Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

US Policy Shift Sparks New Row Over Falklands Sovereignty

The UK government has reiterated that sovereignty over the Falkland Islands rests with Britain after reports suggested the United States could reconsider its stance on the disputed territory. Downing Street issued the statement following a Reuters report about an internal Pentagon email that allegedly outlined potential diplomatic measures against NATO allies considered unsupportive of the US during its war with Iran.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

Among the options discussed in the reported message was the possibility of reviewing Washington’s position on Britain’s claim to the Falkland Islands. The email also reportedly raised the idea of seeking Spain’s suspension from NATO due to its opposition to the conflict.

The British government responded by stressing that the status of the islands is not in question.

UK Emphasises Islanders’ Right to Decide

A spokesperson for the prime minister said the Falkland Islands had voted overwhelmingly to remain a British Overseas Territory and that the government continues to support the principle of self-determination.

“The Falkland Islands have hugely voted overwhelmingly in favour of remaining a UK overseas territory,” the spokesperson said. “We have always stood behind the islanders’ right to self-determination and the fact that sovereignty rests with the UK.”

The official added that the government’s position has been communicated clearly to successive US administrations.

“We could not be clearer about the UK’s position,” the spokesperson said. “Sovereignty rests with the UK and the islanders’ right to self-determination is paramount.”

BBC News said it has not seen the reported Pentagon email and has contacted the US Department of Defense for comment.

NATO Membership Question Raised

The internal communication cited by Reuters reportedly proposed several measures involving NATO partners. One suggestion included seeking Spain’s suspension from the alliance because of its stance against the US military campaign in Iran.

However, a NATO official indicated that the organisation’s founding treaty does not contain any provision allowing for the suspension or expulsion of member states.

Spain’s Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, also played down the significance of the report, saying his government responds only to formal positions issued by Washington.

“We do not work based on emails,” he said. “We work with official documents and official positions taken, in this case, by the government of the United States.”

Long-Running Dispute With Argentina

The Falkland Islands, located in the South Atlantic about 300 miles (480km) east of Argentina, have long been the subject of a sovereignty dispute between London and Buenos Aires.

Tensions over the territory escalated in 1982 when Argentina’s military ruler at the time, Leopoldo Galtieri, ordered forces to seize the islands. Britain responded by sending a naval task force to retake the territory.

After a 10-week conflict, Argentine forces surrendered. The war resulted in the deaths of 649 Argentine military personnel, 255 British service members and three Falkland Islanders.

Argentina continues to claim sovereignty over the territory, referring to it as the Malvinas.

Diplomatic Tensions With Washington

The report about the possible policy review comes amid strains between the US and the UK over the conflict involving Iran.

President Donald Trump has previously expressed dissatisfaction with the level of British support for the US campaign. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has repeatedly said Britain will not become involved in a broader regional war.

The development also surfaced just days before King Charles and Queen Camilla were scheduled to travel to Washington for a visit that includes a meeting with President Trump at the White House.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 24 April 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, BusyB said:

In 1953 the US at the behest of the UK deposed a democratically elected Iranian government, imposed the Shah tyranny and kept it going for so long the Iranians desperately turned to Khomeini for rescue. To plunder Iranian oil. The US is largely responsible in every way for the plight of Iran and the Iranian people today. They turned in desperation to Khomeini as the only unifier available. And have suffered under religious tyranny since - a tyranny strengthened by US behavior.

Iran has NEVER threatened the US. It has occasionally carried out hostile and murderous acts. That you fail to comprehend the country's hostility towards you is a measure of your comprehension of the world in general.

Perhaps if you exercised kindness and support, shared your wealth and power, instead of tearing up functioning nuclear treaties to stir up the hostility again, you might find what a peace loving and generous people they are. I've only ever met kind and gracious Iranians (not many I admit, but ALL kind and gracious) They have certainly suffered appallingly as a result of US hegemony as much as religious tyranny. Not least in recent weeks.

Americans whinge about the price of gas. Iranians are now scratching for food thanks to them.

Did the Biden Administration not try kindness, support, and sharing the wealth with Iran for four years?

Was Iran not involved in the attempted assassination of Trump and other US officials during the 2024 election?

Do you think Iran should be allowed to continue developing their nuclear and interconnectable ballistic missile programs?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, BusyB said:

Russia obviously.

And we can no longer rely on the US. It supports Russia. Directly and indirectly. Openly prefers it. Literally bows down to it. That is a sea change in global alliances and we're responding to it.

The EU can be slow and comfy a lot of the time, that makes it reliable and benevolent and it works. And we can also be very fast and exceedingly efficient and powerful when responding to threats of any nature. (Including the US attempt to bust the euro back then ;D)

How is the US supporting Russia, oil prices?

BusyB Platinum Member

BusyB

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Bang on brother - when you realise that the US has killed 10s of millions in their rapacious economic empire whilst screaming democracy and "freedom" your whole life will change.

I'm sure the only reason Europeans see the US as so benevolent is because the bunker busters weren't falling on our air raid shelters and the napalm wasn't gushing through our towns and villages.

But since Iraq we've been wising up.

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
16 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

I asked Deep Seek what they thought !

So you cannot think for yourself and "ask" a Chinese mouthpiece for its "sage advice!!

BusyB Platinum Member

BusyB

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Did the Biden Administration not try kindness, support, and sharing the wealth with Iran for four years?

I don't know about Biden, but I do know that Trump tore up a (one of many) functioning treaty that was bringing certainty about the country's nuclear program and assets as well as some serious economic relief to the country at last. A treaty backed by many democratic countries. And obviously followed wisely by Biden.

We now have to deal with the economic fall out from the US' latest contemptible war of choice. NOT TRUMP note - you elected him, it's what you want. Blaming Trump is like saying Adolf killed 6 million. It took millions of Germans to do what 'Adolf' did. And 'Trump' and his disgraceful regime are supported by tens of millions of AMERICANS.

Sadly for the decent ones the world is now responding to that, like they did with Germany. Serious change is afoot and you have none but yourselves to blame.

I am not aware of any Iranian attempt to assassinate Trump, but I'm open to factual evidence. I think the ear twitcher got closer to Ol Bone Spurs, and that was (like 9-11) a US security lapse.

BusyB Platinum Member

BusyB

Advanced Member
15 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Do you think Iran should be allowed to continue developing their nuclear and interconnectable ballistic missile programs?

Of course not. But they weren't under the treaty Trump tore up. Normality was gradually moving in.

It's logical they resumed it again. I would have.

And let's face it, Trump wouldn't dare start bombing N. Korea now would he? He'd rather genuflect to Little Rocket Man. Wonder why ...

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, BusyB said:

Of course not. But they weren't under the treaty Trump tore up. Normality was gradually moving in.

It's logical they resumed it again. I would have.

And let's face it, Trump wouldn't dare start bombing N. Korea now would he? He'd rather genuflect to Little Rocket Man. Wonder why ...

Trump did not tear up a treaty. He got out of the JCPOA, which was an agreement between Obama, Iran and the UN. Had it been a treaty, Trump could not have pulled out.

The JCPOA did not do anything to stop Iran's nuclear program, except to limit uranium enrichment levels, and it had a ten-year sunset that removed all restrictions. The JCPOA also did not facilitate unscheduled inspections, making it largely useless. It die provide Iran with much needed funding to build up their military and fund their proxies.

The JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's intercontinental ballistic missile program, but it did fund it.

North Korea is not chanting "death to America", but do you really want another North Korea?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
22 minutes ago, BusyB said:

I don't know about Biden, but I do know that Trump tore up a (one of many) functioning treaty that was bringing certainty about the country's nuclear program and assets as well as some serious economic relief to the country at last. A treaty backed by many democratic countries. And obviously followed wisely by Biden.

We now have to deal with the economic fall out from the US' latest contemptible war of choice. NOT TRUMP note - you elected him, it's what you want. Blaming Trump is like saying Adolf killed 6 million. It took millions of Germans to do what 'Adolf' did. And 'Trump' and his disgraceful regime are supported by tens of millions of AMERICANS.

Sadly for the decent ones the world is now responding to that, like they did with Germany. Serious change is afoot and you have none but yourselves to blame.

I am not aware of any Iranian attempt to assassinate Trump, but I'm open to factual evidence. I think the ear twitcher got closer to Ol Bone Spurs, and that was (like 9-11) a US security lapse.

Well, I know about Biden, he begged Iran come to the table, and he lifted sanctions (like he did Russia), further Iran's military and terrorist proxies.

beautifulthailand99 Ruby Member

beautifulthailand99

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Trump did not tear up a treaty. He got out of the JCPOA, which was an agreement between Obama, Iran and the UN. Had it been a treaty, Trump could not have pulled out.

The JCPOA did not do anything to stop Iran's nuclear program, except to limit uranium enrichment levels, and it had a ten-year sunset that removed all restrictions. The JCPOA also did not facilitate unscheduled inspections, making it largely useless. It die provide Iran with much needed funding to build up their military and fund their proxies.

The JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's intercontinental ballistic missile program, but it did fund it.

North Korea is not chanting "death to America", but do you really want another North Korea?

This tired trope of Death to America is really tiresome - is that best you got they kept shouting nasty things at us so we had to kill them ? Ditto burning or trampling over flags - grow up America and stop behaving like a spoilt teenager on steroids with a sugar habit and too many guns. For the rest of the world Trump is as good excuse to ignore you until and if you come to your senses. If not we will happily leave you to rot in peace. You had your day in the sun like every other dog.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
17 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

This tired trope of Death to America is really tiresome - is that best you got they kept shouting nasty things at us so we had to kill them ? Ditto burning or trampling over flags - grow up America and stop behaving like a spoilt teenager on steroids with a sugar habit and too many guns. For the rest of the world Trump is as good excuse to ignore you until and if you come to your senses. If not we will happily leave you to rot in peace. You had your day in the sun like every other dog.

That's all you have on Trump

beautifulthailand99 Ruby Member

beautifulthailand99

Advanced Member
56 minutes ago, BusyB said:

I don't know about Biden, but I do know that Trump tore up a (one of many) functioning treaty that was bringing certainty about the country's nuclear program and assets as well as some serious economic relief to the country at last. A treaty backed by many democratic countries. And obviously followed wisely by Biden.

We now have to deal with the economic fall out from the US' latest contemptible war of choice. NOT TRUMP note - you elected him, it's what you want. Blaming Trump is like saying Adolf killed 6 million. It took millions of Germans to do what 'Adolf' did. And 'Trump' and his disgraceful regime are supported by tens of millions of AMERICANS.

Sadly for the decent ones the world is now responding to that, like they did with Germany. Serious change is afoot and you have none but yourselves to blame.

I am not aware of any Iranian attempt to assassinate Trump, but I'm open to factual evidence. I think the ear twitcher got closer to Ol Bone Spurs, and that was (like 9-11) a US security lapse.

One was a pro-Ukrainian kook who had volunteered over there. But he didn't have the cards.

BLMFem Star Member

BLMFem

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Was Iran not involved in the attempted assassination of Trump and other US officials during the 2024 election?

What are you on about? Do you mean the infamous "earsassination" scam? That was highly likely arranged with the help of Mossad.

BLMFem Star Member

BLMFem

Advanced Member
43 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Trump did not tear up a treaty. He got out of the JCPOA, which was an agreement between Obama, Iran and the UN. Had it been a treaty, Trump could not have pulled out.

What??🤣

Grok (AI):

image.png

Palatus Senior Member

Palatus

Member

Perhaps it is time for Spain to apply t for the return of Arizona, California, New Mexico , Colorado etc.

beautifulthailand99 Ruby Member

beautifulthailand99

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, Palatus said:

Perhaps it is time for Spain to apply t for the return of Arizona, California, New Mexico , Colorado etc.

It’s all an invention - maps drawn on the skin and bones of the unwary, framed by a language we didn't choose and flags waved at naked made up emperors. Once you realize the game is a fiction, you can finally stop playing. Then, and only then, can you die happy. And I just made all that up.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
22 minutes ago, Palatus said:

Perhaps it is time for Spain to apply t for the return of Arizona, California, New Mexico , Colorado etc.

you mean the land the Spanish stole from the Aztec Empire?

uncletiger Advanced Member

uncletiger

Member
19 hours ago, Bannoi said:

You mean the USA

The USA is a vassal state of the City of London and European Globalists. Europe also created and manipulates Israel to be the US's handler. Make no mistake, the European Globalist criminal syndicate is above both the USA and Israel in the hierarchy of evil. The fact that they have used the USA to do their dirty work doesn't change this.

Rimmer Star Member

Rimmer

Admin

A cartoon video with no dialogue has been removed also a post purposely misspelling politicians names.

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

During the Korean war, the Chinese fought the United States to a standstill. And the US had a big army there. But you think it would have been a wise decision for the British with supply lines that would be thousands of miles long , to fight against the Chinese right on their border?

No wonder you unfailingly approve of Trump''s strategy, such as it is, in the Iran war

How long was our supply line to Okinawa and Normandy.

The days of British greatness, built on the blood and treasure of the "lesser races", are over.

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Bang on brother - when you realise that the US has killed 10s of millions in their rapacious economic empire whilst screaming democracy and "freedom" your whole life will change

10s of millions LOL. The hysterical lunacy is increasing to a frenzy of delusion 555555555555555555

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

you mean the land the Spanish stole from the Aztec Empire?

You mean the land the Aztecs stole from the Alcohua?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

You mean the land the Aztecs stole from the Alcohua?

But but but Trump!

BarraMarra Ruby Member

BarraMarra

Advanced Member

There has been a video floating around on here what a MAGA fan is all about. Im no longer taking there bait so i do not answer there post's but to the newbies should look at it and listen to what he say's such as if you post something they don't or can't answer they will change the post and bring up Biden or Obama its called deflection, hit them with something they can't den'y and they will bring older names into the thread or will try to insult you its how they work and it gets there post counts up.

BusyB Platinum Member

BusyB

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

This tired trope of Death to America is really tiresome - is that best you got they kept shouting nasty things at us so we had to kill them ? Ditto burning or trampling over flags - grow up America and stop behaving like a spoilt teenager on steroids with a sugar habit and too many guns. For the rest of the world Trump is as good excuse to ignore you until and if you come to your senses. If not we will happily leave you to rot in peace. You had your day in the sun like every other dog.

The problem is it's not just Trump is it?

It's the millions of mentally and morally challenged that elected him in full knowledge of what an appalling disgrace of barely a human he is.

The US has given up any pretense of being civilized and enlightened since it elected GWB for a second term. It's a barbarian, rogue, bullying nation that despises its former allies and friends for being 'weak'. And its opposition, such as still exists, has proven incapable of stopping the developments.

It's not Trump at all - he's just a symptom. Their mouthpiece. Their idol.

It's gonna take a generation at least for the US to get sorted and return to some form of decency. If it ever does with Project 2025 already bearing down. This lot has been quietly beavering away at this since GWBush and the hanging chards. They have no values in common with the enlightened free 'west', from Australia, via Japan and S. Korea, to Europe and, hohoho, Greenland.

As you point out, they are also extremely thin skinned, fearful and insecure and easily provoked. Like their felon in chief.

And guess what, they are all mostly 'deeply religious' 'christian' loonytics. Mirror images of the mullahs and with pretty much the same approach to a modern changing world they don't understand in the slightest.

That's why they're so frightened and touchy to the point of warfare.

Replacing Trump won't change things for the better at all. Just look at the horrors waiting in the Republican wings.

And despite the flashes of occasional light (pun intended) in the dems like Ossoff et al, that party has been bought by the same ones who bought the Reps.

Bannoi Silver Member

Bannoi

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

So you cannot think for yourself and "ask" a Chinese mouthpiece for its "sage advice!!

Unfortunately thats the way the whole world seems to be evolving if it carries on humanity may lose the ability to think for itself altogether we will be controlled by computers and algorithms.

Computer software will make all our decisions for us tell us what to do how to act even how we are feeling.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, uncletiger said:

The USA is a vassal state of the City of London and European Globalists. Europe also created and manipulates Israel to be the US's handler. Make no mistake, the European Globalist criminal syndicate is above both the USA and Israel in the hierarchy of evil. The fact that they have used the USA to do their dirty work doesn't change this.

By "the City of London and European Globalists", your sort really means the Jews, right?

Loon.

Patong2021 Diamond Member

Patong2021

Advanced Member

They were not and have never been a part of Argentina. The Argentine claim to the Falklands was never established and rests solely on the former presence of the Spanish on the island. Using the Argentine logic, the USA, Germany, French and Portuguese could make a claim too since they all had whaling/seal killing stations. It was only the British who had invested in building long term settlements and who established a legal claim in 1833. The Argentinians never had a population, nor a colony on the Falklands. The did try to establish a penal colony and it failed. Today, the local inhabitants do not want anything to do with the Falklands.

A close reading of the US position accepts the will of the Falklands people. To do otherwise, is to greenlight a Chinese invasion of Taiwan and to facilitate Chinese expansion in the South China Sea, which the USA is opposed to. The Falklands is British and this is undeniable. The financially insolvent and inept Argentinians should find another national rallying focus, like maybe an effort to end corruption?

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
11 hours ago, Palatus said:

I suppose you must be American, open mouth first then think about it later? The uninhabited Falkland islands were originally claimed by the British for Britain in 1765, before Argentina even came into existence.

Come to think of it before your mob became a country also. #arroganceknowsnobounds

Sometimes Yagoda seems very Russian. "Yagoda" is a Russian word and name. Don't recall that he or she has identified themselves as American. I've always assumed they are a Russian.

beautifulthailand99 Ruby Member

beautifulthailand99

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, Yagoda said:

10s of millions LOL. The hysterical lunacy is increasing to a frenzy of delusion 555555555555555555

Ah a US genocide denier - noted. I asked Gemini - they are up there with your mates the Nazis.

The Grand Total

If you aggregate these major conflicts along with smaller interventions (Grenada, Panama, various African and Balkan involvements), most academic and independent estimates range between 10 million and 20 million deaths.

  • Conservative estimates: Focus only on direct military action and confirmed civilian "collateral damage," usually landing around 7–10 million.

  • Broader estimates: Include the "Colonel class" style coups and the long-term ripple effects of infrastructure collapse, which push the figure toward 20 million or more.

4. Why the numbers vary so much

  • State Proliferation: It is hard to distinguish between deaths caused specifically by U.S. actions and those caused by the local regimes or opposing superpowers (like the USSR or China) that the U.S. was fighting at the time.

  • Economic Sanctions: Some researchers include deaths from sanctions (notably in Iraq during the 1990s), while others argue these are not "prosecution of war" in the traditional sense.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
14 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

They were not and have never been a part of Argentina. The Argentine claim to the Falklands was never established and rests solely on the former presence of the Spanish on the island. Using the Argentine logic, the USA, Germany, French and Portuguese could make a claim too since they all had whaling/seal killing stations. It was only the British who had invested in building long term settlements and who established a legal claim in 1833. The Argentinians never had a population, nor a colony on the Falklands. The did try to establish a penal colony and it failed. Today, the local inhabitants do not want anything to do with the Falklands.

A close reading of the US position accepts the will of the Falklands people. To do otherwise, is to greenlight a Chinese invasion of Taiwan and to facilitate Chinese expansion in the South China Sea, which the USA is opposed to. The Falklands is British and this is undeniable. The financially insolvent and inept Argentinians should find another national rallying focus, like maybe an effort to end corruption?

The reason they invaded in 1982 was because they (the Argenitinan government) was insolvent and inept. Classic distraction. Economically confident countries generally don't attack others.

Prior to the Falklands War, the US took a neutral stance over the Falklands. Jeane Kirkpatrick wanted the US to take the side of Argentina in the conflict, at the very least, blocking weapon sales to the UK. Other notable politicians who backed Argentina were Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms.

While the US supports the right of the Falkland Islanders to self determination, it has never taken a formal position on the sovereignty of the Islands. Notably, when the Falkland Islanders voted in a referendum to remain British, Victoria Nuland stated "We obviously recognize the de facto administration of the islands by the United Kingdom, but we take no position on sovereignty". Notably to this day, the State Department will also use the alternative name for the islands, the Malvinas.

In December last yer, Denmark transferred F16s, funded by the US, to Argentina.

https://ar.usembassy.gov/first-f-16-fighter-jets-arrive-in-argentina-with-u-s-support/

This was despite vociferous British opposition to arming a state that has an unresolved territorial dispute with the United Kingdom. This ends a US embargo on arms sales to Argentina that's been in place since 1982. War with Chile or Brazil is unlikely. There was only one reason Argentina wanted fighter jets.

While the deal was originally hatched during the Biden regime, it was pushed home by the Trump regime.

However the nugget of the deal actually started under Trump Mk1:

https://en.mercopress.com/2023/01/02/us-favors-supplying-argentina-with-vintage-f16s-to-counter-chinese-influence-and-despite-uk-s-objection

Venezuela is an example of a South American country flooded with modern American weaponry, but nevertheless adopting an Anti-Washington tone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.