.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Blue Muton
-
Posts
2,052 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Blue Muton
-
-
18 minutes ago, NCC1701A said:
being a former Pretty Boy I can say I am surprised he had to resort to this behavior.
Horrible.
Not so much of the "former", you still very hansum.
-
1
-
-
23 hours ago, grollies said:
Red lead/red oxide
Only if you want to be poisoned by the stuff, it was banned in the EU years ago, along with paraquat, and asbestos.
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, BobBKK said:Let's get this clear? Bercow is mandated to be NEUTRAL and he has not been. He was then afraid of being 'outed' and resigned as Speaker and now he's on national TV spouting away.
He's a disgrace. Any decent Speaker would never allow Parliament to descend into this chaos - bring back Betty!
His duty is most certainly NOT to be neutral when it comes down to protecting parliament against the illegal actions of a cowboy PM.
-
5
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
40 minutes ago, JonnyF said:
Again, which post? I have no idea what you are talking about. I suspect you do not either.
If I changed a post it was have a line underneath saying "edited by..."
So which post was it?
The post that was directly quoted in #295. The fact that your previous post has since been deleted does not excuse your lies about having clearly posted what you now claim you haven't.
-
1
-
-
14 minutes ago, JAG said:
Neither the Electoral Commission who oversaw the referendum, the government who called it, the Remain Campaign who fought and lost it nor the parliament which was subsequently elected promising to honour the result has made any moves to overturn it on the grounds of serious electoral fraud. Neither the silly slogans painted on that notorious bus displayed by the leave campaign, nor the exaggerated claims of impending economic and social disintegration made by many on the remain campaign (including government ministers) constitute serious electoral fraud. There have been no substantiated claims, Where there have been claims no action has been taken.
Yet again: there was no "serious electoral fraud", no matter how many times you repeat it!
You are showing that you don't know what you're talking about. Let me remind you, as you seem to have missed it.
It was the head of the Electoral Commission that branded the offences committed by the Leave campaign "most serious".
Uder UK Electoral law there could not be any moves to overturn the result because the referendum was a non-binding, advisory one. Had it been a binding referendum then it would have been possible to challenge the result.
Electoral Fraud is defined in law. What you describe as "exagerated claims" are not covered by that law. Interestingly, deliberately lying by an official campaign would appear to be covered, given that the reason the courts gave for stopping the action against Johnson was not that the £350m a week lie was within the law, rather that the motivation for bringing the action was deemed to be politically motivated.
Do try to keep up.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
39 minutes ago, JonnyF said:Evidence please. If you haven't been keeping up, here's an article from yesterday. In fairness it was easy to miss because the Remainstream media have completely ignored. it.
The evidence is out there. I am aware of yesterday's announcement as I read it in the mainstream media, strange that as you pretend they didn't report it.
In true Brexiteer style you have gone off on an irrelevant tangent. The criminal allegations are quite separate from the Electoral Commission's investigations into the Electoral Fraud that the Leave campaign was found guilty of multiple counts of "most serious" electoral fraud, being subject to the strongest allowable punishment of a £20,000 fine for each count.
-
3
-
9 minutes ago, Xonax said:
I like the look of that top one.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just now, JonnyF said:
Parliament is predominately made up of Remainers. So how could a few Brexiteers block it? It was a Remain Parliament that blocked it. The likes of Johnson and Rees Mogg voted for it he 3rd time and it still failed.
You are clutching at straws to hide your anti-democratic views. You are right to hide them, they are extremely undesirable in 21st Century Britain ????.
How dare you use the anti-democratic label when the leave side committed so much fraud?
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, JonnyF said:These individuals are supporting the majority of UK citizens that voted to Leave. Not trying to over-ride the Democratic vote like the HOC, the Civil service and the House of Lords.
Multiple convictions of electoral fraud prove it was not a democratic vote, stop pretending otherwise.
The majority of UK citizens most certainly did not vote to Leave, as you put it, that is a lie. 17.4 million people out of over 60 million is a majority now?
-
4
-
- Popular Post
14 hours ago, JAG said:Well I have to say that I am not particularly surprised. The "Remain Campaign" has from before the referendum, been very much the child of the establishment. The courts are after all the product of the establishment, and I suspect that the government realised that from the start.
Amidst the whole sea of opinions, campaigns, parliamentary and party machinations a couple of fixed points poke out of the foam. One: the people of the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union in the referendum. Two: the subsequent general election returned a parliament, of which the overwhelming majority of members, on both sides of the house, were elected on manifestoes which stated that the result of the referendum was to be honoured, and the UK was to leave the EU. Both results, obtained through the ballot box, have effectively been overturned by this establishment, and a general election, the proper constitutional means to arrive at a solution has been denied. It is tempting if perhaps melodramatic to suggest that the establishment has vigorously and contemptibly put two fingers up to the electorate.
Where do we go from here? I suspect that it will be some time before we have an election - the Labour Party, which has spent the last week in conference busily confirming its reputation as being unelectable will not want one until they are sure that they can win it - a long wait; and the Conservative rebels will not want one unless they can oust Johnson and his team and replace them with their own people, if they don't manage that then they know that come an election they will be toast! We are probably in for quite a long period of a stalled government, and yet more choleric grandstanding from Mr Speaker Bercow - he won't resign now!
Yet again: The result of a referendum marred by most serious electoral fraud committed by the leave campaign deserves no respect, and no honouring. Had the leave campaign shown any respect for the rule of law covering the referendum you might have had a point. They didn't and you don't, no matter how many times you repeat it.
-
4
-
1
-
48 minutes ago, StayinThailand2much said:
but only one in 7 gets anywhere near to daily sex!
Guess I'm lucky, then...
Me too. I'm one of the six.
-
2
-
-
5 hours ago, Will27 said:
Spiral is great.
I've just managed to find season 7 on the SBS website.
Another excellent French series is Braquo.
SBS?
-
5 minutes ago, wgdanson said:
Just done Ep 9 of Pennyworth, so just one to go. I am amazed at all the genuine old cars they have in it, Rover 75s, Rover 3500 % 2000, a Hilman Husky van and a Vauxhall Victor were spotted.
All of those oldies are waiting to come back into production on the 1st of November, Johnson has his hand on the switch ready to rekindle the white heat of the British car industry. Of course then they won't have to comply with any EU safety or emmissions regulations and there'll be no need for such nonsense as seat belts, airbags, indicators or electric starters.
-
2
-
-
36 minutes ago, jastheace said:
If I spent 3 hours in the company of KP the 'OP', I would suffer PTSD too I reckon
It was four days.
-
On 8/26/2019 at 1:32 PM, localexpat said:
Hello
thanks for you advise
Do not want to be picky, but, True is out for me as I would need to buy their minimum package about 20, 000 Baht and only have premiereship
Footybite is interesting, I presume free, so it might have a big stress factor, buffering etc
I can across
BCE – Biggest Center of Entertainment
Cost for a month is 15 usd, review seems good, anyone had any experience of this?
It costs a fraction of what you say. If you have a mobile from them and the tv package you can get it cheaper, just ask the True people in one of the malls. I switched my mobile from AIS to them last year and I pay around 600THB per month for calls, 4g and their Premier League football package.
-
16 hours ago, worgeordie said:
Electric fence next, is it Colin.
regards worgeordie
I think Ken Bates has a secondhand one going cheap.
-
1
-
-
Good. Robbing bar stewards.
-
23 minutes ago, CharlieH said:
Ultimately, I would have thought whoever consumed the food would have to pay for it, in the absence of who ordered it. Failing that whoever is left at the table.
.....and whoever wore the beer?
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Well I had a great night in Pattaya last night, was walking past a restaurant when a girl rushes out and bumps into me. We got chatting and then went to a bar, one thing led to another and she dragged me to a hotel and, well, being a gentleman I won't go into too much detail but suffice it to say that the minbar wasn't the only thing that took a bashing. And best of all, she paid for everything, she must have spent about 15,000 Baht!
-
2
-
12
-
1 minute ago, elliss said:
Lets not forget , Cottage industry , and weaving .
Soon to be quoted on the stock exchange , invest now...
Not possible, all of the financial institutions will have gone to Germany by then. Or France. Or The Netherlands.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
22 hours ago, Loiner said:Do you ever wonder why we say the EU has decimated UK industry over the past 43 years? You have given one good example, of the many available.
I've never wondered that because it's simply untrue. It's greedy people like Dyson who move their already profitable companies abroad for cheap labour.
-
4
-
12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
Right so someone tells Brexit Part MEPs who to vote for, well did they follow the instruction. If not, they used their democratic right to vote as they wish, if they followed the instruction they chose not to use their democratic right to vote as they wish.
A bit like party whips at Westminster telling MP's how to vote then? ????
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Forethat said:
Just like calling others racist, fascist, stupid, crazy, nutter, liar, extremist etc.
Sounds familiar...
I really have no idea what you're talking about.
-
1 minute ago, evadgib said:
The Brexit Party claim they were told who to vote for re the incoming gang of five, furthermore one MEP was told just one week ago when she objected to being branded 'far right' that she could not contest the allegation as the accuser 'was on the same side' (ie a British MEP from another party).
Democratic?
They had the choice of doing what they were told or not, nobody had a gun to their heads, so yes. And if it talks far right and walks far right, the chances are that's what it is. Remember MP's in the UK can make wild, unfounded accusations about others but have immunity against laws on slander, is that any different (the answer is no)?
-
2
-
Supreme Court: Suspending Parliament was unlawful, judges rule
in World News
Posted
No, it was your post that I quoted :
Multiple convictions of electoral fraud prove it was not a democratic vote, stop pretending otherwise.
The majority of UK citizens most certainly did not vote to Leave, as you put it, that is a lie. 17.4 million people out of over 60 million is a majority now?
I have highlighted the part where you wrongly stated that the majority of UK citizens voted to leave, you remember, the since deleted bit that you now lie about having written.