Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

UK to Deploy Jets, Drones, Warship to Hormuz Mission

The UK has pledged fighter jets, drones and a warship to a multinational effort aimed at protecting commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important oil transit routes.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The announcement was made on Tuesday by defence minister John Healey during a virtual meeting of defence ministers from countries participating in the initiative. The mission, involving more than 40 nations, is intended to safeguard shipping in the narrow channel linking the Persian Gulf to global markets.

British officials said the operation would begin once conditions allow.

Tensions in the region have been high for months after Iran asserted control over the waterway in response to military strikes by the United States and Israel.

UK military contribution

The UK’s contribution will include autonomous systems designed to detect and clear naval mines, drone boats and Eurofighter Typhoon jets assigned to conduct air patrols over the shipping lanes.

Officials said the mission would be supported by £115m in new funding to expand the use of mine-hunting drones and counter-drone technologies.

A British destroyer, HMS Dragon, which is already travelling toward the Middle East, will be ready to take part in operations aimed at securing the waterway. Another vessel, RFA Lyme Bay, is currently being upgraded with additional equipment in case it is required for deployment.

The UK already has more than 1,000 personnel stationed in the region as part of existing defensive operations. These include counter-drone teams and fast-jet squadrons, according to the UK Ministry of Defence.

Healey said the multinational mission, first announced last month by the UK and France, is intended to reassure shipping companies and restore safe passage through the strait.

“With our allies, this multinational mission will be defensive, independent and credible,” he said in a statement.

Strategic waterway under strain

The Strait of Hormuz carries around 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas shipments. Disruptions there have already pushed global energy prices higher.

Iran has maintained control over the passage in retaliation for military pressure from Washington and its allies. At the same time, the United States has enforced a blockade of Iranian ports in an attempt to force Tehran to accept its terms, a move that has drawn strong criticism from Iran.

Although a ceasefire between the US and Iran has been in place since April, the situation remains fragile. US President Donald Trump recently described the truce as being on “massive life support”.

Both Tehran and Washington have accused each other of launching attacks in the strait during the standoff.

Political backdrop in London

The defence announcement comes as domestic political pressure builds on UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Dozens of Labour MPs have called on him to step down, prompting a show of support from Healey.

In a message posted on X, Healey said Starmer was guiding Britain through a period of international instability and warned that further political turmoil would not be in the country’s interests.

During a cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Starmer did not address calls for his resignation. Instead, discussions focused on the consequences of the Middle East conflict.

A spokesperson for Downing Street said ministers agreed that reopening the Strait of Hormuz to international shipping remained the government’s top priority.

Starmer has repeatedly said the UK should not be “dragged” into the conflict. He has also stated that Britain would not support the ongoing US blockade of Iranian ports.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 May 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

davb Silver Member

davb

Advanced Member

Welcome to the coalition! Trump's diplomatic efforts are paying off as he rallies countries around the world to finally put an end to the evil, despotic Iranian regime.

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
36 minutes ago, davb said:

Welcome to the coalition! Trump's diplomatic efforts are paying off as he rallies countries around the world to finally put an end to the evil, despotic Iranian regime.

It is a group of countries trying to look after their own interests after Trump's unlawful and deranged attack on Iran especially without first consulting the now ex allies!

They are NOT rallying behind him but together under their own flags!

JBChiangRai Diamond Member

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, davb said:

Welcome to the coalition! Trump's diplomatic efforts are paying off as he rallies countries around the world to finally put an end to the evil, despotic Iranian regime.

You mean the sovereign nation of Iran illegally attacked by Israel and it's dog the USA.

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member

The US clearly can't handle the mess it made. The adults need to take over.

Smokey and the Bandit Gold Member

Smokey and the Bandit

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, davb said:

Welcome to the coalition! Trump's diplomatic efforts are paying off as he rallies countries around the world to finally put an end to the evil, despotic Iranian regime.

I agree with your sentiment, but the UK sending one warship, that's gonna take weeks to get there is not gonna make that much difference.

Smokey and the Bandit Gold Member

Smokey and the Bandit

Advanced Member
18 minutes ago, gargamon said:

The US clearly can't handle the mess it made. The adults need to take over.

Are you referring to Starmer as being adult??cheesy

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Are you referring to Starmer as being adult??cheesy

Compared to Trump? You have to ask that?

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, webfact said:

Starmer has repeatedly said the UK should not be “dragged” into the conflict.

Yet here he is getting dragged into it.

What a loser this guy is. A wreck of a man. Lost the plot. Get rid.

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member

I wouldn't get too excited on this development afterall it was a "pledge" and wisely put as "when the condition is right ". UK is diplomatically smart in making foreign policy statements. Can't say the same for the USA side.

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member

Haha starmer falls back in line to follow his master Don

Don’t do it again loser it’s your last chance

VocalNeal Star Member

VocalNeal

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, davb said:

Welcome to the coalition! Trump's diplomatic efforts are paying off as he rallies countries around the world to finally put an end to the evil, despotic Iranian regime.

Maybe Britain is an ally/friend of UAE and/or Bahrain et al who have been attacked by Iran. Neither are in Nato but...

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, VocalNeal said:

Maybe Britain is an ally/friend of UAE and/or Bahrain et al who have been attacked by Iran. Neither are in Nato but...

But they wait two months...

VocalNeal Star Member

VocalNeal

Advanced Member

In WWII the us waited over two years.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
51 minutes ago, VocalNeal said:

In WWII the us waited over two years.

Leftist in office, sorry.

JAG Ruby Member

JAG

Advanced Member

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Yet here he is getting dragged into it.

What a loser this guy is. A wreck of a man. Lost the plot. Get rid.

Still haven't fixed the ridiculously short time the clear previous edit button is displayed I see!

JAG Ruby Member

JAG

Advanced Member

Almost a "leitmotif" running through the whole Iran war, is that it is a response, certainly on the western side, to government leaders finding themselves in political trouble!

VocalNeal Star Member

VocalNeal

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Leftist in office, sorry.

Nothing sinister at all. But I can be dextrous if needed.

shackleton Platinum Member

shackleton

Advanced Member

Good job the UK is only contributing their one and only serviceable warship

What a pathetic state our armed forces are in under a Labour government

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member

Israel's war. Keep your beaks out.

bannork Star Member

bannork

Newsman

A failure of allies to support the US military offensive against Iran was “unconscionable”, the country’s defence secretary has said and warned “we will remember”.

Pete Hegseth and US President Donald Trump have both singled out the UK for criticism in the past over its reluctance to be drawn into the Middle East conflict.

The latest rebuke was contained in a written statement by Mr Hegseth to powerful appropriations subcommittees in Congress which oversee defence spending.

Refusal by allies to back US in war against Iran 'unconscionable', says Hegseth

Mr Hegseth also warned there will be “consequences” for Nato members that “do not step up”.

bannork Star Member

bannork

Newsman
On 5/13/2026 at 7:31 AM, shackleton said:

Good job the UK is only contributing their one and only serviceable warship

What a pathetic state our armed forces are in under a Labour government

How many years were the Tories in power until recently, and what did they do to upgrade the armed forces?

bannork Star Member

bannork

Newsman
On 5/13/2026 at 2:59 AM, EastBayRay said:

Haha starmer falls back in line to follow his master Don

Don’t do it again loser it’s your last chance

Starmer isn't stupid like Trump.

Which other countries apart from Israel have joined Trump's war?

None, because they knew it would close the Strait of Hormuz and to beat Iran militarily would be impossible as the US has found to its cost.

bannork Star Member

bannork

Newsman

download (10).jpg

Thomas Friedman

NATO rescue plea as Trump Iran crisis deepens

A Nobel Prize-winning economist has launched a dramatic plea to NATO as the fallout from President Donald Trump’s decision to launch war on Iran continues to deepen. And the warning could not be starker.

Writing in the New York Times, economist Thomas Friedman urged the Western alliance to rush naval forces to the Persian Gulf before tensions spiral even further. His target? An increasingly volatile standoff over Iran and the Strait of Hormuz — one of the world’s most critical shipping routes.

But Friedman did not hold back when it came to Trump himself. In a blistering assessment, he accused the president of having “no strategy” and claimed the U.S. leader “sounds more and more unhinged every day.”

The explosive appeal came despite Friedman openly acknowledging that many NATO allies deeply distrust Trump. He listed a string of grievances, from Trump walking away from Ukraine to threatening Greenland and Canada, while also accusing him of cozying up to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Friedman even pointed to recent tensions with Germany, noting that the German chancellor had claimed Trump’s America was being “humiliated” by Iran. Yet despite all of that bad blood, Friedman insisted NATO must act now.

“Now get over it,” he pleaded, demanding the alliance send its navies to join the American armada in the Persian Gulf. The goal? To make clear that Iran cannot control access through the Strait of Hormuz.

The stakes, Friedman warned, stretch far beyond the Middle East.

He argued that allowing Iran to impose any kind of control over the strait could trigger dangerous consequences across the globe. According to Friedman, Tehran has already created a new body called the Persian Gulf Strait Authority, which seeks to position Iran as the authority deciding which ships can pass through the waterway.

And that, he warned, could open the floodgates for other nations to impose similar restrictions on key global shipping lanes. A terrifying precedent.

“The last thing we should want,” Friedman wrote, “is for those concessions to include any special right for Iran to set up a tollbooth to shake down ships.”

Friedman’s second major concern centered squarely on Trump’s handling of the crisis. He argued the administration had failed to think through the consequences of its actions and accused Trump of contradicting himself publicly.

He highlighted a Truth Social post in which Trump blasted Iran’s response to a peace proposal as “totally unacceptable” while simultaneously referring to Iranian negotiators as “so-called Representatives.”

Friedman seized on the contradiction, asking why the administration had negotiated with those same officials for weeks if they were not legitimate representatives. He also suggested that the killing of senior Iranian leaders by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may have undermined any chance of reaching a meaningful agreement.

“You thought the regime would collapse, but instead you hardened it,” Friedman warned.

The economist also acknowledged why NATO countries may hesitate to jump into the crisis. After years of insults and tensions with Trump, Friedman admitted many allies may prefer to stand back and let Trump and Netanyahu “reap what they sowed.”

Still, he warned that the consequences of inaction could be devastating if Iran emerges from the conflict stronger than before.

Yet even as he issued the urgent appeal, Friedman sounded pessimistic about NATO stepping in. He concluded that Trump and Netanyahu had done little to earn the alliance’s support, despite the enormous importance of keeping the Strait of Hormuz open. His final prediction was bleak.

“Our NATO allies will almost surely reject this appeal,” Friedman wrote.

Nobel economist begs NATO for help with Iran: Trump has 'no strategy'

BarraMarra Ruby Member

BarraMarra

Advanced Member
On 5/13/2026 at 3:11 AM, Yellowtail said:

But they wait two months...

You lot waited 2 years to join us in WW2, and that was only because you got your Arses kicked by the Japanese lol.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

You lot waited 2 years to join us in WW2, and that was only because you got your Arses kicked by the Japanese lol.

Yeah, we had a leftist in the White House at the time, sorry.

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

You lot waited 2 years to join us in WW2, and that was only because you got your Arses kicked by the Japanese lol.

And they only joined in the war in Europe because both Germany and Italy declared war on the US on 11 Dec 1941. If they had not done so it is unlikely that the US would have become entnagled in it!

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

And they only joined in the war in Europe because both Germany and Italy declared war on the US on 11 Dec 1941. If they had not done so it is unlikely that the US would have become entnagled in it!

Again, we had a feckless leftist (redundant) in the White House at the time.

BarraMarra Ruby Member

BarraMarra

Advanced Member

To be honest Scottie the Yanks are mostly bluster when it comes to the push there found wanting because they lack the will to fight when the going gets tough such as Viet, Afgahn, and now Iran. Whats the next OPP going to be called Opperation Evade and Distance.

JBChiangRai Diamond Member

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member
13 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Yeah, we had a leftist in the White House at the time, sorry.

Until you yanks can stop with the leftist this and rightist that, you're condemned to a dreadful future.

Try thinking American this, American that, one people, one people under god, now where is that written?

3NUMBAS Ruby Member

3NUMBAS

Advanced Member
23 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

You lot waited 2 years to join us in WW2, and that was only because you got your Arses kicked by the Japanese lol.

The us ignored U.K. intel about Japanese was going to bomb us assets

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.