Social Media

Trump Threats Force Iran To Blink As Protest Hangings Halted Iran has appeared to back down after President Donald Trump issued blunt warnings over the execution of anti-regime protesters, with Tehran “postponing” the hanging of a young demonstrator amid mounting international pressure. Erfan Soltani, a 26-year-old shop owner, had been due to be executed on Wednesday after being sentenced to death for taking part in anti-government protests last week. His case became a flashpoint after his family publicly appealed to Trump to intervene. In response, Trump warned Tehran that the United States would take “very strong action” if executions went ahead. “If they hang them, you’re going to see something,” the president said. Hours later, Soltani’s family said they had been informed the execution would not proceed as planned. However, relatives stressed the move was only a delay, warning that Soltani — currently held in solitary confinement at Ghezel Hesar prison — could still be executed at any time. Iran now appears to be scrambling to contain the fallout as unrest spreads and fears of U.S. military action grow. Tehran briefly shut its airspace to all flights without special permission, according to Flightradar24, while the U.S. Embassy in Doha urged Americans in Qatar to exercise “increased caution” and limit non-essential travel near Al Udeid Airbase. Human rights groups paint a far darker picture than Iran’s official line. Iran Human Rights says more than 3,400 people have been killed since protests erupted in late December, while unverified estimates suggest the true toll could be far higher. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi sought to dismiss concerns, insisting there was “no plan” to carry out executions. But separatist groups and activists say executions are continuing quietly, away from public view. “They won’t stop for a single minute,” one Kurdish source warned. “They’ve just moved the killings into basements.” Key TakeawaysTrump’s warning lands: Tehran delayed a protester’s execution after Trump threatened “very strong action.” Pause, not mercy: Families and activists warn hangings may continue in secret. Iran rattled: Airspace closures and regional alerts point to rising fear of U.S. escalation. SOURCE: EXPRESS

‘It’s the Apocalypse’: Leaked Videos Expose Iran’s Brutal Crackdown Grainy videos smuggled out of Iran are offering a rare and horrifying glimpse into the scale of the regime’s violent crackdown, as security forces move to crush nationwide protests sparked by economic collapse. One video shows rows of bodies laid out inside what appears to be a makeshift morgue near Tehran. Men wrapped in blood-soaked white shrouds lie shoulder to shoulder. Others are sprawled across tiled floors, faces streaked with blood, arms frozen in raised positions. “It’s horrifying. It’s the apocalypse,” the man filming says. “There are lots of bodies.” Iran has been largely cut off from the outside world for days after authorities shut down the internet and severely restricted phone access as unrest spread across the country following the currency’s collapse and soaring inflation. Despite the blackout, videos that leaked online and were geolocated by NBC News show machine guns fired into crowds, mass casualties, and clashes from Urmia in the northwest to Isfahan in central Iran. Footage from Tehran shows a helmeted man firing an automatic weapon at protesters across a public square, muzzle flashes lighting up the night. In another clip, chants of “Death to Khamenei” are followed by at least 15 seconds of uninterrupted automatic gunfire near a police station. The clearest evidence of the crackdown’s scale comes from the Kahrizak Forensic Medical Center, south of Tehran, which has become an overflow morgue. Videos show body bags lined up on dirt and asphalt, bodies unloaded from ambulances and even container trucks, and grieving relatives gathered around the dead. At least 2,500 people have been killed, according to the U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, though Iranian authorities have released no official death toll. Rights groups say the deadliest violence occurred after the internet blackout, with scenes not witnessed in decades. Despite the regime’s efforts to seal the country, officials have acknowledged that some footage escaped via Starlink satellite internet, reportedly smuggled into Iran during previous protests. Key TakeawaysRare visual proof of mass killings: Leaked videos show hundreds of bodies, machine-gun fire, and overwhelmed morgues. Crackdown intensified after blackout: Rights groups say the deadliest violence came once Iran cut internet access. Death toll likely far higher: Activists estimate 2,500 killed, with no official figures from Tehran. SOURCE NBC NEWS WARNING. UPSETTING CONTENT

Trump Says Zelensky Is Blocking Ukraine Peace Deal President Donald Trump has accused Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky of slowing down efforts to end the war with Russia, shifting blame for stalled negotiations squarely onto Kyiv. Speaking in an interview with Reuters, Trump said Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared more willing to reach a settlement than Ukraine’s leader. “I think he’s ready to make a deal,” Trump said of Putin. “I think Ukraine is less ready to make a deal.” Pressed on why U.S.-led negotiations have failed to produce a breakthrough, Trump offered a one-word answer: “Zelensky.” The remarks underscore growing frustration inside the Trump administration as its high-profile push to end the nearly three-year conflict has yielded little concrete progress. Since beginning his second term, Trump has made ending the Ukraine war a central foreign policy objective, holding multiple meetings with Zelensky and even sitting down with Putin in Alaska several months ago. Last month, Trump hosted Zelensky at Mar-a-Lago, where both leaders struck an optimistic tone. At a joint press conference, Trump claimed significant progress had been made on a 20-point peace proposal that Zelensky publicly supported. “Our meeting was excellent,” Trump said at the time. “Somebody would say 95 percent — I don’t know what percent — but we have made a lot of progress on ending that war.” Yet when asked about unresolved issues, Trump acknowledged that territorial disputes remain the biggest sticking point. He warned that Ukraine risks losing more land the longer the war continues. “I think the land — some of that land has been taken,” Trump said. “Some of that land is maybe up for grabs, but it may be taken over the next period of a number of months — and you’re better off making a deal now.” The comments suggest the White House is increasingly prepared to pressure Kyiv toward concessions, even as the war continues to grind on with no clear end in sight. Key TakeawaysTrump blames Kyiv, not Moscow: The president says Zelensky is delaying peace, while Putin appears more willing to negotiate. Land concessions at the heart of talks: Trump signaled Ukraine may need to accept territorial losses to end the war. U.S. frustration growing: Despite repeated meetings and a touted 20-point plan, Trump’s peace push is stalling, exposing widening cracks with Ukraine. Inspired by: THE HILL

U.S. completes first Venezuelan oil sale — ~$500 M The United States has completed its first sales of Venezuelan oil valued at about $500 million under a new energy arrangement with Venezuela. This is part of a broader $2 billion deal agreed earlier this month between Washington and Caracas, and officials expect additional sales in the coming days and weeks. Revenue from the initial sale is being held in U.S.-controlled bank accounts (notably in Qatar) to ensure oversight and avoid seizure. Under this arrangement, U.S. authorities are effectively marketing Venezuelan crude on global markets, marking a significant shift in how Venezuela’s oil is traded after prolonged sanctions and diplomatic conflict. The move coincides with the Trump administration’s push to re-engage U.S. oil companies in Venezuela and rebuild the country’s struggling energy infrastructure. SLB (formerly Schlumberger), Chevron, and other service firms are positioning to benefit from expanded operations under the new policy. What this means✔ U.S. is now a direct seller of Venezuelan oil: For the first time in the post-Maduro era, the U.S. has officially sold Venezuelan crude and is facilitating further transactions. ✔ Proceeds are tightly controlled: Revenue is being held in U.S.-controlled accounts abroad, a move framed as protecting the funds and preventing seizure by creditors or hostile actors. ✔ Part of a broader energy strategy: This sale is tied to a larger attempt to re-open Venezuelan oil production, draw in private investment, and influence global energy flows — even though some U.S. oil executives have been skeptical of investment risks. Key Takeaways U.S. now selling Venezuelan oil: Washington has completed its first $500 million sale of Venezuelan crude, with more sales expected soon — a major shift from sanctions to direct control and marketing of the oil. Big ambitions, little buy-in: Trump is touting $100 billion in future investment, but top U.S. energy executives privately warned Venezuela remains “uninvestible” without major legal and commercial reforms. Oil discounted, profits controlled: Venezuelan crude is being offered at a discount to attract buyers, while proceeds are tightly controlled by the U.S., limiting Maduro-era access and creditor claims. SOURCE: CNN

Duplicate post removed

Starmer Branded ‘Peking’s Poodle’ Over China Mega-Embassy Plan Keir Starmer is facing a furious backlash from across Parliament as he prepares to approve China’s plan for a vast new embassy in London — a move critics say risks Britain’s security and humiliates the country on the world stage. The Prime Minister was accused of a “craven kowtow” to Beijing, with opponents warning he is sacrificing national security in exchange for hoped-for trade deals ahead of his first official visit to China later this month. Blueprints for the proposed embassy, which would be the largest Chinese diplomatic site in Europe, reveal a hidden chamber positioned just metres from sensitive fibre-optic cables carrying financial data to the City of London. Not a single MP rose to defend the plan in the Commons. Seven Labour backbenchers publicly opposed it, citing China’s human rights record and growing intimidation of Hong Kong dissidents in the UK. Nine more Labour MPs have written directly to Communities Secretary Steve Reed urging him to reject the application before a looming deadline. The controversy has also triggered alarm among Britain’s allies. Reports suggest the White House is “deeply concerned”, forcing the UK to reassure the US and others that no classified data passes through the cables adjacent to the site. Adding to the embarrassment, Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle rebuked the Government for sending a junior housing minister — rather than a Home Office figure — to answer MPs’ concerns about espionage and repression. Meanwhile, the Metropolitan Police has apologised for failing to investigate allegations that Chinese officials monitored protesters near the embassy site. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp accused Starmer of acting as “Peking’s poodle” and a “useful idiot” for Xi Jinping, warning that the Prime Minister is gambling with Britain’s security to rescue a faltering economy. Key TakeawaysNo MP backed the embassy plan, with Labour rebels leading the opposition Security fears centre on secret rooms near vital City of London data cables US and allies alarmed, raising concerns over espionage and UK credibility SOURCE: DAILY MAIL

ICE Shooting Fallout Sparks DOJ Revolt In Minnesota Office The Trump administration’s handling of a fatal ICE shooting in Minneapolis has triggered an internal revolt inside the U.S. attorney’s office in Minnesota, with multiple senior federal prosecutors resigning amid accusations of political interference and a one-sided investigation. At least six federal prosecutors have stepped down following Washington’s decision to focus scrutiny on Renee Good and those around her — rather than on the ICE officer who shot her, according to sources familiar with the matter. The office is leading the federal probe, but insiders say morale has collapsed as tensions between state and federal authorities intensify. The administration moved swiftly to declare the ICE agent, Jonathan Ross, acted appropriately. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said Tuesday there was “no basis for a criminal civil rights investigation,” signalling that federal authorities would not examine the officer’s conduct — even as they blocked state officials from conducting their own inquiry. Among those who resigned were Joseph Thompson, the second-in-command at the Minnesota U.S. attorney’s office, and Harry Jacobs, a senior prosecutor who helped lead a major Justice Department fraud investigation in the state. Their departures underscore the depth of internal opposition to Washington’s approach. Initially, federal prosecutors agreed to a joint investigation with local authorities and the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension — a standard procedure in officer-involved shootings. That arrangement was later abruptly scrapped. State officials were informed that the FBI would take sole control of the investigation, excluding local agencies entirely. The order came directly from Washington, according to sources. At the same time, lawyers in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division were told they would not participate — a highly unusual move that departs from longstanding DOJ practice in cases involving potential police or federal-agent misconduct. Federal officials have justified the decision by citing fears of leaks and concerns that ICE agents could be doxxed. Vice President JD Vance publicly echoed those claims, saying Washington no longer trusted local authorities to handle sensitive information. The investigation has since been marked by a series of irregular steps. Video footage from the ICE officer’s cellphone — a key piece of evidence — was released not through official channels, but via a conservative Minnesota media outlet. President Donald Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem have publicly defended the officer and placed blame on Good and others involved. Meanwhile, state investigators remain effectively sidelined. Local prosecutors do not have access to Good’s vehicle, shell casings, or other physical evidence collected by federal agents. Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty said her office has been blocked from reviewing critical materials necessary to conduct an independent assessment of the shooting. Minnesota authorities have appealed to the public to submit video and information directly to state investigators — a rare step reflecting their exclusion from the federal probe. The result is a fractured investigation, a gutted U.S. attorney’s office, and growing concern that political considerations — not legal standards — are driving one of the most sensitive federal use-of-force cases in years. Key TakeawaysMultiple federal prosecutors resigned after DOJ blocked scrutiny of the ICE officer Washington seized control of the probe, cutting out state investigators and civil-rights lawyers Public trust is eroding fast as evidence access is restricted and political leaders pre-judge the case SOURCE: MSN

Trump Boasts Of Iran Options—But US Military Leverage Is Thinning President Donald Trump says he has “many” military options to punish Iran if the regime escalates its crackdown on protesters. The reality is far less dramatic. America’s military posture in the Middle East has quietly thinned, leaving the White House with fewer credible tools than even a year ago — and far fewer than Trump’s rhetoric suggests. Key US ships and troops once positioned to pressure Tehran have been redirected elsewhere. Aircraft carriers that surged into the region in June are long gone. A Patriot missile defense system rushed from South Korea to the Middle East last year has since returned to the Korean Peninsula. Meanwhile, major naval assets — including the USS Ford — remain deployed in the Caribbean following US operations tied to Venezuela. Administration officials privately acknowledge there are no plans for major force movements toward Iran. That leaves Trump with a narrow menu: limited airstrikes, long-range bomber missions, cyber operations — and little else. While the president could order precision strikes against Iranian leadership, military facilities, or communications hubs, even those options carry growing risk. US weapons stockpiles have been strained by sustained operations in the Red Sea, Venezuela, and earlier strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Air-defense interceptors — critical if Iran retaliates — are now in especially short supply. That vulnerability matters. Roughly 10,000 US troops remain stationed at Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar, with smaller contingents spread across Iraq, Syria, and Jordan — all within reach of Iran’s missile arsenal. “If this turns into sustained exchanges, interceptor capacity becomes decisive very quickly,” one former defense official warned. “The US could get into a sticky situation fast.” Political resistance is also mounting. Lawmakers from both parties are openly questioning what a strike on Iran would achieve. “What’s the objective?” asked Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee. “The president hasn’t shown how military force helps the Iranian people or changes the regime.” Even Trump allies are wary. Republican senators stressed there would be no invasion, no boots on the ground, and little appetite for another open-ended conflict. Several senior lawmakers said they have not even been briefed on possible strikes. The skepticism comes as Iran’s unrest intensifies. Protests over inflation and repression have spread nationwide since December. Human rights groups estimate security forces may have killed up to 2,000 demonstrators. Trump has responded with threats, cancelling diplomatic contacts and warning Iran’s leaders they will “pay a big price.” But behind the scenes, officials confirm no major military escalation is imminent. The Pentagon insists it stands ready to execute any order. Congress, however, is signaling limits — after recently rebuking Trump over military action in Venezuela. The gap between presidential bravado and actual military leverage is growing — and both allies and adversaries can see it. Key TakeawaysUS military options against Iran are far narrower than Trump claims, with major assets redeployed elsewhere Weapons stockpiles and missile defenses are stretched, raising risks if Iran retaliates Congress is increasingly resistant to new military action, limiting Trump’s freedom to escalate SOURCE: POLITICO

Trump Says the US Has ‘More and Better’ Nuclear Weapons Than Russia U.S. President Donald Trump said the United States possesses a larger and “better” nuclear arsenal than Russia, rejecting claims that Moscow holds a strategic advantage in nuclear firepower. Trump made the remarks during conversations with journalists, insisting that Washington’s nuclear weapons and military equipment surpass those of Russia. “We have more than they do. We have better than they do,” he said, adding that comparisons ultimately matter little because “it only takes one.” The president also used the opportunity to criticize Russian military capabilities, citing what he described as the underperformance of Russian air defence systems during a recent U.S. military operation in Venezuela. Trump suggested that the operation exposed weaknesses in the systems Russia sold to Caracas. Trump’s comments came amid broader debate over nuclear strategy, arms control and U.S.–Russia relations. He has earlier indicated he may allow the key New START arms control treaty to lapse without renewal — a deal that limits deployed strategic nuclear warheads — unless Moscow agrees to a broader agreement, potentially including China. Analysts note that nuclear arsenal comparisons are complicated, and independent experts track arsenals differently. Public estimates usually put Russia slightly ahead in total warheads when counting retired and reserve stockpiles, though U.S. deployed strategic weapons remain comparable. In other nuclear policy developments, Trump has signalled an interest in resuming U.S. nuclear testing for the first time in more than three decades, saying he wants testing on “an equal basis” with other powers — comments that have drawn concern from arms control advocates. Trump has also discussed nuclear weapons limitations with Russian and Chinese leaders, saying he aims to bring both parties into broader arms control talks, though no formal agreement has been reached. While the United States and Russia together hold about 90% of the world’s nuclear arsenal, Trump’s public positioning reflects ongoing debate within Washington over deterrence, arms control and great-power competition, even as tensions persist over the war in Ukraine and broader U.S.–Russia relations. Key TakeawaysTrump Claims U.S. Nuclear Superiority: He stated that the United States has more nuclear weapons and more advanced systems than Russia, though independent analysts rate Russia’s total arsenal slightly higher under some measures. New START In Limbo: Trump indicated he may let the key U.S.–Russia arms control treaty expire without renewal, pushing instead for broader talks. Nuclear Testing Back on the Table: The president signalled a desire to resume nuclear testing — the first since the 1990s — a move that could escalate nuclear competition if pursued. Inspired by: UNITED24 MEDIA

Is Europe Ready For War — Or Just Rearming Too Late? Europe is rearming — at least on paper. But whether it is genuinely ready for war by 2030 remains a far more troubling question. Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine shattered decades of complacency across the European Union. Combined with mounting pressure from Washington to shoulder more of its own defence burden, Brussels has been left with little choice but to confront a reality long avoided: Europe is vulnerable, underprepared, and dangerously exposed. EU leaders insist they are responding. Last December, the bloc agreed to a €90 billion loan package for Ukraine. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has unveiled a suite of defence initiatives designed to strengthen deterrence against Russia and other adversaries by 2030. Defence spending across Europe now exceeds €300 billion annually, with a proposed €131 billion earmarked for defence and aerospace in the EU’s next long-term budget. The rhetoric is urgent — and increasingly alarmist. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has warned that Russia could attack the alliance within five years. Germany’s defence minister has declared Europe may have already experienced its “last summer of peace.” Vladimir Putin, meanwhile, has bluntly stated Russia is ready to fight and may soon have “no one to negotiate with.” Yet beneath the political urgency lies a more sobering reality: Europeans themselves are deeply reluctant to fight. A recent Euronews poll found that 75% of respondents would not take up arms to defend EU borders. Only 19% said they would be willing to fight. The sense of threat is real — particularly in frontline states — but public readiness for war is alarmingly low. It is the Baltic states, Poland and Finland that are acting most decisively. Lithuania and Latvia are constructing “drone walls,” restoring wetlands as natural defences, and running nationwide civil resilience drills. Poland has fortified its borders and introduced security education in schools, including weapons theory for teenagers. Finland, Sweden and Estonia have revived Cold War-style public guidance on what to do if war breaks out. Elsewhere, preparedness is thinner — and largely rhetorical. At EU level, Brussels is racing to close the gap. The Readiness 2030 plan aims to allow troops and equipment to move across the bloc within hours, not weeks, by dismantling national permit systems and creating a so-called “Military Schengen.” Hundreds of bridges, tunnels and transport corridors are being upgraded to handle heavy armour. New financial tools such as ReArm Europe, SAFE, and the European Defence Industry Programme are designed to pool procurement, accelerate weapons production, and reduce reliance on non-European suppliers. Early demand is strong, with nearly €50 billion requested for missiles, air defence and ammunition alone. But experts warn money and plans will not fix everything. Europe’s defence industry remains fragmented, slow-moving and constrained by regulation. Production cannot be scaled overnight. Political unity is fragile. And time may not be on Europe’s side. The United States has made its impatience clear. Washington expects Europe to carry far more of NATO’s conventional defence burden by 2027 — a target many privately admit is unrealistic. The transatlantic relationship is fraying, even as the threat from Russia intensifies. Europe is no longer debating whether it must prepare for war. The question now is whether it can move fast enough — before deterrence turns into desperation. Key TakeawaysEurope is rearming fast, but public willingness to fight remains extremely low. Baltic states and Poland lead preparedness, while much of Western Europe lags. Brussels has launched sweeping defence plans, including Military Schengen and joint weapons financing. US patience is wearing thin, with Washington demanding Europe carry more of NATO’s burden. Time is the real enemy, as industrial bottlenecks and political fragmentation persist. SOURCE: EURO NEWS

Zahawi: Labour Has Broken Britain — And Reform Is The Only Way Out Former Conservative chancellor Nadhim Zahawi has delivered a blistering verdict on Britain under Labour, saying it “breaks my heart” to see the country that gave his refugee family safety now being driven into economic and social decline. Writing with raw emotion, Zahawi recounts fleeing Saddam Hussein’s Iraq as a child and arriving in Britain aged 11 without a word of English — before going on to build successful businesses and reach the very top of British politics. That journey, he says, is proof of what Britain once stood for: enterprise, opportunity and reward for hard work. But that Britain, he argues, is now disappearing fast. Zahawi accuses Labour of actively despising capitalism, surrounding itself with ministers who lack any real-world or business experience. The result, he says, is economic incompetence baked into every department — from a “clueless” chancellor to an energy secretary obsessed with Net Zero regardless of the cost, and a foreign secretary “giving away British territory and charging us for it.” He also takes aim at an attorney general he claims is so beholden to the European Court of Human Rights that deporting even the worst offenders is effectively off the table. Yet Zahawi does not spare his own party. He admits the Conservatives failed the country by being too timid, allowing unelected bureaucrats, quangos and regulators to block meaningful reform. “It’s too complicated,” they were told — and they believed it. Politics, he says, softened his edge and dulled his straight-talking instincts. No longer. Zahawi warns Britain has entered a dark chapter, with economic stagnation, rising unemployment and collapsing businesses — but also something more dangerous. He claims radical Islamist figures are positioning themselves to enter Parliament, stirring division and targeting Jewish communities as a prelude to wider unrest. That is why, he says, he has joined Reform UK. Zahawi argues only Nigel Farage has the clarity, courage and political will to reverse Britain’s decline, rebuild the economy and restore democratic control. He says he could have remained comfortably in business after leaving Parliament — but could no longer stand by as Labour “slowly suffocates” the country. Britain, he concludes, is fundamentally broken — and Reform is its last chance. Key TakeawaysZahawi says Labour has wrecked Britain, economically and socially, through hostility to business and ideological governance. He admits the Conservatives failed too, blaming timidity and surrender to unelected bureaucrats and regulators. Warns of rising radical Islamist influence, claiming extremists are positioning to enter Parliament. Announces support for Reform UK, calling Nigel Farage the only leader capable of saving the country. Frames Britain as “broken”, with stagnation, rising unemployment and collapsing enterprise. SOURCE: DAILY MAIL

Trump Considers Military, Cyber And Sanctions Options As Iran Unrest Escalates President Donald Trump is weighing a range of strong options — including possible military strikes — in response to the Iranian regime’s deadly crackdown on nationwide protests, U.S. officials say, as tensions between Washington and Tehran surge. Trump’s top national security advisers are expected to brief him on Tuesday on a menu of possible responses that span military, cyber and economic actions. Options reportedly under review include targeted airstrikes against Iranian security or military infrastructure, cyber operations designed to disrupt regime communications or capabilities, and expanded sanctions aimed at key sectors of the Iranian economy. Speaking to reporters late Sunday, Trump said the situation is being taken “very seriously” and reaffirmed that the military is examining “very strong options.” He did not rule out military strikes but also stressed that diplomacy remains a priority and that Iran’s leadership has privately indicated interest in talks. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed that message, saying diplomacy is “always the first option” — even as she confirmed that airstrikes and other military measures are among the tools the president is prepared to employ if necessary to protect protesters or punish Tehran for widespread killings. Human rights groups say more than 500 protesters and dozens of security personnel have been killed since unrest began, with tens of thousands detained — figures that cannot be independently verified amid Iran’s near-total internet blackout. Range Of Options Being DiscussedMilitary Strikes: • Limited airstrikes against regime sites tied to violence against civilians. • Possible precision strikes on Revolutionary Guard Corps infrastructure. • Any kinetic action aims to avoid large civilian casualties and prevent wider regional escalation. Cyber Operations: • Disruptive measures against Iranian systems used to suppress protests or monitor communications. • Aimed at undermining Tehran’s ability to enforce the blackout and track dissent. Economic Pressure: • New sanctions on Iranian elites, energy and banking sectors. • Trade penalties against nations doing business with Tehran. Tech Assistance: • Proposals to expand satellite internet access — such as Starlink — to help protesters bypass shutdowns, though this remains secondary to broader policy deliberations. Tehran’s Response — And Risks Of EscalationIranian authorities have responded to talk of U.S. intervention with warnings of retaliation. Senior Iranian figures have declared that Israeli and American military assets would be legitimate targets in the event of an attack — a stark escalation that raises the stakes for U.S. policymakers. Iran’s government insists it has the situation under control and says it remains open to negotiations under “mutual respect,” according to Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi — even as troops violently suppress protests and enforce communications blackouts. Why This Matters• Largest unrest in years: Protests have spread to all 31 provinces amid economic collapse and social discontent. • Risk of regional conflict: Any U.S. strike could trigger direct confrontation with Tehran, potentially drawing in Israel, Gulf states and U.S. forces. • No decision yet: Trump has not settled on a course, and senior aides continue to stress the high risks of direct military engagement. Key TakeawaysTrump weighing force: President Trump is actively considering military, cyber and economic options in response to Iran’s violent crackdown on protesters, with airstrikes not ruled out. Death toll rising fast: Rights groups say more than 500 people have been killed and over 10,000 arrested in just two weeks of unrest — figures Iran has not officially confirmed. Tehran warns of retaliation: Iran’s leadership has threatened to strike U.S. bases and Israel if Washington intervenes, raising the risk of rapid regional escalation. Diplomacy still on the table: Despite the threats, Trump says Iranian leaders have reached out to negotiate, and the White House insists diplomacy remains the first option. Regime under pressure: Analysts say Iran’s rulers are weaker than at any point in years, battered by economic collapse, public fury, and a stretched military. ORIGINAL SOURCE: THE HILL

'The Pitt' and 'The Studio' win top TV honors at Golden Globes LOS ANGELES, Jan 11 (Reuters) - HBO Max’s “The Pitt,” a medical drama which puts a spotlight on America’s strained emergency rooms, won best drama series at the Golden Globes on Sunday, while “The Studio,” a Hollywood satire from Apple TV, earned the award for best comedy. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-pitt-and-the-studio-win-top-tv-honors-at-golden-globes/ar-AA1U1iEp

Russia’s Next-Gen Oreshnik IRBM Relies on Cold War Tech, CNN Investigation Finds, CNN Investigation Finds Russian ballistic missile components retrieved from a 2024 strike in Dnipro show that the weapon, known as “Oreshnik” (or “Kedr”), relies on outdated technology, including Soviet-era vacuum tubes and mechanical gyroscopes. This is according to a video investigation published by CNN on January 11, 2026, based on an analysis conducted by Ukraine’s Kyiv Scientific Research Institute of Forensic Examinations. In the CNN report, Ukrainian weapons specialists walk journalists through the missile debris, describing its internal architecture. “Yuri Gagarin flew with the same type of gyroscope,” one expert remarked, referring to the navigation system found inside the missile wreckage. Full story: https://united24media.com/latest-news/russias-next-gen-oreshnik-irbm-relies-on-cold-war-tech-cnn-investigation-finds-14910

US issues warning to US citizens, leave Venezuela immediately The U.S. government has issued an urgent warning telling American citizens in Venezuela to leave the country immediately, citing escalating violence and credible reports of armed militia groups targeting U.S. nationals following the recent capture of President Nicolás Maduro. In a security alert on Saturday, the U.S. Embassy in Caracas and the State Department said the security situation “remains fluid” and warned that armed pro-regime paramilitary groups, known as colectivos, have been setting up roadblocks and checkpoints across parts of the country. These groups are reportedly stopping vehicles to inspect occupants for evidence of U.S. citizenship or support for the United States. “With international flights now resuming, U.S. citizens in Venezuela should leave the country immediately,” the advisory said, urging Americans to remain vigilant and exercise caution when travelling, especially by road. The warning reiterates that Venezuela is under a Level 4: Do Not Travel advisory — the highest danger level — due to risks including wrongful detention, torture, kidnapping, civil unrest, terrorism, crime and arbitrary enforcement of local laws. The travel alert comes amid a wave of instability since a U.S. military operation earlier this month captured Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, transporting them to the United States on narco-terrorism charges. While some Venezuelans welcomed Maduro’s removal, the country remains volatile, with armed colectivos and military checkpoints documented around Caracas and along major highways. Journalists and activists have reported rifle-carrying militias inspecting vehicles and searching equipment, heightening fears for foreigners. Colombia has mirrored Washington’s warning, urging its citizens to avoid travel to Venezuela due to similar safety concerns. The Venezuelan government dismissed the U.S. advisory as “based on fabricated claims”, asserting that the nation is in a state of “absolute calm, peace and stability” and that all security forces remain under government control. U.S. officials have stressed that consular services in Venezuela are suspended, meaning American citizens cannot rely on embassy assistance if they encounter legal trouble, health emergencies, or violence. The warning underscores not only immediate threats to foreign nationals but also the broader breakdown of security in Venezuela as the country grapples with power shifts, armed groups, and uncertainty after years of political turmoil and international intervention. Key TakeawaysEvacuation Urged Now: The U.S. government has ordered American citizens in Venezuela to leave immediately as armed militias set up checkpoints and reportedly target U.S. nationals. Highest Danger Level: Venezuela remains at Level 4: Do Not Travel due to threats including kidnapping, wrongful detention, terrorism and civil unrest. Consular Support Suspended: The U.S. has no functioning embassy operations in Venezuela, leaving Americans without government protection if emergencies arise. SOURCE: NEW YORK POST

Iran Protest Death Toll Passes 500 As Trump Weighs Intervention Deaths from Iran’s nationwide protests have surged past 500, according to a rights group, as President Donald Trump openly considers U.S. intervention and Tehran issues stark threats against American military targets. The U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) said on Sunday it had verified the deaths of 490 protesters and 48 security personnel, with more than 10,600 people arrested during nearly two weeks of unrest. Iran has not released official casualty figures, and the numbers could not be independently verified. The demonstrations — the largest since 2022 — have shaken Iran’s clerical leadership, with protests spreading across multiple provinces amid a sweeping security crackdown. Rights groups and activists report live ammunition, mass arrests, and beatings as authorities attempt to crush dissent. Trump, who has repeatedly warned Tehran against using force on demonstrators, confirmed that U.S. military options are now under active consideration. “The military is looking at it, and we’re looking at some very strong options,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday night. According to U.S. officials cited by The Wall Street Journal, those options include targeted military strikes, covert cyber operations, expanded sanctions, and online support for anti-regime forces inside Iran. Trump is expected to meet senior advisers on Tuesday to review the proposals. The president also claimed he has been in contact with Iranian opposition figures and said — without offering details — that Iran’s leaders had reached out seeking negotiations. “They want to talk,” Trump said, adding that discussions were possible. Tehran responded with blunt warnings. Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf cautioned Washington against what he called a “miscalculation,” vowing retaliation if the U.S. intervenes. “Let us be clear,” Qalibaf said. “In the case of an attack on Iran, Israel, all U.S. bases, and U.S. ships will be legitimate targets.” The threat sharply raises the risk of a regional escalation, potentially drawing Israel, Gulf states, and U.S. forces across the Middle East into direct confrontation. Analysts say Iran’s leadership now faces a narrowing set of choices: intensify repression and risk wider revolt, or seek talks from a position of growing weakness — all while Washington signals it is prepared to act. With internet restrictions tightening, information from inside Iran remains limited. But if HRANA’s figures reflect even part of the reality on the ground, Iran’s unrest has already crossed into one of the deadliest protest movements of the past decade. Key Takeaways Protest Deaths Surge Past 500 Amid Intensifying Crackdown A rights group says at least 490 protesters and 48 security personnel have been killed, with more than 10,600 arrests in just two weeks — the deadliest unrest since 2022. Trump Signals Readiness To Act As Military Options Are Weighed President Trump says the U.S. is considering “very strong options,” including military strikes, cyber operations, sanctions, and support for opposition groups. Iran Issues Direct Threats Against U.S. Bases And Israel Tehran has warned that any U.S. intervention would trigger retaliation against American forces and Israel, raising the risk of regional escalation. SOURCE: MSN

Thousands Killed Homes Burned Myanmar Rejects Junta Fake Vote Myanmar’s military rulers insist that their long-delayed election will restore stability after years of chaos. On the streets, the response is bitter disbelief. As the country heads into the second phase of voting on Sunday — nearly five years after the 2021 coup — many citizens say the ballot is nothing more than a theatrical exercise designed to entrench military rule, not end it. Public criticism of the junta is brutally punished. Even mild dissent can lead to decades behind bars. But in private, anger toward the army and its so-called election is widespread. “This is a fake election intended to create long-term oppression,” said Aye Aye, a 54-year-old housewife who asked that her name be slightly altered for safety. “Everyone knows Senior General Min Aung Hlaing is power-hungry. He has arrested tens of thousands of innocent people. Thousands have been killed. Hundreds of thousands have fled their homes. Why, knowing all that, would I vote?” Her own family has paid a heavy price. Her daughter was sentenced to 10 years in prison in 2022 for criticising the military online. Her husband lost his job as inflation surged. Her two sons have fled abroad to avoid forced conscription. “No one in my family is voting,” she said. “Whatever threats the authorities make, I don’t care. I worry not only about my youngest daughter, but about our leader, Aung San Suu Kyi. We love her like our own mother.” Myanmar’s elected civilian government was overthrown in the 2021 coup. Suu Kyi, now 80, is serving a combined 27-year sentence on charges including corruption and election fraud — accusations she denies and which international observers say are politically motivated. Voter turnout in the first phase of voting on December 28 was reportedly extremely low, despite coercion and intimidation, according to the United Nations. Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy — which won landslide victories in 2015 and 2020 — was dissolved by the junta and barred from participating. Hope for Suu Kyi’s return is fading. “She never kneels, never bows her head,” said Gyi, a 65-year-old barber. “But she is old now. We fear for her health. There are rumours she has died in prison. We pray they are not true.” For others, opposition to the vote is rooted in personal tragedy. Moe, a 48-year-old flower seller and widowed mother of five, said the military forced her eldest son into the army last year. Within weeks, he was dead. “We were too poor to pay a bribe,” she said. “They told me he was fine. Then a defector called and said he had been killed. I received no compensation. Not even an apology.” On Thursday, the UN’s special rapporteur on Myanmar urged the international community to reject the election outright, calling it “a theatrical performance designed to dupe the world.” “You cannot have a free or credible election when thousands of political prisoners remain behind bars, opposition parties are dissolved, journalists are silenced and fear governs daily life,” he said. For many in Myanmar, the conclusion is simple: voting would not be an act of hope — but of surrender. Key Takeaways A Sham Election Rejected By The Public Myanmar’s military-backed election is being widely boycotted, with citizens calling it a staged exercise to legitimise dictatorship after the 2021 coup. Fear, Repression And Personal Tragedy Drive Resistance Thousands have been killed, tens of thousands jailed, and families torn apart by conscription, inflation and violence — leaving many unwilling to participate under threat. Global Pressure Mounts As UN Calls Vote A ‘Theatrical Performance’ The United Nations has urged the international community to reject the results, warning the election lacks credibility while political prisoners, including Aung San Suu Kyi, remain behind bars. SOURCE: INDEPENDENT

I decide.mp4

US ‘Mystery Weapon’ Crippled Venezuelan Troops In Maduro Raid The United States deployed a powerful, previously unseen weapon during the lightning raid that captured Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro — leaving enemy troops collapsed on the ground, bleeding from the nose and vomiting blood, according to a chilling eyewitness account shared by the White House. In a dramatic interview posted on X by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, a Venezuelan security guard described how U.S. forces annihilated defending units without suffering a single casualty, using technology he said was “unlike anything we’ve ever faced.” The guard said the operation began with a sudden, total failure of Venezuelan radar and surveillance systems. “All our systems shut down at once,” he said. “Then the drones came. Many drones. We didn’t know what to do.” Moments later, fewer than a dozen helicopters appeared, inserting an estimated 20 U.S. troops into the area. Despite being massively outnumbered, the Americans quickly overwhelmed hundreds of defenders. “They were firing with impossible speed and precision,” the guard claimed. “It felt like each one was shooting hundreds of rounds per minute.” But the most terrifying moment came when U.S. forces allegedly deployed a weapon the guard could not identify. “They launched something — not a bomb,” he said. “It felt like my head was exploding from the inside.” The effects were immediate. Troops collapsed, bleeding heavily from the nose. Some began vomiting blood. Others were left unable to stand or move. “We fell to the ground helpless,” he said. “After that weapon, the fight was over.” The Venezuelan Interior Ministry claims roughly 100 security personnel were killed during the Jan. 3 raid, though it remains unclear how many deaths were directly caused by the alleged weapon. A former U.S. intelligence source told the New York Post the symptoms described are consistent with directed-energy weapons, which use focused microwaves or similar technology to disable targets. Such systems have existed for decades, the source said, but this may mark the first confirmed combat use by the U.S. China was accused of deploying a microwave weapon against Indian troops in 2020. The witness warned the raid has already sent shockwaves across Latin America — especially after President Trump signaled that Mexico is now “on the list.” “No one wants this,” the guard said. “After what I saw, I never want to face the United States again.” Key TakeawaysWeapon Unlike Anything Seen Before Venezuelan troops described symptoms consistent with directed-energy or microwave weapons. Overwhelming Force, Zero US Casualties A tiny U.S. unit allegedly defeated hundreds of defenders without losses. Message Sent Across The Region The raid is already reshaping deterrence in Latin America after Trump’s warning shots. SOURCE: NEW YORK POST

Trump Blocks Seizure Of Venezuelan Oil Revenues, Eyes Strategic Control U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order to block U.S. courts and private creditors from seizing Venezuelan oil revenue held in Treasury accounts — a move aimed at preserving those funds for U.S.-led efforts to stabilise post-Maduro Venezuela. The emergency order, justified under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the National Emergencies Act, decrees that oil revenue from Venezuelan crude sales must remain sovereign assets held in U.S. custody and cannot be attached through legal claims. The emergency order said the revenue, held in foreign government deposit funds, should be used in Venezuela to help create "peace, prosperity and stability." Trump’s directive comes as the administration seeks to shape economic and political outcomes in Venezuela following U.S. forces’ capture of Nicolás Maduro in Caracas last week. Washington is negotiating an agreement with interim Venezuelan leaders under which up to 50 million barrels of crude oil — already sold — will be shipped to U.S. refineries specially equipped to process heavy Venezuelan crude. The White House framed the new order as crucial to preventing legal interference that could undercut U.S. policy goals in the region. A fact sheet says allowing judicial seizure of these funds “would directly jeopardise U.S. objectives,” including efforts to foster economic and political stability in Venezuela. While the order does not name any specific companies, several U.S. oil giants such as ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips still have unpaid claims from assets nationalised in Venezuela nearly two decades ago. ConocoPhillips CEO Ryan Lance told Trump he is owed about $12 billion. Trump responded by saying the U.S. would “start with a clean slate” and focus on future opportunities rather than past losses. The executive order was signed the same day Trump met with senior executives from major energy firms, encouraging them to invest up to $100 billion in Venezuela’s oil sector — a key objective of the administration as it seeks both to rebuild production and to lock in U.S. energy influence in the region. The move coincides with other signs of U.S. strategy in Venezuela, including possible further sanctions relief to facilitate oil sales and economic recovery, according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. He suggested the U.S. may soon lift additional restrictions and release nearly $5 billion in IMF funds to support rebuilding efforts. Trump and his allies have framed the protection of Venezuelan oil revenues as part of broader national-security priorities, tying economic influence in the Western Hemisphere to efforts to curb illegal immigration and narcotics trafficking. However, foreign governments like China have criticised U.S. control of Venezuelan oil as a violation of sovereignty, while global oil markets continue to watch how these unprecedented moves will affect supply and investment dynamics. Key Takeaways Executive Order Protects Oil Funds: Trump signed an order to stop courts and creditors from seizing Venezuelan oil revenue held in U.S. accounts, preserving them for U.S. policy goals. Strategic Use Tied To Venezuela Policy: The funds are meant to support stability and reconstruction efforts after U.S. military action removed Maduro, and up to 50 million barrels are expected to go to U.S. refineries. Oil Sector and Investment Focus: Trump invited major oil companies to invest billions in Venezuela’s oil industry, while Treasury officials signal potential sanction relief to attract private capital. SOURCE: MSN

Swiss Bar Fire Probe Deepens After Owner Admits Exit Was Locked Investigators probing the deadly New Year’s Eve fire at a Swiss ski resort bar have uncovered a critical new detail that could dramatically escalate charges against the owners. Jacques Moretti, co-owner of the Le Constellation bar in Crans-Montana, has admitted to authorities that a basement service door — used by patrons attempting to flee the blaze — was locked from the inside. The fire killed 40 people after breaking out during New Year’s Eve celebrations. According to Swiss broadcaster RTS, Moretti told investigators he opened the door from the outside and found multiple lifeless bodies behind it. Several victims are believed to have become trapped while trying to escape through the locked exit as smoke and flames spread through the venue. Moretti has claimed he does not know why the door was locked. However, prosecutors say the revelation is of central importance to the case and could significantly worsen the legal exposure facing Jacques Moretti and his co-owner, Jessica Moretti. The pair are currently charged with involuntary manslaughter, negligent arson, and negligent bodily harm. If prosecutors determine the owners knew the door was locked — or accepted the risk that it might be — the case could be reclassified as murder with contingent intent under Swiss law, a charge carrying a potential sentence of up to 20 years in prison. Investigators are also examining another potentially damning detail: the acoustic soundproofing foam installed in the bar’s ceiling. Moretti said he replaced old foam with new material purchased from a Hornbach DIY store. Swiss media reports suggest bar staff were aware the foam posed a serious fire risk. One waiter is alleged to have warned customers on the night of the fire about the danger of igniting the ceiling’s soundproofing material. Prosecutors are now working to verify that claim. If confirmed, it could further strengthen the case that the owners were aware of hazardous conditions inside the bar. The investigation remains ongoing, with authorities focusing on whether safety failures — including the locked exit and flammable materials — directly contributed to the high death toll in one of Switzerland’s deadliest nightclub fires in decades. Key Takeaways Locked Escape Route Central To Case Victims trying to flee the fire were trapped behind a basement door locked from the inside. Charges Could Escalate Sharply Prosecutors may pursue murder with contingent intent, carrying penalties of up to 20 years. Fire Safety Failures Under Scrutiny Investigators are probing flammable ceiling foam and claims staff knew the risks. SOURCE: EURO NEWS

Trump Signals Iran Strike Options As Protests Turn Deadly President Donald Trump has signaled that the United States is prepared to take military action against Iran after a brutal crackdown on nationwide protests left more than 50 people dead, according to human rights groups. In a series of posts on Truth Social, Trump said the U.S. was “ready to help” the Iranian people, declaring that Iran is “looking for FREEDOM, perhaps like never before.” The president has repeatedly warned Tehran that continued bloodshed would trigger a severe response. U.S. officials told The Wall Street Journal that the Trump administration has held preliminary discussions about possible military action, including large-scale aerial strikes on multiple Iranian military targets. Officials stressed that the talks were part of routine contingency planning and said no troops or equipment have been moved, nor is an attack imminent. The warnings come as protests enter their second week across Iran, fueled by anger over soaring living costs and mounting calls to dismantle the clerical system that has ruled since the 1979 Islamic revolution. Demonstrations have spread to more than 220 towns and cities across all 31 provinces. According to the Iranian rights group HRANA, at least 65 people have been killed, including 50 protesters and 15 security personnel. Doctors inside Iran reported hospitals treating large numbers of injured demonstrators, many suffering broken limbs, head injuries, and severe beatings. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and security forces have launched a sweeping crackdown. Attorney General Mohammad Movahedi Azad warned that protesters would be treated as “enemies of God,” a charge that can carry the death penalty. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused Trump of inciting unrest, claiming the president’s “hands are stained with the blood of Iranians.” Trump allies, including Senator Lindsey Graham and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, publicly backed the protesters, framing the unrest as a historic moment and warning Tehran that its actions would not go unanswered. Key Takeaways Military Options On The Table Trump administration officials have discussed potential large-scale airstrikes on Iranian military targets, though no attack is imminent. Deadly Crackdown Fuels Tensions More than 50 protesters have been killed as demonstrations spread nationwide, prompting fierce international condemnation. Trump Escalates Rhetoric The president has openly backed Iranian protesters and warned the regime it will be “hit very hard” if killings continue. SOURCE: DAILY MAIL

ICE Shooting Sparks Nationwide Protests As Tensions Boil Over Thousands of demonstrators poured into streets across the United States on Saturday, rallying against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after an officer shot and killed a U.S. citizen during an operation in Minneapolis earlier this week. Minneapolis became the epicenter of the unrest, with tens of thousands marching through the city since Wednesday night. Police said at least 30 people were detained during protests on Friday as demonstrations and candlelight vigils continued into the weekend. Protests quickly spread nationwide. In Austin, Texas, more than 100 people gathered outside City Hall, with demonstrators calling for ICE to be defunded. Some compared the current political climate to authoritarian regimes, warning that federal enforcement tactics are escalating. Hundreds assembled at Boston Common, holding signs reading “ICE Out,” “No Kings in America,” and “Justice for Renee Good,” referring to Renee Nicole Macklin Good, who was killed while sitting in her SUV during the ICE operation. Similar protests erupted across Massachusetts and in cities including Los Angeles and New York City. The demonstrations were largely organized by Indivisible, a progressive activist group that has previously led nationwide “No Kings” protests opposing the Trump administration. Organizers framed the rallies as both a memorial and a demand for accountability. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the ICE officer involved, Jonathan Ross, acted in self-defense, claiming Macklin Good attempted to run him over with her vehicle. That account has been disputed by critics, including Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who expressed sympathy with protesters while urging them to remain peaceful. Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a warning ahead of the demonstrations, stating that while peaceful protest is protected by the Constitution, interfering with federal officers or damaging federal property would result in arrests and prosecution. Local and federal authorities say demonstrations will continue to be closely monitored as tensions remain high. Key Takeaways Nationwide protests erupted after an ICE officer killed a U.S. citizen during a Minneapolis operation. Demonstrations spread to major cities, driven by anger over federal immigration enforcement tactics. The Trump administration is defending the officer’s actions, while critics warn of growing authoritarianism. SOURCE: THE HILL

Bob Weir, founding member of the Grateful Dead, has died Bob Weir, guitarist, vocalist and founding member of the Grateful Dead, has died at the age of 78, his family has confirmed. In a statement posted on his Instagram account by his daughter, Chloe, the family said Weir passed away peacefully, surrounded by loved ones. He had been diagnosed with cancer in July and began treatment shortly before performing a run of shows at Golden Gate Park in San Francisco. While he successfully beat cancer, the statement said he later died due to underlying lung issues. “For over sixty years, Bobby took to the road,” the family wrote. “A guitarist, vocalist, storyteller, and founding member of the Grateful Dead. Bobby will forever be a guiding force whose unique artistry reshaped American music.” Weir was just 16 when he met Jerry Garcia in Palo Alto in 1963. The two musicians first played together in Mother McCree’s Uptown Jug Champions before forming the Warlocks, which soon evolved into the Grateful Dead in 1965. The band would go on to become one of the most influential and enduring acts in American music history, known for its improvisational live performances and fiercely loyal fanbase. “There is no final curtain here, not really,” the family’s statement continued. “Only the sense of someone setting off again.” It added that Weir often spoke of building a “three-hundred-year legacy,” determined that the Grateful Dead’s music would endure long after him. Weir is survived by his wife, Natascha Münter, and their two children, Chloe and Monet. Key Takeaways A Founding Giant Of American Music Is Gone Bob Weir, co-founder and guitarist of the Grateful Dead, has died at 78, ending a six-decade career that helped define psychedelic rock and reshape live American music. He Played On Almost Until The End Diagnosed with cancer in July, Weir continued performing just weeks before his death. He ultimately beat cancer, but died from underlying lung issues, passing peacefully surrounded by family. The Grateful Dead’s Legacy Lives On From meeting Jerry Garcia at 16 to helping build one of the most enduring bands in history, Weir leaves behind a vast musical legacy — one his family says he hoped would endure for “three hundred years” through future generations of Dead Heads. SOURCE: THE HILL

America’s Lost Credibility May Take A Generation To Rebuild This is shaping up to be a tipping-point year — not because China, Russia or Iran are about to trigger a global explosion, but because the United States itself has become the single biggest source of international instability. That stark conclusion runs through the Eurasia Group’s Top Risks 2026 report. The country that designed and enforced the postwar global order is now actively dismantling it, driven by a president more willing — and more able — to reshape America’s role in the world than any modern predecessor. Last weekend offered a glimpse of what this means in practice. After months of pressure, U.S. special forces captured Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro and flew him to New York to face charges. No American casualties. A dictator humiliated. By Trump’s standards, a flawless win. The president has already christened his approach the “Donroe Doctrine” — a modern twist on the Monroe Doctrine. But where Monroe sought to keep European powers out of the Americas, Trump is using military force, economic coercion and personal leverage to bend the hemisphere to his will. This is not isolationism. The U.S. is more deeply entangled with Israel and Gulf states than ever. Trump has struck Iran, interfered in European politics, and sent Taiwan its largest-ever arms package. Nor is this a classic spheres-of-influence strategy. Trump isn’t carving up the world — he’s probing it. His foreign policy doesn’t run on familiar distinctions like allies versus adversaries or democracies versus autocracies. It runs on a far simpler test: can the other side hit back hard enough to matter? If the answer is no, and Trump wants something, that country becomes a target. If the answer is yes, negotiations follow. Venezuela failed that test completely. Maduro had no credible allies, no retaliatory capability, and no leverage Trump cared about. So he was removed — even though the broader regime remains intact and democratic transition remains uncertain. Trump was content to keep the same machinery in place, as long as it answered to him. The “or else” threat appears to be working — at least tactically. Trump has since announced that Venezuela’s new authorities will hand over tens of millions of barrels of oil, with proceeds personally controlled by the White House. That success will only embolden further pressure — in Cuba, Nicaragua, Colombia, Mexico, and beyond. Contrast that with China. When Trump escalated tariffs, Beijing retaliated with export controls on rare earths and critical minerals — exposing U.S. vulnerabilities. Trump backed down. Now he’s intent on détente, not dominance. This is not grand strategy. It is the law of the jungle. American power is being applied wherever Trump believes he can get away with it — detached from alliances, institutions and norms that once gave U.S. leadership legitimacy. As domestic constraints tighten and midterm politics loom, his appetite for risk abroad is growing. The damage extends far beyond the Western Hemisphere. Trump’s threats toward Greenland show Europe is firmly in his sights. With weak governments in London, Paris and Berlin — and Washington backing far-right movements — the continent lacks leverage to push back. China, by contrast, is content to wait. Xi Jinping will still be in power long after Trump leaves office. Alliances and credibility are force multipliers. They allow power to endure. Trump is burning through that inheritance, treating it as a burden rather than an asset. And once credibility is gone, it doesn’t snap back. America’s lost credibility will take a generation to rebuild — if it can be rebuilt at all. That is why 2026 matters: not because we know how this ends, but because we are already seeing what happens when the country that wrote the rules decides it no longer needs them. Key Takeaways US power is now raw and transactional, not rules-based Trump’s foreign policy operates on a simple test: can a country hit back hard enough to matter? If not, it becomes a target. Alliances, institutions and norms that once gave American power legitimacy are being sidelined. Short-term “wins” are accelerating long-term damage Actions like the Maduro capture deliver quick, low-cost victories, but hollow out US credibility. Once allies stop trusting Washington, that lost leverage cannot be quickly rebuilt — if at all. America, not China or Russia, is driving global instability By undermining the order it created, the US is becoming the system’s biggest destabiliser. Rivals like China can afford to wait while American influence erodes from within.