Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

John Bolton Calls Iran Deal a US Setback

Former national security adviser John Bolton has criticised a proposed agreement between Washington and Tehran, describing it as a major setback for the United States and arguing that domestic political concerns are shaping the Trump administration’s approach.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

Speaking on NewsNation’s Elizabeth Vargas Reports on Thursday, Bolton said the administration was pursuing the arrangement because of worries about fuel prices and their potential impact on upcoming midterm elections rather than broader strategic considerations.

“It’s a big defeat for the United States,” Bolton said, adding that he believed concerns about gasoline prices were the primary factor driving the negotiations.

Proposed ceasefire extension

The tentative agreement, first reported by Axios, would take the form of a 60-day memorandum of understanding aimed at extending a fragile ceasefire and reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

The arrangement is designed to ease economic pressure on both the United States and Iran. Under the proposal, Iran would agree not to charge tolls to commercial vessels using the waterway and would remove mines from the strait.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most important shipping routes, carrying more than one-fifth of global oil and gas supplies.

In return, the United States would lift its naval blockade and provide certain sanctions waivers that would allow Iran to sell oil more freely. Washington would also agree to begin discussions on wider sanctions relief.

Nuclear commitments under discussion

The memorandum would include a pledge by Iran not to pursue nuclear weapons. However, Tehran has made similar assertions in the past, and those claims have been questioned by non-proliferation specialists.

According to the Axios report, early negotiations would focus on the future of Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium and on how any future uranium enrichment activities would be handled.

The proposed framework would leave several major issues to be negotiated during the 60-day period.

Concerns over Iran’s intentions

Bolton argued that Iran could use the agreement to strengthen its position while talks continue.

He said Tehran may seek to benefit from sanctions relief and renewed oil sales while delaying decisions on the most difficult issues. According to Bolton, such a process could allow Iran to rebuild financial resources and military capabilities while reducing the economic pressure facing the government.

Bolton also suggested that Iranian leaders may believe US willingness to use force in the region could weaken as the midterm elections approach.

“They think we’ve got a short attention span, we’re obsessed by the elections,” he said.

Election-year criticism

During the interview, host Elizabeth Vargas noted that President Donald Trump had recently said he was not focused on the midterm elections.

Bolton rejected that claim, arguing that electoral considerations were central to the administration’s calculations.

He said reopening the Strait of Hormuz could increase energy supplies, potentially lowering global oil prices, reducing fuel costs for American consumers and easing inflationary pressures.

According to Bolton, the administration views those economic effects as beneficial to its political prospects ahead of November’s elections.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 30 May 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member

Iran is running rings around trump and his Admin, A 3rd world country WOW !! think its time for you to go back home Yanks !!

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member

Forget about the uranium. The main point must be withdrawing funding from Hezbollah and Hamas.

I wonder what Iran thinks sponsoring these terrorists does, in the short-, medium- and long-term? They'll certainly never overcome Israel militarily so, eally, what's the point?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member

Bolton hates him some Trump

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
13 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Bolton hates him some Trump

And how do you know That ?????? or is this just your opinion !! which is worth squat !!

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
10 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

And how do you know That ?????? or is this just your opinion !! which is worth squat !!

Not just my opinion

bolton.jpg

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
34 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Bolton hates him some Trump

Messenger shooting in 3, 2, 1...

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Messenger shooting in 3, 2, 1...

The US is not in an agreement with Iran, and John Bolton has not had a security clearance for over a year, so he does not know more than anyone else. It is nice that he is now a hero to the left, given they have despised him for forty years.

Just another old hater trying to stay relevent.

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The US is not in an agreement with Iran, and John Bolton has not had a security clearance for over a year, so he does not know more than anyone else. It is nice that he is now a hero to the left, given they have despised him for forty years.

Just another old hater trying to stay relevent.

As much as I dislike Bolton from way back as Dubya's pet hawk, he probably has more foreign policy nous and political intelligence in his turds than Trump has forgotten already.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, NanLaew said:

As much as I dislike Bolton from way back as Dubya's pet hawk, he probably has more foreign policy nous and political intelligence in his turds than Trump has forgotten already.

But he has no inside information, and he is likely just pandering to the press for favorable coverage for his upcoming trial.

He'll be playing the victim and calling the trial retribution.

FigLeaf Senior Member

FigLeaf

Member
1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Forget about the uranium. The main point must be withdrawing funding from Hezbollah and Hamas.

I wonder what Iran thinks sponsoring these terrorists does, in the short-, medium- and long-term? They'll certainly never overcome Israel militarily so, eally, what's the point?

They obviously have better strategic analysis skills than you do. Terrorists to you. If they were from the Northern hemisphere, they might be called contractors.

FigLeaf Senior Member

FigLeaf

Member
16 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

But he has no inside information, and he is likely just pandering to the press for favorable coverage for his upcoming trial.

He'll be playing the victim and calling the trial retribution.

Aaah...that 4D chess again.

They aren't negotiating with Iran because they want to do them a favour. Get real.

FigLeaf Senior Member

FigLeaf

Member
57 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Not just my opinion

bolton.jpg

He has a point. The truth hurts, if you are one who studiously tries to avoid it.

FigLeaf Senior Member

FigLeaf

Member
43 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Just another old hater trying to stay relevent.

You hate him, don't you? 🤣

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
29 minutes ago, FigLeaf said:

They obviously have better strategic analysis skills than you do. Terrorists to you. If they were from the Northern hemisphere, they might be called contractors.

Sure, but to accomplish what, exactly, for Iran? What is Iran getting its money's worth out of Hamas and Hezbollah? Merely blueflies annoying Israel.

FigLeaf Senior Member

FigLeaf

Member
1 minute ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Sure, but to accomplish what, exactly, for Iran? What is Iran getting its money's worth out of Hamas and Hezbollah? Merely blueflies annoying Israel.

Netanyahu was happy to support HAMAS at one time, wasn't he?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, FigLeaf said:

Netanyahu was happy to support HAMAS at one time, wasn't he?

And "Palestine" was happy to support Hitler during WWII, what's your point?

BLMFem Star Member

BLMFem

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Bolton hates him some Trump

Yes, most people do. He's historically unpopular both at home and abroad.thumbsup

FigLeaf Senior Member

FigLeaf

Member
13 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

And "Palestine" was happy to support Hitler during WWII, what's your point?

As did the Zionist group; Lehi, in Mandatory Palestine. They wanted to be the ones to join up with the Nazis. but the Nazis already had their preferred candidate in the mufti of Jerusalem, the Palestinian you have in mind. The reason for this was that the enemy was considered to be the British. Both sides wanted to get rid of the British.

Not only, Lehi, but Irgun too. You also had people playing both sides, in case of Germany winning.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-06-21/ty-article-magazine/.highlight/zionist-military-org-efforts-to-recruit-nazis-in-fight-against-the-british-are-revealed/00000188-d93a-d5fc-ab9d-db7ae0ea0000

https://archive.ph/ROHQT

My point, to you, is that you should learn from history, rather than to swallow the first thing that you read, only to repeat it parrot fashion.

Alliances are formed with what may seem like undesirable people, in order to achieve certain goals. 'Your side' has some form for doing so. To try to label one side good and one side evil without taking all of these things into account, marks you out as someone who doesn't care about these things. Perhaps just a foot soldier who prefers to be kept in the dark.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
27 minutes ago, FigLeaf said:

As did the Zionist group; Lehi, in Mandatory Palestine. They wanted to be the ones to join up with the Nazis. but the Nazis already had their preferred candidate in the mufti of Jerusalem, the Palestinian you have in mind. The reason for this was that the enemy was considered to be the British. Both sides wanted to get rid of the British.

Not only, Lehi, but Irgun too. You also had people playing both sides, in case of Germany winning.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-06-21/ty-article-magazine/.highlight/zionist-military-org-efforts-to-recruit-nazis-in-fight-against-the-british-are-revealed/00000188-d93a-d5fc-ab9d-db7ae0ea0000

https://archive.ph/ROHQT

My point, to you, is that you should learn from history, rather than to swallow the first thing that you read, only to repeat it parrot fashion.

Alliances are formed with what may seem like undesirable people, in order to achieve certain goals. 'Your side' has some form for doing so. To try to label one side good and one side evil without taking all of these things into account, marks you out as someone who doesn't care about these things. Perhaps just a foot soldier who prefers to be kept in the dark.

I meant what was your point in general

FigLeaf Senior Member

FigLeaf

Member
12 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I meant what was your point in general

I just illustrated that to you in my previous reply.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, FigLeaf said:

I just illustrated that to you in my previous reply.

So your point was that it made sense for Netanyahu/Israel to support HAMAS at one time, yes?

FigLeaf Senior Member

FigLeaf

Member
6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So your point was that it made sense for Netanyahu/Israel to support HAMAS at one time, yes?

Is that what you took from my illustration?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
15 hours ago, FigLeaf said:

Netanyahu was happy to support HAMAS at one time, wasn't he?

And "Palestine" was happy to support Hitler during WWII, what's your point?

FigLeaf Senior Member

FigLeaf

Member
Just now, Yellowtail said:

And "Palestine" was happy to support Hitler during WWII, what's your point?

Is there any reason why you are simply repeating what you wrote earlier?

I explained that alliances are made according to the goal, rather than the general concensus over who is good and who is evil. A terrorist can become a good guy if he's on your side of the fence in a specific battle.

Ahmed al-Sharaa, once branded a terrorist by the US, became the first Syrian leader to visit the White House.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, FigLeaf said:

Is there any reason why you are simply repeating what you wrote earlier?

I explained that alliances are made according to the goal, rather than the general concensus over who is good and who is evil. A terrorist can become a good guy if he's on your side of the fence in a specific battle.

So your point was that it made sense for Netanyahu/Israel (the good guys) to support one of Iran's terrorist proxies Hamas (the bad guys) at one time, just as it made sense for the US (the good guys) to support Stalin in WWII, got it.

FigLeaf Senior Member

FigLeaf

Member
Just now, Yellowtail said:

So your point was that it made sense for Netanyahu/Israel (the good guys) to support one of Iran's terrorist proxies Hamas (the bad guys) at one time, just as it made sense for the US (the good guys) to support Stalin in WWII, got it.

I don't think that I suggested Netanyahu/Israel are good. In fact, the corrupt are more likely to work with other corrupt leaders. I don't need to say more on that particular subject, other than to think about who might have been facing jail had they not been elected. You might make some heinous alliances in order to avoid such a fate. Look inside the Trump administration. Look at the history of some of the most prominent. Shocking.

I think you may have some issue with your mental health or perhaps you are just lacking in intelligence, for you to have produced such a statement from my clear illustration.

Best you take care of that, before continuing to propagate what seems like a quite poor reputation amongst your peers. Good luck with that.

johnnybangkok Platinum Member

johnnybangkok

Advanced Member
17 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

.

Just another old hater trying to stay relevent.

And you are just a Trump sycophant who cannot hear one word of criticism about your beloved Trump.

Bolton (and no, I'm not a fan) certainly has a point - 'Bolton said the administration was pursuing the arrangement because of worries about fuel prices and their potential impact on upcoming midterm elections rather than broader strategic considerations.' This is an entirely justified point that anyone other than a devoted MAGA sycophant could see from about a mile away. Trump knows that even his most loyal base are now suffering with US gasoline prices having jumped by roughly 50% since the war on Iran began, rising from below $3.00 per gallon to a national average of nearly $4.50 per gallon.

All politicians know 'it's the economy stupid' and even though Trump is surrounded by yes men, even he will know the increased cost of living across the board will kill him in the midterms - hence a desperate attempt to end a war he should never have started, hence being in a compromised position when trying to negotaite himself out of said war. The Iranians (hell the whole world) knows this.

It's only people like yourself that refuse to accept this reality.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
20 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

And you are just a Trump sycophant who cannot hear one word of criticism about your beloved Trump.

Bolton (and no, I'm not a fan) certainly has a point - 'Bolton said the administration was pursuing the arrangement because of worries about fuel prices and their potential impact on upcoming midterm elections rather than broader strategic considerations.' This is an entirely justified point that anyone other than a devoted MAGA sycophant could see from about a mile away. Trump knows that even his most loyal base are now suffering with US gasoline prices having jumped by roughly 50% since the war on Iran began, rising from below $3.00 per gallon to a national average of nearly $4.50 per gallon.

All politicians know 'it's the economy stupid' and even though Trump is surrounded by yes men, even he will know the increased cost of living across the board will kill him in the midterms - hence a desperate attempt to end a war he should never have started, hence being in a compromised position when trying to negotaite himself out of said war. The Iranians (hell the whole world) knows this.

It's only people like yourself that refuse to accept this reality.

Any you are another leftist Obama sycophant that cannot stand for Trump to be allowed even one fair word to be spoken about him.

John Bolton lost he security clearance a year and a half ago, he has been indited, and he awaits tril.

He has no inside information, knows nothing about the negotiations, and he is likely just pandering to the press for favorable coverage for his upcoming trial, where he'll be playing the victim and calling the trial retribution.

The left hated Boltan for thirty years, now he's your hero because he writes a hit piece to undermine the United States in Iran conflict.

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Any you are another leftist Obama sycophant that cannot stand for Trump to be allowed even one fair word to be spoken about him.

John Bolton lost he security clearance a year and a half ago, he has been indited, and he awaits tril.

He has no inside information, knows nothing about the negotiations, and he is likely just pandering to the press for favorable coverage for his upcoming trial, where he'll be playing the victim and calling the trial retribution.

The left hated Boltan for thirty years, now he's your hero because he writes a hit piece to undermine the United States in Iran conflict.

There's more colours than black and white. I don't think Bolton is the hero of anyone, he is a republican hawk speaking out against trump.

And if you think he doesn't have any friends on the inside, you're delusional. His sources are much better than yours and mine, plus he does have experience in this field.

johnnybangkok Platinum Member

johnnybangkok

Advanced Member
34 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

45 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

45 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Any you are another leftist Obama sycophant that cannot stand for Trump to be allowed even one fair word to be spoken about him.

John Bolton lost he security clearance a year and a half ago, he has been indited, and he awaits tril.

He has no inside information, knows nothing about the negotiations, and he is likely just pandering to the press for favorable coverage for his upcoming trial, where he'll be playing the victim and calling the trial retribution.

The left hated Boltan for thirty years, now he's your hero because he writes a hit piece to undermine the United States in Iran conflict.

Yet another ad hominem attack from you.

As I clearly stated, I am no fan of Bolton and he's never been or never will be my 'hero'. I'm not 'leftist' (anothe one of your favourites) and I'm no 'Obama sycophant' (although compared to Trump the man is an angel). If Trump did anything I thought was good and decent then he would get plenty of 'fair words' from me but he doesn't do anything redeemable other than look after billionaires, line his own pockets, sow discontent and cause havoc on the world stage. I don't give two hoots about how Americans are affected by him (you voted for him - you live with the consequences) but through his dumb tarriffs and now this completely unneccessary war, he is affecting my business and therefore myself personally. And I'm not the only one suffering from his hubris and complete lack of understanding of how the world is integrated together.

Bolton is just voicing what many, many others think in that Trump has backed himself into a corner due to an ill-fated war that should never have happened.

So how about debating THAT opinion rather than your usual juvenile character assignations? Do you actually think Trump is in a strong position to negotiate with Iran when Iran knows that gas prices are through the roof (even in America) and there's the mid-term elections coming and his approval ratings have sunk to an all time low?

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.