to sexual abuse experienced by women and men in war and conflict zones."

Citing 14 firsthand testimonies, Kristof reported on Palestinian men, women and children who said they were sexually assaulted or raped by settlers or members of the security forces while detained in one of Israel's multiple documented torture camps like Sde Teiman.

"It's a simple proposition," Kristof wrote. "Whatever our views of the Middle East conflict, we should be able to unite in condemning rape."

Despite the allegations being backed by human rights groups, the United Nations, independent studies and Israeli media, public figures like former Biden antisemitism czar Deborah Lipstadt and journalist David Shuster called Kristof and his reporting into question.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/latest-news-live-updates_n_6a01a0f2e4b06e786e3f4160

So rather than acknowledge the depravity of what happened on Oct 7th you decided to defend those animals?

When there are stories about Israel's wrongdoings, do you stick up for them the same way as you stick up for Hamas/Palastinians?

Or is your whataboutery only one way?

richard_smith237 Star Member

richard_smith237

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

The indoctrination of hate is no different to the hate Israeli's feel for Palestinians. The Palestinians fight because they were evicted from their land which has been stolen. It's a simple matter, undo the wrong that has been done.

Simple framing, complicated reality - you managed to compress into two lines - thats part of the issue in these discussions - a lot of people compress complexity into a bite or meme-sized comment that ignores reality.

The land question is real and legitimate. Palestinians have been displaced, and that dispossession is historically documented and morally serious. That part of the argument stands, whether we support the Israel or Palestinians - personally, I believe 'both' have historical rights to the whole lands.

But "simply undo the wrong" collapses about a century of layered history into a single reversible transaction. Which wrong, exactly? 1948? 1967? The Ottoman period? The British Mandate? Jewish communities existed in the region continuously for millennia before modern Zionism. Arabs lived there too. The wrongs run in multiple directions across multiple generations and no clean "before" state exists to return to.

On indoctrination: Palestinian children in Gaza are taught from early ages that Jews are enemies to be eliminated. Israeli children in certain communities are taught that Arabs are subhuman. Both are real, both are wrong, and treating them as equivalent ignores that one is state-sponsored curriculum and the other is fringe extremism within a democracy.

The October 7 attacks weren't a land dispute. They were a planned massacre of civilians, including Israeli Arabs, foreign workers and peace activists at a music festival. Hamas's own charter historically called for the elimination of Jews, not just the return of land.

The Palestinian grievance is legitimate. The response on October 7 was not. And "simply undo the wrong" has been the stated position of every party for 75 years. The difficulty is that nobody agrees what the wrong was, when it started, or who gets to define it.

JBChiangRai Diamond Member

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member
12 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

Israel or Palestinians - personally, I believe 'both' have historical rights to the whole lands.

I don't believe in historical rights. The whole concept is nonsense. If you believe in that, surely we're talking DNA? and we know where that leads.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
9 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

I don't believe in historical rights. The whole concept is nonsense. If you believe in that, surely we're talking DNA? and we know where that leads.

Okay, so no historical rights, so whoever can hold it, has rights to it, yes?

PhilipHabib Senior Member

PhilipHabib

Member
On 5/13/2026 at 10:40 AM, spidermike007 said:

And does anyone believe the IDF did not rape and pillage the Palestinians in Gaza?

You crossed the line one too many times.

JBChiangRai Diamond Member

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Okay, so no historical rights, so whoever can hold it, has rights to it, yes?

Not at all, you're being ridiculous. Might is NOT right.

If it was your great grandfather's land he passed it down through the family to you then it's yours.

richard_smith237 Star Member

richard_smith237

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

Not at all, you're being ridiculous. Might is NOT right.

If it was your great grandfather's land he passed it down through the family to you then it's yours.

"Historical rights are nonsense" - fine, but where's your line in the sand?

Because you do have one. Everyone does. You've just drawn it somewhere conveniently after the Jews were expelled from Judea by Rome, and called it neutral. It isn't.

Let's be specific. The Kingdom of Israel and Kingdom of Judah were real, documented, archaeologically confirmed states. The Tel Dan Stele (~870 BCE) mentions the "House of David" in stone — extrabiblical, undisputed.

Jerusalem was a Jewish capital around 1000 BCE. The Hasmonean dynasty was an independent Jewish kingdom recognised diplomatically by Rome itself in the 2nd century BCE.

Then Rome destroyed the Second Temple in 70 CE, crushed the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 CE, and - here's the part worth noting - Emperor Hadrian deliberately renamed the province from Judea to "Syria Palaestina" and renamed Jerusalem "Aelia Capitolina." He banned Jews from entering. The very name "Palestine" was a Roman political act designed specifically to sever Jewish identity from that land.

So the disconnection wasn't organic. It was forced, military, and intentional. By a colonising empire.

Now apply your principle consistently:

Why do we return Nazi-looted art to dispossessed families 80 years later if historical connection has no moral weight?

Why is Native American dispossession considered an ongoing injustice worth addressing, but Jewish expulsion from Judea by Rome is just... inert history?

On your DNA point - that actually cuts both ways. Genetic studies including research published in the American Journal of Human Genetics (2010) show Jewish populations worldwide share significant common ancestry from the ancient Near East. Mizrahi Jews never left the region. The DNA doesn't undermine the claim. It supports it.

But more importantly, the case for Israel was never built on genetics. It was built on the League of Nations Mandate, the 1947 UN Partition Plan, and legal statehood. Not blood purity. That framing is yours, not theirs.

"Historical rights are nonsense" sounds principled. It isn't, unless you apply it everywhere. The moment you call any dispossession a historical wrong worth correcting, you've accepted the principle.

You've just moved the line. And your line sits almost exactly where Rome left it to fit your narrative.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
42 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

Not at all, you're being ridiculous. Might is NOT right.

If it was your great grandfather's land he passed it down through the family to you then it's yours

Would that not be a historical right?

I don't think people waving a set of keys gives anyone rights to a home

JBChiangRai Diamond Member

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member

I’m sorry Richard, we’re going to have to agree to disagree here.

IMHO talking about rights from thousands of years ago is nonsense.

In the case of the Palestinians expelled from Gaza they can trace immediate family to owners of land in Israel and to specific farms and houses.

That is not the case with those who moved to Israel, they can only trace an ethnicity to no specific person or property. That is the kind of evidence needed. That is my line in the sand.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

I’m sorry Richard, we’re going to have to agree to disagree here.

IMHO talking about rights from thousands of years ago is nonsense.

In the case of the Palestinians expelled from Gaza they can trace immediate family to owners of land in Israel and to specific farms and houses.

That is not the case with those who moved to Israel, they can only trace an ethnicity to no specific person or property. That is the kind of evidence needed. That is my line in the sand.

Perhaps if the Palestinians quit trying to eradicate the Jews things would improve for them.

Did Israel not give Gaza back to the Palestinians in 2005? What happened?

ericbj Silver Member

ericbj

Advanced Member
On 5/13/2026 at 3:48 PM, johng said:

The real question is who founded them and why.

Substitute 'promoted' for 'founded' and I would agree with you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas

Rams86 Gold Member

Rams86

Advanced Member

An Independent Israeli Investigation, enough said I bet Bibi had a finger in the pie.

connda Star Member

connda

Advanced Member

Rolling this back out again in order to distract from the prison rapes of Palestinian men and women in Israeli prisons.

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
20 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Some valid points - the nationalism point cuts both ways. Hamas runs on nationalist and religious ideology too, so applying that critique only to Israel doesn't hold up.

On Mossad: their track record on targeted killing spans decades and multiple countries. The problem in Gaza isn't locating people in principle. It's tunnels, dense urban areas, and civilian cover making surgical operations genuinely hard, even for a capable service.

The sarcastic "kill 'em all" line implies you believe Israel's approach is purely indiscriminate. That's a contested claim, not a settled one. The civilian casualty figures are real and serious. So is the documented reality that Hamas deliberately embeds in civilian infrastructure - so the black and white, good vs evil binary overview is flawed.

Really the question should be....

"what does an effective, proportionate response to October 7 actually look like?"

"Find all the Hamas fighters one by one in the rubble" ????..... sounds reasonable until reality kicks in.

In practice it's brutally difficult, even for the most capable militaries in the world.

Sure, okay, but its their job, they signed up for it. Find the terrorists not blow up the whole country and murder its population.

Jingthing Legendary Member

Jingthing

Advanced Member

3 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Sure, okay, but its their job, they signed up for it. Find the terrorists not blow up the whole country and murder its population.

Translation -- not enough dead Jews for your liking.

richard_smith237 Star Member

richard_smith237

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

I’m sorry Richard, we’re going to have to agree to disagree here.

IMHO talking about rights from thousands of years ago is nonsense.

In the case of the Palestinians expelled from Gaza they can trace immediate family to owners of land in Israel and to specific farms and houses.

That is not the case with those who moved to Israel, they can only trace an ethnicity to no specific person or property. That is the kind of evidence needed. That is my line in the sand.

A strong point, and that's precisely why this topic ignites such fierce debate.

It cuts to something almost universally felt: the instinct to protect your family, your home, the people standing next to you. That's not ideology. That's human.

A parent in Tel Aviv and a parent in Gaza are feeling the exact same thing. That's the unbearable truth at the centre of this.

Two peoples, one overwhelming instinct, and a history so tangled that untangling it has become almost beside the point...

...Which is why the complex history keeps getting buried. Not because people are ignorant of it, but because this particular argument bypasses the intellect entirely and lands somewhere deeper.

Should we still be relitigating the Battle of Culloden? Because on a long enough timeline, every border, every nation, every claim to land is built on someone else's loss. The Nakba. The Holocaust. The Ottoman collapse. Layer after layer of catastrophe, each one real, each one weaponised.

At some point the argument stops being about history and starts being about now.

About the child in the rubble.

About the family that won't come home.

That's the line in the sand. And that's why nobody can agree on where it falls - is it really just about 'my great grandfather lived here' ??? It feels like it should be - but how many great grandfathers do we go back ?

Nick Carter icp Star Member

Nick Carter icp

Advanced Member
15 minutes ago, mistral53 said:

This has all been debunked at length as good Israeli propaganda, they really are good at it - why does AN feel it is their duty to regurgitate all these lies? For a bag of silver coins I must assume..... 30 pieces was paid a couple of millenniums ago, how much would that be in today's account?

Where was this debunked ?

It was live streamed and recorded .

You cannot show it was debunked....................because it wasn't

Nick Carter icp Star Member

Nick Carter icp

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Sure, okay, but its their job, they signed up for it. Find the terrorists not blow up the whole country and murder its population.

30 000 civilians dead out of population of 2 300 000 is reasonable amount of civilian deaths .

Remember when Israel told Hamas , release the hostages NOW or Israel will go full force ?

The hostages were not released immediately .

Israel went full force

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
8 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

I don't believe in historical rights. The whole concept is nonsense. If you believe in that, surely we're talking DNA? and we know where that leads.

Leads to nobody should live in Palestine, eh!

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

A strong point, and that's precisely why this topic ignites such fierce debate.

It cuts to something almost universally felt: the instinct to protect your family, your home, the people standing next to you. That's not ideology. That's human.

A parent in Tel Aviv and a parent in Gaza are feeling the exact same thing. That's the unbearable truth at the centre of this.

Two peoples, one overwhelming instinct, and a history so tangled that untangling it has become almost beside the point...

...Which is why the complex history keeps getting buried. Not because people are ignorant of it, but because this particular argument bypasses the intellect entirely and lands somewhere deeper.

Should we still be relitigating the Battle of Culloden? Because on a long enough timeline, every border, every nation, every claim to land is built on someone else's loss. The Nakba. The Holocaust. The Ottoman collapse. Layer after layer of catastrophe, each one real, each one weaponised.

At some point the argument stops being about history and starts being about now.

About the child in the rubble.

About the family that won't come home.

That's the line in the sand. And that's why nobody can agree on where it falls - is it really just about 'my great grandfather lived here' ??? It feels like it should be - but how many great grandfathers do we go back ?

Thank you. Very beautifully put. No one is the enemy.

ericbj Silver Member

ericbj

Advanced Member

8 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

"Historical rights are nonsense" - fine, but where's your line in the sand?

Because you do have one. Everyone does. You've just drawn it somewhere conveniently after the Jews were expelled from Judea by Rome, and called it neutral. It isn't.

Let's be specific. The Kingdom of Israel and Kingdom of Judah were real, documented, archaeologically confirmed states. The Tel Dan Stele (~870 BCE) mentions the "House of David" in stone — extrabiblical, undisputed.

Jerusalem was a Jewish capital around 1000 BCE. The Hasmonean dynasty was an independent Jewish kingdom recognised diplomatically by Rome itself in the 2nd century BCE.

Then Rome destroyed the Second Temple in 70 CE, crushed the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 CE, and - here's the part worth noting - Emperor Hadrian deliberately renamed the province from Judea to "Syria Palaestina" and renamed Jerusalem "Aelia Capitolina." He banned Jews from entering. The very name "Palestine" was a Roman political act designed specifically to sever Jewish identity from that land.

So the disconnection wasn't organic. It was forced, military, and intentional. By a colonising empire.

Now apply your principle consistently:

Why do we return Nazi-looted art to dispossessed families 80 years later if historical connection has no moral weight?

Why is Native American dispossession considered an ongoing injustice worth addressing, but Jewish expulsion from Judea by Rome is just... inert history?

On your DNA point - that actually cuts both ways. Genetic studies including research published in the American Journal of Human Genetics (2010) show Jewish populations worldwide share significant common ancestry from the ancient Near East. Mizrahi Jews never left the region. The DNA doesn't undermine the claim. It supports it.

But more importantly, the case for Israel was never built on genetics. It was built on the League of Nations Mandate, the 1947 UN Partition Plan, and legal statehood. Not blood purity. That framing is yours, not theirs.

"Historical rights are nonsense" sounds principled. It isn't, unless you apply it everywhere. The moment you call any dispossession a historical wrong worth correcting, you've accepted the principle.

You've just moved the line. And your line sits almost exactly where Rome left it to fit your narrative.

I love your cock and bull story. Very entertaining.

Now let me tell you one to see if you appreciate it as much.

My paternal grandmother was a Donnan. One day I said to her something (forget what, I was young in those days which unfortunately is no longer the case) about the Tuatha dé Danaan, sometime rulers of the Emerald Isle who sailed over from the Eastern Mediterranean. I learnt to my surprise she liked to believe the Donnans are descended from these people. It turns out that in the Gaelic of Co. Down the word donnan means leader (and also brown-haired, but that is beside the point).

This much is fair dinkum.

As a scholar of Hebrew history, you will be aware that there were originally twelve tribes of these descendants of Abraham, and, depending upon the epoch, two kingdoms, Israel and Judea. Only one of these tribes lived on the coast and were seafarers. The tribe of Dan, the tribe of the serpent, the people that causes the others to stumble, and judges them.

The other tribes were landlubbers, confined within their borders. The people of Dan were outward looking, ranging far and wide, trading, settling, and conquering. Samson belonged to the tribe of Dan. They were closely associated with the seafaring Canaanites (the Phoenicians as the Greeks called them) who always maintained close relations with the Israelites, subsequent to, and despite, the latter's seizure of part of the once extensive Canaanite lands.

The Canaanites are not to be confused with the Philistines, one of the Sea-Peoples who during the 13th to 12th centuries B.C. wrought immense destruction around the Eastern Mediterranean, marking the end of the Late Bronze Age.

Ultimately, owing to powerful and blood-thirsty neighbours, there remained in situ just two tribes, Judah and Ephraim, only the former of any size and significance. Strictly speaking the Jews are members of the tribe of Judah.

When the Levant was progressively overrun by the extremely cruel Assyrian kings, nine of the ten tribes of the northern kingdom, Israel, were deported and disappeared forever. But one, the tribe of Dan, in common with the Canaanites, had settlements elsewhere. These seafaring, trading peoples had founded trading-posts that became self-governing city-states rather than extensive kingdoms or empires. Settled in Greece they became the Danae or Danaan who destroyed Troy, an outpost of the decaying Hittite Empire. In Ireland, they became the Tuatha dé Danaan, who vanquished the Firbolg.

They moved steadily westward across northern Europe, settling along the European rivers, the Danube, the Don, the Dneiper, lending their name to such places as Donetsk and Gdansk (Danzig) to finish in Denmark (French Danemark).

Note that ancient Hebrew text had no vowels, so only D and N are significant.

In about 590 B.C. after the rump southern kingdom, Judea, was conquered by Babylon, the Temple of Solomon was utterly destroyed, and the principal citizens led away into captivity.

Seventy years later Babylon was overthrown by the Iranian (Persian) Emperor Cyrus the Great. Cyrus ordered all captives of the Babylonians, including the Israelites, returned to their countries of origin and the restoration of their destroyed heritage. He ordered and paid for, out of the Iranian royal treasury, the construction of the Temple of Jerusalem.

Note that in origin the word Iranian translates as Aryan. They are not a Semitic people such as the Arabs and the Jews.

We come here to the crux of the matter.

What say you to my right to go and grab a bit of land in the area formerly occupied by the tribe of Dan?

Whether before or after they were forced to move north by pressure from the Philistines on their southern flank?

Perhaps sequencing my DNA might be useful?

But it seems not, since present-day 'Palestinians' have been shown to be more closely related to Biblical Israelites than Ashkenazi Jews. The latters’ female genes suggest past marriages between male Jews and female non-Jews was not uncommon.

Any further embellishments you see fit to make to this tale would be welcome.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.