Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

PM Demands Ratcliffe Apology for "Colonised by Immigrants" remarks

Sir Jim Ratcliffe's comments outraged UK politics.

Billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe, co-owner of Manchester United, sparked a political storm with his inflammatory remarks on immigration. He claimed the UK was "colonised by immigrants" and criticised the PM for not taking tough economic measures. Labour's Sir Keir Starmer, alongside No 10, swiftly slammed these comments as "offensive and wrong," demanding an apology.

Get the latest headlines in your email subscribe.png

The controversy erupted following Sir Jim's Sky News interview, where he voiced concerns about the UK's population growth. He suggested that the Prime Minister lacked the resolve to stabilise the economy by making "difficult decisions." The backlash was immediate.

Critics argue Sir Jim's statements fuel divisiveness. "Play into the hands of those who want to divide," warned a No 10 spokesperson. Manchester United fans groups, including the Supporters Trust and Muslim Supporters Club, expressed deep concern. They insisted such remarks should unite, not alienate, supporters.

Football organisations also condemned the billionaire. Show Racism the Red Card and Kick It Out emphasised the need for unity. The 1958 Group criticised Sir Jim for commenting from a tax haven. "Ill-advised," they branded his words, highlighting his Monaco residence to avoid UK taxes.

Sir Jim, however, remains steadfast in his stance. Drawing a parallel to his tough decisions at Manchester United, he argued that addressing major national issues demands courage and unpopularity. Since acquiring 27.7% of the club, he made sweeping changes, including sacking two managers and making hundreds redundant.

The billionaire, with a net worth of £17bn, met Reform UK leader Nigel Farage recently. He described Farage as “intelligent,” sparking further debate. Farage backed Sir Jim's concerns about immigration, challenging Labour's stance.

Prominent political figures joined the fray. Sir Ed Davey insisted the remarks were "out of step with British values" and urged Sir Jim to apologise. Meanwhile, information from the Office for National Statistics contradicted Sir Jim's claims, estimating the UK's population slightly lower.

Sir Jim's multi-faceted empire, INEOS, known for everything from chemicals to luxury brands, remains under scrutiny. Yet, his controversial statements have placed him at the centre of a heated national discussion.

Key Takeaways

  • Ratcliffe claimed the UK was "colonised by immigrants."

  • Political leaders and fan groups demand an apology.

  • ONS data contradicts Ratcliffe's population claims.

Join the discussion? creat-account.png

Already a member? comment on this.png


image.png
  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 12 Feb 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

bannork Star Member

bannork

Newsman

Hang on, didn't we have the biggest empire in the world at one point?

In 1920 the British empire covered nearly a quarter of the world's land surface, ruling and colonising over 412 million people.

So what goes around, comes around, lol

Fact Gold Member

Fact

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, bannork said:

Hang on, didn't we have the biggest empire in the world at one point?

In 1920 the British empire covered nearly a quarter of the world's land surface, ruling and colonising over 412 million people.

So what goes around, comes around, lol

Now, you stand as a desolate and melancholic island nation.

bannork Star Member

bannork

Newsman
4 minutes ago, Fact said:

Now, you stand as a desolate and melancholic island nation.

Blimey, you've been reading too many romantic novels.

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
11 hours ago, Purdey said:

Colonists have been around for a millennia. Migrants are not colonists in that they haven't taken the reins of government.

17708613216308221009807527492954.jpg

Give them time.

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
10 hours ago, Stocky said:

It's true, Romans, Saxons, Vikings, Normans.

And Muslims. Try to keep up.

bannork Star Member

bannork

Newsman
5 minutes ago, emptypockets said:

And Muslims. Try to keep up.

Not yet. There's a long way to go till the Muslim population in the UK equals the native Brits.

Speaking of Muslims, which countries of theirs did we colonise or rule over?

Iraq, Palestine, Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, Egypt, Sudan, Somalia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India (largest Muslim population in the empire), Malaysia, Brunei, Maldives, Aden( Yemen), Oman.

I agree with control of migration, but regarding the view espoused by the right that Muslims don't integrate, I think the jury has to be out on this.

My reasoning is the Muslim children generally go to state schools and there they mix with whites and blacks, kids whose parents have come from all kinds of places.

These kids get on with each other, play with each other, so I can't see the girls growing up, prepared to stay at home like their parents did.

No way. They want jobs like anyone else.

Thus I think integration will occur as generations pass but state support should stop at 2 kids a Muslim family for everyone knows the birth rate is higher amongst Muslims.

Perhaps penalise Muslim families financially that have more than 2 children.

nexus7 Senior Member

nexus7

Member

I think he really wanted to say invaded rather than colonised but couldn't quite bring himself to do it, fearing the backlash.

nexus7 Senior Member

nexus7

Member
11 hours ago, bannork said:

Not yet. There's a long way to go till the Muslim population in the UK equals the native Brits.

No need to wait for equality. When muslim populations reach about 15% during hijara, the country tends to become unstable.

Sigmund Gold Member

Sigmund

Advanced Member

What about some kind of apology regarding the Epstein scandal and those involved or covered up by the Uk govt ?

brewsterbudgen Star Member

brewsterbudgen

Advanced Member

At least he has attempted a rather half-hearted apology! What a fool.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
19 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

At least he has attempted a rather half-hearted apology! What a fool.

Not really an apology. He said he's sorry if anyone was offended. Not sorry about the message.

Either way, a mistake. Never apologize to leftists, even if it's only for offending them. It's never enough. Better to double down and offend them again.

image.png

brewsterbudgen Star Member

brewsterbudgen

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

Not really an apology. He said he's sorry if anyone was offended. Not sorry about the message.

Either way, a mistake. Never apologize to leftists, even if it's only for offending them. It's never enough. Better to double down and offend them again.

image.png

He's a businessman so apologising (even half-heartedly) makes sense. His comments about Starmer and Farage were interesting!

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
On 2/12/2026 at 9:15 AM, Smokey and the Bandit said:

February 27, 2025, Starmer in the Oval Office with the President and JD Vance.
Starmer said......"We've had free speech for a very, very long time in the United Kingdom, and it will last for a very, very long time,"

So then Starmer swiftly slammed these comments, from Ratcliffe, as "offensive and wrong," demanding an apology, doesn't add up.

Starmer was clearly lying in the Oval Office......SHOCK??cheesy

He always lies.

He should apologize for appointing a known associate of the world's most notorious Pedo who leaked state secrets and had already been sacked twice for scandals to the position of Ambassador. The clue was in the nickname Keir, "Prince of Darkness".

But no, he'd rather throw his mate McSweeney under the bus. With friends like Starmer, who needs enemies?

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

He's a businessman so apologising (even half-heartedly) makes sense. His comments about Starmer and Farage were interesting!

I disagree. He has FO money, he should apologize to nobody. I certainly wouldn't.

Captain Flack Star Member

Captain Flack

Global Moderator

Troll post removed

@Tidal wave rule 15.You may not discriminate, use slurs, or post hostile or abusive comments based on personal characteristics such as race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity, nationality, disability, medical history, marital or family status, gender identity, or sexual orientation. Posts breaching this rule will be removed, and posting suspension or account closure may result.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

He always lies.

He should apologize for appointing a known associate of the world's most notorious Pedo who leaked state secrets and had already been sacked twice for scandals to the position of Ambassador. The clue was in the nickname Keir, "Prince of Darkness".

But no, he'd rather throw his mate McSweeney under the bus. With friends like Starmer, who needs enemies?

Starmer does not appear in the Epstein files, your mate Farage does.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
41 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Starmer does not appear in the Epstein files, your mate Farage does.

Farage was mentioned in news articles and newsletters that others sent to Epstein. Hardly a fault of Farage.

Starmer on the other hand appointed Epstein's long standing bestie to be ambassador. 😄

Summerinsiam Advanced Member

Summerinsiam

Member
2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

I disagree. He has FO money, he should apologize to nobody. I certainly wouldn't.

He is a hipocrite, who used his platform at Manchester United to effectively campaign for Farage, because he knows that as one of the super rich he would directly benefit from a Reform government. He is not a private person. If he wanted to score political points, he should have at least checked his statistics which were patently inaccurate, if not deliberately fake. What is true is that in 2020, when he moved his fortune to Monaco and avoided paying the British state (which he professes to love) an estimated four billion pounds, hard-working immigrants contributed an estimated twenty billion to the British economy.

bangadang Advanced Member

bangadang

Member
On 2/12/2026 at 4:41 PM, Red Forever said:

On LBC radio Ben Kentish show last night one of the topics was this billionaire’s outburst. A caller who represented (I think) “Kick Racism Out” absolutely nailed it: exposing the lies that Radcliffe spewed about UK population growth (12 million in 5 years “!!!

Look, it’s obvious that the moronic minority can’t wait to get Farridge into No. 10 but with cheerleaders such as this billionaire don’t be surprised if further scrutiny of this far right hyperbole works against this aim.

Red forever gives you away

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.