Jump to content

Suradit69

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    13,230
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Suradit69

  1. On January 31, 2020 at 8:59 AM, Langsuan Man said:

    The subject of mandatory Thai based health insurance has been done to death here a Thai Visa, do a search

     

    But quick answer, Yes

    He appears to be asking about the O-A vise, not an extension of stay. Not sure how you get Thai based insurance in your home country, which is where you'd get the visa.

    • Like 1
  2. 18 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

    good old thorough hand washing with soap and water, or using an alcohol-based gel, can remove the viral presence on one's hands

    As I said, I agree about hand washing with soap and water, but no mention of hand sanitizers in the CDC's. Corona virus prevention advice

     

     

     

     

    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/index.html

    Quote

     

    Prevention

    How to protect yourself

    There are currently no vaccines available to protect you against human coronavirus infection. You may be able to reduce your risk of infection by doing the following

    • wash your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds
    • avoid touching your eyes, nose, or mouth with unwashed hands
    • avoid close contact with people who are sick

     

     

     

    • Quote

      Handwashing can help prevent illness. It involves five simple and effective steps (Wet, Lather, Scrub, Rinse, Dry) you can take to reduce the spread of diarrheal and respiratory illness so you can stay healthy. Regular handwashing, particularly before and after certain activities, is one of the best ways to remove germs, avoid getting sick, and prevent the spread of germs to others. It’s quick, it’s simple, and it can keep us all from getting sick. Handwashing is a win for everyone, except the germs.

  3. 33 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

     

    That notwithstanding, the mainstream medical advice

    "Mainstream medical advice " has no meaning except to help market some products or some cherished belief.   What is or isn't mainstream? Where's the evidence? Certainly at this point some research exists on the effectiveness of alcohol when dealing with the spread of viral disease. Both alcohol and viruses have been around for a long time. Where's some experiential or experimental proof and why has alcohol not stopped the spread of other viral epidemics?

     

    Can't agree with your interpretation of the FDA comment either. Basically Purell has no evidence that alcohol based sanitizers  "remove " viruses as you claim. They were marketing the hand sanitizer based on some nebulous marketing tactic that depended on something meaningless like mainstream medical advice.

     

    If you have links to research proof of the effectiveness of alcohol used against the spread of viral disease please share. It would be good news for us all and would make overpriced hand wipes a bargain.

     

    Here's some more mainstream medical advice

    image.jpeg.3e288d99ccfb912bfb1aa2a841c80b5b.jpeg

     

    • Like 1
  4. 10 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

     

    But, the health authorities have confirmed, that good old thorough hand washing with soap and water, or using an alcohol-based gel, can remove the viral presence on one's hands

    While I agree that washing hands with soap and water is useful, as noted above, the US FDA has ordered Purell to stop making claims about its hand sanitizer regarding any virus.

     

    Quote


    Federal health officials are calling on GoJo, the maker of Purell products, to stop making claims that its hand sanitizer is effective at eliminating diseases.

    In a letter, the Food and Drug Administration called out the company for posting several claims across Purell website pages and its social media platforms that the over-the-counter hand sanitizers could reduce the risk of illnesses including Ebola, norovirus, influenza and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which is an infection is caused by a type of staph bacteria.

    "We are not aware of evidence demonstrating that the Purell Healthcare Advanced Hand Sanitizer products as formulated and labeled are generally recognized by qualified experts as safe and effective for use under the conditions suggested, recommended, or prescribed in their labeling," the letter stated

     

    .

     

     

  5. 16 hours ago, cyril sneer said:

    7-eleven sells antibiotic gel

    Since the epidemic involves a virus, does an antibiotic offer much protection?

     

     

    Quote

    The [US]  Food and Drug Administration has warned the maker of Purell hand sanitizers to stop claiming its products can prevent people from catching the flu, Ebola virus, the MRSA superbug and norovirus. ... The agency said it was reclassifying Purell as an unapproved drug, rather than an over-the-counter product.16 hours ago

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/health/purell-fda-ebola-virus.html

     

     

     

     

  6. 58 minutes ago, bluweyze said:

    Just a word of warning.

    I am sure this will not happen to you but the day you divorce your marriage visa ends, not the day of the visa stamp!

     

    Once you have changed to a marriage visa returning to the business visa starts the process all over again. It is as difficult as it was the first time.

     

    An extension of stay ends the day the reason for it ends. An extension based on marriage ends when the marriage ends. .An extension based on employment ends when employment ends. A permission to stay granted on a  visa entry does not end for those reasons.

     

    Once again the distinction between a visa and an extension of stay is not simply nitpicking. There are differences which can be significant.

     

     

     

     

     

     

  7. 30 minutes ago, Thaidream said:

    Why should a Thai person have to leave their own country; sell their home; pull their children out of school to see their husband and live together.

     

    You might want to read Article 16 of the UN Declaration of Rights to which Thailand is a signatory and review the Thai Constitution.

    A  bit overboard and an hysterical reaction to something that can be easily resolved by using an extension of stay.

     

    The O/P said he didn't feel like getting an annual extension. I doubt that getting an extension of stay, which is used by most farang with Thai spouses, is so onerous that it will merit a special session of the UN for human rights violation.

     

    The choice to do multi entry visas for years is his. He may feel inconvenienced if he did extensions of stay, but it doesn't oblige anyone to sell houses or to deny children an education or any of the nonsense you mentioned.

     

     

     

  8. 10 minutes ago, TBKK said:

    If I understand you correctly, if I sold my condo for 2 million baht and deposited the amount in my bank account, I could not use that deposit for the  THB 800,000 financial requirement.

    I would have to transfer THB 800,000 of the money out of the country and transfer it back in and leave it in my account for a minimum of three months in order to use this deposited money to satisfy the THB 800,000 requirement.

    Is that correct?

    Not sure how you concluded that from what he said in that quote.

     

    At various times I've used the 800 k in the bank method and then went with the embassy letter income method (when it was still available to me) and last year I sold my condo and used that money to cover the 800 k method for my most recent renewal. Never been asked where the money came from.

  9. 18 hours ago, 1 said:

    Not sure how much is being discussed here but I did find information suggesting that you required 400,000 so I thought I would just share my experience.

    Any mention of for long and how much of 400 k or 340 k had to remain in the bank during the balance of the year when you use the combination method?  I can't recall if something specific/definite has ever been posted about that.

     

  10. 2 hours ago, Gecko123 said:

    found that 45% of workers report that the total value of their household’s savings and investments is less than $25,000.

     

    2 hours ago, Gecko123 said:

    The $48,885 per year is not a per person average, but rather a per household average.

     

     

    It seems that the quoted material makes it clear they're talking about households. I assume they are comparing apples to apples in their assessment.

     

    But the exact amounts weren't really I was drawing attention to. The point is that people currently are woefully unprepared for retirement now and that is unlikely to improve with future generations, but there will probably be a sizable number of retirees who will be sufficiently well prepared to retire in Thailand or elsewhere.

     

     

    I expect middle class retirement in future will be more restrictive than is currently is in terms of the need to work longer (if possible) and thus retire at a later age and with less "cushy" retirement packages than is common now. My pension, for example, includes medical insurance for life but that is no longer on offer by my former employer to current employees. And starting retirement at 62 as I was able to do is a different matter from starting at 68 or 70 if you're thinking of moving  halfway round the world at that age,

     

    Nonetheless, even now when a number of retirees may still  be able to afford retirement in Thailand, they are somewhat exceptional among their age peers. 

     

    So it seems to me the initial thesis that we are the last generation to stay in Thailand in retirement appears unlikely. Those here now are members of a generation that is collectively not all that well prepared financially for retirement and, on the other hand,  future generations will still have a decent number of people who could easily afford to live here. 

     

     

    • Like 1
  11. 17 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

    If they have a decent pension or saved money, yes

    Yes. As western retirement/pension ages are increased and liberal work related pensions become less generous and/or pensions generally are under funded, the whole middle income notion of retirement will change. But there Will undoubtedly still be a large pool of people with sufficient retirement income/savings  to retire in Thailand if they want to. 

     

    The current generation is certainly not universally able to achieve a comfortable retirement and many of those on the brink of retirement have notably very little saved.

     

    Quote

    The 2018 Retirement Confidence Survey by the Employee Benefit Research Institute and the independent research firm, Greenwald and Associates, found that 45% of workers report that the total value of their household’s savings and investments is less than $25,000. This is not enough to cover one year's expenses. Based on information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, adults 65 and older spend, on average, $48,885 a year.

     

     

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...