Jump to content

sandyf

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    15,920
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sandyf

  1. On 1/21/2020 at 9:41 AM, ubonjoe said:

    I would say this is good proof of it. What are your sources that say otherwise.

     

    You go to the train station on the Thai side of the border.

    You were wrong to take something said as some sort of proof.

    I arrived at Padang Besar yesterday morning on train No 45 from Bangkok and can confirm that the immigration facilities at the station operate in exactly the same way as they have done for many years, apart from the introduction of fingerprinting and X ray machines.

    I got off the train and walked the few yards into Thai immigration, they have 3 desks and all were manned but everyone had to queue at the same desk. Down the passage to the Malaysian desks and stamped into Malaysia, luggage through the X ray and then over to the men in white suits for thermal imaging and passport check. I have a Chinese visa that they picked up on until they saw it was 6 months old, getting on for an hour to get into the station concourse.

    I went back to the station a few hours later and bought a ticket for the Hat Yai shuttle, preferred to wait a bit in Hat Yai than at the station. Formalities were effectively the reverse of arrival, Malaysian immigration does not open for departing passengers until inbound passengers have been processed. You are then stamped out and pass through to Thai immigration and then on to the platform where officers ensure you go straight on to the train. The train doesn't leave until all passengers have cleared immigration.

    It is fairly obvious that some that have travelled by road from Thailand to Padang Besar, or from Padang Besar station to Thailand by road, have failed to grasp the procedure for rail travellers and have been disseminating false information.

     

    • Like 1
  2. Surprise surprise, we want out of the EU and then just cherry pick the regulations that are perceived as beneficial. Those that were unknowingly beneficial don't come into it.

     

    “But even so, around two-thirds of them on mobile phone roaming and on flight compensation, say yes we should follow the European Union rules.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-trade-deal-brexit-news-eu-public-support-a9316511.html

    • Like 1
  3. 3 hours ago, nauseus said:

    Another bunch of gripes grapes.

    One day the reality of the bunch will sink in.

     

    Most strikingly, one third said they would consider moving either their businesses or themselves across the Channel to remain part of the EU and its huge market.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-boris-johnson-small-businesses-leave-uk-eu-market-a9310356.html

     

    PS Not holding my breath.

    • Like 1
  4. 19 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

    Basic state Pensions are NOT benefits

    I would agree with the sentiment but I think that you will find that every government document regarding state pensions refers to it as a benefit.

    The contributions made over the years were immediately paid out so unlike a private scheme there is no fund that you can claim on.

    It is highly immoral that people paying the same contribution over the same number of years get a different pension based on where they live, unfortunately we are all well aware that morality is sadly lacking in Westminster.

    • Like 1
  5. On 2/1/2020 at 11:24 PM, evadgib said:

    Very smart. Is that the Seaforth Highlanders?

    Now that you mention it, I don't know, always assumed it was the Forres pipe band as he was in that for about 15 years after the war. He was in the Seaforths but seconded to the 9th Commandos and demobbed at the end of the war. I have a photo of the full band and my uncle who was born in 1927 is a side drummer so looks like after the war, possibly the TA.

    Thanks for the observation and apologies for the digression. 

    • Thanks 1
  6. 17 hours ago, Andrew Dwyer said:

    I was replying to a poster who stated, on post number 10, that he had already obtained a certified copy of his passport and a certified translation at MFA , rather than assuming he got these for free I asked “ how much “.

    Clearly you haven’t read the thread in its entirety .

    As I said you should be more careful in how you say things. You were not responding to Post No 10 but to post No 24.

  7. 18 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:

    Issued 26 July 2553 Expires 25 July 2563, clearly imprinted on the bottom left below my photo. I obtained mine as well as the yellow tabien ban after I married my wife, who I am now divorced from, and who is the daughter of the Phu Yai for Nong Saeng.  He is the one who set the wheels in motion for me.  The house is now in my daughters name.

     

    In 2016 with the need to ensure registration of all migrant workers it went nation wide.  The program actually started in 2551.

     

    https://www.isaanlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Regulation-of-Pink-Card.pdf

    Like quite a few things in Thailand, what is available to one is not always available to all. When I heard about them going nationwide I went along to the local Amphur here in Chonburi and they said they didn't do them but would shortly as they had sent someone on a training course. Went back a few weeks later and picked up the 7th one they had issued, and like the yellow book which I got in 2010, all free of charge.

    I believe the validity only applies to those under 60, there is no expiry date on mine.

  8. Ball is back in Bojo's court.

     

    The Scottish parliament passed a motion demanding that Boris Johnson allow another referendum on Scotland's place in the UK, pointing to Brexit as a "material change in circumstances" since the 2014 vote.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/scottish-independence-referendum-nicola-sturgeon-snp-msp-a9308756.html?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=INDNEWS%2330012020&utm_term=IND_Headlines_Masterlist_CDP

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  9. 20 hours ago, Forethat said:

    So, you are referring to an article covering a paper where it is concluded that each UK citizen could have had £13,000 in a pension fund in case the UK government HAD set aside oil and gas revenue?

     

    May I remind you that using that very same principle, this time based on tax expenditure per person in Scotland each year, that each UK-citizen would have had £70,000 in a pension fund had we saved the difference between what is spent on each citizen in the rest of the Union (except Northern Ireland).

    https://fullfact.org/economy/scotland-england-public-services-spending/

     

    The way I see it, you can just hand back the difference before you leave. £57,000 per jock. 

    Obviously a creative accountant, maybe one day you will recognise the difference between apples and oranges.

     

    • Like 1
  10. On 1/28/2020 at 6:40 PM, bwpage3 said:

    Impossible to do in places like rural Isaan where all of the local transactions are in cash.

    No its not.

    I was in China back in June and they are virtually cashless even out in the sticks. Everyone that takes money shows you a QR code and they just use their mobile phone, even the old ladies in the markets. I got some strange looks paying with actual cash.

    Makes it very difficult for tourists as many services are automatic and unattended so cannot be used.

×
×
  • Create New...