Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

UK Confirms Biological Sex Rules for Toilets

Single-sex spaces such as toilets and changing rooms should be used according to biological sex, new guidance from Britain’s equality watchdog has confirmed.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The updated code of practice, produced by the Equality and Human Rights Commission and approved by ministers, states that a transgender woman should not use female toilets or changing facilities because she is biologically male.

Instead, the guidance says transgender people should be offered alternative facilities, including gender-neutral or third spaces where possible.

The guidance follows last year’s landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, which found that the definition of a woman under the Equality Act is based on biological sex.

New rules for public services

The code of practice outlines how businesses, associations and public services should organise facilities ranging from gyms and shopping centres to hospitals and restaurants.

It also states that denying transgender people access to all facilities would likely be disproportionate and could amount to discrimination.

The guidance recommends that gender-neutral toilets and changing rooms should include self-contained lockable cubicles with floor-to-ceiling walls and wash basins. The EHRC said organisations could also choose to allow transgender people to use disabled toilets.

Where premises only have separate male and female toilets, the guidance says they could instead be redesignated as unisex facilities.

The code, which runs to more than 300 pages, has now been placed before parliament. MPs and peers have 40 days to object before it becomes statutory guidance.

The EHRC first submitted the draft guidance to the government in September 2025. Ministers initially said the issue would be handled “thoroughly and carefully” before releasing the document eight months later.

Women and Equalities Minister Bridget Phillipson said the government’s aim was to ensure people could live free from discrimination and harassment.

“Our focus has always been making sure organisations have clear, accessible guidance on how to implement the law,” she said.

Debate over impact on trans people

EHRC chair Mary-Ann Stephenson said she hoped the public would approach the code “with an open mind”.

“I think we do need to broaden out the debates, and we need to start from a point of saying, how do we make sure that everyone has access to the services they need,” she said.

At the Watershed arts cinema in Bristol, chief executive Clare Reddington said delays to the guidance had caused confusion and misinformation.

The venue, which has gender-neutral toilets alongside separate male and female facilities, won a Loo of the Year award in 2024.

Reddington described the impact on transgender people as “toxic” and said many had been waiting for clarity on what the guidance would mean for “their ability to live a full public life”.

“I would say that designing toilets for everyone is great for business,” she added.

a1b106b0-553f-11f1-9182-e71b657bd088.jpg.webp

Clare Reddington

Campaign groups divided

Gender-critical campaign group Sex Matters welcomed the guidance.

Its co-founder Maya Forstater said organisations could no longer claim they were waiting for official clarification before changing policies.

“The new guidance is long and detailed, but at its heart is a simple principle: ‘sex’ means what it says – male and female,” she said.

However, transgender rights group TransActual said the guidance reduced protections for transgender people and the wider LGBT community.

The group said it would continue campaigning for equal access to public life and would publish a fuller response after reviewing the code in detail.

Employment lawyer Joanne Moseley of Irwin Mitchell said businesses were increasingly seeking legal advice on how to respond to the changes.

She said clear signage and the availability of gender-neutral facilities would be important, but warned that organisations could still face discrimination claims even before the guidance formally comes into force.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 May 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
18 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

You quite often suggest otherwise.

No I don't.

18 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

I've read about homosexual rapes in men's toilets. Would you suggest all homosexuals are potential rapists? Should they not be allowed in men's toilets?

Ah the old "other crimes happen so let's encourage some more" defense. 😃

Cory1848 Silver Member

Cory1848

Advanced Member
11 hours ago, Gsxrnz said:

I feel sorry for the unlucky future historian who has to write a thesis on The Bathroom Wars of the early 21st Century, and explain how societies went from peak-wealth to hell in a handcart in less than a couple of decades. coffee1

I don’t know what the rationale for this is in the UK. But in the US, Republican politicians have gotten their followers so laser focused on other people’s genitalia (among other trivial topics) that they are oblivious to the wholesale grift taking place at the highest levels of government.

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
16 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

No I don't.

Ah the old "other crimes happen so let's encourage some more" defense. 😃

You often say "men in dresses". Without gurther specification. That would suggest "all".

16 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Ah the old "other crimes happen so let's encourage some more" defense. 😃

No. Just a question.

wil iam not Gold Member

wil iam not

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Of course it is decided by biological sex. I dont want my niece sharing a toilet with a bloke in a skirt pumped full of hormones.

And if your lovely niece decided that 'it' wanted to be regarded as, and fully dressed as a man, would you go for a jimmy with 'it'.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

You often say "men in dresses". Without gurther specification. That would suggest "all".

No.

ALL men in dresses would suggest that. Anything else is you imagining things.

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

No.

ALL men in dresses would suggest that. Anything else is you imagining things.

Ok. So would you care to elaborate which transgenders are acceptable to you and which aren't? Which ones you think are dangerous to teenage girls and which aren'?Thanks.

An answer to my other question is still overdue.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
15 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Ok. So would you care to elaborate which transgenders are acceptable to you and which aren't? Which ones you think are dangerous to teenage girls and which aren'?Thanks.

An answer to my other question is still overdue.

Impossible to know.

Therefore the best way to protect girls is to stop them using girls toilets. Girls not being raped is more important to me than blokes who think they are women using women's toilets. Let them urinate with the other blokes. I can put up with it to ensure girls safety.

Seems to me you are prepared to break a few eggs to make the ideological omelette. Eggs being young girls innocence.

Not your daughter, right? 🤢

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
13 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Impossible to know.

Therefore the best way to protect girls is to stop them using girls toilets. Girls not being raped is more important to me than blokes who think they are women using women's toilets. Let them urinate with the other blokes. I can put up with it to ensure girls safety.

Seems to me you are prepared to break a few eggs to make the ideological omelette. Eggs being young girls innocence.

Not your daughter, right? 🤢

Ok. So it's impossible to know but you clearly think transgenders are a danger to young ladies. However, you've provided one example of a despicable person offending. So, what is possible to say is a tiny minority are possibly a danger. Just with every walk of life. Would transgenders be a risk to young men in a men's toilet?

An answer to my other question is still overdue.

CG1 Blue Gold Member

CG1 Blue

Advanced Member
32 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Would transgenders be a risk to young men in a men's toilet?

Young men are more likely to be able to defend themselves against a predatory trans person.

Why are you keen to allow trans women into safe spaces for women and girls?

Most women and girls would prefer them not to be there. It makes them feel unsafe. Does that not matter to you?

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
37 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Ok. So it's impossible to know but you clearly think transgenders are a danger to young ladies. However, you've provided one example of a despicable person offending. So, what is possible to say is a tiny minority are possibly a danger. Just with every walk of life. Would transgenders be a risk to young men in a men's toilet?

An answer to my other question is still overdue.

You think the rights of men in skirts to use a female toilet is more important than young girls avoiding sexual assault in said toilets.

Frankly I find your position abhorrent.

Why are you so keen to allow this to continue? What are you not telling us?

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
43 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

Young men are more likely to be able to defend themselves against a predatory trans person.

Why are you keen to allow trans women into safe spaces for women and girls?

Most women and girls would prefer them not to be there. It makes them feel unsafe. Does that not matter to you?

I'm asking questions. I'm curious. I've not made any opinion of my own known, or others for that matter.

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
45 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

You think the rights of men in skirts to use a female toilet is more important than young girls avoiding sexual assault in said toilets.

Frankly I find your position abhorrent.

Why are you so keen to allow this to continue? What are you not telling us?

I've only asked questions, some of which remains unanswered. I'm interested in how some conclusions appear to have been come to.

It would appear some don't even know themselves.

Priorexpat Silver Member

Priorexpat

Advanced Member

I have supermarket customers and although I had been to the toilets in this place before it was really early in the morning and I was super hungover.

Stumbled into the toilet for a wiz, looked around no urinals. "Why in the world would they take out the urinals"....when a woman starts to exit one of the closets. WHOOPS, ran out of there......

Instead of doors that read man or woman how about innie and outie?

wil iam not Gold Member

wil iam not

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Therefore the best way to protect girls is to stop them using girls toilets

Rather an ambiguous sentence.

wil iam not Gold Member

wil iam not

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, Priorexpat said:

I have supermarket customers and although I had been to the toilets in this place before it was really early in the morning and I was super hungover.

Stumbled into the toilet for a wiz, looked around no urinals. "Why in the world would they take out the urinals"....when a woman starts to exit one of the closets. WHOOPS, ran out of there......

Instead of doors that read man or woman how about innie and outie?

How about you not going into the wrong toilets, hungover or not, can you not read or recognise pictures?

Why would you be any different from the woman if you had gone into the cubicle, sat down, had your wizz, and left the place, ignoring whoever was also in there.

LennyW Ruby Member

LennyW

Advanced Member

It is a sad reflection of the times we live in when this actually has to be confirmed/clarified!!

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
11 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

I've only asked questions, some of which remains unanswered. I'm interested in how some conclusions appear to have been come to.

Your position is clear. Im on the side of protecting women/girls and you're on the side of men in skirts. No problem. If you can live with that.

11 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

It would appear some don't even know themselves.

You inability to comprehend the answer to your question is not my issue. Maybe stick to hanging around women's toilets. Its simpler.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
13 minutes ago, wil iam not said:

Rather an ambiguous sentence.

Only when quoted in isolation, without the rest of my post.

But of course that was why you did it.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
12 hours ago, CG1 Blue said:

Why are you keen to allow trans women into safe spaces for women and girls?

Sounds like a very poorly disguised fantasy to me.

He hasn't even got the cahones to state his opinion. Doesn't want to out himself 😄

wil iam not Gold Member

wil iam not

Advanced Member
10 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Only when quoted in isolation, without the rest of my post.

But of course that was why you did it.

No, I did it because your sentence is ambiguous and sounds like you are suggesting that the girls stop using the girls' toilets.

the rest of your post was OK.

wil iam not Gold Member

wil iam not

Advanced Member

How would this rule apply to trans men who go for a jimmy in full female attire and make up/hair done up? Which should they use?

Into the bogs, cubicle, do the business, wash hands of course, then out. Who would notice?

There are many women who look more like men anyway, intentionally or naturally, and vice versa.

Emdog Platinum Member

Emdog

Advanced Member

I suppose one could say these rules do mean squat... or is it don't mean squat? So confusing.

youreavinalaff Ruby Member

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Your position is clear. Im on the side of protecting women/girls and you're on the side of men in skirts. No problem. If you can live with that.

You inability to comprehend the answer to your question is not my issue. Maybe stick to hanging around women's toilets. Its simpler.

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Your position is clear. Im on the side of protecting women/girls and you're on the side of men in skirts. No problem. If you can live with that.

You inability to comprehend the answer to your question is not my issue. Maybe stick to hanging around women's toilets. Its simpler.

Funny.

Firstly, if you could point out where I've apparently made my position clear, that would be great, thanks.

Secondly, it's not possible to comprehend the answer to a question when it hasn't been answered.

Thirdly, your attempt to swerve by insinuating and making things up speaks volumes.

Priorexpat Silver Member

Priorexpat

Advanced Member
14 hours ago, wil iam not said:

How about you not going into the wrong toilets, hungover or not, can you not read or recognise pictures?

Why would you be any different from the woman if you had gone into the cubicle, sat down, had your wizz, and left the place, ignoring whoever was also in there.

Because I don't sit down when I urinate?

wil iam not Gold Member

wil iam not

Advanced Member
8 hours ago, Priorexpat said:

Because I don't sit down when I urinate?

Well why not try it next time you use the Ladies.

Actually, it is better for those of us who suffer from weak urination due to prostate problems, it is better to sit to pee, sitzenpinkler in German. 555

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
On 5/22/2026 at 8:42 AM, JonnyF said:

Another case of dumb liberals bringing down western society. The smug look on that clowns face makes me wanna puke.

Of course it is decided by biological sex. I dont want my niece sharing a toilet with a bloke in a skirt pumped full of hormones.

I dont really want to share a toilet with them either but I'll take one for the team (so to speak 😃) if it means teenage girls having safe spaces.

Time for the trans lobby to jog on.

An odd thing to say given this confirmation of the rules has happened under a Labour Government.

Perhaps the previous 14 year Illiberal Government found making a lot of noise about the matter more useful as a distraction to do anything about it.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
On 5/22/2026 at 7:05 PM, JonnyF said:

Impossible to know.

Therefore the best way to protect girls is to stop them using girls toilets. Girls not being raped is more important to me than blokes who think they are women using women's toilets. Let them urinate with the other blokes. I can put up with it to ensure girls safety.

Seems to me you are prepared to break a few eggs to make the ideological omelette. Eggs being young girls innocence.

Not your daughter, right? 🤢

Most rapes occur in domestic settings, the victims own home being the most prevalent location:

“For year ending (YE) March 2020 and YE March 2025 combined, the most common location for rape or assault by penetration to occur was in the victim’s home (38.2%), followed by the perpetrator’s home (28.5%).”

Given your broad perjorative views of who might be the perpetrators, the best way to protect young girls (or indeed anyone) from rape might actually be to isolate all men from their likely victims, mass chemical or physical castration might be a more practical alternative.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/natureofsexualassaultbyrapeorpenetrationenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2025#circumstances-of-the-assault

Priorexpat Silver Member

Priorexpat

Advanced Member
16 hours ago, wil iam not said:

Well why not try it next time you use the Ladies.

Actually, it is better for those of us who suffer from weak urination due to prostate problems, it is better to sit to pee, sitzenpinkler in German. 555

It's not better to sit and pee, the bladder doesn't fully drain and can lead to urinary tract infections.

wil iam not Gold Member

wil iam not

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, Priorexpat said:

It's not better to sit and pee, the bladder doesn't fully drain and can lead to urinary tract infections.

So how does that go for the Ladies?

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
21 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

An odd thing to say given this confirmation of the rules has happened under a Labour Government.

Perhaps the previous 14 year Illiberal Government found making a lot of noise about the matter more useful as a distraction to do anything about it.

Odd that you'd revert to "but but but the Tories" when it was the supreme Court that made the ruling not Labour.

Then Labour softened the statutory code of practice to water down the ruling.

Many Labour mps even suggest the ruling should not be accepted.

Nice try though Higgot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.