richard_smith237

He’ll leave ‘quietly’ in the noise before a certain court hearing… Meanwhile the Military are perfectly posed to hold a Coup in no confidence of the current PM. Who then gets the concessions for those Casinos on the boarder town ?? Oversimplified perhaps - but that’s how this seems to be being played out….

We have quite different situations - what you see as a huge price…. I see as phenomenal reward… Many wives have given up & compromised their careers more than many husbands care to admit. My Wife’s devotion to myself & our family by far supersedes any savings I’d make by being single.

More ‘classic cockroachery’ from the forums number one cretinous troll… …. so very very desperate to bait & snag a bite like the true trolling verminous weasel you are….

With a lost childhood - she’s an amazing testament to resilience… but this remains a tragic story & she’s been failed by the state & those around who may have known of her situation & shown no consideration until now. Props to those who did get involved - I hope she finds a deeply caring home for what remains of her childhood.

Surprising comments from you… I thought you’d be more open minded to varying dynamics in relationships, why & how they work etc… No hard rules - some just work with a better simplicity & balance than others it seems.

ohhh boy, you must be new here, in case you didn't know/notice, here we are called walking ATM machines 555 On that perspective… - Driver (child to & from school) - Cook (excellent food) - Does all the grocery shopping - Given up a good career (after child) - lots more that I forget…. Whats ours is ours for very good reasons - a trusted life partner who’s sacrificed a lot…. Some of the comments don’t see things firing that perspective because they may not have been in the same situation… … but it’s also clear many are in mutually caring, mutually respectful & loving relationships who do get the ‘sharing concept’… Without my wife, my life would be a lot more expensive - child care alone…

Maybe true - Wife always deals with the bills… I can’t be bothered… She also drives mostly these days… I can’t be bothered with that either… We have the same account / card - so it doesn’t matter who makes the transaction- it comes from the same account. If she’s busy chatting, I’ll get the bill, if I’m busy, she’ll get it - the action of who executes the transaction itself matters little to us from a financial perspective - it’s usually her though, ‘cos I’m taking with my son or friends etc & the wives will just sort it out. I’ve never given it a second thought.

Hope it’s a better attempt at trolling than the cretinous bumf you’ve been churning out lately… Many are now wise to your parasitic vapidity - so you’ll need to up your game…

Wife generally makes the payment with her card because I can’t be bothered dealing with that stuff… We have two cards from the same Credit Card account that gets paid off in full every month. While our child is still young - she’s a stay at home mum - driver - chef - house master - gym freak etc… & an amazing wife dedicated to her family. Before children she had her career and money… what was hers was hers and mine was mine - we both had our own cars etc… now she has the house, the car… The dynamic changes after children… a happy compromise for someone so doting & responsible…

The sole surviving passenger of the ill-fated Air India Flight 171 was Vishwashkumar Ramesh - a British national of Indian origin. Born in India, moved to the UK in 2003, gained British citizenship some years later. None of that has the slightest bearing on his extraordinary survival. But, of course, that’s not the point for Malcy. His goal was never to share meaningful information or honour the story - it was to bait. To twist the spotlight away from a miraculous survival and drag the thread into yet another pointless nationality debate, where he could then sit back, twist words, level accusations of racism. This is classic Malcy - the same tired formula: frame the post with a thin veneer of plausibility, say just enough to provoke, then pretend it’s everyone else who has the problem. It’s trolling with a smirk, not insight. And this is the second thread he's used to try the same bait on this exact incident. His exploitation of this tragedy shows exactly how low he’ll stoop for engagement. It’s textbook weasel-tier behaviour: calculated, cowardly, and utterly cockroachey - right down there with his creepy little threads about Thai prostitutes. He lays the groundwork under the guise of 'discourse' but carefully crafts his wording to spark arguments, from which he can manipulate, accuse, and claim the moral high ground. This is not debate. This is attention-seeking vermin at work. And I react not because he’s worth it - but because others need to see this for what it is: a trap. A nasty, desperate, manipulative little trap laid by someone with no genuine interest in truth or community - just in seeing how many people he can poke into outrage.

Pathetic attempts to bait yet again - your tune never changes... like a bottom feeding cockroach with the dregs of the bedwetting trollers attempting to provoke with every post... So very very desperate....

You're making a distinction without a meaningful difference to the context of the story of the crash that killed 270 nor this, apparently, sole survivor. If an Irish person had gained British citizenship, would you be be equally butthurt about some perceived challenge to YOUR British-ness? Its NOT about you. 270 people are dead for crying out loud. Who gives a FF about your Britishness? No one referred to the Jeju Air flight attendants as 'the Korean survivors'.... They were rightly described as 'Jeju Air survivors' - because in the aftermath of a crash, the airline is the relevant detail, not the survivor’s passport. In this case, too, nationality is irrelevant. The fact Vishwashkumar Ramesh is a British national, that he was born in India, moved to the UK in 2003 and acquired nationality sometime after etc... has nothing to do with his survival. ... All forum members know that if a Frenchman is named Karim Bensaïd, or a German is called Tariq Al-Masri in any news reports on here the usual suspects will start grumbling about, origins, and ‘true nationality' etc..... ..... And Malcy?... He knows this perfectly well. That’s why he posted what he did - not out of confusion, but with deliberate intent. It’s bait, thinly veiled under faux-plausibility. He lights the match, waits for the reaction.... .... He’ll start twisting replies, hurling accusations..... And when the thread spirals into exactly the chaos he engineered, he’ll sit back, proud of the fire he set - probably adding another imaginary ‘posting award’ to his mental shelf. Classic Malcy..... Same formula, different thread....

Screenshot? Point is Richard seems to think I made this up. I read mostly the British press, and they all wrote that he was British. Richard might be embarrassed about him, but I am proud of my fellow Brit survivor, but to be honest cringe about the ugly Brits like Richard. The title of the very video you linked doesn’t even refer to Vishwashkumar Ramesh as a “Brit” — it simply calls him the “Air India survivor"..... .....Why? ...... Because his nationality is irrelevant to the actual story: a man survived a devastating crash. That’s the focus. But had he been an Indian national, you wouldn’t have made your two smug bait posts - because you know full well there’d be no opportunity to stir the pot over nationality. Your entire angle relies on weaponising the 'British' label to provoke a reaction, then playing the wounded genius when people call you out. It’s cheap, transparent, and tiresomely predictable.... to most at least...

Nope... I haven't said you've made up his nationality, nor have I claimed he is not a British National... Again you twist comments and gaslight like the true spineless weasel you are... I've accused you of concentrating on his nationality for no other reason than to deliberately provoke the forum into debate about his nationality... and you have now done so in two different threads.

Are you ashamed that he British? He doesn't fit you narrative of what a Brit looks like? What is exactly your issue with the man? He isn’t white enough for you? Issue is with your baiting and deliberate provocation... You want there to be a discussion about nationality so you can gaslight people with the exact comments you've attempted to gaslight me with above - This is your whole modus-operandi - bait and provoke, wait for the responses, gaslight and claim moral highground...