canuckamuck

3 minutes ago, RichardColeman said:

And just what exactly are you - and any other vaccine fearers - going to do if it is insisted on as a visa point for Thailand ? If you must show vaccine taken at immigration when incoming and for visa extension renewals after ? 

My kids have all the regular vaccinations. My concern is with the rush job. Vaccine injuries are no laughing matter.

32 minutes ago, sungod said:

Who says the the vaccine is more risky, the experts developing it or those posting on Thai visa? I know who i would back!

Post 18 addresses some situational realities. 

Should we abandon vaccine trials now, because of Covid? Your real question should be who says its safe? And how much do they get paid if we believe them.

7 minutes ago, scorecard said:

But who says the vaccine is risky?

It take years to ensure a vaccine is safe and even approved vaccines injure people every year. So therefore this vaccine will be risky. But on top of that, the vaccine being developed is an mRNA vaccine which will essential modify your DNA. That has not been done before. The trial evidence is insufficient, and therefore it is risky. Especially if have not yet had children.

The only people that should consider a vaccine are those at high risk.

20 minutes ago, J Town said:

1 October 2020 will go down in history as the day liberals starting to believe in god and 45 supporters started to believe in science.

That is so true.

26 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Make no bones about this, hospitalization is a big deal. 80% of infected cases don’t need to go to the hospital. WH has been totally non-transparent about his actual condition and none of the WH physician has made any official statement. This is worrisome. The next thing to watch whether he will remain in the Covid unit where he will be treated and monitored. If his health deteriorated further, he will move to the ICU where intubation and ventilator will be decided by the physicians. At his age, putting on a ventilator will be touch and go. Only decent to wish him all the best. 

 

 

There is a presidential suite there and an office. So why not work from there, makes good sense.

33 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

Yeah, now compare this with your original post where you celebrated it as a 'brilliant move'. Then try to read my post again. The option raised above is addressed.

It's all theater. If he actually has it, he will use it to his advantage. If it's a ploy, it is a good one.

Brilliant can be be used as advantageous rather than only intentional. 

1 minute ago, Morch said:

 

Not sure which narrative you're pushing (but not expecting consistency anyway).

 

What's a 'brilliant move'? Getting infected with Covid-19? Do you mean Trump did so intentionally? If so, how is it 'brilliant'? If it happened by chance, how is it a 'move'?

 

Now, on the other hand, if you wish to imply there's no real infection and it's a (yeah...) 'hoax' - then what 'recovery' are you on about? And given it will be leaked eventually, does the President need another instance of lies and misinformation regarding Covid-19?

He may not even have it. But it is advantageous, either way, if he survives.

48 minutes ago, J Town said:

Nope. He started an economic war with China that everyone around him told him not to do, but he's a spoiled man-child that just grabs at the nearest, shiniest object.

Poor China!, What is the death toll so far from this war?

4 minutes ago, serenedion said:

Even if you're nonsense about the previous presidents being narcissistic psycopaths were true, why leave out Reagan. Or does the brutal wars he illegally supported in Central America not count?

You could add many

8 minutes ago, polpott said:

Trump has set the bar on sympathy. After publicly mocking a disabled reporter, publicly mocking Clinton's pneumonia, he can have no argument with the world mocking him now.

 

Don't blame "Chainea", his illness is completely self inflicted, he was told to wear a mask, told to social distance but declared the medical experts, "Wrong, I disagree with them". Lets see if he disagrees with the medical advice he's getting now.

Trump doesn't care too much about feelings. As it should be. 

8 hours ago, PremiumLane said:

Is this the right-wing PC word for fascist now? ???? 

Sorry please include a subject when making a sentence.

Just now, Morch said:

 

That's your opinion. And given that you're strongly biased the other way, nor providing any sort of even semi objective support for your claim, they are on par with the other poster's comments.

 

See the link provided above. Try and figure it out. It's not too hard.

My support for my claim is that they attack the Republicans, No matter what. And they fall all over themselves for the Democrats. If you can't see it you don't want to see it. And me being biased is my right, but I am not strongly in favor of any political activity currently. I just see the Democrats as the most dangerous.

4 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

Did the complaint had anything to do with reporting the news? Or rather with opinion columns? I do not denying the NYT leanings (if not characterizing them quite as extreme as some you do) - in fact, it appears in the link provided. Educate yourself? Try and comprehend the difference between reliability or factual and bias. Not quite the same. Bias is an issue only when it gets out of hand and effects reporting.

It's out of hand, waaay out of hand. They are pure Democrat narrative 24/7

Meanwhile the globalists increased their wealth by 30% profiting from the covid lock downs. As the rest of us took a huge hit. You can get as excited as you want another sham American election. The real issues will keep rolling along.

How do I find out if my 2010 ranger can take B10? If they are going to call it diesel I guarantee someone is going to put B10 in the tank.

False positives are fairly common. depending on the process used. Running the test for many cycles increases the chance of false positives.