Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

US did not share details with the UK before attacking Iran

The United States did not provide the United Kingdom with exact operational details or timings before launching joint airstrikes with Israel on Iran, according to government sources, in a move that has exposed tensions between Washington and London over the widening Middle East conflict.

Get the latest headlines in your email subscribe-orange.png

The decision to withhold precise information came as British Prime Minister Keir Starmer initially declined a U.S. request to use British military bases for the offensive operation. Sources said that while the UK was aware action was likely, it was not formally briefed on the exact moment or scope of the strikes.

The airstrikes — carried out by the U.S. and Israel — killed Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, along with dozens of senior military figures, dramatically escalating the conflict.

Intelligence but no tipoff

A Whitehall source said Britain knew military action was imminent because of the buildup of equipment moving through allied channels and intelligence shared “via the usual channels.” However, the UK was not given advance notice of the precise timing or operational details of the attack.

The British government evacuated its embassy staff from Tehran on Friday, signaling that it believed strikes were coming. Still, officials were not informed about when over the weekend the operation would unfold.

Government insiders said the UK is typically closely aligned with the U.S. on military matters, making it difficult to judge whether this level of limited notification was unusual. However, the absence of detailed coordination underscores strains in what is often described as the “special relationship.”

Trump criticizes Starmer

U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly criticized Starmer for refusing to allow American forces to use British bases for the initial strikes. Trump reportedly said the special relationship was “not what it was” and dismissed Starmer as “no Churchill.”

In the days following the attack, Starmer reversed course in part, granting permission for U.S. forces to use British bases for defensive strikes aimed at degrading Iran’s missile capabilities after Tehran retaliated against targets in the Gulf.

The shift reflects the delicate balance the British government is attempting to maintain: avoiding direct involvement in offensive operations while protecting British personnel and regional allies from retaliatory attacks.

Starmer defends “special relationship”

Facing criticism in Parliament, Starmer robustly defended his approach during Prime Minister’s Questions. Conservative MP Gareth Bacon challenged him on whether his handling of the crisis had strengthened or weakened ties with Washington.

Starmer responded that British military deployments had been under way for weeks and were coordinated with U.S. forces. He emphasized that British assets were actively protecting American personnel and interests in the region.

“The American planes are operating out of British bases,” Starmer told MPs. “That is the special relationship in action. British jets are shooting down drones and missiles to protect American lives in the Middle East on our joint bases. That is the special relationship in action.”

He added that intelligence sharing between the two countries continued daily, arguing that cooperation on defense and security — rather than rhetorical exchanges — defines the alliance.

Military deployments across the region

According to the prime minister, British deployments include radar systems, ground-based air defenses, counter-drone systems and fighter jets. Since the start of the escalation, multiple F-35 and Typhoon aircraft have been operating not only in the Middle East but also from Cyprus.

Further missions were flown overnight, with Typhoon jets defending Qatar and F-35s protecting other regional partners. The UK government framed these deployments as defensive in nature and focused on protecting lives and regional stability rather than conducting offensive strikes.

A spokesperson for the prime minister reiterated that Starmer would only authorize actions deemed in Britain’s national interest and necessary to keep British citizens safe.

Strains but continued cooperation

Despite the lack of detailed advance notice, officials stressed that U.S.-UK military coordination remains extensive. American aircraft continue to operate from British bases, and intelligence cooperation has not been suspended.

However, the episode highlights a moment of friction in the transatlantic alliance at a time of heightened global instability. While both governments maintain that the special relationship endures, differences over operational decisions and political messaging have revealed a more complicated dynamic behind the scenes.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 04.03 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Smokey and the Bandit Gold Member

Smokey and the Bandit

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

The Prince of Wales is not "out of action".

Until yesterday, it was effectively out of action due to planned maintenance on its flight deck.

As of today, Sunday, March 8, 2026, the status has shifted from "maintenance" to "Advanced Readiness."

But whatever its too little and far too late!

Scouse123 Ruby Member

Scouse123

Advanced Member
10 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Until yesterday, it was effectively out of action due to planned maintenance on its flight deck.

As of today, Sunday, March 8, 2026, the status has shifted from "maintenance" to "Advanced Readiness."

But whatever its too little and far too late!

And that is also what Trump has just said.

This is typical Starmer pandering to the Muslim vote. He'll be gone soon, and after the next election, so will the Labour party.

Scouse123 Ruby Member

Scouse123

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Why do you assume Muslim immigrants in the US are not involved in the "war"?

4 hours ago, Purdey said:

Nice to see the muslim immigrants in the USA are not involved in the war. Fully expected then to be at one point.

Muslims DO NOT CARE about right or wrong; they will just side with Muslims.

Truth or justification, etc., is ALWAYS TRUMPED by the fact that they choose the Muslim side, which is usually the wrong choice!

lavender19 Silver Member

lavender19

Advanced Member

Can you blame him not trusting that spineless Muslim loving wet wipe. Did you see him with the Palestinian guy. Christ they were nearly humping each other. Disgusting

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Until yesterday, it was effectively out of action due to planned maintenance on its flight deck.

As of today, Sunday, March 8, 2026, the status has shifted from "maintenance" to "Advanced Readiness."

But whatever its too little and far too late!

Based on what you read in an article written by a spotty 20 year old. Getting sick of these pseudo-Patriots like you continuously denigrating the Armed Forces at every opportunity.

Its far too <deleted> late, because unlike Reagan, Bush, this President didn't bother to consult with allies about what on earth he was doing. He just regards us as vassals and real estate.

British forces should only be used to defend and protect British interests. America has been reckless in exposing 300,000 Britons to harm and death. They don't care, and are in cahoots with the marxist MEK, because they are just so dumb. Its going to be the ruin of all of us.

Smokey and the Bandit Gold Member

Smokey and the Bandit

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Roadsternut said:

Based on what you read in an article written by a spotty 20 year old. Getting sick of these pseudo-Patriots like you continuously denigrating the Armed Forces at every opportunity.

Its far too <deleted> late, because unlike Reagan, Bush, this President didn't bother to consult with allies about what on earth he was doing. He just regards us as vassals and real estate.

British forces should only be used to defend and protect British interests. America has been reckless in exposing 300,000 Britons to harm and death. They don't care, and are in cahoots with the marxist MEK, because they are just so dumb. Its going to be the ruin of all of us.

Oh dear,

The HMS Prince of Wales was officially on 14-day notice for maintenance until just yesterday, March 7, when it was finally moved to "Advanced Readiness" at five days' notice. Pointing this out isn't denigrating the troops; it’s identifying a clear failure of political foresight. If Starmer had prioritized readiness on February 28, the ship wouldn't have been caught halfway through a maintenance cycle while the Middle East was already under fire.

The claim that the U.S. failed to "consult" the UK also falls apart under scrutiny. In reality,

Starmer was consulted and chose to opt out of the initial February 28 strikes, explicitly denying the U.S. permission to use British bases like RAF Fairford and Diego Garcia for offensive missions.

He insisted on a "legal review" to avoid being complicit in what he called "regime change from the skies," effectively telling our closest ally "no" during the most critical opening hours of the conflict.

Trump’s anger isn't because he treats the UK as a "vassal," but because Starmer acted like a reluctant bystander while American and Omani interests were being targeted.

Furthermore, the argument that Starmer is "defending British interests" by staying out of it is a dangerous reversal of the truth. It is Iranian drones and missiles that have spent the last week hitting the airports and hotels where 300,000 Britons are currently trapped.

By refusing to join the preemptive strikes aimed at "blinding" Iranian launch sites on Day 1, Starmer arguably left those British citizens more exposed to the retaliatory drone swarms that hit Cyprus and Bahrain shortly after.

The current "deep hole" the UK finds itself in isn't a result of U.S. recklessness; it’s the direct consequence of a Prime Minister who chose legalistic hand-wringing over the immediate protection of his own people and allies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.