Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Trump Orders Limits On Birthright Citizenship

President Trump signed two executive orders on Thursday aimed at tightening eligibility for automatic citizenship for children born in the United States, following a Supreme Court ruling that upheld the constitutional basis for birthright citizenship.

Supreme Court Ruling Spurs new Moves

In late June, the Supreme Court rejected Trump’s previous “Day 1” order, which sought to end citizenship by birth for children born on US soil. The court said the plan conflicted with the 14th Amendment, which protects the citizenship rights of people born in the country.

Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump said the Supreme Court decision was “unfortunate” and described it as close, adding that he would make “adjustments” because he believed the outcome was unfair.

Expanding Who Could Be Barred From Automatic Citizenship

One of the new orders broadens the category of people said to be ineligible for automatic citizenship. According to administration officials, the order would treat certain groups as not covered by the Citizenship Clause, including “alien enemies of the United States”, members of foreign terrorist organisations, and “large categories of people who lobby and act on behalf of foreign governments”.

Officials said the move is intended to work around the framework used by courts to identify exceptions to birthright citizenship. Courts have long recognised four exceptions tied to the Citizenship Clause: children born in the US to foreign sovereigns and diplomats, now referenced in the order; children born to foreign forces during a hostile occupation; children born on foreign public ships; and children of Native American tribes.

It was unclear, however, how the administration would determine who would fall within the description of people who “lobby and act on behalf of foreign governments” or how that would apply in practice.

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said the order ensures that “large numbers” who would otherwise qualify for birthright citizenship would no longer be eligible for benefits.

Order Targets “Birth Tourism” Practice

The second executive order focuses on what the administration calls “birth tourism”. The practice involves travelling to another country with the primary purpose of giving birth there so that the child automatically becomes a citizen of that country.

US law already makes such conduct illegal when it involves visa or immigration fraud, and the practice has become a political focus for the right. Trump said birthright citizenship was originally intended for “the babies of slaves”. He argued that recent patterns were different, alleging that “wealthy people” have built businesses around the practice and that the US should not allow it.

He also claimed that “hundreds of thousands” take advantage of birth tourism, though data cited in the article suggests those estimates are inflated.

Trump said the original policy applied shortly after the Civil War ended, adding that it was not intended for families he described as arriving with multiple children.

Citing Immigration Law For Denying Visas

Miller said Trump has authority to pursue the new approach under Section 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. He described it as a provision that governs the travel of non-citizens into and out of the country and said it is rarely used.

Miller argued that if someone tells a consular officer they are coming as a tourist but intends to give birth for the purpose of securing citizenship for the child, they are committing fraud against the government. He said, based on that reasoning, the relevant visa “can and should and will be now denied”.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

7 August 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

JAG Ruby Member

JAG

Advanced Member
46 minutes ago, Tug said:

...what an absolutely ugly specimen of a man.

Trump or Miller?

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member

President Trump signed executive orders targeting the "birth tourism industry" and restricting birthright citizenship. Administration officials asserted that foreign nationals engage in fraud by entering the U.S. on tourist visas to give birth and secure citizenship for their children, prompting legal challenges from civil rights groups.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6015054-trump-executive-orders-birthright-citizenship-birth-tourism/

NB DJT is just mad that he missed out on that industry.

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, Front Row said:

It’s not a bill so there’s nothing to pass. It’s an EO that the administration will action, at least until the lawsuits begin. What a clown show we are in.

Well for Mr. Tug then say it ain't gonna pass muster.

Old Croc Star Member

Old Croc

Advanced Member

I don't agree with anything about MAGA and their sect leader, except the policy of removal of birthright citizenship.

Forty years ago this month, Australia amended the Citizenship Act legislation to eliminate this type of automatic citizenship right. (It's not a specific part of the Australian Constitution)

This had become a concern in the years leading up to the end of the British lease on the territory of Hong Kong, as many residents there were concerned about changes under a Chinese govt. "Birth tourism" was common as many families wanted an alternate escape plan if things went bad.

Different rules apply to NZers as Australia values and abide by agreements with their close friends and allies.

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
(edited)
42 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Why should "the courts" have more power than a President?

And what makes "the courts" infallible and all-knowing that they can do no wrong?

I would ask Gouverneur Morris who is credited writing much of the final text of the US Constitution but he has been dead for over 200 years.

Edited by JerryM

save the frogs Star Member

save the frogs

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Cory1848 said:

It's a fairly simple principle called "separation of powers": the executive, the courts, and the legislature. In the US system, the president cannot unilaterally change the constitution. If the president has power over the courts, then we are essentially in a dictatorship. And I'm afraid we're pretty close to that already.

But people seem to think if ONE person makes decisions, it's bad.

Compared to a bunch of different people, that somehow protects you from bad decisions.

The ONE guy may be a genius and the whatever number of court guys may be idiots.

John Drake Diamond Member

John Drake

Advanced Member

After he loses the midterms, Trump will cut a deal with the Democrats and pass a big illegal alien amnesty bill. Just watch it happen.

Caldera Ruby Member

Caldera

Advanced Member

Maybe he should turn his focus on measures that are legal and benefit ordinary Americans.

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member

This will again fail in court like so many of his orders. Taxpayers will be on the receiving end of the mounting court loses

Trump’s Court Losses Leave Taxpayers Facing Millions in Legal Fees

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
(edited)

There is no official tally of babies born to tourists on American soil. In its most recent estimate in 2020, the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that supports restricting immigration, put the number at around 20,000 to 26,000 babies a year.

That is less than 1 percent of the number of babies born in the United States in 2020, according to statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/01/us/politics/supreme-court-birth-tourism-birthright-citizenship.html

A study led by researchers at Penn State University reviewed historical natality records and concluded that "birth tourism" births consistently sit between 5,000 and 10,000 annually.

https://www.wbaltv.com/article/birthright-citizenship-birth-tourism-fact-check/71800161

NB China citizens do not qualify for visa waiver program -- they must apply for a tourist visa at a US embassy or consulate.

The Visa waiver program (for 42 countries) is for 90 day maximum stay so to time a pregnancy and still allowed entry to US (i.e. not showing pregnancy) is pretty tight

Edited by JerryM

WDSmart Platinum Member

WDSmart

Advanced Member

What is meant by "...children of Native American tribes"? According to existing laws, all Native Americans born in the United States are U.S. citizens, a status formally granted by the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924. Even if "American tribes" refers to tribes throughout the Americas, which includes North, Central, and South America, the designation of "children of Native American tribes in the USA" would still be against existing laws.

If anyone has a better explanation of what this means, please let me know.

GroveHillWanderer Platinum Member

GroveHillWanderer

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, save the frogs said:

Why should "the courts" have more power than a President?

And what makes "the courts" infallible and all-knowing that they can do no wrong?

The courts do not have more power than the President - they have different powers.

Neither are they infallible. However, based on the US Constitution:

"Jurisdiction to interpret laws and determine constitutionality belongs to the judicial branch under Article III."

https://www.jurist.org/news/2025/02/trump-signs-order-declaring-only-president-and-ag-can-interpret-us-law-for-executive-branch/

As that article goes on to point out:

The framers of the Constitution designed the separation of duties to prevent any single branch of government from becoming too powerful.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.