Guitar God

Facebook doesn’t GAF about scam ads as long as they make money. They’re obvious scams, a full block pallet of working, returned Apple products plus free shipping anywhere in the world for $49.95. Sounds legit, right? Users report them and they never remove the ads. I’d think FB would have some legal culpability.

Yeah, the “legal” stuff that’s responsible for the majority of most fatal vehicle accidents and chronic disease. The “legal” stuff that has an LD50, that people actually die from if they consume too much. The original date rape drug. The drug responsible for most domestic violence. If you’re taking about cannabis, it’s now legal too and it doesn’t have all the negatives that alcohol does. In every place that’s (re)legalized cannabis, both opiate and alcohol use decreased as did automobile accidents, violence and other crimes and social problems.

Another a-hole conservative sackduster

Not a problem. Nobody gaf what you do. Bye bye

It's technically possible not to wear any hat. That solves your problem of false dichotomy.

So, she got too high, went into her room, wasn't in any danger, wasn't causing any problems so her friend asked the hotel staff to get involved, they called the police who showed up and freaked the woman out and caused her to have a panic attack. The story should have stopped at "isolated herself in her room".

If I pay taxes in Thailand I just enter the amount on line 8 of IRS form 1116 and deduct that amount from my U.S. taxes owed. There's no double taxation. He's making a campaign promise to fix a problem that doesn't even exist. Expats in Thighland aren't interested in what you're peddling DonOld.

Cannabis-fueled? Was he giggling? Did he stop at a 7 for Snickers bar? The writers where sure go out of their way to try to demonize cannabis. Cannabis doesn't cause aggression, like alcohol or ya ba does. The fact that they don't mention a single thing he did that would support their claim of his fleeing the police being "cannabis fueled". Just vague BS.

I recommended that you consult a doctor. That's my opinion, not a medical opinion. I'm giving you advice, not medical advice. Maybe your doctor can explain the distinction...

It depends. If you think Trump will accept the results of the election this time when he didn't the last time when it's patently obvious that he lost then yes, a trip to a psychologist might be in order. What are your qualifications to judge my opinions? Are you trying to say my opinion is wrong? I supported my position with facts, not feelings and not smartass remarks either. So yes, I definitely think a mental health screening for you is in order.

Trump said that he would accept the results of the election only if it was a fair election. To him, a fair election is one where he wins, no matter how many fewer votes and electoral votes he received. So yes, essentially Trump said that he won't accept the results under any circumstances if Harris wins. Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, he's still claiming he won the 2020 election. He claimed there was outcome-determinate fraud so they picked the state they thought it would be the easiest to prove and spent $8 million dollars and nine months doing a full recount, full audit, verified signatures, interviewed poll workers and investigated the claims of anyone who claimed there was fraud. They watched thousands of hours of security video and in the end the found ZERO evidence of any election fraud and the found another 354 votes for Biden FFS. This was a partisan group consisting entirely of Trump-loving Trump supporters whose goal was the prove there was fraud and that Trump won. They conclusively proved both allegations were false. And Trump still is pushing the "Big Lie to his gullible band of ignorant haters four years later. If you think Trump will accept the results of the 2024 election if he loses. You're insane.

If the roles were reversed and a disgruntled Democrat had lain in wait with a gun and was charged with an attempted assassination of Biden the conservatives would be saying. It wasn't an assassination. He's not a sniper, it's not a sniper rifle, it's not an assault rifle (or an assault-style rifle), it's obviously a hunting gun and the guy was just there waiting for rabbit season to open.

FOX is complaining that an FBI agent who doesn't like Trump is heading the investigation but guess which judge has been assigned to try the case? Aileen Cannon. The Trump appointed, Trump-loving judge who capriciously decided to delay the federal case against Trump, for stealing and refusing to return top secret government and military documents, until after the election. The possible consequence of that is if Trump is reelected then he can't be tried for those crimes until January 2029, if he's still alive and he hasn't pressured any of his other appointed officials into dropping the case. Is FOX mentioning that???

If it’s on FOX it’s got to be true. How is it unfair when an FBI agent is in charge of an investigation into an assassination attempt, but it’s not unfair if judges actually appointed by Trump drop charges against him or delay trials against him? Trump directly and personally benefited from these biased judges and FOX defended them. What’s the worst case outcome in having an FBI agent who doesn’t like Trump ( like over half the country does) investigating a potential assassin? Do people think the shooter is going to go free and the FBI agent is going to suggest he was just out shooting rabbits? Routh is already facing life in jail and has been charged with two weapons charges and attempted assassination of the president which we wrote a letter confessing to. He’s certainly going to be convicted. It’s a non-issue. Conservatives aren’t happy unless they have something to bitch about. No matter how inconsequential.

Trump supporters claimed there was widespread outcome-determinate fraud so they poured $10 million dollars and spent eight months doing a full audit, full hand recount and viewed hundred of hours of security video in the state they thought it would be the easiest to prove fraud, Arizona. What were the results? Absolutely no evidence of voter fraud and in the end they found that Biden received 384 votes that hadn’t been counted initially. It’s pretty obvious that the Trump supporters were repeatedly lied to by Trump and that they’re all really poor losers.