Social Media

Off topic trolling post removed consisting of repetitive references to false claims that the war started before 7th Oct @Neeranam

A far-left activist has been arrested in connection with a series of attacks on France's high-speed train network, which led to widespread travel disruption. The arrest, confirmed by France's interior minister, took place in Seine-Maritime, Normandy, and comes amid a broader investigation into acts of sabotage that have plagued the country's infrastructure. The French media, including Le Parisien and BFM TV, have reported that telecom installations belonging to SFR and Bouygues Telecom were vandalized, mainly affecting fixed-line services. Cables in electrical cabinets were cut in various locations, including southern France, the Meuse region near Luxembourg, and the Oise area near Paris. While it remains unclear if the telecom vandalism is directly connected to the railway attacks, the coordinated nature of the disruptions has raised concerns about broader security threats. The railway sabotage, which coincided with the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics, involved the use of explosive devices to ignite fires that damaged signal boxes along key lines connecting Paris with cities such as Lille in the north, Bordeaux in the west, and Strasbourg in the east. The state-owned railway operator, SNCF, described the incidents as coordinated sabotage, resulting in hundreds of thousands of travelers being stranded at stations. Notably, an attack on the Paris-Marseille line was thwarted, preventing further chaos. The disruption impacted high-speed services, including the Eurostar connection between London and Paris, which had to switch to slower lines. Germany's national railway company, Deutsche Bahn, also warned of disruptions to its long-distance services. Normal traffic resumed on Monday morning, but not before around 800,000 customers experienced significant delays and inconvenience. The opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics, held on the banks of the River Seine, saw more than 300,000 spectators gather to watch the athletes' parade through the heart of the city on a flotilla of barges and riverboats. To ensure the safety of the event, France deployed an extensive security force, including 45,000 police officers, 10,000 soldiers, and 2,000 private security agents. Snipers were positioned on rooftops, and drones patrolled the skies. Despite the heavy security in Paris for the opening ceremony, other parts of the country experienced lighter security measures, highlighting the challenges of ensuring nationwide safety during such a high-profile event. The arrest of the far-left activist underscores the ongoing threats and the necessity for vigilant security measures to protect both the public and critical infrastructure during the Paris Olympics. Credit: Sky News 2024-07-29 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

Please remain on topic which is: Rocket Strike Killing 12 Children & Teens puts Israel and Hezbollah on brink of all-out war

Questionable source link has been removed and a post making unsubstaniated claims A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies. Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source.

The Middle East teeters on the edge of a broader conflict following a deadly rocket strike from Lebanon, which hit a soccer field in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights on Saturday, killing 12 children and teens. This attack, the deadliest on Israeli civilians since October 7, has raised fears of an all-out war between Israel and Hezbollah. In a rare move, Hezbollah denied responsibility for the rocket attack. The White House National Security Council is currently in discussions with Israeli and Lebanese officials, aiming to find a diplomatic solution to "end all attacks once and for all" in the volatile border area between Israel and Lebanon. In response to the rocket strike, the Israeli military launched a series of strikes inside Lebanon, with Hezbollah also conducting retaliatory attacks. So far, no casualties have been reported from these exchanges. The tragic incident occurred as Israel and Hamas are negotiating a cease-fire to end the nearly 10-month-long war in Gaza. The rocket hit the Druze town of Majdal Shams, located about 12 kilometers south of Lebanon and near the Syrian border, killing 12 children and teens and wounding 20 others. “I feel darkness inside and out. Nothing like this happened here,” said Anan Abu Saleh, a resident. The scene was described as horrific, with residents expressing the need for increased security. The Israeli military is investigating why the rocket was not intercepted, suggesting the short journey and reaction time may have been factors. A bomb shelter stood close to the blackened field, steps away from where the rocket struck. The Druze, a religious sect with communities in Israel, Syria, and Lebanon, are among Israel's most loyal citizens, despite some tensions in the Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria in the 1967 Mideast war and annexed in 1981. Much of the international community still considers the area occupied territory. “Big anger, big, big. I have no feelings that I can explain to you,” said Hassan Shakir, a resident of Majdal Shams. The scale of the attack and the young victims could prompt a severe response from Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who hurried back from the U.S. after the attack, warned that Hezbollah “will pay a heavy price for this attack, one that it has not paid so far.” The security Cabinet has authorized Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant to decide on the appropriate response. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken indicated that all signs pointed to Hezbollah being responsible for the rocket. Israeli military’s Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi said an Iranian-made Falaq rocket, typically used by Hezbollah, was fired. The White House on Sunday declared Hezbollah responsible for a deadly rocket attack on Saturday that killed 12 children in the Druze town of Majdal Shams, as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened the security cabinet to discuss Israel’s reaction to the attack. “It was their rocket, and launched from an area they control,” National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson said in a statement, adding that the Hezbollah attack should be “universally condemned.” “Our support for Israel’s security is ironclad and unwavering against all Iran-backed threats, including Hezbollah,” she noted, adding that the Iran-backed terror group “started firing at Israel on October 8, claiming solidarity with Hamas, another terror organization in Iran’s so-called ‘Axis of Resistance.'” Hezbollah has been engaging in attacks on Israel since Hamas’ attack on October 7, prompting Israel to target Hezbollah’s military infrastructure with airstrikes and drones. While most attacks have been confined to border areas, Israel has also targeted Hezbollah and Hamas leadership farther north in Lebanon. The ongoing conflict has led to the evacuation of tens of thousands of people along the border. Hezbollah’s superior firepower compared to Hamas poses a significant threat, and a war on two fronts would strain Israel’s military capabilities, as noted by Barak Ben-Zur, a researcher at the International Institute of Counter-Terrorism. In Lebanon, preparations for potential increased Israeli fire are underway. Lebanon’s national airline postponed the Beirut arrival of seven flights until Monday morning. Caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati has been in urgent calls with diplomats and politicians. Abdallah Dalal, a resident of the Lebanese border village of Chebaa, said, “I doubt that there will be a strike, but nothing is far-fetched when it comes to the enemy.” Any escalation could involve Iran, which has warned Israel that a strong reaction would lead to “unprecedented consequences.” Tensions between Iran and Israel flared in April when Iran launched 300 missiles and drones at Israel, most of which were intercepted, following the killing of an Iranian general. The United Nations Secretary-General has called for maximum restraint from all parties involved. Officials from the United States, Egypt, and Qatar are meeting with Israeli officials in Rome to push for a cease-fire deal in Gaza. The head of Israel’s Mossad spy agency, David Barnea, has returned home, and negotiations are expected to continue. Credit: BBC | AP | TOI 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

Nonsense inflamatory troll and baiting posts removed @frank83628

Off topic unapproved video removed. Latest developments and discussion of events in the Israel-Hamas War. Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source. There is a new topic on the latest ICC here. ICC Accepts Numerous Briefs Delaying Arrest Warrants For Hamas & Israeli Leaders

Troll posts and off topic unattibuted claims removed from the usual suspect

An inflamatory personal attack post has been removed. @Neeranam

Keir Starmer recently pledged swift intervention and harsh consequences to tackle knife crime, but mere words are insufficient to protect our children. Take the tragic case of Pharrell Garcia, a 15-year-old boy sent to pick up his sister from Benthal Primary, a school familiar to many in north London. Nearing his old school earlier this week, Pharrell was mugged and, after refusing to hand over his phone, was fatally stabbed. Despite paramedics' best efforts, he bled to death on the street at four in the afternoon. In another horrifying incident from May, a nine-year-old girl from Birmingham was excitedly heading out for dinner during a visit to London. The chosen venue was Evin, a popular Turkish restaurant where patrons often dine outside on warm evenings. Around 9pm, a helmeted figure on a stolen motorcycle opened fire, injuring three adults and critically wounding the little girl. She may never walk or talk again. These incidents highlight the stark reality of Hackney, a gentrified yet troubled area of multicultural London. Despite Victorian terraced homes valued at over £1.5 million, the neighborhood remains plagued by violence. Just before Christmas, local mother Lianne Gordon, 42, was killed in a bungled home attack meant for someone else. She was among three people shot, including a 20-year-old man and a 16-year-old boy. Violence seems ever-present, affecting even those of us who try to return to our routines after initial shock. We wonder if continuing to walk our dogs in the park where Lianne lived is foolish or simply a testament to Londoners’ resilience in the face of violence. But the brutal truth is that we are all personally affected by the knowledge that children are being killed and grievously injured in our streets. Calling it “black-on-black” violence diminishes its broader threat to our community and society as a whole. As Westminster debates the defense budget, it's crucial to remember that safety begins at home. For residents like me, who pay exorbitant income and council taxes, crime seems out of control. It’s unsettling that my children feel lucky to avoid crossfire on a night out. This leads to the pressing question: what concrete actions will Keir Starmer and Labour take? Their manifesto claims they will halve knife crime in a decade and end "empty warnings" with rapid intervention and tough consequences for knife-carrying individuals. But what is their actual plan? Telling teenagers not to carry knives has clearly failed. The shift towards guns is even more terrifying, with teenage gangs controlling entire postcodes. Hackney’s dual image is evident: to Gen Z, it’s a hub of edgy, artistic creativity, while to worried grandparents in the Shires, it’s a crime hotspot validating their preference for quieter towns like Chichester. Yet for families like mine, London is home, and we deserve to feel safe. Unfortunately, we don’t. The juxtaposition of affluence and violence isn’t unique to Hackney. Even Kensington & Chelsea, home to some of London’s safest streets, witnessed the shooting of 15-year-old Rene Graham at a family fun day. Four men were arrested on suspicion of murder, demonstrating that knife crime permeates even elite areas. The current situation demands more than hand-wringing and condolences. The debate over stop and search illustrates the divide: the black community often views it as harmful, while bereaved mothers see it as essential. Statistics from Statista show that 14% of stop and search interventions lead to arrests. Such measures might have prevented my daughter and her boyfriend from being mugged one Sunday afternoon near our home. Two men, smelling of skunk, separated them, and one threatened her boyfriend with a zombie knife, taking both their phones. The police responded quickly but were limited in their actions. My daughter chalked it up to experience. Boys are more often targeted for muggings due to being “less screamy,” while children in “posh” uniforms are frequently mugged. Parent groups in Enfield and Dulwich have started patrolling streets themselves, but citizen armies are not a long-term solution. Labour’s promise to ban zombie blades, ninja swords, and machetes is a start, but a more comprehensive policing strategy focused on youth is crucial. After all, the attacker arrested for Pharrell Garcia’s murder was another 15-year-old boy. In London, halving knife crime in a decade feels like an eternity. We need immediate and decisive action to stop the senseless violence and protect our communities. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

In a significant development, federal prosecutors have announced that the man who severely injured author Salman Rushdie in a 2022 knife attack in western New York was driven by a Hezbollah leader's endorsement of a fatwa calling for Rushdie's death. The revelation came as new terrorism charges were filed against Hadi Matar, a U.S. citizen from New Jersey, marking a crucial step in the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Kruly disclosed that Matar was motivated by the fatwa originally issued in 1989, which called for the death of Rushdie over his novel "The Satanic Verses." Matar believed that the fatwa had the backing of Hezbollah, a Lebanon-based militant group, and was further endorsed by the group's secretary-general, Hassan Nasrallah, in a 2006 speech. According to Kruly, Matar's attack was an attempt to carry out this fatwa. "We allege that in attempting to murder Salman Rushdie in New York in 2022, Hadi Matar committed an act of terrorism in the name of Hezbollah, a designated terrorist organization aligned with the Iranian regime," said Attorney General Merrick Garland in a news release. He emphasized the Justice Department's commitment to prosecuting those who perpetrate violence in the name of terrorist groups and undermine fundamental freedoms. Matar, who already faces state charges of attempted murder and assault, pleaded not guilty to the new federal charges. These include terrorism transcending national boundaries, providing material support to terrorists, and attempting to provide material support to a terrorist organization. Matar's attorney, Nathaniel Barone, highlighted the complexity of the federal case, noting that it involved multiple agencies and countries over a two-year investigation. Barone indicated that the federal case would delve into broader conspiracies compared to the state charges, which primarily focus on the physical assault on Rushdie during a lecture at the Chautauqua Institution in August 2022. Despite the serious charges, Matar plans to mount a vigorous defense and maintains his innocence. Since the attack, Matar has been held without bail. During the assault, he stabbed Rushdie more than a dozen times in front of an audience of about 1,500 people, leaving the author with knife wounds that blinded him in one eye. The event moderator, Henry Reese, was also wounded before bystanders managed to subdue Matar. U.S. Attorney Trini Ross commended the bravery of those present at the scene, stating, "This defendant put time and effort into traveling to the western district of New York with the intent of taking the life of another. Only because of the brave efforts of those who were present that day, the defendant was prevented from completing his murderous intention." Rushdie detailed the harrowing attack and his subsequent painful recovery in a memoir published in April. The new federal charges against Matar follow his rejection of a plea deal offered by state prosecutors, which would have recommended a shorter prison sentence in exchange for guilty pleas to both state and federal charges. With this rejection, both cases are now set to proceed to trial separately. Jury selection for the state case is scheduled for October 15, while a detention hearing in the federal case is set for August 7. The attack on Rushdie has raised ongoing concerns about his security, given the persistent death threats against him. Although state police and a county sheriff's deputy were assigned to his lecture, the incident has sparked debate about whether adequate protection was in place. Historical precedents underscore the severity of the threat: in 1991, a Japanese translator of "The Satanic Verses" was murdered, and an Italian translator survived a knife attack the same year. In 1993, the book’s Norwegian publisher was shot but survived. Born in the U.S. to Lebanese parents, Matar holds dual citizenship. His mother has reported that her son became withdrawn and moody after visiting his father in Lebanon in 2018. The investigation into Rushdie's stabbing has also explored whether Matar acted alone or was in concert with militant or religious groups. As the legal proceedings continue, the case remains a poignant reminder of the enduring and dangerous reach of extremist ideologies. Credit: Time 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Two Just Stop Oil activists have been found guilty of criminal damage after throwing soup over Vincent van Gogh’s renowned painting, "Sunflowers." Anna Holland and Phoebe Plummer, both 22, faced trial at Southwark Crown Court for their actions in October 2022, when they splashed tinned soup over the iconic artwork. The protesters, donned in Just Stop Oil T-shirts, hurled two tins of Heinz tomato soup at the 1888 masterpiece, which was displayed in the National Gallery. Following the act, they knelt in front of the painting and glued their hands to the wall beneath it. Although the painting itself remained unharmed, the 17th-century gold-coloured frame sustained damage. Prosecutors highlighted that the soup, purchased from a nearby Tesco, acted like paint stripper on the wooden frame, which they described as "a piece of art in itself." In a video captured during the protest, Plummer can be heard questioning, "What is worth more, art or life? Is it worth more than food? Worth more than justice?" She continued, "Are you more concerned about the protection of a painting, or the protection of our planet and people? The cost of living crisis is part of the cost of oil crisis." Despite their arguments, the two women denied the charge of criminal damage. Judge Christopher Hehir, who recently sentenced five other Just Stop Oil activists to prison terms ranging from four to five years for disruptions on the M25, released Holland and Plummer on bail. Their sentencing is scheduled for September 27. Until then, their bail conditions prohibit them from carrying glue, paint, or any adhesive substances in public, and they are barred from visiting galleries or museums. This incident was not an isolated one; it was the second attack on the National Gallery by Just Stop Oil in 2022. Earlier in July, two other supporters of the group glued themselves to John Constable’s "The Hay Wain." Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a significant political move, former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee on Friday morning. This endorsement arrives at a pivotal moment, just days after President Joe Biden announced his withdrawal from the race and threw his support behind Harris. The Obamas' backing solidifies Harris’s position as the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination. Barack and Michelle Obama expressed their enthusiasm and unwavering support for Harris in a campaign email and video. “This week, we got a chance to catch up with a friend who we've known for more than 20 years. She'd had a pretty busy couple of days, to say the least. But we couldn't be more excited for her — or more thrilled to endorse Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee for President of the United States,” they stated. The video showed the Obamas calling Harris to share their pride in her achievements and their commitment to supporting her campaign. Barack Obama emphasized, "We will do everything we can to get you through this election and into the Oval Office." Harris, expressing her gratitude for their friendship and support, responded, “We're gonna have some fun with this too, aren't we?” The Obamas’ endorsement brings substantial weight to Harris’s campaign. Barack Obama had previously supported Biden’s decision to step down, acknowledging the difficulty of the decision but affirming that it was made with the nation’s best interests at heart. He said, “For him to look at the political landscape and decide that he should pass the torch to a new nominee is surely one of the toughest decisions in his life. But I know he wouldn't make this decision unless he believed it was right for America.” Obama’s endorsement is not only a personal affirmation of Harris but also a strategic move to unify the Democratic Party behind a single candidate. Barack Obama has been a critical surrogate for Biden throughout his campaign, participating in fundraisers that set single-night fundraising records. His support for Harris now signifies a continuation of his influence in the Democratic Party. Obama has also served as a mentor and advisor to Harris over the two decades they have known each other, providing guidance and support. Michelle Obama, known for her popularity and effectiveness as a campaigner, is expected to play a significant role in Harris’s campaign. According to some polls, she remains the most popular figure in American politics, which could prove to be a valuable asset for Harris. The Democratic National Committee is set to formally select its nominee in a virtual roll call ahead of the party's convention, which begins on August 19. Since Biden’s endorsement, Harris’s campaign has seen record-setting donations and garnered numerous high-profile endorsements, further solidifying her position as the presumptive Democratic nominee. The endorsements from the Obamas are expected to rally the party’s base and bring together various factions within the Democratic Party. The unified support from the Obamas and other prominent Democratic figures signals a strong and cohesive front as Harris prepares for the general election. This consolidation of support is crucial for maintaining momentum and building a robust campaign infrastructure. With the backing of such influential figures, Harris’s campaign is poised to mobilize voters, attract funding, and navigate the complex political landscape ahead. Harris’s campaign is expected to leverage the Obamas’ endorsement to highlight her qualifications, vision, and readiness to lead the nation. The endorsement serves as a testament to Harris’s capabilities and her alignment with the values and goals of the Democratic Party. As the campaign progresses, the focus will be on uniting the party, reaching out to undecided voters, and countering the opposition’s narrative. The support from the Obamas underscores the importance of continuity and stability in leadership, especially in a time of political and social challenges. Their endorsement reflects a commitment to building on the progress made during their administration and ensuring that the Democratic Party remains focused on its core principles and objectives. Harris, with her experience, vision, and dedication, is presented as the candidate best suited to carry forward this legacy. As the Democratic National Committee prepares for the convention and the official nomination process, the focus will be on consolidating support, finalizing the campaign strategy, and preparing for the general election. The endorsement from the Obamas marks a significant milestone in Harris’s campaign, signaling a unified and determined Democratic Party ready to take on the challenges ahead and work towards victory in the upcoming election. Credit: AXIOS 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

In a recent turn of events in the political arena, Vice President Kamala Harris has accused former President Donald Trump of retracting his commitment to a September 10th presidential debate. Harris addressed reporters with a clear message: "I'm ready." Her comments came after she returned to Washington following a speech to the American Federation of Teachers in Houston. "I'm ready to debate Donald Trump. I have agreed to the previously agreed upon Sept. 10 debate. He agreed to that previously. Now it appears he's backpedaling. But I'm ready. And I think the voters deserve to see the split-screen that exists in this race on a debate stage. And so I'm ready. Let's go," she asserted. This accusation follows an earlier agreement between Trump and then-President Biden to participate in two presidential debates, the first of which took place on June 27th, hosted by CNN. The second debate was scheduled for September 10th and was to be hosted by ABC News. However, Biden's underwhelming performance in the first debate led to widespread calls for him to withdraw from his reelection campaign, a decision he announced on Sunday. Biden's exit from the race paved the way for Harris to announce her candidacy, and she has since garnered the support of a majority of delegates necessary to secure the Democratic nomination. Trump had previously indicated his willingness to debate Harris, expressing his openness to facing her "more than once." Nonetheless, he has now suggested a change in the debate's hosting network, advocating for Fox News instead of ABC News. Trump took to his social media platform to label ABC as "fake news" and a "joke," casting doubt on the network's credibility. Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung underscored this position in a statement on Thursday evening, noting, "general election debate details cannot be finalized until Democrats formally decide on their nominee." Harris’s readiness to confront Trump on the debate stage highlights her determination to engage in direct political discourse and underscores the significance of these debates in the eyes of the electorate. Her insistence on maintaining the original debate schedule reflects a broader commitment to transparency and accountability in the democratic process. Meanwhile, Trump's insistence on changing the debate host has sparked a contentious debate about media credibility and the platforms that should be entrusted with such pivotal events. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the potential showdown between Harris and Trump on September 10th remains a focal point of public interest. The outcome of these debates could significantly influence the direction of the upcoming election, providing voters with a clear comparison between the candidates. Harris’s bold stance and Trump’s contentious counter-moves set the stage for a highly anticipated and potentially transformative moment in American politics. Credit: CBS 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Among the essentials are a lend-lease program, real sanctions on Russia, and a revitalized NATO. Pundits claim that if Donald Trump is re-elected, he will cut off aid to Ukraine, give away its territory, and deal directly with Vladimir Putin to impose an ignominious “peace” on the country. There’s no evidence that such capitulation will be part of President Trump’s policy and much evidence to the contrary. It was Mr. Trump who in 2017 lifted the Obama administration’s arms embargo on Ukraine, providing it with the Javelin missiles that helped save Kyiv in the earliest days of Russia’s invasion. More recently, Mr. Trump gave political cover to House Speaker Mike Johnson when he maneuvered to pass additional military aid. Helping Ukraine while revitalizing the American defense industrial base in Alabama, Pennsylvania, and Virginia is good policy—and good politics. The Biden administration’s weakness has left Ukraine where it is today: two years into a full-scale war, with cities destroyed, hundreds of thousands killed, millions of refugees, and without the means to win. The White House has no strategy for victory, and Americans are rightly concerned. While Mr. Biden stumbled into war through weakness, Mr. Trump could re-establish peace through strength. Here’s how a successful plan for Ukraine might look: Unleash America’s energy potential. This will fire up the U.S. economy, drive down prices and shrink Mr. Putin’s war-crimes budget. Rebuild ties with Saudi Arabia and Israel and work together against Iran. This will stabilize the Middle East, ease the Gaza crisis, and create an opening for the Saudis to join the U.S. in squeezing Russia out of global energy markets. Impose real sanctions on Russia. The Biden administration’s sanctions sound good on paper but are hollow. The Treasury, for example, exempts Russian banks from U.S. sanctions if their transactions are related to energy production—the most important revenue source for the Kremlin’s war machine. Bulk up America’s defense industry. We must show our adversaries, especially Russia and China, that they can’t compete with U.S. defense capabilities. Russia’s economy is smaller than Texas’. We can’t allow China to match and surpass the U.S. Revitalize the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. This includes making Europeans pay their fair share. It is time to raise the bar on spending to 3% of member countries’ gross domestic product. Create a $500 billion “lend-lease” program for Ukraine. Instead of saddling U.S. taxpayers with more bills, let Ukraine borrow as much as it needs to buy American weapons to defeat Russia. This is how we helped Britain in World War II before Pearl Harbor. It’s how we can send a clear signal to Mr. Putin that he will never win. Lift all restrictions on the type of weapons Ukraine can obtain and use. This will re-establish a position of strength, which Mr. Putin will understand means the war must end. He will face rising costs and no chance of further gain. These steps would position Mr. Trump to set the terms of a deal: The war stops immediately. Ukraine builds up substantial defense forces so Russia never attacks again. No one recognizes Russia’s occupation and claimed annexation of any Ukrainian territories—just as we never recognized the Soviet incorporation of the Baltic states and withheld recognition from East Germany until 1974. Crimea is demilitarized. Ukraine rebuilds with reparations from Russia’s frozen central-bank reserves, not U.S. taxpayer dollars. Ukraine joins NATO as soon as possible so all European allies assume the burden of protecting it. NATO should establish a $100 billion fund for arming Ukraine, with the U.S. share capped at 20%, as is the case with other alliance common budgets. The European Union should swiftly admit Ukraine and help it modernize and develop its economy. If Russia complies with these terms, the West will gradually lift sanctions. They will be fully removed once Ukraine is in both NATO and the EU. These steps, and not the half-measures of the Biden administration, will end the war, establish a lasting peace, ensure Europe bears the burden of maintaining it, and re-establish freedom and security on the Continent. To those who doubt: The last thing Mr. Trump wants in a second term is a foreign-policy failure that distracts from his domestic agenda and makes Mr. Biden’s botched withdrawal from Afghanistan look like a success in comparison. This comprehensive strategy highlights the belief that strength, clear policies, and strategic international alliances are essential to ending the conflict in Ukraine. By leveraging America's energy resources, reinforcing defense capabilities, and revitalizing NATO, a Trump-led administration could potentially navigate the complexities of the Ukraine-Russia conflict toward a resolution that prioritizes stability and security for Ukraine and the broader international community. Mr. Urban is managing director at the BGR Group and of counsel at Torridon Law. Mr. Pompeo served as secretary of state, 2018-21. Credit: Wall Street Journal 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

Joshua Sutcliffe, a Christian former math teacher, has raised alarms about the potential risks for educators who share their personal beliefs in the classroom after he lost a High Court appeal against a decision to ban him from teaching. Sutcliffe was barred from the profession in 2023 after the Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) concluded that he breached safeguarding duties by refusing to use a transgender student’s preferred pronouns and telling students that homosexuality was a sin. This case, the first of its kind to reach and be dismissed at the appeal stage, underscores the challenges at the intersection of personal beliefs and professional conduct in education. Mr. Sutcliffe expressed his dismay at the ruling, stating, "I still stand by my Christian convictions that it is harmful and detrimental to affirm gender-confused children." He claimed that he had been targeted ever since he "dared to express [his] Christian beliefs in a school" and made public appearances in the media. He argued that the TRA had been intent on making him recant his views, punishing him severely for his refusal. Despite this setback, Sutcliffe vowed to continue his fight for justice and to reclaim his career. He lamented the lack of guidance for teachers on such issues during his early years in the profession, noting that schools were more likely to follow advice from organizations like Stonewall rather than the government or other experts. Sutcliffe's attempt to overturn the prohibition order from May 2023 was rejected. The TRA had found him guilty of "unacceptable professional conduct" while he was employed at The Cherwell School in Oxford from 2015 to 2018. The misconduct panel determined that Sutcliffe had repeatedly failed to use a pupil’s preferred pronouns, referring to the student in class, in an email to staff, and during an appearance on ITV’s This Morning. The panel also found that he had failed to safeguard students' wellbeing by telling them that God had stopped someone from being gay because it was wrong, and by expressing his disapproval of equal marriage. In his defense, Sutcliffe’s lawyers argued that the teaching ban represented an "unjustified interference" with his rights to freedom of speech and religion. They contended that the decision was "unsafe" and based on "perverse" findings, maintaining that Sutcliffe had a right "not to believe in gender identity belief." However, Mr. Justice Pepperall, in a written ruling, dismissed these arguments. The judge concluded that Sutcliffe "fails to understand or accept the harm that he caused vulnerable children in his class," asserting that there was "no merit" in his claim that the ban infringed on his religious expression. Justice Pepperall clarified that the case was not about a teacher who accidentally failed to adhere to a school's policy on pronouns or who tried to reconcile personal beliefs with such policies by avoiding pronouns altogether. Instead, it concerned a teacher who intentionally used female pronouns for a transgender male student, both in the classroom and on national television, thereby causing significant distress to a vulnerable child. The judge also condemned Sutcliffe for his comments implying that homosexuality was a sin that could be cured by God, noting that these remarks showed "no regard for the gay and lesbian children in his class" and made them feel "worthless." Additionally, Sutcliffe faced allegations of showing inappropriate videos to students while working as a math teacher at St Aloysius College in Islington, north London, from 2018 to 2019. The TRA found it "more likely than not" that he had shown students a video about masculinity, which suggested that women were only attracted to "real men" and not "a passive man who looks to her to be his provider, protector, and leader." Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-07-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

Hours before the opening ceremony for the Paris Olympics, French rail company SNCF says its high-speed network has been targeted by "malicious acts" aimed at paralysing the system. Several high-speed TGV lines have been hit to the west, north and east of Paris and queues have formed at Montparnasse station which serves destinations to the west of the capital. Transport Minister Patrice Vergriete has strongly condemned "criminal acts" that he said would affect people's holiday plans. A number of trains have been cancelled and SNCF has warned that the situation could last "at least all weekend while repairs are conducted". Sports Minister Amélie Oudéa-Castéra described the attacks as "downright appalling", adding that the impact on the public and Olympic athletes was currently being assessed. More than 300,000 spectators are expected in the heart of Paris on Friday for an opening ceremony that will see thousands of Olympic athletes sailing down the River Seine. SNCF said fires had been set alight aimed at damaging its facilities. A source close to the investigation told AFP news agency that the attack involved acts of "sabotage". Although no-one has admitted targeting the high-speed network, there will inevitably be concern that it involves apparently co-ordinated acts of vandalism. Some high-speed services have been diverted on to other lines, causing a knock-on effect to other services. Credit: BBC 2024-07-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Inflamatory post and a conspiracey troll post removed. The topic here is. Netanyahu Addresses Congress: Vision for Gaza and Anti-Iran Alliance

Kamala Harris's first significant move on the global stage as the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee has raised eyebrows and sparked discussions. On July 24th, she did not attend the address by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu to a joint meeting of Congress. Traditionally, as vice president and president of the Senate, Harris would oversee the event alongside Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House. Instead, she has chosen to attend a previously scheduled event in Indianapolis with Zeta Phi Beta, a historically Black sorority. This decision, criticized by Republicans as "outrageous." This absence signals a generational transition within the Democratic Party. President Joe Biden, likely the last Democratic president to call himself a "Zionist," belongs to a generation that recalls Israel's early years as an underdog democracy fighting for survival against Arab adversaries. In contrast, Harris’s formative view encompasses the last 30 years, during which Israel has been seen as a dominant power in the Middle East, often criticized for its treatment of Palestinians. Despite this shift in perspective, it is not to say that Harris will abandon the Democratic Party's long-standing support for Israel. Although several Democrats boycotted Netanyahu, Harris is set to meet with the Israeli prime minister on July 25th. Netanyahu also plans to meet with President Biden the same day, and with former President Donald Trump on July 26th. Harris’s position on Israel, while supportive, lacks the emotional intensity seen in Biden's approach. Her husband is Jewish, but she does not exhibit the same emotional attachment to Israel. This was evident when Biden visited Israel soon after Hamas’s attacks on October 7th, embraced Netanyahu, and declared, “The United States stands with you.” In contrast, Harris has more forcefully decried the suffering of Palestinian civilians and advocated for a ceasefire and hostage release. At her first campaign rally in Wisconsin on July 23rd, Harris did not mention foreign policy. Her early experience in this area was limited and controversial, particularly her role in addressing the "root causes" of migration from Central America. Republicans have renewed attacks on her for failing to secure the southern border. However, Harris has become more assured lately, having visited Europe, Asia, and Africa, among other regions. Her national security adviser, Philip Gordon, is a seasoned expert in European and Middle Eastern affairs, having served under previous Democratic administrations. Over 350 former national-security officials have described Harris as "the best qualified person to lead our nation as Commander in Chief," noting that she possesses more foreign affairs experience than most recent incoming presidents. Harris shares Biden's internationalist perspective. In February, at the Munich Security Conference, she warned against American retrenchment, stating, "Isolation is not insulation. In fact, when America has isolated herself, threats have only grown." Yet, she may not fully share Biden's generation’s instinctive transatlanticism. Unlike Trump, Harris would not threaten to abandon European allies. However, American politicians are increasingly focused on the growing rivalry with China, and Harris is expected to continue this trend. Regarding the Middle East, Harris is likely to continue seeking to create a regional counterbalance involving Israel and Gulf Arab states, notably Saudi Arabia. For this to happen, the U.S. is pushing for a ceasefire in Gaza, coupled with an exchange of Israeli hostages. This ceasefire could pave the way for ending the war and making progress towards Palestinian statehood. In June, Gordon outlined two paths for Israel: one of endless war in Gaza, leading to "the looming threat of serious regional escalation, and growing Israeli isolation on the world stage," and another promising "the path to a strong, secure and prosperous Israel; at peace with its neighbors; backed by the United States; and integrated in the region as never before." Biden hopes to secure this deal during his remaining time in office. If he fails, this challenge could fall to Harris. Aaron David Miller of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace suggests that Harris's presidency might see little real change in U.S.-Israel relations. He notes that American pressure on close allies, particularly Israel, is rare due to domestic politics. Even President Obama, who criticized Israeli settlements and pushed for a Palestinian state, did not impose his will on Netanyahu and signed a significant security deal with Israel. "We rarely use real pressure or leverage on any of our close allies," says Miller. "And when it comes to the Israelis, because of our domestic politics, that is true in spades." Netanyahu's visit to Congress in 2015, where he opposed Obama’s Iran nuclear deal, contrasts with his expected approach this time, given the current political uncertainties in the U.S. Many in Congress remain receptive to his warnings about Iran, especially as Iran's nuclear program advances and it aligns more closely with autocratic regimes like Russia, China, and North Korea. Iran’s supply of ballistic missiles and drones to Russia for use in Ukraine further complicates the geopolitical landscape. In summary, Kamala Harris's foreign policy approach as the presumptive Democratic nominee for president suggests a nuanced blend of continuity and change. While maintaining the Democratic Party's traditional support for Israel, she is likely to adopt a more critical stance on Israeli policies towards Palestinians. Her focus will also include managing the growing rivalry with China and maintaining a strong stance against Russian aggression. Credit: Economist 2024-07-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A police officer at Manchester Airport has been suspended following the release of a video showing a man being kicked while on the ground. The footage, widely shared on social media, depicts officers from Greater Manchester Police (GMP) kicking and stamping on a man's head after he was tasered. This incident occurred on Tuesday evening and has since ignited significant public outrage. A police spokesman said three officers were "punched to the ground" in a "violent assault" when they attempted to arrest one of the suspects, he added. “As the attending officers were firearms officers, there was a clear risk during this assault of their firearms being taken from them." Three officers were taken to hospital for treatment, with one female officer suffering a broken nose. In response to the video, hundreds of protesters gathered outside a police station in Rochdale, expressing their anger and chanting, "GMP, shame on you." The victims, identified as Ahmed and Fahir, have spoken out through their solicitor, who has lodged a formal complaint against GMP. A spokesman for the police stated that the incident is under investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), and an officer has been suspended from all duties. The solicitor representing the victims, Akhmed Yakoob, revealed in a video that Ahmed and Fahir were released from Cheadle Police Station and had to make their way to the hospital due to head injuries. Yakoob criticized the police for not ensuring the victims received immediate medical care, stating, "It was the police's duty to take them to a hospital." The victims' elderly mother was present during the incident as a bystander. During a protest outside the Rochdale station, demonstrators expressed their frustration with cries of "f*** the police" and "Allahu Akbar [God is greatest]." A local Imam, attempting to calm the crowd, urged them not to resort to violence, reminding them to remain "respectable citizens." Greater Manchester Police has acknowledged the public's concerns and is cooperating with the IOPC for a comprehensive investigation. The officer involved has been removed from active duty. Paul Waugh, a newly elected Labour MP, expressed his shock over the video, describing it as "truly shocking and disturbing." He confirmed his intent to meet with the victims' family and has communicated his concerns to the police leadership. In the video, a woman in a headscarf can be seen standing over the victim. The officer with a taser kicks the man in the head before stamping on him and attempting to arrest him. A female officer, appearing shocked, instructs onlookers to stand back. Another officer can be heard shouting commands at a seated man, who is then forcibly handcuffed. The elderly woman, revealed to be the victims' mother, appears confused and is pushed away by an officer. Additional footage shows officers trying to control a group in the concourse. An officer, wielding a taser, points it at a man, threatening arrest. At one point, pepper spray is deployed, and the men are subdued and removed from the premises. Witness Amar Rafiq recounted the chaotic scene, describing how officers tackled the individuals to the ground after an altercation. He noted the public's fear, saying, "Everyone was worried about themselves; they started panicking and rushing away." Amar Minhas, another witness, described arriving at the airport to see police confronting a young man, leading to a physical struggle and the eventual use of a taser. Minhas noted, "That's when the policeman kicked him." GMP Assistant Chief Constable Wasim Chaudhry stated, "We understand the immense feeling of concern and worry that people feel about our response and fully respect their right to demonstrate their views peacefully." The police are engaging with community leaders to address concerns and ensure transparency as the investigation proceeds. Credit: Metro | BBC | X 2024-07-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has accepted numerous requests from states, organizations, and individuals to file amicus briefs concerning the potential arrest warrants for Israeli leaders and Hamas figures. This influx of briefs is expected to delay the court’s decision by several months. The ICC Prosecutor, Karim Khan, is seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas leaders Ismail Haniyeh, Yahya Sinwar, and Mohammed Deif, citing alleged crimes during the October 7 attack by Hamas and the ensuing conflict in Gaza. Seventy parties have been granted permission to submit briefs, many disputing the ICC’s jurisdiction over Israeli nationals and its authority to issue arrest warrants. This situation highlights ongoing debates about the court's jurisdiction and the admissibility of the case, which could ultimately lead to a rejection of the warrants. The UK and other Israeli allies argue that the ICC lacks jurisdiction because the Oslo Accords state that Palestinian authorities cannot exercise criminal jurisdiction over Israelis. Moreover, Israel and its supporters contend that the Palestinians never had jurisdiction to delegate to the ICC. Admissibility issues arise from the principle of complementarity, a key component of the ICC’s framework. This principle prohibits the court from proceeding if the accused's home state is capable and willing to conduct its own investigation. Critics argue that Khan did not allow enough time for Israeli investigations before pursuing international warrants. Several countries, including Germany, the US, and Argentina, along with organizations like the Israel Bar Association and various Jewish legal groups, support Israel’s position. They express concerns over both jurisdiction and the complementarity principle, suggesting that Khan’s actions may undermine the ICC’s legitimacy. Conversely, countries such as South Africa, Ireland, Bangladesh, and Spain have been allowed to submit briefs opposing Israel’s stance. The court’s pre-trial chamber must now review all submissions and provide Khan with the opportunity to respond, contributing to the delay. This case illustrates the complexity and contentious nature of international legal proceedings related to geopolitical conflicts. Credit: Reuters | TOI 2024-07-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The 2024 Olympics, set to commence in Paris on Friday, promises to be a significant event on the global stage, not only for its athletic competition but also for the geopolitical tensions that loom over it. With the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Palestine conflict, and strained relations between the U.S. and countries like Iran and China, the backdrop of these Games is more charged than usual. Despite these global tensions, athletes from around the world will be expected to set aside international disputes and exhibit exemplary sportsmanship. Among these athletes are participants from Russia and Ukraine, potentially leading to direct competitions between them. This is particularly noteworthy given that, technically, Russia has been banned from the Games. Following President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine, Russian athletes will compete as "Individual Neutral Athletes" (AIN). This decision by the organizers means that while Russian athletes can participate, they cannot represent their country officially. The Russian flag, national kit, and anthem are all banned from the venues. Furthermore, any medals won by Russian athletes will not count towards the official Paris 2024 medal table. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has stipulated that these athletes must not have actively supported the war or have any connections to the Russian military. Additionally, no Russian teams are allowed to compete, and the governing body of World Athletics has banned Russian track and field athletes. These sanctions have significantly reduced the number of Russian competitors at the Games. Whereas 335 Russian athletes competed in Tokyo 2020, only 15 are expected in Paris. Some Russian athletes who had accepted invitations were later rejected by their sport’s governing bodies. For instance, Russia's weightlifting federation declined invitations for 10 athletes, citing an "unsportsmanlike selection principle." President Putin has criticized the IOC’s conditions, accusing them of "ethnic discrimination" and claiming that the restrictions aim to marginalize Russian athletes. "If the IOC's artificial conditions are designed to cut off the best Russian athletes and portray at the Olympics that Russian sport is dying, then you need to decide whether to go there at all," Putin said last year. The IOC has firmly denied these accusations, stating, "Participation in the Olympic Games is by no means a human right," and emphasizing that the restrictions respond to breaches of the Olympic Charter by the Russian and Belarusian governments. Despite the challenges, some prominent Russian athletes are set to compete in Paris. This includes former world number one tennis player Daniil Medvedev, along with six other tennis players, three canoeists, three road cyclists, one trampoline gymnast, and one swimmer. Ukrainian athletes are also expected to participate in similar disciplines, setting the stage for potential direct competitions between Russians and Ukrainians. The IOC has acknowledged the complex situation for Ukrainian athletes who may find themselves competing against Russians. "We are glad that they will be given this opportunity [to compete in the Games], and at the same time, we are aware of the difficult inner conflicts they may have, given the aggression against their country," the IOC stated. They have encouraged International Federations to manage these situations with sensitivity and reiterated their solidarity with Ukrainian athletes. This situation is not unprecedented for Russia, which faced an Olympic ban in 2018 after an investigation revealed state-sponsored doping. Many Russian athletes were banned for life or had their medals stripped, though some were allowed to compete as "clean" athletes under the banner of the "Russian Olympic Committee" (ROC), rather than Russia itself. Credit: Newsweek 2024-07-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A man has been arrested and charged with attempted murder after allegedly stabbing a 17-year-old transgender girl multiple times at Miami International Airport. The attack occurred on Sunday evening while the victim was eating on the floor of Terminal J. Alexander Love, 29, has been charged with first-degree attempted murder with a deadly weapon and attempted premeditated murder. According to the arrest report from the Miami-Dade Police Department, officers responded to reports of a stabbing around 11:30 p.m. Upon arrival, they found the victim severely injured from multiple stab wounds to her face, head, arms, shoulders, neck, and legs. Police stated that Love attacked the girl without any provocation, using a butcher knife. He allegedly tried to throw her over a safety retaining glass after the stabbing. Despite her critical injuries, the victim managed to escape the assault and ran down to the third-floor level, where officers found her. She was immediately taken to a local medical center for emergency surgery. Her current condition remains unknown. Customs and Border Patrol agents apprehended Love shortly after the incident. During his arrest, Love claimed to have been acquainted with the victim prior to the attack. He provided a bizarre explanation, stating that he believed he had been drugged and that an unknown object had been inserted into his rectum. Although he was uncertain if the victim was responsible, Love said he felt compelled to "hurt whoever hurt him" and purchased the knife from a nearby Target store. Law enforcement officials recovered the knife at the scene. Love was subsequently booked into the Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center, where he was denied bond in court on Monday. He was also ordered not to contact the victim. It remains unclear whether he has obtained legal representation. The police spokesperson indicated that hate crime charges have not been ruled out, as investigators have yet to speak with the victim. The investigation is ongoing as authorities work to gather more information about the circumstances surrounding the attack. Credit: NBC 2024-07-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a highly charged rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, former President Donald Trump took the stage to declare victory over Joe Biden and launch a scathing attack on Vice President Kamala Harris. This marked Trump’s first major public appearance since President Biden ended his re-election bid, and the atmosphere was electric as Trump addressed his enthusiastic supporters. Trump, sporting a small bandage on his right ear, began by proclaiming his win over Biden. "As you know, three days ago, we officially defeated the worst president in the history of our country," he told the crowd, which erupted in applause. "He quit because he was losing so badly in the polls," Trump asserted, suggesting that the Democratic Party leaders forced Biden out using the 25th Amendment. "The bosses said, ‘Either you get out or we’re going to throw you out using the 25th Amendment.’ That’s what happened," he argued. Turning his attention to Kamala Harris, Trump was unrelenting in his criticism. "We have a new victim to defeat – Lyin Kamala Harris," he declared. Trump did not hold back, claiming, "I was supposed to be nice. They say something happened to me when I got shot. I became nice. And when you’re dealing with these people — they’re very dangerous people — When you’re dealing with them, you can’t be too nice." Drawing cheers from the audience, he added, "So if you don’t mind, I’m not going to be nice." Harris, who Biden endorsed to run in his stead, has already secured enough Democratic delegate support to receive the party’s nomination for president. She is expected to be formally named the Democratic nominee by August 7, following a virtual roll call approved by the Democratic National Committee rules committee. Trump lambasted Harris as "the most incompetent and far-left vice president in American history," attributing record levels of inflation and illegal immigration to her influence in the Biden administration. "For three-and-a-half years, Kamala Harris has been the ultra-liberal driving force behind every single Biden catastrophe," Trump claimed. "She is a radical left lunatic who will destroy our country if she ever gets the chance to get into office." The former president painted Harris as more liberal than Senator Bernie Sanders, calling her "the most liberal elected politician in American history." He linked her to the Biden administration’s border policies, which he noted were one of Biden’s biggest weaknesses. "She was the border czar but she never went to the border," Trump noted. "As border czar, Kamala opened our borders and allowed 20 million illegal aliens to stampede into our country from all over the world." Trump also criticized Harris for her role in the economy, highlighting her tie-breaking vote to pass the $739 billion Democratic spending plan known as the Inflation Reduction Act. "As vice president, she cast the tie-breaking vote that created the worst inflation in a half-century, decimating middle-class families and hurting very badly, as you know, all people in North Carolina," he said. On foreign policy, Trump blamed Harris for the failure to prevent Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. "Kamala Harris was sent to Europe to deter Russia – what a joke that was – from attacking Ukraine," he claimed. "How did that work out? Russia answered by launching the invasion just five days after she left." He added, "Putin laughed at it like she was nothing. She is nothing." Several rally attendees echoed Trump’s sentiments, expressing their dissatisfaction with the Biden-Harris administration. Austin Davis, a 26-year-old GIS technician, told The Post, "My paycheck has definitely gone down since Biden took over." Michelle Smith, 57, said she believes Trump "has the heart of America as what he stands for" and criticized the state of illegal immigration. Robin Padgett, 55, lamented, "There are too many homeless people, people cannot afford rent, groceries. It’s just terrible." During the rally, Trump briefly touched on the July 13 shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania, which left him and two others wounded and killed one rally-goer. "Bullets were flying," Trump recalled, describing the incident as "a rough, horrible, horrible time." He noted that Secret Service agents wanted to put him on a stretcher, but he refused. "I said, ‘You’re not putting me – I’m not getting on a stretcher,’" he recalled. "My shoes got knocked off … They tackled me so damn hard." Near the end of the rally, Trump announced he had received the endorsement of the National Association of Police Organizations. NAPO President Mick McHale praised Trump as a "steadfast and very public" supporter of law enforcement in a letter distributed to the media at the event. Credit: NYP 2024-07-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The Duke of Sussex, Prince Harry, believes that his ongoing legal battles with tabloid newspapers have significantly contributed to the rift within the British royal family. In an ITV documentary titled *Tabloids on Trial*, Harry candidly discusses how his fight for privacy in the courts has impacted his relationship with his family. Prince Harry explained that his decision to challenge the tabloid press legally was a "central piece" in the deterioration of relations with his family in the UK. When asked whether his legal actions had destroyed the relationship, he affirmed, "Yeah, that’s certainly a central piece to it. But, you know, that’s a hard question to answer because anything I say about my family results in a torrent of abuse from the press." Harry expressed his desire for a united front against the media, stating, "I’ve made it very clear that this is something that needs to be done. It would be nice if we, you know, did it as a family. I believe that, again, from a service standpoint and when you are in a public role, that these are the things that we should be doing for the greater good. But, you know, I’m doing this for my reasons." When questioned about the royal family’s decision not to engage in similar legal battles, he responded, "I think everything that has played out has shown people what the truth of the matter is. For me, the mission continues, but it has, it has, yes. It’s caused, yeah, as you say, part of a rift." Prince Harry has long been vocal about his frustration with the royal family’s reluctance to confront the press. He has previously shared that his father, King Charles, warned him that taking on the media would be a "suicide mission." In his memoir *Spare*, Harry criticized what he perceived as the royal family’s complicity with the media through alleged leaks, viewing himself as collateral damage. He wrote scathingly about his father's inaction, highlighting that "the same shoddy bastards who’d portrayed [Charles] as a clown" were now "tormenting and bullying" him and his wife, Meghan. In December 2023, Harry felt vindicated after winning damages in his hacking case against Mirror Group Newspapers. He remarked at the time, "I had been told that slaying dragons will get you burned," but defiantly added, "The mission continues." Reflecting on the case in the documentary, he described the victory as "huge" and a "monumental victory." He also expressed concerns that his mother, the late Diana, Princess of Wales, might have been an early victim of phone hacking. The Duke of Sussex, who appears alongside several celebrities in the documentary airing on ITV1 and ITVX, continues to pursue legal actions over privacy against News Group Newspapers and Associated Newspapers. His determination to challenge the press legally remains steadfast, despite the personal and familial costs it has incurred. Credit: The Guardian 2024-07-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe