Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Trump Faces Pressure to Pay $5M After Supreme Court Rebuff

Attorneys for E. Jean Carroll have asked a federal judge to order US President Donald Trump to pay the $5 million awarded to her after the Supreme Court declined to hear his appeal in a civil case involving sexual abuse and defamation.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

Carroll seeks release of judgment funds

In a court filing submitted on Tuesday, Carroll's legal team argued that the long-running legal battle has reached its conclusion and that the money held in escrow should now be released to her.

The Supreme Court rejected Trump's appeal without any recorded dissent, leaving intact the 2023 verdict and judgment against him.

Lawyers oppose further delay

Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, told the court that Trump's legal team had contacted her to ask whether Carroll would agree to another delay while Trump sought reconsideration from the Supreme Court.

Kaplan rejected the request, writing that after four years of litigation through every level of the federal court system, the case should now come to an end.

She argued that the conditions agreed by both sides for releasing the funds had been met once the Supreme Court declined to review the case. Under that agreement, she said, Carroll is entitled to receive the money awarded by the jury.

The $5 million has remained in escrow while Trump's appeal was pending.

Trump vows to continue legal fight

Following the Supreme Court's decision, Trump said he intended to continue challenging the case.

In a post on his social media platform, he described the lawsuit as an example of "weaponization" and "lawfare" and said he would keep fighting the defamation claim "with all of my power and strength."

His attorneys have indicated they may ask the Supreme Court to reconsider its refusal to hear the appeal.

Jury found Trump liable in 2023

A Manhattan jury ruled in 2023 that Trump was liable for sexually abusing Carroll in a dressing room at the Bergdorf Goodman department store during the mid-1990s. The jury also found him liable for defaming Carroll in 2022 after he publicly denied her allegations.

The jury awarded Carroll $5 million in damages.

In his appeal, Trump argued that the trial judge had made several legal errors. He objected to jurors being shown excerpts from the 2005 "Access Hollywood" recording, in which he discussed sexually aggressive behaviour that he later dismissed as "locker room talk."

Trump also challenged the judge's decision to allow testimony from Jessica Leeds and Natasha Stoynoff, two women who accused him of sexual assault. Trump has denied their allegations.

With the Supreme Court declining to hear the appeal, Carroll's attorneys argue that there are no remaining grounds to withhold payment and have urged the court to release the funds without further delay.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 1 July 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
24 minutes ago, impulse said:

I'm skeptical about a "lady" who finds herself in one situation after another where she gets SA'ed by multiple powerful men, then makes bank on it.

whether you are skeptical or not is immaterial, he was found civilly liable in 2023 for sexually abusing a women, end of story !!

impulse Star Member

impulse

Advanced Member

whether you are skeptical or not is immaterial, he was found civilly liable in 2023 for sexually abusing a women, end of story !!

If you think that the story has ended, I have a bridge I can give you a great deal on.

impulse Star Member

impulse

Advanced Member

whether you are skeptical or not is immaterial, he was found civilly liable in 2023 for sexually abusing a women, end of story !!

Eventually, it's all going to come out that the entire lawsuit was just another attempt to keep Trump off the ballot. (Which won't be a surprise to anyone that actually followed what was happening, just to those who believe the MSM.) Funded by an oligarch who was disturbingly close to Epstein. Here's an update from yesterday (July 2)

NLPC today filed a complaint with the Attorney Grievance Committee (AGC) of the New York State Supreme Court against Roberta Ann Kaplan for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct regarding the outside funding of E. Jean Carroll’s two defamation lawsuits against President Trump. The lawsuits were funded by left-wing billionaire Reid Hoffman through a nonprofit called American Future Republic.

“Roberta Kaplan’s coverup of the outside financing of E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits by billionaire Reid Hoffman for six  months and her excuses for doing so should be thoroughly investigated by the New York Bar authorities for ethical violations,” said Paul Kamenar, counsel to NLPC who drafted the 15-page complaint.

Hoffman wished President Trump had been made an “actual martyr” at a Sun Valley gathering in summer 2024, just days before the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, then offered a non-apology that blamed the audience.

Bar Complaint Filed Against E. Jean Carroll's Lawyer Roberta Kaplan - National Legal And Policy Center

https://nlpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/NLPC-NY-Bar-Complaint-vs-Roberta-Kaplan-Julyh-2-2026.pdf

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, impulse said:

I'm skeptical about a "lady" who finds herself in one situation after another where she gets SA'ed by multiple powerful men, then makes bank on it.

Others? Source, please?

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, impulse said:

Eventually, it's all going to come out that the entire lawsuit was just another attempt to keep Trump off the ballot. (Which won't be a surprise to anyone that actually followed what was happening, just to those who believe the MSM.) Funded by an oligarch who was disturbingly close to Epstein. Here's an update from yesterday (July 2)

NLPC today filed a complaint with the Attorney Grievance Committee (AGC) of the New York State Supreme Court against Roberta Ann Kaplan for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct regarding the outside funding of E. Jean Carroll’s two defamation lawsuits against President Trump. The lawsuits were funded by left-wing billionaire Reid Hoffman through a nonprofit called American Future Republic.

“Roberta Kaplan’s coverup of the outside financing of E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits by billionaire Reid Hoffman for six  months and her excuses for doing so should be thoroughly investigated by the New York Bar authorities for ethical violations,” said Paul Kamenar, counsel to NLPC who drafted the 15-page complaint.

Hoffman wished President Trump had been made an “actual martyr” at a Sun Valley gathering in summer 2024, just days before the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, then offered a non-apology that blamed the audience.

Bar Complaint Filed Against E. Jean Carroll's Lawyer Roberta Kaplan - National Legal And Policy Center

https://nlpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/NLPC-NY-Bar-Complaint-vs-Roberta-Kaplan-Julyh-2-2026.pdf

More info about that American Future Fund. Tell me again, why some billionaires are trustworthy and others scum?

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, impulse said:

Eventually, it's all going to come out that the entire lawsuit was just another attempt to keep Trump off the ballot. (Which won't be a surprise to anyone that actually followed what was happening, just to those who believe the MSM.) Funded by an oligarch who was disturbingly close to Epstein. Here's an update from yesterday (July 2)

NLPC today filed a complaint with the Attorney Grievance Committee (AGC) of the New York State Supreme Court against Roberta Ann Kaplan for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct regarding the outside funding of E. Jean Carroll’s two defamation lawsuits against President Trump. The lawsuits were funded by left-wing billionaire Reid Hoffman through a nonprofit called American Future Republic.

“Roberta Kaplan’s coverup of the outside financing of E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits by billionaire Reid Hoffman for six  months and her excuses for doing so should be thoroughly investigated by the New York Bar authorities for ethical violations,” said Paul Kamenar, counsel to NLPC who drafted the 15-page complaint.

Hoffman wished President Trump had been made an “actual martyr” at a Sun Valley gathering in summer 2024, just days before the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, then offered a non-apology that blamed the audience.

Bar Complaint Filed Against E. Jean Carroll's Lawyer Roberta Kaplan - National Legal And Policy Center

https://nlpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/NLPC-NY-Bar-Complaint-vs-Roberta-Kaplan-Julyh-2-2026.pdf

AI: The National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) is a conservative 501(c)(3) non-profit group that monitors and reports on the ethics of public officials, supporters of liberal causes, and labor unions in the United States.

Clutching at straws over decisions already made. That NLPC doesn't like.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, impulse said:

Eventually, it's all going to come out that the entire lawsuit was just another attempt to keep Trump off the ballot. (Which won't be a surprise to anyone that actually followed what was happening, just to those who believe the MSM.) Funded by an oligarch who was disturbingly close to Epstein. Here's an update from yesterday (July 2)

NLPC today filed a complaint with the Attorney Grievance Committee (AGC) of the New York State Supreme Court against Roberta Ann Kaplan for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct regarding the outside funding of E. Jean Carroll’s two defamation lawsuits against President Trump. The lawsuits were funded by left-wing billionaire Reid Hoffman through a nonprofit called American Future Republic.

“Roberta Kaplan’s coverup of the outside financing of E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits by billionaire Reid Hoffman for six  months and her excuses for doing so should be thoroughly investigated by the New York Bar authorities for ethical violations,” said Paul Kamenar, counsel to NLPC who drafted the 15-page complaint.

Hoffman wished President Trump had been made an “actual martyr” at a Sun Valley gathering in summer 2024, just days before the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, then offered a non-apology that blamed the audience.

Bar Complaint Filed Against E. Jean Carroll's Lawyer Roberta Kaplan - National Legal And Policy Center

https://nlpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/NLPC-NY-Bar-Complaint-vs-Roberta-Kaplan-Julyh-2-2026.pdf

Who cares the case is over !! trump is a sexual predator and he lost the case and will have to pay the money !!

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member

The Supreme Court has denied hearing the $5 million assault/defamation verdict.

Trump can still request hearing from SCOTUS next session October on the $83 million defamation only case which is the original case filed while Trump was still President first term.

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, Wingate said:

Pardon me for getting into the nitty gritty, but E Jean Carroll kept the dress she wore on the day she claimed Trump sexually assaulted her. She never laundered it, and she says it has stains from Trump's ejaculate. During the trial, her lawyers requested a strand of Trump's hair to try to match the DNA with the stains on Ms Carroll's dress.

(Judge) Kaplan said that lawyers for Trump and Carroll had over three years to make DNA an issue in the case and that both chose not to do so

After refusing to provide Trump’s DNA sample, his lawyers recently switched tactics, saying they would provide his DNA if Carroll’s lawyers turned over the full DNA report on the dress.

(Judge) Kaplan wrote in an order that Trump had provided no persuasive reason to relieve him of the consequences of his failure to seek the full DNA report in a timely fashion.

And the judge noted that the report did not find evidence of sperm cells and that reopening the dispute would raise a “complicated new subject into this case that both sides elected not to pursue over a period of years.”

https://www.wric.com/news/u-s-world/ap-judge-to-trump-too-late-to-offer-dna-to-rebut-rape-claim/

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member

the 5 million should be pocket money for Trump, after all he's a Billionaire, he should just pay and shut up

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, Wingate said:

Trump refused.

only guilty people refuse DNA testing, if one has nothing to worry about let them do as many DNA as they want

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Others? Source, please?

was ready to ask the same question but MAGA usually just do the blablabla without any supporting evidence, unfortunately they get away with it, this shouldn't be allowed, they should put up or shut up

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
14 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

only guilty people refuse DNA testing, if one has nothing to worry about let them do as many DNA as they want

That is a myth. Anyone who tells their attorney they want to submit DNA will be told get another lawyer.

As judge Kaplan wrote, there would be no way to prove that non-semen DNA -- which is what it was -- from Trump did not get on the dress some way other than Ms. Carroll claimed.

impulse Star Member

impulse

Advanced Member

Others? Source, please?

Read her book.

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member
18 hours ago, JerryM said:

That is a myth. Anyone who tells their attorney they want to submit DNA will be told get another lawyer.

As judge Kaplan wrote, there would be no way to prove that non-semen DNA -- which is what it was -- from Trump did not get on the dress some way other than Ms. Carroll claimed.

if I am not guilty I don't give a damn about what my lawyer says

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
19 hours ago, Mavideol said:

the 5 million should be pocket money for Trump, after all he's a Billionaire, he should just pay and shut up

Shut up? You're talking about Trump! He'd need his lips sewn together!

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
On 7/1/2026 at 10:48 AM, chickenslegs said:

And they're tiny fingers, apparently.

But bigger than.... 😃

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
25 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

if I am not guilty I don't give a damn about what my lawyer says

DNA can come back indecisive whether you believe you are innocent or not.

Secondary Transfer: DNA is incredibly sensitive. Your skin cells can transfer to an object, a location, or another person without your knowledge. Innocent explanations rarely matter once your profile is found in a database

And in this case it turned out the DNA was not sperm so they could have somehow gotten Trumps DNA and put it on the dress years later than the supposed encounter.

cjinchiangrai Platinum Member

cjinchiangrai

Advanced Member
On 7/2/2026 at 10:13 AM, JerryM said:

The Supreme Court denied any hearing on the $5 million judgment.

Trump will likely separate appeal on the $83 million next SCOTUS session.

True, but since it was based on the first case, it is unlikely to be accepted either. The third case is going to be a slam dunk, because the idiot in chief can't keep his mouth shut.

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, cjinchiangrai said:

True, but since it was based on the first case, it is unlikely to be accepted either.

But there was a major overhaul to the complaint on $83 million verdict after the assault ruling which was protested by team Trump so that is not 100% true.

cjinchiangrai Platinum Member

cjinchiangrai

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, JerryM said:

But there was a major overhaul to the complaint on $83 million verdict after the assault ruling which was protested by team Trump so that is not 100% true.

It is going to be tabled pending the outcome of case number three.

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, JerryM said:

But there was a major overhaul to the complaint on $83 million verdict after the assault ruling which was protested by team Trump so that is not 100% true.

what are trying to prove, the guy was found guilty and liable to pay, write the damn check ans stop the excuses

impulse Star Member

impulse

Advanced Member

what are trying to prove, the guy was found guilty and liable to pay, write the damn check ans stop the excuses

If you don't understand the difference between guilty and liable, you may want to sit this one out.

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, impulse said:

If you don't understand the difference between guilty and liable, you may want to sit this one out.

I will explain to you.... guilty = he pays..... liable = he pays... did you get it or do you need a link

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.