Bacon1

It’s really concerning how fast AI has advanced, even in just the past year. Now I can easily generate a near-perfect video of a monkey riding a tiger. I don’t think it’ll be long before someone makes a video of Mr. Trump—or another world leader—saying something like, “Take cover, there’s an imminent nuclear attack.” I don’t think any actual laws have been implemented yet, but it seems that Europe, the U.S., and especially Thailand, in our case, are working on frameworks. https://fosrlaw.com/2025/ai-data-privacy-thailand-2025/#:~:text=Thailand is developing formal regulations,A Preview of What's Coming

As artificial intelligence reshapes the workforce, veterans have a powerful edge: they’re already wired for “augmented intelligence” — where human judgment and machine power work together. Rather than replacing people, AI can amplify human strengths — and that’s exactly the kind of human-machine pairing that veterans have lived through in their military careers. In the military, service members routinely operate with systems that merge human oversight and cutting-edge tech: from command-and-control platforms to unmanned aircraft. Veterans know how to make high-stakes decisions under uncertainty, and they bring ethical reasoning, leadership, and adaptability — skills that AI cannot replicate. While many civilians treat AI as a threat, veterans instinctively see it as a force multiplier. Their mental model allows them to view AI as a teammate, not a replacement. That mindset helps veterans learn fast. Throughout their careers, they’ve mastered new technologies, changed roles on the fly, and adjusted to evolving missions. These are exactly the traits that today’s employers crave in an AI-driven world. For veterans transitioning to civilian careers, AI is already serving as a bridge: helping them re-write resumes, translate military experience into civilian language, prepare for interviews, and even explore business ideas. Whether in operations, healthcare, cybersecurity, or entrepreneurship, AI is “partnering” with veterans — enhancing planning, forecasting, risk detection, and tactical execution. In every case, the veteran remains central; machines support, but do not lead. Far from being replaced, veterans are being reinforced: their leadership, discipline, and mission-focused mindset make them ideal for the new age of human-centered AI. Key Takeaways: Veterans thrive in AI-teamed environments: Their military experience has already trained them to operate alongside technology, giving them a natural advantage in augmented-intelligence roles. Human judgment remains irreplaceable: Veterans’ ethical decision-making and tactical insight are qualities AI cannot replicate — they remain the decisive factor. AI empowers transition and growth: AI tools help veterans translate their military experience into civilian careers, enabling faster reskilling and smoother career shifts. Adapted From https://www.military.com/feature/2025/11/21/why-veterans-are-built-ai-shift-all-veterans-need-know.html

Australia is facing a renewed challenge from neo-Nazi groups, and governments are scrambling to find effective — and lawful — ways to respond. The issue surged into national debate after about 60 neo-Nazis staged a rally outside the New South Wales Parliament, chanting extremist slogans and displaying an antisemitic banner. The footage triggered public outrage and raised urgent questions about how authorities should counter rising far-right extremism. One attendee, South African national Matthew Gruter, was quickly detained by the federal government and is expected to be deported. Meanwhile, the NSW government has proposed new laws that would criminalize public expressions of support for Nazi ideology. These measures go beyond Australia’s current bans on Nazi symbols. Critics, however, argue that sweeping laws could threaten civil liberties or be misused in the future. Security agencies say the problem is larger and more complex than any single rally. ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess describes modern extremism as a “wicked problem” — a tangle of online radicalization, opportunistic activism, and groups trying to exploit social tensions. One such group, the National Socialist Network, has recently rebranded as “White Australia” and is attempting to recruit supporters through anti-immigration protests. The possibility that extremists could register a political party has added another layer of concern. Under NSW rules, they would need only 750 members to qualify — and blocking them could collide with constitutional protections around political communication. Experts warn that simple solutions won’t work. Banning groups outright may push extremists underground, making them harder to track. Many specialists argue for a balanced approach: targeted laws that punish harmful conduct, strong judicial oversight, and long-term programs that build social cohesion and reduce the appeal of extremist ideologies. Key Takeaways Governments are struggling to balance public safety with civil-liberty protections as neo-Nazi activity resurges. Extremist groups are exploiting social tensions, particularly anti-immigration sentiment, to expand their influence. Experts say long-term community programs and targeted legal tools may work better than sweeping bans. Adapted From https://theconversation.com/grattan-on-friday-combatting-the-neo-nazis-is-a-wicked-problem-for-governments-269393

A deep transformation is unfolding inside American Christianity — one that is redefining both the faith and the nation’s approach to immigration. A rising bloc of nationalist evangelical leaders has steadily recast Christianity into a political weapon, using religious authority to legitimize harsh immigration policies and amplify fear of newcomers. This movement represents more than a theological shift; it is a powerful cultural realignment. Once, Christian teachings centered on humility, compassion, and a moral duty to welcome the stranger. Today, those values are being overshadowed by a narrative that paints America as a fragile “Christian homeland” under siege by demographic change. From pulpits to social media, this ideology frames migrants not as human beings in need, but as threats to identity, security, and divine order. Mainline Protestant traditions — historically champions of social justice and immigrant support — have not been able to counter the scale or speed of this transformation. Their quieter messaging struggles to compete with the emotional force of nationalist rhetoric. As a result, the public perception of American Christianity has drifted toward a harder, more exclusionary stance, one intertwined with the political rise of authoritarian-leaning leaders. Yet throughout the country, resistance is taking shape. Clergy, theologians, and lifelong believers are reclaiming the moral language of their faith, insisting that Christianity’s core message cannot be stretched to justify cruelty. They remind their communities of past moments when Christians led refugee aid, civil rights marches, and humanitarian outreach. Younger activists and older church elders alike are demanding a course correction — one grounded in empathy rather than fear. At stake is far more than immigration policy. The struggle within American Christianity will influence the nation’s democratic character, its moral integrity, and its understanding of who deserves welcome and protection. Key Takeaways: A powerful nationalist evangelical movement is reshaping immigration attitudes by framing migrants as cultural and spiritual threats. Traditional Christian teachings on compassion and care for the vulnerable are being pushed aside by politicized religious messaging. A growing coalition of faith leaders and activists is fighting to restore a justice-centered Christianity that supports humane immigration policies. Adapted From https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2025/nov/23/america-christian-evangelical-discrimination-immigration

Baiting post removed

Agree; I gave shortly after that.

You weren't beaten, you looked at the positives only. You acted in good faith. She just lied. So..... who's next on the list?

She’s clearly either lined up a date or taken a booking. Cancelling on you just a few hours beforehand isn’t a good sign at all. If it were me, I’d just leave it. Don’t contact her. If she reaches out, take your time and reply a few hours later. But honestly, don’t worry about it. There are plenty of others out there. You’re the one with value — not them. Keep your head up.

Photos of alcohol removed 42. You will not advertise, display, promote, review or endorse, directly or indirectly, the name or trademark of any alcoholic beverage. Such actions are potentially in contravention of Section 32 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (2008).

Line Of Duty 7 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cev1r8vee0eo https://www.imdb.com/news/ni65580503/?ref_=nwc_art_perm

Unpleasant comment removed @watchcat

Flame post removed @Airalee

Looks good 👍 https://m.imdb.com/title/tt29768334/

Pilot didn't even have time to eject...☹️

Paradromics, a brain-computer interface (BCI) company based in Austin, Texas, has received FDA approval to begin a human study of its Connexus BCI — a fully implantable brain chip designed for long-term use. The Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) granted for its Connect-One Early Feasibility Study marks a milestone: it’s the first time the FDA has authorized a high-data-rate implantable BCI specifically for restoring speech. Connexus is constructed from medical-grade materials — a titanium-alloy body with more than 400 ultra-fine platinum-iridium electrodes, each thinner than a human hair. These electrodes will be placed just beneath the brain’s surface in the motor cortex, the area that controls articulation. On-chip processing captures brain signals, which are then wirelessly transmitted out of the body through an internal transceiver and a wearable external one. The external unit charges inductively (like a wireless phone) and streams data to a computer running AI-powered language models. That system decodes neural patterns into text or synthesized speech, letting users communicate. The trial will begin with only two participants, each receiving a Connexus implant about 7.5 mm wide inserted 1.5 mm into the motor cortex. These volunteers will listen to sentences, then imagine speaking them in their mind. The device learns their neural “speech” patterns by mapping brain activity to sound, enabling real-time synthetic voice generation. Paradromics will also assess whether Connexus can pick up neural patterns linked to imagined hand movements—potentially allowing cursor control. If the first phase goes well, the company hopes to expand to 10 participants later, including some who might receive two implants to boost signal resolution. Paradromics CEO Matt Angle described the approval as “very exciting.” From an academic standpoint, BCI researcher Mariska Vansteensel noted that fully implantable systems like this are the future for clinical applications. Key Takeaways: The FDA has approved a human trial for Paradromics’ fully implantable Connexus brain chip, a BCI designed to help people with paralysis restore speech. Connexus uses over 400 microelectrodes, wirelessly transmits brain signals, and converts neural activity into text or synthesized voice with AI. The initial study involves two participants, with future plans to expand; it may also enable cursor control via imagined hand movements. Adapted From https://newatlas.com/medical-devices/human-trial-experimental-brain-chip-connexus/ Nature Link https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03849-0

Grace Jin Drexel is urging U.S. lawmakers to help free her father, Pastor Ezra Jin Mingri, who was arrested in China along with 17 other leaders of the Zion Church. The underground Christian congregation, which is not officially registered with the state, faces harsh pressure from Chinese authorities. The leaders are charged with “illegally using information networks,” a crime that could carry up to three years in prison. Drexel, speaking before the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, said her father founded Zion Church so believers could worship freely under God’s authority, rather than under Party control. She described past harassment — including interrogations, threats, and pressure to conform to government religious mandates. The arrest comes amid broader concerns about religious freedom in China. The Chinese Communist Party continues to crack down on unregistered churches, often shutting buildings, seizing assets, or even detaining clergy and congregants. Drexel’s testimony aligns with former President Donald Trump’s frequent rhetoric about defending Christians globally. A White House official said Trump is aware of the detentions, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio has publicly called for the leaders’ immediate release. Religious freedom advocates, including former U.S. Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom Sam Brownback, have called the crackdown in China a national security issue — warning that the Communist Party’s repression of faith is not just a domestic matter, but a threat to universal religious rights. Key Takeaways: Grace Jin Drexel appeals to U.S. Congress to free her father, Pastor Ezra Jin Mingri, and other detained Zion Church leaders in China. Zion Church, one of China’s largest unregistered Christian congregations, is targeted for refusing to conform to state-controlled religious structures. The detentions highlight growing religious persecution in China and have drawn U.S. political attention, including calls for action by Trump-era officials Adapted From https://apnews.com/article/trump-china-christian-leaders-detained-nigeria-babd324066dfee9d9c3065675f9f8c01

Two British researchers, Michael Crowley and Malcolm Dando of the University of Bradford, are raising the alarm: “brain weapons” that can manipulate human consciousness, memory, or behavior are moving beyond science fiction. In their forthcoming book—published by the Royal Society of Chemistry—they argue that rapid advances in neuroscience, pharmacology, and artificial intelligence are making tools that target the central nervous system (CNS) more precise, feasible, and potentially weaponizable. The pair point to historical precedent, such as Cold War-era efforts by states to develop CNS-acting chemicals, and a notable incident in 2002 when Russian forces used fentanyl derivatives during the Moscow theatre siege. Though the operation freed many hostages, more than 120 people died, and others suffered long-term effects. These facts, they contend, underscore how real and deadly such technologies already are. Crowley and Dando argue that existing arms control treaties are inadequate to address this emerging threat. In particular, they highlight gaps in the Chemical Weapons Convention. As the 30th session of the Conference of the States Parties (CSP) convenes in The Hague, they propose a new, more holistic arms control framework. Their plan includes establishing working groups to monitor CNS-acting agents, defining key terms, and setting up international mechanisms to track research. They emphasize these steps are not meant to hamper scientific progress—rather, they aim to prevent malign uses without stifling innovation. Their message is urgent: without decisive global governance, the human brain may become the next battleground. The researchers describe their work as a wake-up call—one that demands proactive policy to prevent the weaponization of neuroscience. Key Takeaways: “Brain weapons” capable of altering consciousness are becoming technically viable, thanks to advances in neuroscience, AI, and pharmacology. Historical use of CNS-acting agents, such as in the 2002 Moscow theatre siege, shows that brain-targeting weapons are not just theoretical. Crowley and Dando call for a robust, new arms-control structure — including working groups and monitoring — to prevent the misuse of neurotechnology. Adapted From https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/nov/22/mind-altering-brain-weapons-no-longer-only-science-fiction-say-researchers

Three unnecessary posts removed. This is The Wellness Zone, a place for advice, not frivolous jokes

Pleased you've got another date with your China girl. Has she heard that song? Maybe play it to her on your date...

Count the red flags you've detected, make a list. Have you heard from her this morning?

No, she is. Sounds as of you're devalued. If she doesn't see your worth; up to she. 😁

US rapper Eminem has launched legal action against an Australian beachwear company named Swim Shady, arguing that its branding is too close to his iconic stage name, Slim Shady. In September, Eminem — born Marshall B. Mathers III — filed a petition with the US Patent and Trademark Office seeking to cancel Swim Shady’s US trademark. The company is required to respond by next week under US law. His legal team claims the Sydney-based brand is creating a “false association” that could mislead customers into believing the business is linked to the Grammy-winning rapper. Swim Shady, which sells portable beach umbrellas, swim bags, and accessories, told the BBC it would “defend our valuable intellectual property”. According to Australian business records, the company first registered its name in September 2023 after originally trading as Slim Shade, and officially launched in 2024. The brand secured a US trademark for “Swim Shady” earlier this year — prompting Eminem’s team to file their cancellation request. The rapper has also moved to oppose the brand’s trademark in Australia. In a statement, the company described itself as a grassroots Australian business focused on producing stylish sun protection products for local conditions. It declined further comment due to the ongoing legal proceedings. Documents show that Eminem trademarked Slim Shady in the US in 1999, the same year he released The Slim Shady LP. However, he only applied for trademark protection in Australia in January 2025. His lawyers argue that the name has become “distinctive and famous” worldwide, firmly tied to his music career since the breakout success of “The Real Slim Shady” in 2000. The case unfolds against the backdrop of other high-profile Australian trademark battles, including last year’s overturned ruling involving singer Katy Perry and local designer Katie Perry. Key Takeaways Eminem seeks to cancel Swim Shady’s US trademark, alleging it mimics his Slim Shady brand. Swim Shady says it will defend its intellectual property and denies any intentional association. The dispute adds to a growing list of notable trademark clashes involving international celebrities. Adapted From Source: BBC https://share.google/ASzP4W8Mvto9V8NIM Link To Swim Shady https://swimshady.com.au/?srsltid=AfmBOorF3nzuTuAhcr1OPlJz6OQybWGurgbXDFWKL8BqMcmQ06auRD1E

Let her know you’re not wealthy and watch how she reacts. It sounds like she enjoyed the comfortable lifestyle her ex could offer and may be hoping for something similar again. Have you heard from her this morning? If not, send a simple “hello” around 11 and see how she responds. Take some time to figure out what you truly want and need. Keep your options open.

Flame post removed @moose7117 Replies removed

ศูนย์ตรวจ MRI กาฬสินธุ์ https://share.google/lLgJDxcbuiszzFbjn I had an MRI on my spine about five years ago, but it wasn’t done in Kalasin. The cost was 12,000 baht.