Jump to content

tomacht8

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    5220
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tomacht8

  1. 2 hours ago, Joseph98765 said:

    just asking...is enough to have a copy in the cloud so you can show them all the copies on your phone??

    Of course you need your passport when you travel. However, once you have arrived at your holiday destination or place of residence, it makes sense to  have only a photocopy of your passport with all the stamps and leave the original passport in the safe. It must be ensured that, in the worst case, you can quickly organize and show your original passport.

    • Thumbs Up 1
  2. 2 hours ago, jaideedave said:

    Correct herfie,The average depth of the gulf is 190 ft. I served 4 years on a diesel,electric sub that was 312 ft long.End on it would stick out of the water here by 120 ft.lol. The Yuan is about 250 ft.At least if it sank in the gulf the men could just pop open a hatch and swim to the surface. We trained for that at Ford Island sub base in Hawaii.

    FYI: I was at Queen Sirikit Naval hospital last year and noticed a couple Thai officers in uniform with submarine badges. What's that all about?

     

     

    Must have been 7 years ago. There I met Thai soldiers which were in a submarine training program in Kiel, at Germanys submarine base.

    • Like 1
  3. 13 minutes ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

    I'm just glad we were able to experience it. 

    Those were the times. Had a funny problem a long time ago. My flight was 3 days after my last visa stamp. Then I went to immigration to extend it for 1900 baht. There was quite a lively discussion between the immigration staff. Paying 3 days overstay at the airport would only be 1500 baht. Recommendation was: No worry. You pay at airport only 1500 Baht and you can save 400 Baht. Well those days are obviously over.

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, ozimoron said:

    I always use cash at Starbucks and the coffee is always at exactly the same temperature. Consistency in quality is one of Starbucks main selling points. You get what you pay for an any honest comparison puts SB coffee way above any of the other chain franchises.

    Each to his personally experience. I had the cash problem described above. But it's certainly not like Starbuck coffee is super much better than the other chains or alternatives. High price = gladly much better quality does not always correspond to subjective reality.

  5. 10 hours ago, Andrew65 said:

    Thai libel laws. I notice that when someone falls from a high building (and dies) in Thailand the building is never identified. I believe that this is done so as not to fall foul of libel laws?

    Yes. I once wrote a hotel review. Everything OK. Only as a constructive criticism that the balcony railings are too deep. Simply dowel in an additional higher rod. Not everyone is a midget. Well nothing happened. Neither a law suit against me nor that there would be additional balcony poles for safety reasons. TiT

  6. 5 minutes ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

    Back in the day, 20 or so years ago, overstay wasn't a big deal. You may have been deported but most likely a slap on the wrist and off to the border you went.

     

    Sign of the times that they now slap a 5 or 10 year ban on those caught.

     

    It was a much friendlier place back then, no denying that.

     

    A lot of this has to do with the quality of foreigners coming now. Budget travel has a lot to answer for.

    The good old times. That must have been almost 30 years ago. A guy from Argentina had a 6 year overstay. He bought a return ticket. Stands at the airport in front of immigration - no money left over -. He gave them his silver travers concert flute. 2 weeks later he was back on the island.

    • Like 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
  7. 5 hours ago, moogradod said:

    Given the (probably) relatively low number of overstayers all in all I really cannot understand the huge importance that is contributed to this issue which makes big headlines. They present a caught overstayer like a drug lord. What evil does an overstayer actually commit ? Spending money for the benefit of the economy cannot be it. Not that I am against the law. But this is all a bit exaggerated isn't it ?

    Exceeding the permitted length of stay is against the law. No question. But it's not the super-serious criminal offense either. I'd rather have a peaceful overstayer than a sneaky knife man, a brutal bar thug or a rapist - with a valid visa.

    • Like 1
  8. Sometimes it is also the case that the hotel descriptions on the booking platforms (booking, agoda, etc.) are wrong or misleading.

     

    - free parking, yes but 300 meters away from the hotel.

    - Rooms with balcony, yes but only subject to availability.

    - Hotel in a quiet side street, yes hardly any traffic, but on the neighboring property there is a chicken farm where the roosters start crackling around at 4 am.

     

    If somebody is afraid of writing a public review in such cases, you can also write directly to the booking platforms. 

  9. 4 minutes ago, Polaky said:

    Plenty of people leave factual negative reviews to assist their fellow travellers and nothing ever comes of it, without these reviews we would be staying in absolute horrible hotels, so we owe them a great deal of thanks.

    I agree. Rating systems force hotels, restaurants, bars to optimize their product. Honest and constructive customer feedback helps. The worst thing for business are unhappy customers who don't complain at all; they stay away and are lost forever. 

  10. It depends on the wording in the context. No personal insults, better factually informative. The evaluation of facts is always subjective. A review should never be a vendetta.

     

    - We were lucky and were able to use 2 comfortable sun loungers out of the 8 loungers on the pool deck.

    - It was lovely in the swimming pool which was full of children playing.

    - The hotel staff always tried to help us with one or the other problem.

     

    It is same as the "secret language" in job references.

  11. 27 minutes ago, The Fugitive said:

    Definitely! Haven't heard the term 'Obotor' previously. My Mrs refers to a guy she calls 'The Prefect'. He was wearing a gold chain on one occasion. Once we were in the same restaurant and when we came to settle our bill the owner told us; 'No need, the Prefect paid for you'. Apparently, he was impressed that I am the only foreign blood donor at our local collection sessions.

    That was maybe the Kamnan.

    • Thanks 1
  12. 10 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

    Maybe that was mentioned already: Gambling, including playing cards, is illegal in Thailand.

    If the cops see it, then they arrest the gamblers - also up country in the villages. Or the gamblers have to pay the police not to get arrested.

    So if you want to stop any game, call the police and let them arrest her and her friends.

    Maybe that is "incentive" enough for her to stop.

    Not a good idea. Only leads to additional money loss and does not solve the problem. Not to mention what standing you have in your village after, when you rush the police on your neighbors.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  13. Bad situation. I also have many family members who enjoy playing cards. The degree between social gathering and real gambling addiction is fluid. What are the stakes? Are there already 500/1000 baht notes on the towel or are they playing for coins? Which game is being played? Bok deng, Kauke or Thai dummy? If she doesn't keep her household and child responsibilities, it's a very bad sign. The ultra-long playing times are also questionable. Are always the same people playing or do strangers sometimes come by? The fact that she has no job and that she is bored only encourages her possible addiction. I would try to set a time limit for the card game with her first. A time when a cardsession has definitely to be finished. If she doesn't manage to keep up, and can not stop playing cards at a given time, you have to pull the ripcord. Pathological gambling addiction can also ruin you and your family financially.

    • Like 1
  14. 5 minutes ago, h90 said:

    That is bad enough, but worse is what the government can do....track people who go to demonstrations. Check what business owner donated to the opposition. Just switch you off and than even if you win every lawsuit you are meanwhile destroyed.

    And your drug, alcohol consumption and insurance....Or in German topic: The people should not eat meat....you can limit these purchases

    True.

    We have also determined with our systems the health index of the individual customers via their shopping baskets. Such data records are worth tens of millions. Insurance companies are very keen to get their hands on such consumer records with real names. 

    • Confused 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
    • Thanks 1
  15. 3 hours ago, candide said:

    It seems there is another condition:

    "The third reading also requires a majority vote of the parliament. However, that majority must also include one-third of the Senate, and 20 percent of MPs from all political parties which do not hold positions as cabinet members, Speaker of House of Representatives, or Deputy Speaker of House of Representatives."

    https://prachataienglish.com/node/9086

     

    I am not sure how to interpret this other condition, as it is translated in English from the original version. Is it 20% of all MPs, or is it 20% of MPs in each party?

     

    20% of MPs in each party can not be. There are parties with only one seat in parliament. That would mean a total veto if that one MP is not present.

     

    The 20% is probably a minimum requirement and refers to those present in order to have a quorum at all.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...