Blue Muton
-
Posts
2,069 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by Blue Muton
-
-
We used to have Pangasius fillet "fish 'n' chips in our company's restaurant, it was decent enough, especialy with oodles of their delicious freshly made tartar sauce.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
So our PL fixtures prior to the Man City game on November the 24th are:
Brighton H
Southampton A
Newcastle H
Burnley A
Watford A
Palace H
Now I'm not so daft as to say we'll win the lot or that there are any "easy" games in this league, especially the shape that our defence is in, opposition teams will be aware of and try to take advantage of our vulnerability, but these are not the best teams in the league and if ever there was a chance to put a run together this should surely be it. We are certainly capable of hurting opponents and some of our youngsters will be new challenges for them.
If we can get the defence sorted we'll be on our way up. A spine of Rudi, Kante, Mount and Abraham is certainly something to build on. The group of youngsters with their ability and energy, supported by a manager that's doing all he can to encourage them is on the brink of something special.
-
3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
10 hours ago, keithsimmonds said:Not a bad watch....Reece James looked the part and scored a cracking goal,he has a big future,Billy Gilmour worked hard all night...maybe too hard. Marc Guehi played well in defence and could also have a bright future. The lad who did catch my eye was Tino Anjorin strong on the ball an eye for a pass,and he only came on for the last 20 mins....we will see. Mind you i thought Gael Kakuta was going to be the nuts and Charlie Musonda.....you just never know.
Yes, a lovely goal from him and there's was pretty damn good too, not sure where our defence was though. Bats' turn and shot was pretty impressive, Pulisic struggling for form at present.
-
3
-
1 hour ago, ChrisY1 said:
A Yaris.......!
A Yaris with "go faster" stripes, no less.
-
1
-
-
13 hours ago, JamJar said:
"wearing a nice blazer and nice pants" is exactly what I wear when I'm going on holiday. ????
Why would your underwear make any difference?
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, TheAceFace said:
15 pages of reading shi&e , been a long time member, you new people are not worth a wan& , I know many people here with good hearts, there not all after ripping us off. Seems the OP has been had and fair play you mug
"Calm is his mind, calm is his speech..."
Are you sure?
-
24 minutes ago, grollies said:
Red oxide won't poison you. I merely mentioned red lead for the benefit of older people (like myself) who could assimilate the two products. Never mind.
ok but of course all of these things are still available here where people don't enjoy the protections that we get in the UK and elsewhere. Even the US was nearly twenty years behind Europe in banning asbestos.
-
10 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:
So it was a political maneuver by Johnson? Suspend parliament so he can behave like a dictator.
Something he explicitly denied on several occasions and indeed appears to affirmed that this was not the case to the Queen.
So he was lying AGAIN.
Well he was sacked for lying previously, surprising that so many thought he'd change his spots if they selected him for PM.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
56 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:There was no fraud. You're a bit behind with the news.
For the third tme in this one thread, you are confusing yesterday's news about criminal investigation being stopped through lack of evidence with the proven findings of electoral fraud for which the Leave campaign were fined the maximum amount of £20,000 on multiple counts. Those offences were described by the head of the Electoral Commission as "most serious". Do try to keep up, you're a bit confused by the news.
-
3
-
1 hour ago, JamesBlond said:
That is what they do in Africa when they have lost an election. You're dragging British politics down to that level.
I'm sure all the Africans who have piled into Britain to exploit our standard of living are fine with that, but I am not - it is un-British and ignoble. Nobody is making any legal challenges to the validity of the vote. Just honour it. Anything else is anarchy and third-worldism.
What are you waffling on about bringing up legal challenges?
No legal challenges are allowed in the case of a non-binding, advisory referendum. That's under UK electoral law, which is the topic under discussion, not some attempted deflection by bringing Africa ito the debate.
-
16 minutes ago, evadgib said:
Didn't the latest case against Arron Banks & Co also collapse yesterday?
That's already been covered in this thread, yesterday's news was relating to a criminal investigation that in no way negates the previous findings of the Electoral Commission.
-
5 minutes ago, billd766 said:
quote from your post "The majority of UK citizens most certainly did not vote to Leave, as you put it, that is a lie. 17.4 million people out of over 60 million is a majority now?
If you want to quote figures, please back them up with links or references otherwise it is just your guess, and you were 5,648,000 people out which makes your figures incorrect.
The population of the UK at 30 June 2016 is estimated to be 65,648,000 people.
Actually of those 60 odd million people only 46,500,001 were registered to vote.
Of the 46,500,001 people registered to vote, 12,948,108 could not be bothered to vote.
If you cannot be bothered to vote, then you must accept the fact that you have no voice in the vote and accept the outcome.
Of the rest 17,410,742 51.89% voted to Leave and 16,141,241 48.11% voted to Remain.
Therefore the Leave vote won the day.
Therefore the Remain side should accept the result.
That is called democracy.
Sadly it appears that they are unwilling or cannot accept the result. That is why over 3 years later the UK is in the state it is now.
Results
Votes %
Leave 17,410,742 51.89%
Remain 16,141,241 48.11%
Valid votes 33,551,983 99.92%
Invalid or blank votes 25,359 0.08%
Total votes 33,577,342 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 46,500,001 72.21%
Sadly not a single one of you will accept the fact that the Leave campaign commeted electoral fraud, nor have you had the decency to say that it's wrong or the honesty to say that you're ok with it. Once again, nobody should accept a result achieved through fraud, that's democracy.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
16 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:A team of lawyers put the case to the judges. The case was brought by her, John Major and a number of Scottish MPs.
Always good for brexiteers to find a scapegoat for their misdemeanours.
Strange that the courts were so impartial, fine and upstanding a couple of weeks ago but now they're the antichrist!
A week really is a long time.
-
5
-
58 minutes ago, JonnyF said:
Post 292 was quoted in post 295. 292 is still there, unedited.
You're losing the plot mate.
No, it was your post that I quoted :
These individuals are supporting the majority of UK citizens that voted to Leave. Not trying to over-ride the Democratic vote like the HOC, the Civil service and the House of Lords.
Multiple convictions of electoral fraud prove it was not a democratic vote, stop pretending otherwise.
The majority of UK citizens most certainly did not vote to Leave, as you put it, that is a lie. 17.4 million people out of over 60 million is a majority now?
I have highlighted the part where you wrongly stated that the majority of UK citizens voted to leave, you remember, the since deleted bit that you now lie about having written.
-
1
-
1
-
-
18 minutes ago, NCC1701A said:
being a former Pretty Boy I can say I am surprised he had to resort to this behavior.
Horrible.
Not so much of the "former", you still very hansum.
-
1
-
-
23 hours ago, grollies said:
Red lead/red oxide
Only if you want to be poisoned by the stuff, it was banned in the EU years ago, along with paraquat, and asbestos.
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, BobBKK said:Let's get this clear? Bercow is mandated to be NEUTRAL and he has not been. He was then afraid of being 'outed' and resigned as Speaker and now he's on national TV spouting away.
He's a disgrace. Any decent Speaker would never allow Parliament to descend into this chaos - bring back Betty!
His duty is most certainly NOT to be neutral when it comes down to protecting parliament against the illegal actions of a cowboy PM.
-
5
-
1
-
2
-
40 minutes ago, JonnyF said:
Again, which post? I have no idea what you are talking about. I suspect you do not either.
If I changed a post it was have a line underneath saying "edited by..."
So which post was it?
The post that was directly quoted in #295. The fact that your previous post has since been deleted does not excuse your lies about having clearly posted what you now claim you haven't.
-
1
-
-
14 minutes ago, JAG said:
Neither the Electoral Commission who oversaw the referendum, the government who called it, the Remain Campaign who fought and lost it nor the parliament which was subsequently elected promising to honour the result has made any moves to overturn it on the grounds of serious electoral fraud. Neither the silly slogans painted on that notorious bus displayed by the leave campaign, nor the exaggerated claims of impending economic and social disintegration made by many on the remain campaign (including government ministers) constitute serious electoral fraud. There have been no substantiated claims, Where there have been claims no action has been taken.
Yet again: there was no "serious electoral fraud", no matter how many times you repeat it!
You are showing that you don't know what you're talking about. Let me remind you, as you seem to have missed it.
It was the head of the Electoral Commission that branded the offences committed by the Leave campaign "most serious".
Uder UK Electoral law there could not be any moves to overturn the result because the referendum was a non-binding, advisory one. Had it been a binding referendum then it would have been possible to challenge the result.
Electoral Fraud is defined in law. What you describe as "exagerated claims" are not covered by that law. Interestingly, deliberately lying by an official campaign would appear to be covered, given that the reason the courts gave for stopping the action against Johnson was not that the £350m a week lie was within the law, rather that the motivation for bringing the action was deemed to be politically motivated.
Do try to keep up.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
39 minutes ago, JonnyF said:Evidence please. If you haven't been keeping up, here's an article from yesterday. In fairness it was easy to miss because the Remainstream media have completely ignored. it.
The evidence is out there. I am aware of yesterday's announcement as I read it in the mainstream media, strange that as you pretend they didn't report it.
In true Brexiteer style you have gone off on an irrelevant tangent. The criminal allegations are quite separate from the Electoral Commission's investigations into the Electoral Fraud that the Leave campaign was found guilty of multiple counts of "most serious" electoral fraud, being subject to the strongest allowable punishment of a £20,000 fine for each count.
-
3
-
9 minutes ago, Xonax said:
I like the look of that top one.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just now, JonnyF said:
Parliament is predominately made up of Remainers. So how could a few Brexiteers block it? It was a Remain Parliament that blocked it. The likes of Johnson and Rees Mogg voted for it he 3rd time and it still failed.
You are clutching at straws to hide your anti-democratic views. You are right to hide them, they are extremely undesirable in 21st Century Britain ????.
How dare you use the anti-democratic label when the leave side committed so much fraud?
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, JonnyF said:These individuals are supporting the majority of UK citizens that voted to Leave. Not trying to over-ride the Democratic vote like the HOC, the Civil service and the House of Lords.
Multiple convictions of electoral fraud prove it was not a democratic vote, stop pretending otherwise.
The majority of UK citizens most certainly did not vote to Leave, as you put it, that is a lie. 17.4 million people out of over 60 million is a majority now?
-
4
-
- Popular Post
14 hours ago, JAG said:Well I have to say that I am not particularly surprised. The "Remain Campaign" has from before the referendum, been very much the child of the establishment. The courts are after all the product of the establishment, and I suspect that the government realised that from the start.
Amidst the whole sea of opinions, campaigns, parliamentary and party machinations a couple of fixed points poke out of the foam. One: the people of the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union in the referendum. Two: the subsequent general election returned a parliament, of which the overwhelming majority of members, on both sides of the house, were elected on manifestoes which stated that the result of the referendum was to be honoured, and the UK was to leave the EU. Both results, obtained through the ballot box, have effectively been overturned by this establishment, and a general election, the proper constitutional means to arrive at a solution has been denied. It is tempting if perhaps melodramatic to suggest that the establishment has vigorously and contemptibly put two fingers up to the electorate.
Where do we go from here? I suspect that it will be some time before we have an election - the Labour Party, which has spent the last week in conference busily confirming its reputation as being unelectable will not want one until they are sure that they can win it - a long wait; and the Conservative rebels will not want one unless they can oust Johnson and his team and replace them with their own people, if they don't manage that then they know that come an election they will be toast! We are probably in for quite a long period of a stalled government, and yet more choleric grandstanding from Mr Speaker Bercow - he won't resign now!
Yet again: The result of a referendum marred by most serious electoral fraud committed by the leave campaign deserves no respect, and no honouring. Had the leave campaign shown any respect for the rule of law covering the referendum you might have had a point. They didn't and you don't, no matter how many times you repeat it.
-
4
-
1
Thief suspect says he missed life inside two hours after prison release
in Pattaya News
Posted
How would he get a visa?