tomacht8

China's "goodwill" sounds like the vaccines are gifts. Rather the opposite. Thailand paid significantly higher prices per dose for the vaccines than other countries.

I'm pretty sure when a common man with no money in his bank account, drunk and full with drugs, races through the city at top speed; hits a policeman off a motorcycle, drags him 200 meters to death, does not stop and escapes. This common man would rot in prison since 8 years already.

The case has dragged on for many many years until most of the charges were dropped or reached their statute of limitation. For this result it took the committee a year to find out. WOW. Work was done in a flash. An incised media show to calm the angry population down. The population's trust in the judiciary, police, public administration and government is steadily approaching zero.

On Thursday night, responding to media questioning, Colonel Thitisan did, however, admit to being responsible for the removal of CCTV footage from the station at Nakhon Sawan after the death of the drugs suspect. https://www.thaiexaminer.com/thai-news-foreigners/2021/08/29/fears-that-ferrari-joe-will-evade-justice/

Yes. It is not clear in the report what exactly he removed. Whether he just unscrewed the cameras or removed the entire system including the hard drives. But it was noticed that he removed something. Hence the question to him.

How do you come to this assumption? He was dead after being tortured with plastic bags. Resuscitation was obviously in vain. He was officially pronounced death in the hospital.

Asked why he removed CCTV cameras from the room where the incident took place, Thitisan merely said he was inexperienced and had not been thinking clearly. https://www.thaipbsworld.com/the-high-rolling-career-of-joe-ferrari-top-cop-in-corruption-spotlight/

The IMF and World Bank estimate that 3%-5% of global GDP is laundered-approximately $2.17- $ 3.61 trillion annually. 546.000.000.000 Thailand GDP in$ Laundered Thai money in circulation: 21.840.000.000 in $ = 4% approx. Assets secured by AMLO = approx. 10.000.000 in $ Success in %: 0.04578754578 % The success is in the hundredth of a percent range. Or to put it another way: For every dollar that the AMLO secured, 2184 dollars were not detected. That is nearly nothing, and there is nothing nice to talk about either.

I think with 6 plastic bags on his head, and the breathing air cut off for 6 minutes without a break ... What else could the victim have done to avoid his own death? There was no break in there. The victim didn't even had a chance to say anything. He was cruelly and willingly suffocated to death. To the bitter end. For 6 minutes!!! No one survives such a long period of time. Something like that is murder and not an "accident" while torturing a person with an "unfortunate" result of death. Due to the method and the length, the dead was deliberately accepted. And then the whole cover-up aftermath: They had to go somewhere with the corpse. They couldn't throw him on the street. There is still the victim's girlfriend as a witness. So off to the hospital and there the lies told to the doctors. Then the destruction of the CCTV recordings. Let's see what comes out of it.

It was 6 minutes. https://www.nationthailand.com/in-focus/40005544

When you look at the whole process, death is not surprising if you cut off someone's air supply for 5-6 minutes. If the victim wasn't a world-famous free diver, it is clear to everyone that after 4,5,6 minutes the whole thing has to end in death. In the end, the possible death was accepted approvingly. It is then irrelevant what Joe said or thought during or after the murder. Also the motive to brutally torture someone to either extort money or to get bonus points for their own career. The method of killing also shows the perversion. And finally the cover-up tactics and all the lies. Let's see what the end of the charge is. For me it is a bestal torture murder.

Recommendation: Read other sources as well to better understand the process. In short: Joe and his gang of plastic bag murderers brought the dead victim in the close Princ Paknampo Hospital by car at 1:30 pm. They told the doctors there the lie, that they followed the drug addict victim for 10 minutes and then he allegedly collapsed. The doctors inserted a tube into his bladder to obtain urine for drug screening as claimed by Pol Thitisant. At 7.20pm, they transferred the victim to Sawanpracharak Hospital since he required specialists and was involved in a drug case. Doctors at Sawanpracharak Hospital listed the death as possible drug abuse since they found substances in his urine. They also wrote it could be caused by asphyxiation. In some cases where the causes of death are not known at the time, an autopsy must be conducted. Although the victim's body was cremated, the hospital must have earlier conducted an autopsy but the results were not known immediately. After the murder video became public, the investigators probably dig out the autopsy report.

He said he had worked tirelessly with the Chinese in Thailand and with the government in China in a spirit of good relationship and good cooperation. 555 It was definitely worth it. The only question is for whom?

There are some people here who fall for this bogus "intention" argument in Joe's defense. In order to be punishable, it is necessary that the perpetrator had at least a conditional killing intention, i.e. approved or accepted the death considered possible, but not allowed himself to be dissuaded from carrying out the act. Because of the generally higher inhibition threshold for killing, a comprehensive overall assessment of all objectively and subjectively significant circumstances must be carried out in each individual case, why the perpetrator has overcome this inhibition threshold. In this context, the aim and the motives for the offense, the way in which the offense was carried out, the danger emanating from the offense, the level of knowledge of the offender and his / her psychological state must be taken into account. In Joes case 3 murder criteria are fulfilled. Greed, cruelty and cover up. The realization of murder marks is crucial. These can be divided into three groups. The first and third groups concern perpetrator-related characteristics of murder, the second group crime-related characteristics of murder. In the first group, the pure motivation of the perpetrator is decisive. Here the perpetrator always commits murder when he takes the life of another person for low motives. These include lust for murder, satisfaction of the sexual instinct, greed and other low motives. Greed Greed represents any unusual, unhealthy and morally objectionable increase in the pursuit of profit at any price. Characteristic is the unbridled, ruthless pursuit of profit "at any price", including that of a human life. A further prerequisite is that the victim's assets increase immediately, at least as he imagines, through the killing or that there is otherwise no prospect of an immediate increase in assets. In the case of the crime-related characteristics of the murder of the second group, a certain way of committing the crime and thus a certain unworthy behavior of the crime is viewed as particularly reprehensible. A total of three variants can be distinguished here. Cruelty It is cruel to inflict particularly severe physical or mental pain - which goes beyond what is necessary for the killing as such, measured in terms of the severity, duration and repetition of the cause of the pain. In doing so, action must be taken out of a callous, ruthless disposition. Torture, burning, starvation or dying of thirst. After all, killing is always punishable as murder if the objective is reprehensible. This is related to another offense, which reveals the reprehensible degree of the perpetrator. This third group of murder traits includes: Concealment intention The intention to cover up is understood to mean the endeavor to prevent or make it more difficult to become aware of the predicate offense, whether internal or external, to evade threatened criminal prosecution or to evade another person. It is irrelevant for what reasons the predicate offense should be covered. For this reason, the avoidance of consequences under criminal law is also a permissible target of concealment.

Unclear information. How much of assets was seized in total and in what period of time? A total of 300 million baht would be then really nothing.

Last poll: 90.64% cited the dishonest failures of the Thai government in coping with the pandemic, playing politics and being hopeless in solving corruption issues. The only question that arises is how do you get rid of the incapacity if it does not want to cede itself?

I suspect you didn't study criminal law. In Joes case 3 murder criteria are fulfilled. Greed, cruelty and cover up. The realization of murder marks is crucial. These can be divided into three groups. The first and third groups concern perpetrator-related characteristics of murder, the second group crime-related characteristics of murder. In the first group, the pure motivation of the perpetrator is decisive. Here the perpetrator always commits murder when he takes the life of another person for low motives. These include lust for murder, satisfaction of the sexual instinct, greed and other low motives. Greed Greed represents any unusual, unhealthy and morally objectionable increase in the pursuit of profit at any price. Characteristic is the unbridled, ruthless pursuit of profit "at any price", including that of a human life. A further prerequisite is that the victim's assets increase immediately, at least as he imagines, through the killing or that there is otherwise no prospect of an immediate increase in assets. In the case of the crime-related characteristics of the murder of the second group, a certain way of committing the crime and thus a certain unworthy behavior of the crime is viewed as particularly reprehensible. A total of three variants can be distinguished here. Cruelty It is cruel to inflict particularly severe physical or mental pain - which goes beyond what is necessary for the killing as such, measured in terms of the severity, duration and repetition of the cause of the pain. In doing so, action must be taken out of a callous, ruthless disposition. Torture, burning, starvation or dying of thirst. After all, killing is always punishable as murder if the objective is reprehensible. This is related to another offense, which reveals the reprehensible degree of the perpetrator. This third group of murder traits includes: Concealment intention The intention to cover up is understood to mean the endeavor to prevent or make it more difficult to become aware of the predicate offense, whether internal or external, to evade threatened criminal prosecution or to evade another person. It is irrelevant for what reasons the predicate offense should be covered. For this reason, the avoidance of consequences under criminal law is also a permissible target of concealment.

Isn't that the job of the tourism authority?

I am also amazed at the media response in my home country. Newspapers and television full broadside. Videos of police officers torturing a person to death by suffocating with plastic bags over his head do not fit into the image of an idyllic and supposedly secure vacation paradise. Especially in countries where the police is respected and are really friends and helpers.

90.64% cited the dishonest failures of the Thai government in coping with the pandemic, playing politics and being hopeless in solving corruption issues. That almost goes quite well together what one hears among the normal Thai citizens.

Cute to see them all, pull in their arms so you can't see their wrists.

Transportation also for foreigners or not? Last time foreigners were excluded from transport. https://www.khaosodenglish.com/news/crimecourtscalamity/2020/06/11/bus-operator-confirms-ban-on-foreign-travelers-in-pandemic/

You see the Video? They simply tortured him to death. His death struggle, which lasted several minutes, was easy to see for all police officers present and nobody stopped it and they willingly let him suffocate. The intention was: you tell us something or we will kill you. That's intent. Do not fall for there lies.

He tortured him to death. This is not manslaughter but barbaric murder. It is not his intended intentions that are decisive, but the result of his actions.

Then you don't know the Thai court practice. 1. The charges are being "negotiated" behind closed doors. 2. Then the show trial begins. Joe will then confess and receive a 50% reduction in sentence in the judgment. 3. Then immediately follows his objection to the judgment. The whole thing then goes into the appeal. 4. This is followed immediately by the application for release on bail. 5. And then the whole thing stretches like chewing gum for many years.