Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Trump Threatens to “Unleash Hell” if Iran Rejects Deal

The administration of Donald Trump warned that the United States could intensify military action against Iran if negotiations aimed at ending the conflict fail.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

At a briefing on Wednesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president prefers a diplomatic outcome but is prepared to escalate if Tehran refuses to reach an agreement.

“The president’s preference is always peace,” Leavitt said. “But if Iran fails to accept the reality of the current moment … President Trump will ensure they are hit harder than they have ever been hit before.”

She added that Trump is ready to “unleash hell” if Iran misjudges the situation or refuses to cooperate in negotiations.

Talks and disputed proposal

According to sources cited by US media, Washington has sent a 15-point peace proposal to Iran through officials in Pakistan.

Iranian state media reported that Tehran rejected the proposal, and Iranian officials have publicly denied that direct negotiations are taking place.

Leavitt maintained that talks are continuing and described them as productive, but declined to provide details about the content of the discussions, the Iranian negotiators involved or whether in-person meetings are imminent.

Earlier this week, Trump said he had delayed major attacks on Iranian energy infrastructure for five days following what he described as constructive contacts with Tehran.

The administration says the pause offers Iran an opportunity to abandon its nuclear ambitions and stop threatening the United States and its allies.

Officials in both Pakistan and Egypt have indicated they could host talks aimed at ending the conflict. A meeting in Islamabad has been discussed but has not been confirmed by Washington.

Trump said negotiations involve several senior figures, including Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Other participants include White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump adviser Jared Kushner.

Leavitt described Vance as a central member of the administration’s national security team who has closely supported the president during the negotiations.

Oil gesture and military pressure

Trump also claimed Iran recently offered the United States a “very big present” linked to oil shipments moving through the Strait of Hormuz.

The president did not specify what he meant by the remark. Reports suggested it might involve an oil tanker carrying about two million barrels that successfully transited the strait, though the White House declined to confirm the details.

Leavitt said the president would address the issue at an appropriate time.

Trump indicated the gesture signaled to him that negotiations were progressing and that Iran was dealing in good faith. He also said many senior Iranian leaders had been killed in US and Israeli strikes, claiming the country’s leadership structure had already changed.

Asked whether Washington is satisfied with Iran’s current leadership, Leavitt said it was too early to make that assessment.

Military operations continue

Despite the diplomatic contacts, the United States continues to reinforce its military presence in the region.

Thousands of additional Marines are being deployed to the Middle East, while the Pentagon has requested roughly $200 billion in supplemental funding related to the operation.

Leavitt declined to comment on potential deployment of units from the 82nd Airborne Division, referring questions to the Defense Department.

She said the administration aims to keep military options available while negotiations continue.

According to the White House, the campaign — known as Operation Epic Fury — remains active and is progressing faster than initially planned.

Officials said the mission was expected to last four to six weeks and that US forces are approaching their core objectives.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 26 March 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

KhunLA Star Member

KhunLA

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, sqwakvfr said:

Did the Iranian government or what is left of it confirm that actual negotiation is ongoing? Lot of mixed messages.

You need better news source, instead of fake news.

Indirect negotiations are underway. I can't post link, or copy & past the info, as not allowed without a link from approved source, which I don't get my news or info from.

I suggest you google this, or just take my word for it ... "Indirect talks between the US and Iran are being mediated by Pakistan, Türkiye, and Egypt, the foreign ministers of the three countries have confirmed, stating they have been passing messages between Washington and Tehran.

Egypt’s Ishaq Dar dismissed the “unnecessary speculation” in the media regarding the peace talks and said that negotiations “are taking place” through intermediaries and that Washington’s 15-point proposal was delivered to Tehran in exactly this manner.

Iranian media have also reported that Iran has already formally replied to the US proposal and is currently awaiting a response. Although Tehran has not released any official statements regarding Washington’s plan, Iranian officials have reportedly dismissed it, demanding concessions from the US" ...

AI is not up to date, or compromised, but if google text above, the 2nd linked article points out reality. Obviously 2 powers fighting want to resolve the situation, to report nothing is being done, is simply fake news ... IMHO

koolkarl Gold Member

koolkarl

Advanced Member

Should send the Enola Gay and do the world a favor and the end of airport security.

koolkarl Gold Member

koolkarl

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

This incredibly evil and pathetic man has already Unleashed hell on the Iranian people and for what?

PM me. I will give you a free 1 way ticket to Iran. Enjoy.

CallumWK Diamond Member

CallumWK

Advanced Member
49 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

You need better news source, instead of fake news.

Indirect negotiations are underway. I can't post link, or copy & past the info, as not allowed without a link from approved source, which I don't get my news or info from.

I suggest you google this, or just take my word for it ... "Indirect talks between the US and Iran are being mediated by Pakistan, Türkiye, and Egypt, the foreign ministers of the three countries have confirmed, stating they have been passing messages between Washington and Tehran.

Egypt’s Ishaq Dar dismissed the “unnecessary speculation” in the media regarding the peace talks and said that negotiations “are taking place” through intermediaries and that Washington’s 15-point proposal was delivered to Tehran in exactly this manner.

Iranian media have also reported that Iran has already formally replied to the US proposal and is currently awaiting a response. Although Tehran has not released any official statements regarding Washington’s plan, Iranian officials have reportedly dismissed it, demanding concessions from the US" ...

AI is not up to date, or compromised, but if google text above, the 2nd linked article points out reality. Obviously 2 powers fighting want to resolve the situation, to report nothing is being done, is simply fake news ... IMHO

Maybe you should get better at Googling, or not just search for what you want to hear.

https://www.nbcnews.com/world/middle-east/live-blog/live-updates-iran-war-talks-trump-peace-plan-troops-hormuz-rcna265051

Iran says it has no plans for negotiations with the U.S.

President Trump said this week his administration was engaged in productive discussions with Tehran, but regime officials countered that account.

https://investinglive.com/news/iran-officially-responded-to-trumps-peace-plan-no-deal-20260326/

Iran officially responded to Trump's peace plan: No deal

Here is a post from Tansim, translated:

  • An informed source told Tasnim News Agency that Iran’s response to the 15-point proposal from the United States was formally delivered last night via intermediaries, and Iran is awaiting the other side’s reply.

  • According to this source, Iran stated in its response that acts of aggression and assassination by the enemy must end; objective conditions must be created to ensure the war will not be repeated; compensation and war reparations must be guaranteed and clearly defined; and the end of the war across all fronts—including all resistance groups involved in the conflict throughout the region—must be implemented.

  • The source added that Iran’s assertion of sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz is its natural and legal right and must be recognized, along with guarantees that the other side’s commitments will be implemented. These conditions are in addition to the demands Iran presented during the second round of negotiations in Geneva (a few days before the U.S. and Israeli attack in the month of Esfand).

  • The source also emphasized that, for Iran, it is clear that the U.S. claim of negotiations is merely a “third deception project,” and that the Americans are pursuing several goals under the cover of negotiations:

KhunLA Star Member

KhunLA

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Maybe you should get better at Googling, or not just search for what you want to hear.

https://www.nbcnews.com/world/middle-east/live-blog/live-updates-iran-war-talks-trump-peace-plan-troops-hormuz-rcna265051

Iran says it has no plans for negotiations with the U.S.

President Trump said this week his administration was engaged in productive discussions with Tehran, but regime officials countered that account.

https://investinglive.com/news/iran-officially-responded-to-trumps-peace-plan-no-deal-20260326/

Iran officially responded to Trump's peace plan: No deal

Here is a post from Tansim, translated:

  • An informed source told Tasnim News Agency that Iran’s response to the 15-point proposal from the United States was formally delivered last night via intermediaries, and Iran is awaiting the other side’s reply.

  • According to this source, Iran stated in its response that acts of aggression and assassination by the enemy must end; objective conditions must be created to ensure the war will not be repeated; compensation and war reparations must be guaranteed and clearly defined; and the end of the war across all fronts—including all resistance groups involved in the conflict throughout the region—must be implemented.

  • The source added that Iran’s assertion of sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz is its natural and legal right and must be recognized, along with guarantees that the other side’s commitments will be implemented. These conditions are in addition to the demands Iran presented during the second round of negotiations in Geneva (a few days before the U.S. and Israeli attack in the month of Esfand).

  • The source also emphasized that, for Iran, it is clear that the U.S. claim of negotiations is merely a “third deception project,” and that the Americans are pursuing several goals under the cover of negotiations:

Well, you're welcome to believe & post your fake news ... IMHO

But I'll stick with news source that actually tell the truth, with named sources, and falls in line with common sense thinking.

Bannoi Silver Member

Bannoi

Advanced Member

Seeing as anything that comes out of Trumps mouth is either a complete fabrication a gross exaggeration or simply a downright lie I tend to agree with the Iranian version.

I think what is happening is that Washington is asking countries that have friendly or at least are on talking terms with Tehran to pass on messages to which Tehrans response is most likely fk you. Hardly what I would call negotiations.

sqwakvfr Platinum Member

sqwakvfr

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, KhunLA said:

You need better news source, instead of fake news.

Indirect negotiations are underway. I can't post link, or copy & past the info, as not allowed without a link from approved source, which I don't get my news or info from.

I suggest you google this, or just take my word for it ... "Indirect talks between the US and Iran are being mediated by Pakistan, Türkiye, and Egypt, the foreign ministers of the three countries have confirmed, stating they have been passing messages between Washington and Tehran.

Egypt’s Ishaq Dar dismissed the “unnecessary speculation” in the media regarding the peace talks and said that negotiations “are taking place” through intermediaries and that Washington’s 15-point proposal was delivered to Tehran in exactly this manner.

Iranian media have also reported that Iran has already formally replied to the US proposal and is currently awaiting a response. Although Tehran has not released any official statements regarding Washington’s plan, Iranian officials have reportedly dismissed it, demanding concessions from the US" ...

AI is not up to date, or compromised, but if google text above, the 2nd linked article points out reality. Obviously 2 powers fighting want to resolve the situation, to report nothing is being done, is simply fake news ... IMHO

What excatly is "indirect negotiation"? is it sening text messages to each other? I might need better news sources but after bombing a country for a month how about face to face meeting to end it or just keep bombing. I am a combat veteran and not some woke liberal. I knew people who did not come home from their last combat deployments in 2006 and 2010. So far US casualties have been low but I do not believe it is worth the risk to send a MEU or a Combat Brigade into Iran. What would that accomplish? After Epic Fury do we transition into Operation Iranian Freedom?

"we will be welcomed as liberators', Donald Rumselfd 2002 before Operation Iraqi Freedom.

KhunLA Star Member

KhunLA

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

What excatly is "indirect negotiation"? is it sening text messages to each other? I might need better news sources but after bombing a country for a month how about face to face meeting to end it or just keep bombing. I am a combat veteran and not some woke liberal. I knew people who did not come home from their last combat deployments in 2006 and 2010. So far US casualties have been low but I do not believe it is worth the risk to send a MEU or a Combat Brigade into Iran. What would that accomplish? After Epic Fury do we transition into Operation Iranian Freedom?

"we will be welcomed as liberators', Donald Rumselfd 2002 before Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Google will answer that for you. I'm not doing the repetitive reply thingy with you, as I can repeat myself over & over and try to explain things to you, but I can't help you understand it.

What I posted is self explanatory, that you don't understand it, is a mystery.

You have a nice day.

sqwakvfr Platinum Member

sqwakvfr

Advanced Member
32 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Google will answer that for you. I'm not doing the repetitive reply thingy with you, as I can repeat myself over & over and try to explain things to you, but I can't help you understand it.

What I posted is self explanatory, that you don't understand it, is a mystery.

You have a nice day.

1) Never asked for your "help" 2) Google is only reliable as "garbage in, garbage out" 3) I am having a nice day 4) What is the end game for Iran ?

KhunLA Star Member

KhunLA

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, sqwakvfr said:

1) Never asked for your "help" 2) Google is only reliable as "garbage in, garbage out" 3) I am having a nice day 4) What is the end game for Iran ?

Again with the silly questions. Ask an Iranian citizen, if wanting to know what they think, instead of what the Iranian govt wants

I know one, and he'd like the USA & Israel to succeed, and rid the country of the present govt.

As much as they didn't like the Shah, he was better than what they have now.

https://aseannow.com/topic/1384451-hundreds-feared-dead-as-iran-forces-fire-on-protesters/#findComment-20325669

sqwakvfr Platinum Member

sqwakvfr

Advanced Member
22 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Again with the silly questions. Ask an Iranian citizen, if wanting to know what they think, instead of what the Iranian govt wants

I know one, and he'd like the USA & Israel to succeed, and rid the country of the present govt.

As much as they didn't like the Shah, he was better than what they have now.

https://aseannow.com/topic/1384451-hundreds-feared-dead-as-iran-forces-fire-on-protesters/#findComment-20325669

Then define Sucess in terms of the attacks on Iran? Because the US is not at war with Iran. POTUS has said "Iran must surrender". How can they surrender if this is not a war? This seems to be a catch 22? What comes after the present Iraninan government is terminated? The CIA seems to be a gigantic waste of money. Do they have any human assets inside of Iran? SIGNIT is not difficlut because it is technology based. But HUMINT is very difficult This is because agents and assets must be recruited, cultivated and maintained inside of hostile and enemy nations. Are the vast majority of Iranian people willing to defy their government and be willing to die to have a democratic nation?

spidermike007 Star Member

spidermike007

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, koolkarl said:

PM me. I will give you a free 1 way ticket to Iran. Enjoy.

I do have some friends that will come right out and say the man is a butthead, he's an idiot, and he's an absolute clown, but I like his policies. Those are the Republicans I admire.

It's an interesting point that you bring up, and one that a lot of Republicans just don't understand these days. During the 20 years that Clinton, Obama and Biden were in office I was continually critical of their policies. Just look back at some of my posts when Obama and Biden were in power. I was not a big fan of Obama for many of the years that he was president and my posts reflect that. As a centrist democrat I criticized a lot of his policies.

I see so little of that coming from Republicans these days, to point where their absolute fealty is actually quite frightening. Most just can't handle critique of Trump, they immediately clam up, get defensive and start making it personal. Instead of behaving like rational intellectuals and debating policy they just start throwing out nonsense, accusations that I've never criticized my own party, or that I get paid to be critical of Trump. That is not only ridiculous, it is inane. I wish somebody would offer to pay me to criticize Trump. I would spend my whole day doing it.

Criticism and open mindedness is what independent thinkers engage in, and it sets them apart from dogmatic subjects of a wannabe king. I invite you to reflect on that for just a moment.

KhunLA Star Member

KhunLA

Advanced Member
19 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

Then define Sucess in terms of the attacks on Iran? Because the US is not at war with Iran. POTUS has said "Iran must surrender". How can they surrender if this is not a war? This seems to be a catch 22? What comes after the present Iraninan government is terminated? The CIA seems to be a gigantic waste of money. Do they have any human assets inside of Iran? SIGNIT is not difficlut because it is technology based. But HUMINT is very difficult This is because agents and assets must be recruited, cultivated and maintained inside of hostile and enemy nations. Are the vast majority of Iranian people willing to defy their government and be willing to die to have a democratic nation?

You're asking questions I can't answer. How am I suppose to know if they have assets in IR.

My idea of success would be what I already stated, complete change of govt. Start from there. That is one of the goals Trump suggested. The rest is above my pay grade, along with, I simply don't care, I'm not Iranian, and wish we (USA military) were never there, in the M.E. ... EVER.

If USA govt didn't learn their lesson in 1967 (USS Liberty), oh well, nuff said.

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, KhunLA said:

Well, you're welcome to believe & post your fake news ... IMHO

But I'll stick with news source that actually tell the truth, with named sources, and falls in line with common sense thinking.

Even if you feel you cannot attribute a quote to your sources the least you can do is list who/examples of what these sources are!

KhunLA Star Member

KhunLA

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, scottiejohn said:

Even if you feel you cannot attribute a quote to your sources the least you can do is list who/examples of what these sources are!

I've been told I'm not allowed to. If you do as I suggest, it will show you the source. I don't need to do it for you, in a PM, do I ???

So you didn't Google do what I suggested ??? Wouldn't that be easier, than posting again, and asking for what I already stated I couldn't do.

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, KhunLA said:

I've been told I'm not allowed to. If you do as I suggest, it will show you the source. I don't need to do it for you, in a PM, do I ???

So you didn't Google do what I suggested ??? Wouldn't that be easier, than posting again, and asking for what I already stated I couldn't do.

What a load of hogwash!

As I said earlier I accept you may not be allowed to make an actual quote from a banned source but there is no rule on AN, to my knowledge, that says you cannot list what sources you prefer to use.

A list such as this is totally allowable and I am NOT suggesting that these are your sources;

Culture and Life

International Affairs

Moscow News

The New Times

Oeuvres et opinions

Femmes de nous jours

Sputnik - not allowed in GDR and Cuba during glasnost.

China Pictorial

China Reconstructs

Peking Review

People's China

China's Sports

Women in China

Evergreen

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

Almost right until the part whereby 168 schoolchildren were killed.

Pales into insignifance compared to the thirty thousand or so Iranian protesters murded on the streets.

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

I do have some friends that will come right out and say the man is a butthead, he's an idiot, and he's an absolute clown, but I like his policies. Those are the Republicans I admire.

It's an interesting point that you bring up, and one that a lot of Republicans just don't understand these days. During the 20 years that Clinton, Obama and Biden were in office I was continually critical of their policies. Just look back at some of my posts when Obama and Biden were in power. I was not a big fan of Obama for many of the years that he was president and my posts reflect that. As a centrist democrat I criticized a lot of his policies.

I see so little of that coming from Republicans these days, to point where their absolute fealty is actually quite frightening. Most just can't handle critique of Trump, they immediately clam up, get defensive and start making it personal. Instead of behaving like rational intellectuals and debating policy they just start throwing out nonsense, accusations that I've never criticized my own party, or that I get paid to be critical of Trump. That is not only ridiculous, it is inane. I wish somebody would offer to pay me to criticize Trump. I would spend my whole day doing it.

Criticism and open mindedness is what independent thinkers engage in, and it sets them apart from dogmatic subjects of a wannabe king. I invite you to reflect on that for just a moment.

Nobody cares what you think personally. The issue is much bigger than that.

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
42 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

What a load of hogwash!

As I said earlier I accept you may not be allowed to make an actual quote from a banned source but there is no rule on AN, to my knowledge, that says you cannot list what sources you prefer to use.

A list such as this is totally allowable and I am NOT suggesting that these are your sources;

Culture and Life

International Affairs

Moscow News

The New Times

Oeuvres et opinions

Femmes de nous jours

Sputnik - not allowed in GDR and Cuba during glasnost.

China Pictorial

China Reconstructs

Peking Review

People's China

China's Sports

Women in China

Evergreen

Wow what an unbiased list!

Femmes de nous jours, what??

vinny41 Platinum Member

vinny41

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, KhunLA said:

Again with the silly questions. Ask an Iranian citizen, if wanting to know what they think, instead of what the Iranian govt wants

I know one, and he'd like the USA & Israel to succeed, and rid the country of the present govt.

As much as they didn't like the Shah, he was better than what they have now.

https://aseannow.com/topic/1384451-hundreds-feared-dead-as-iran-forces-fire-on-protesters/#findComment-20325669

1 person out of Iran total population of 93 million

I wonder how many of the 93 million people want the present govt regardless of how bad they are to be replaced with a Trump or Netanyahu pupppet

If there was such an entity as a regime change fairy I can't think of a single country where someone wouldn't apply to the regime change fairy requesting a change of govt

CallumWK Diamond Member

CallumWK

Advanced Member

1 hour ago, scottiejohn said:

What a load of hogwash!

As I said earlier I accept you may not be allowed to make an actual quote from a banned source

They are banned for a good reason as far as I know, and that is because they aren't credible. Are you surprised that the poster you are replying to, and actually all MAGA's on this forum, get their info from such sources, and are then laughed out of the door?

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, CallumWK said:

They are banned for a good reason as far as I know, and that is because they aren't credible. Are you surprised that the poster you are replying to, and actually all MAGA's on this forum, get their info from such sources, and are then laughed out of the door?

What "such sources"?

You all quote "such sources" but what are they?

I agree that quotes from certain "sources"" may not be accepted by AN but there is nothing wrong with a poster saying that they get their general info from such and such sources such as RU, Al Jazeera etc. At least then we know where they stand!

save the frogs Star Member

save the frogs

Advanced Member

Trump has already unleashed hell, hasnt he?

still kicking Star Member

still kicking

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, KhunLA said:

Well, you're welcome to believe & post your fake news ... IMHO

But I'll stick with news source that actually tell the truth, with named sources, and falls in line with common sense thinking.

And that would be Fox and Truth

metisdead Legendary Member

A low value post and a reply has been removed:

  1. Low-Value Posts - Posts that add no written contribution are not allowed.

    This includes emoji-only replies, very short comments, memes, GIFs, screenshots, or embedded social media posts without explanation or opinion.

IsmeUno Platinum Member

IsmeUno

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, KhunLA said:

They are negotiating a peace deal, so a pause on aggression does make sense.

Fact is that the Ayatollah stated previously that they didn't want nuclear weapons. So Trump claiming that they've agreed to not have a nuclear weapon is just fodder for his gullible followers.

CallumWK Diamond Member

CallumWK

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, IsmeUno said:
9 hours ago, KhunLA said:

They are negotiating a peace deal, so a pause on aggression does make sense.

Fact is that the Ayatollah stated previously that they didn't want nuclear weapons. So Trump claiming that they've agreed to not have a nuclear weapon is just fodder for his gullible followers.

Fact is that Trump is negotiating with a mirror in his bathroom

spidermike007 Star Member

spidermike007

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, emptypockets said:

Nobody cares what you think personally. The issue is much bigger than that.

More deflection. I wouldn't have expected any less.

spidermike007 Star Member

spidermike007

Advanced Member
59 minutes ago, IsmeUno said:

Fact is that the Ayatollah stated previously that they didn't want nuclear weapons. So Trump claiming that they've agreed to not have a nuclear weapon is just fodder for his gullible followers.

There is much evidence that the Ayatollah did not support the nuclear weapons program, and that his son who is far more of a hardliner does support the program. Another omelet on Don's face.

KhunLA Star Member

KhunLA

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, still kicking said:

And that would be Fox and Truth

Don't follow either one of those. Or MSM, as most require to register, or at least turn off ad blocker, which I won't do. Also means I don't follow most of the news posted on AN.

Most news posted by members is left BS. Don't agree with much news or articles posted be staff, so usually bypass them also. Like how their username is colorized, so I don't even have to read the title.

I come in on the last post, so if not interesting, don't bother opening the thread, especially if not the first page. Means it's been answered, or it turned into a Trump topic already.

Food, movies & EV are about all that interest me. Been stuck in house past week and replied to some political threads, and regret that, as they try to wear you down with silly repetitive replies.

Oh well ... back to the dog, and avoiding the trolls. 4 notifications, replied to 1.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.