Bacon1

Scott Adams, the visionary cartoonist who redefined workplace humor through his iconic comic strip Dilbert, has died at the age of 67. His passing marks the end of an era for corporate satire and the millions of fans who saw their own office struggles reflected in his work. For nearly four decades, Adams captured the absurdity of white-collar life. Dilbert debuted in 1989 and quickly became a global phenomenon, appearing in thousands of newspapers across 65 countries. The strip featured a world of cubicles, buzzword-heavy meetings, and "Pointy-Haired Bosses"—scenarios that resonated deeply with anyone who had ever felt like a cog in a corporate machine. Adams' path to success was unconventional. Before becoming a full-time cartoonist, he spent years in the corporate world at companies like Pacific Bell. This firsthand experience provided the "cubicle-level" authenticity that made his humor so relatable. Beyond the daily strips, Adams was a prolific author; his book The Dilbert Principle became a New York Times bestseller by arguing that companies often promote their least competent employees to management to limit the damage they can do. While his creative legacy is immense, Adams' later years were marked by significant public controversy. In 2023, several major media outlets dropped Dilbert following racially insensitive remarks he made on his YouTube channel. Despite these challenges, his influence on the medium of comic strips remains undeniable. Colleagues and fans have begun sharing tributes online, noting how Adams transformed the mundane frustrations of office life into a shared cultural language. He leaves behind a legacy of sharp wit and a character that will forever remain a symbol of the modern workplace. Key Takeaways A Cultural Icon: Scott Adams was the creator of Dilbert, a comic strip that reached over 2,000 newspapers and satirized corporate culture for over 30 years. Corporate Insight: His background in technology and office management allowed him to create a unique brand of "workplace realism" that became a global success. A Complicated Legacy: While celebrated for his early career and bestselling books, his later years were overshadowed by public fallout from controversial social media commentary. Adapted From https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y320k72vyo

Recent headlines have sounded the alarm on microplastics being found in everything from the human brain to the heart. However, a growing group of scientists is now raising a "bombshell" concern: many of these high-profile discoveries might actually be the result of lab errors and background contamination rather than true biological presence. The Problem with the Data According to experts, the methods used to detect these tiny particles are being pushed to their absolute limits. In some cases, natural substances in the body—specifically fats—can create "false positives" that look identical to plastic under certain testing equipment. For instance, a recent study suggesting microplastics in the brain was criticized because the brain is composed of 60% fat, which can mimic the signal of polyethylene. Rushed Research vs. Robust Science The race to publish groundbreaking results has led some research teams to skip vital quality control steps. Critics argue that "blank samples"—tests used to ensure the air or equipment isn't contaminating the results—are frequently missing from published papers. Without these checks, it is impossible to know if the plastic found came from a patient's tissue or simply from the operating room air. While there is no doubt that plastic pollution is everywhere in our environment, the actual concentration inside human organs remains unclear. Overstating these findings can be dangerous; it risks causing unnecessary public panic and gives industry lobbyists ammunition to dismiss legitimate environmental concerns as "scaremongering." Moving Forward Analytical techniques are improving, and scientists are calling for more collaboration between chemists and medical researchers to standardize testing. In the meantime, experts suggest simple precautions like avoiding heating food in plastic and filtering drinking water. Key Takeaways Scientific Skepticism: Leading chemists warn that many studies claiming to find microplastics in human organs may be flawed due to contamination or false positives caused by body fat. Methodological Flaws: A lack of standardized testing and "blank" control samples in several high-profile studies has cast doubt on the reported concentrations of plastic in the body. Need for Accuracy: Accurate data is essential to help governments create effective health regulations without causing undue public alarm or fueling industry pushback. Adapted From https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jan/13/microplastics-human-body-doubt

Met Police Officers Reveal Secret Freemason Ties More than 300 Metropolitan Police officers and staff have declared links to the Freemasons or similar secretive organisations after Scotland Yard ordered compulsory disclosure, a High Court judge has confirmed. The controversial policy, announced in December, requires officers and civilian staff to declare past or present membership of any organisation that is hierarchical, keeps its membership confidential, and expects loyalty between members. The rule explicitly includes Freemasonry. The decision has triggered a legal showdown. The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE), alongside the Order of Women Freemasons and the Honourable Fraternity of Ancient Freemasons, has launched a High Court challenge, arguing the policy is discriminatory, unnecessary, and potentially unlawful. In a court order dated 2 January and published this week, Mr Justice Chamberlain said there was no urgent need to suspend the policy at this stage, noting that around 300 officers and staff had already complied. “The challenged decision purports to impose a requirement to disclose involvement with Masonic and other associations,” the judge wrote, adding that the requirement was already in force. However, he said there was no indication the Met intended to discipline officers who failed to declare their membership “in the next few weeks.” The Met has since confirmed that 316 officers and staff have declared membership in Freemasonry or other hierarchical associations. The judge also revealed that the force has agreed to consider withdrawing the policy after receiving representations from Masonic organisations — a sign the policy may yet be softened or revised. UGLE said it was unsurprised that many members complied, stressing that many Freemasons are open about their affiliation. But it warned the policy unfairly stigmatizes those who prefer privacy. “Those hardworking and honourable men and women who wish to keep their Freemasonry private are being threatened with disciplinary sanction,” a spokesperson said, calling the move deeply regrettable. The Metropolitan Police has defended the policy as a transparency measure aimed at restoring public trust. The force cited an internal survey in which two-thirds of respondents said membership of secretive organisations could affect perceptions of police impartiality. That survey itself is disputed. Freemason representatives claim fewer than 5% of officers and staff took part, raising questions about how representative the findings were. Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has championed the disclosure requirement as part of a wider push to rebuild confidence in the force following years of misconduct scandals. Freemasonry groups argue the policy could breach human rights protections and data privacy laws, including GDPR, and say the issue goes beyond policing into freedom of association. A judge is expected to rule shortly on whether to grant an injunction suspending the policy while the full legal challenge proceeds. Key TakeawaysOver 300 Met officers have declared Freemason links under a new compulsory disclosure rule Freemasonry groups are challenging the policy in court, citing discrimination and privacy concerns The Met argues transparency is needed to rebuild trust, but may yet reconsider the policy SOURCE: BBC

Cam, give up Consult your pipeline Post a progress report.

I generated this video from start to finish in about five minutes. Usually, I take my idea for a prompt, dictate it to ChatGPT or Gemini, and ask them to fix the grammar and turn it into a short prompt for the AI video generator I’m using — in this case, Grok. Once I’m happy with it, I just paste it into the image or video tool, as shown in the photo, and it generates the result. It’s really simple, and I’m using the free version. grok_video_2026-01-13-12-27-16.mp4

Two moderation related comments have been removed. The moderation team and admins are fully aware of everything happening on the forum, and much of their work takes place behind the scenes. From the outside, it can sometimes seem as though members simply stop posting, but that may be due to a suspension or simply a personal choice not to participate. Rest assured, the forum remains well managed.

Comment on moderation removed

Comment on moderation removed

Unnecessary rant about another member removed. @FrankieGoesToHolly

grok_video_2026-01-13-08-47-58.mp4

Several posts discussing another member have been removed. If you have an issue with another member, please use the Report function. Thank you

Can't do that just yet, but here's some pussies...😁 20260113_083000748.mp4

Comment on moderation removed @BerndD 13. You will not publicly comment on moderation in an open forum. You will not comment on actions taken by individual moderators or on specific or general policies and issues. You will not post a negative emoticon in response to a public notice made by a moderator. You may send a private message to a moderator to discuss individual actions or you can email support (at) aseannow.com to discuss moderation policy and account suspensions.You will not block communication from moderators or Admin. Aggression, personal attacks, derogatory comments or any form of abuse toward moderators, Admin, or this forum in general will not be tolerated and will result in strict consequences. There is absolutely no excuse for abusive behavior.

2025-06-01-113843861.mp4

Red_Onion_Character_Video_Generation.mp4

In a case that has once again put the Metropolitan Police under intense scrutiny, two former officers have been sentenced following a sexual assault in London’s Leicester Square. The incident, which took place in 2022, involved the off-duty officers targeting a woman in one of the city's busiest entertainment districts. The court heard how the victim was subjected to unwanted sexual contact while the officers were socializing. While the prosecution highlighted the breach of trust and the impact on the victim, the sentencing has sparked significant public debate. Despite being found guilty of the assault, the two men were spared immediate jail time, receiving suspended sentences instead. This ruling has drawn criticism from advocacy groups who argue that lenient sentencing for police personnel undermines public confidence in the force. The Metropolitan Police Department issued a statement following the trial, confirming that both individuals had already left the service or were in the process of being formally dismissed. They emphasized that there is "no place" for such behavior within the ranks of law enforcement. The case adds to a growing list of scandals involving Metropolitan Police conduct, fueling ongoing calls for systemic reform and more rigorous vetting processes. For many, the outcome of this trial serves as a reminder of the long road ahead in rebuilding the relationship between the police and the communities they serve, particularly regarding the safety of women and girls in public spaces. Key Takeaways Suspended Sentences Issued: The two former Met officers avoided immediate imprisonment despite being convicted of sexual assault. Breach of Public Trust: The incident occurred in 2022 in Leicester Square, involving off-duty officers and a female victim. Ongoing Police Reform: The Metropolitan Police have condemned the actions, stating that the individuals involved are no longer part of the force as the department faces continued pressure to improve officer conduct. Adapted From https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y2g27dzr1oprove

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has officially begun hearing a historic case against Myanmar, centered on allegations of genocide against the Rohingya Muslim minority. The proceedings, initiated by The Gambia, mark a pivotal moment in the global pursuit of international justice and human rights accountability. The Allegations Against Myanmar The Gambia’s legal team presented a harrowing account of the 2017 military crackdown in Rakhine State. They described "cruel and heinous violations" intended to destroy the Rohingya population. The evidence focuses on a pattern of systemic violence, including mass killings and arson, which forced over 700,000 people to flee across the border into Bangladesh. For decades, the Rohingya have faced severe persecution in Myanmar, but the 2017 "clearance operations" sparked international outrage. The Gambia argues that these actions were not merely a response to local insurgency—as Myanmar claims—but a calculated effort to eliminate a specific ethnic and religious group. Myanmar’s Defense and the Road Ahead Myanmar continues to deny the genocide charges, maintaining that its military operations were legitimate counter-insurgency efforts aimed at domestic rebels. However, the case has gained significant international momentum, with several countries offering formal support for the legal challenge. While the ICJ’s eventual ruling could take months or even years to finalize, the current hearings represent a breakthrough for survivors seeking recognition of their suffering. In addition to this case, United Nations investigators and the International Criminal Court (ICC) are conducting separate probes into the conduct of Myanmar’s military leadership. As the world watches, this case stands to set a major legal precedent for how the international community handles allegations of state-sponsored genocide. Key Takeaways Historic Legal Battle: The Gambia has formally accused Myanmar of genocide at the UN’s highest court, seeking justice for the Rohingya people. Systemic Violence: The case focuses on the 2017 military crackdown that forced hundreds of thousands to flee and resulted in widespread reports of atrocities. Long-Term Implications: While a final verdict may take years, the proceedings are a major step toward international accountability for human rights abuses. Adapted From https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7v07m3pr75o

Dozens of high-profile celebrities, medical professionals, and human rights advocates have joined forces to demand an immediate end to the targeting of healthcare facilities in Gaza. In a powerful open letter addressed to world leaders and the Israeli government, the group calls for the urgent restoration of medical services to a system they describe as being on the brink of total collapse. A Call for Humanity The letter, signed by notable figures including Mark Ruffalo, Cynthia Nixon, and Ilana Glazer, highlights the dire state of Gaza’s healthcare infrastructure. Signatories argue that systematic strikes and ongoing blockades have made it nearly impossible for doctors to save lives. The first signature on the document carries a poignant weight: it belongs to Wesam Hamada, the mother of Hind Rajab, a six-year-old girl whose tragic death in early 2024 became a global symbol of the conflict’s civilian toll. Humanitarian organizations, including B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights, have also backed the message. They emphasize that access to healthcare is a "bare minimum of humanity." According to UN experts, the scale of destruction is so severe it has been labeled "medicide"—the calculated dismantling of a population's medical support system. Global Pressure Mounts The appeal comes as the humanitarian situation reaches a breaking point. Medical agencies estimate that over 18,500 people are currently awaiting evacuation for life-saving treatment, with many dying while they wait. The letter will be presented to UK and EU officials this week, aiming to secure "unhindered and sustained" humanitarian access. For the signatories, the mission is clear: politics must not stand in the way of basic medical rights. Key Takeaways Celebrity Advocacy: Actors Mark Ruffalo, Cynthia Nixon, and Ilana Glazer are leading a global call to protect Gaza’s remaining medical facilities. Healthcare Crisis: Over 90% of Gaza's hospitals have been damaged or destroyed, leaving thousands of patients without access to essential care. Urgent Demands: The open letter calls for world leaders to ensure the immediate, unconditional entry of medical personnel and humanitarian aid into the region. Adapted From https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/12/celebrities-letter-israel-attack-gaza-hospitals

20260112_125325301.mp4

grok_video_2026-01-12-12-01-56.mp4

grok_video_2026-01-12-11-59-49.mp4

grok_video_2026-01-12-11-58-15.mp4

I reported on a news story that had been adapted from an established news outlet.

Yep, vertical position is best..😁

A veteran dairy farmer in Northern Ireland was left "totally stunned" this week when one of his cows gave birth to five healthy calves—a miracle event with odds estimated at 20 million to one. Noel Moore, who has been farming in Killen, near Castlederg, for five decades, admitted that while he has seen plenty of surprises in his long career, this "one-in-a-generation" event tops them all. The extraordinary delivery saw the mother cow produce five living quintuplets, a feat so rare it has only been documented a handful of times globally in countries like Mexico and Iran. The drama began at the weekend when Moore went to check on a cow he expected was carrying a large single calf or perhaps twins. To his astonishment, the count kept climbing. After the first few arrived, it became clear this was no ordinary calving. Veterinary experts note that while twin births are common and triplets occur occasionally, quintuplets are nearly unheard of in the cattle industry. What makes this story even more remarkable is the health of the brood. Multiple births in cattle often come with significant complications or low survival rates. However, Moore’s quintuplets are reportedly doing well, defying the usual risks associated with such an intensive delivery. The news has quickly turned the quiet farm in County Tyrone into a focal point for the agricultural community. For Moore, the arrival of these five new additions is a "magical moment" that serves as a powerful reminder of the unpredictability of nature. As the calves settle into their new home, they remain a living testament to an exceptionally rare biological phenomenon. Key Takeaways Astronomical Odds: The chances of a cow giving birth to five living calves are approximately 20 million to one. Veteran Surprise: Farmer Noel Moore, with 50 years of experience, described the event as the highlight of his career. Global Rarity: Quintuplet births are so rare they have only been recorded in a few locations worldwide, including a 2019 case in County Kerry. Adapted From https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg1w0r1zkro