Deplorable behaviour of a sex pest.
That aside the way the police handle this visit is dishonest and shady. Maybe the light blurring of the suspects face means they can do as they wish with the footage.
Sex pest: "What's with all the cameras?"
Cop: "Oh it's a PDPA act in Thailand. It needs to be recorded that nobody is harming you".
Ironically PDPA is Personal Data Protection Act.
According to chatgpt:
"The police do not need to record by law, but they may choose to do so within legal bounds. If you are uncomfortable, you can object, but the police may continue if they justify it as necessary for public interest or their protection. Consulting a legal professional is advisable if such situations arise."
Lawful Purpose and Use:
Recordings made by police must be used strictly for the stated purpose (e.g., ensuring transparency during an investigation or as evidence in court).
If the footage is shared publicly without valid legal justification, it breaches the principle of purpose limitation under the PDPA.
Consent for Disclosure:
Under the PDPA, disclosing personal data to third parties (e.g., news outlets) generally requires the consent of the individual involved, unless specific legal exceptions apply.
Breach of Privacy:
If the footage is leaked or shared without consent, it constitutes a misuse of personal data, potentially leading to legal repercussions for the responsible party (e.g., the police department or an individual officer).
Seems to be the modus operandi for this division of the police. Film it and sell it to news outlets.
See here for light entertainment:
https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/cop-dresses-as-sex-wrestler-to-trap-suspect/news-story/9ede3e6a530ff54f47c41cdcf0ff5dbb