Social Media

Democrats are increasingly optimistic about their chances in Florida's upcoming presidential and Senate races, with recent polls showing a narrowing gap in a state that has favored Republicans in recent years. A Morning Consult poll released Monday showed Vice President Kamala Harris trailing former President Donald Trump by just 2 points in Florida. Similarly, a poll from The Hill and Emerson College last week indicated former Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell (D-Fla.) was only 1 point behind Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), although most other surveys have shown a slightly larger gap of 4 to 5 points between them. Democrats believe that two significant ballot measures—Amendment 4, which seeks to enshrine abortion rights, and Amendment 3, aimed at legalizing recreational marijuana—will drive voter turnout in their favor during the presidential election year. "It’s all the same story," said Nikki Fried, chair of the Florida Democratic Party. "We wouldn’t have had to have an abortion amendment if the Republicans hadn’t taken our state in such an extreme direction." Fried also suggested that Florida voters are experiencing "Trump fatigue," which she believes is contributing to a "huge momentum shift in the state." She added, "People are just tired. They’re tired of the chaos. They’re tired of the show. They’re tired of the rhetoric. You’re seeing that with the momentum shift for Kamala Harris." Mucarsel-Powell’s campaign is echoing this message, positioning her as a fresh face in a state dominated by Republicans and criticizing Scott on issues such as abortion access, Social Security, and Medicare. Lauren Chou, communications director for Mucarsel-Powell’s campaign, said, "There is a lot of new energy on the ground in Florida, a lot of hopefulness that I think comes with having fresh leaders." The Harris campaign is also investing resources in Florida, particularly on abortion rights, launching the “Reproductive Rights for All” bus tour in Palm Beach last week, featuring Mucarsel-Powell and other national Democrats. Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff is also set to visit Florida as part of the campaign’s “New Way Forward” tour. Despite the positive signs for Democrats, there remains skepticism about their ability to win a presidential or Senate race in Florida. The state has trended Republican in recent years, even as the GOP struggled nationwide in the 2022 midterms. GOP strategist Ford O’Connell noted, "Given how Florida has moved from Barack Obama in 2012 narrowly winning the state to today, 12 years later, it’s just a totally different Florida," citing the party’s nearly 1 million voter registration advantage. While Republicans acknowledge that the abortion and marijuana ballot measures could boost turnout, they argue that Florida voters have a history of supporting liberal ballot measures while electing Republican officials. Both measures need 60 percent support to pass, making Republican voter backing essential. Trump and Scott have voiced opposition to Amendment 4, but they differ on Amendment 3, with Trump in favor and Scott against. The tight polling numbers reflect the historically close races in Florida; Trump won the state by 3 points in 2020 and 1 point in 2016, while Scott's Senate win in 2018 and his two gubernatorial victories were by margins of less than 2 points. “Nobody has been more successful at winning close elections in the Sunshine State than Rick Scott,” O’Connell said. Trump campaign senior adviser Brian Hughes expressed confidence, stating, "Florida is Trump country," and emphasizing that voters are ready to reelect Trump and Scott. He added, "Floridians are lining up to reject the Biden-Harris agenda of higher costs, open border, and violent crime." Scott’s campaign is working to link Mucarsel-Powell to Harris, with senior adviser Chris Hartline saying, "She supported Kamala and Biden’s policies up and down the board, and that’s just not going to play in Florida." In a recent interview, Scott remained confident, predicting he and Trump would perform well in the state, arguing that voters are "fed up" with the Biden-Harris administration. Hartline noted that pollsters may be struggling to capture the current political climate in Florida, particularly in Miami-Dade County, which has become a Republican stronghold in recent years. A GOP poll showed Harris and Trump tied in Miami-Dade, although Democrats remain optimistic about the area, citing internal polls that show Harris leading. Christian Ulvert, a Florida-based Democratic strategist, noted, "The national picture where independents are moving more toward Democrats and rejecting former President Donald Trump’s campaign, it’s playing out in Florida." He emphasized that the mobilization efforts in Florida could prove crucial as vote-by-mail ballots are sent out. Credit: The Hill 2024-09-13 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is set to deliver a stark warning that the NHS must "reform or die" as he outlines a new 10-year plan aimed at revitalizing the health service. His comments come as the government publishes an independent report detailing the NHS’s dire state, describing it as being in "critical condition." The investigation, commissioned by Health Secretary Wes Streeting and conducted by Lord Darzi, a renowned peer and surgeon, paints a bleak picture of the NHS, citing record waiting lists, excessive hospital spending, and a significant decline in public health over the last 15 years. Despite the grim assessment, Lord Darzi remains optimistic, stating that the NHS's vital signs "remain strong," thanks to the dedication of staff who possess a "shared passion and determination to make the NHS better for our patients." During his speech, the prime minister is expected to highlight these findings and attribute much of the NHS’s current struggles to policies enacted by the Conservative Party, including the 2012 Health and Social Care Act, which the report condemns as a "calamity" with disastrous consequences. Additionally, Sir Keir will argue that a decade of underinvestment has left the health service vulnerable. The Labour leader plans to introduce his vision for the future of the NHS, which promises substantial input from both NHS staff and patients. He will emphasize that the pandemic exposed the service’s fragility, noting: "Our NHS went into the pandemic in a much more fragile state. We had higher bed occupancy rates, fewer doctors, fewer nurses and fewer beds than most other high-income health systems in the world." Sir Keir will lay blame on past Conservative-led reforms, criticizing them as a "scorched earth approach to health reform" that continues to affect the NHS today. He will describe the 2010s as a "lost decade" for the service, leaving it ill-prepared for current challenges and future opportunities. Acknowledging the urgent need for change, he will state that the government has a "profound responsibility" to address these systemic issues for both health and economic reasons. To meet these challenges, the prime minister will outline three "big shifts" in the government’s approach: implementing more technology to create a "digital NHS," moving care from hospitals into community settings, and shifting focus from treatment to prevention. However, Sir Keir will caution that what he calls "the biggest reimagining of our NHS since its birth" will be neither quick nor easy. He will urge for "major surgery, not sticking plaster solutions," arguing that the NHS is at a critical juncture. "The NHS is at a fork in the road, and we have a choice about how it should meet these rising demands - raise taxes on working people to meet the ever-higher costs of an aging population, or reform to secure its future. We know working people can't afford to pay more, so it's reform or die." Shadow Health Secretary Victoria Atkins responded to the report, stating that the Conservatives will "review this report carefully" but criticized Labour for missing the opportunity to propose substantive reform measures. She emphasized that while investment is necessary, it must go hand-in-hand with meaningful changes. "We Conservatives recognize that investment has to be married with reform. This is why we brought forward long-term plans for productivity, tech, 'Pharmacy First,' virtual wards, attracting pharmaceutical research, and training and retaining staff. We did this whilst boosting investment in the NHS in real terms every single year." Atkins also attacked the Labour government’s track record, arguing, "The Labour government will be judged on its actions. It has stopped new hospitals from being built, scrapped our social care reforms, and taken money from pensioners to fund unsustainable pay rises with no gains in productivity. They need to move from rhetoric to action." As the NHS faces an uncertain future, the government’s approach to reform could determine whether the service can be saved or if it will continue its downward spiral. Credit: Sky News 2024-09-13 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Samir Shah, chairman of the BBC, has called for a thorough review of the broadcaster's coverage of the Israel-Hamas war amid accusations of bias. Speaking to the House of Lords’ communications and digital committee, Shah suggested a “systematic analysis” of the BBC’s reporting on the Middle East conflict should be conducted. He also proposed making the war the subject of the BBC’s “next thematic review,” a comprehensive process that could take up to two years to complete. Previous thematic reviews by the BBC have examined its reporting on topics such as tax and migration. Shah’s remarks came in the wake of a critical report alleging that the BBC displayed a “deeply worrying pattern of bias” against Israel and breached its own editorial guidelines over 1,500 times during its coverage of the conflict in Gaza. Addressing the committee alongside BBC director-general Tim Davie, Shah emphasized the importance of scrutinizing the BBC’s approach to covering the Middle East conflict, noting that it has long been a source of significant public concern. “In my time [at the BBC], and I’ve been in it for 40 years, this is one thing that has really resulted in lots and lots of concern on all sides,” Shah said. “I think it’s the duty of the Board, because we play such a role in reporting Middle East conflict to the world, that we do take time out and do an analysis review of that coverage.” The controversy stems from an analysis led by lawyer Trevor Asserson, which examined four months of the BBC’s output across television, radio, online news, podcasts, and social media, beginning on October 7. The report accused the BBC of consistently downplaying Hamas terrorism while portraying Israel as an aggressive, militaristic nation. The findings have prompted calls for an independent review from Danny Cohen, a former BBC executive, and two leading Jewish organizations, the Campaign Against Antisemitism and the National Jewish Assembly. Responding to the report, the BBC said it would “carefully consider” the findings but raised concerns about the methodology used in Asserson’s analysis. Tim Davie, addressing the committee, defended the BBC’s journalists, highlighting the difficult conditions under which they work. “I want to reassure people that journalists are doing an outstanding job under the most ferocious pressure, the personal pressure, the lobbying, with reports from both sides,” Davie said. Regarding the Asserson report, Davie emphasized the BBC’s commitment to addressing all complaints: “Every complaint that comes in, and this is where I do dispute what’s written, is taken seriously.” The debate over the BBC’s coverage highlights the broader challenges faced by media outlets in reporting on complex international conflicts, particularly those as polarizing as the Israel-Hamas war. As the BBC considers its next steps, the calls for transparency and accountability in its coverage are likely to continue. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-13 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Rock icon Jon Bon Jovi has been lauded by the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department for his heroic efforts in helping a distressed woman who was standing on the ledge of a bridge in Nashville, Tennessee, on Tuesday night. The incident took place on the John Seigenthaler Pedestrian Bridge, where the woman was dangerously close to falling into the Cumberland River below. The Metro Nashville Police Department praised Bon Jovi and his team for their timely intervention, stating on social media, "A shout out to Jon Bon Jovi and his team for helping a woman on the Seigenthaler Pedestrian Bridge [on] Tuesday night. Bon Jovi helped persuade her to come off the ledge over the Cumberland River to safety." Police Chief John Drake also commended the efforts, saying, "It takes all of us to help keep each other safe." The event highlighted the importance of community and the role that individuals, no matter how famous, can play in helping others in moments of crisis. Bon Jovi's quick thinking and compassion may have prevented a tragedy, solidifying his status as not just a rock legend but a true hero in the eyes of many. Credit: BBC | X 2024-09-13 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

In a surprising turn within the MAGA faction, Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene publicly condemned far-right activist Laura Loomer for a tweet that featured racist stereotypes about Vice President Kamala Harris. Loomer, a known provocateur and failed congressional candidate, posted a remark on September 8 that targeted Harris's South Asian heritage, sparking outrage even within the typically aligned Republican ranks. Responding to a post from Harris that included photos from her childhood visit to India, Loomer, who has previously declared herself a "proud Islamophobe," wrote, “If @KamalaHarris wins, the White House will smell like curry & White House speeches will be facilitated via a call center and the American people will only be able to convey their feedback through a customer satisfaction survey at the end of the call that nobody will understand.” Greene swiftly rebuked the comment, taking to social media platform X to call it “appalling and extremely racist,” and distancing both the Republican Party and former President Donald Trump from Loomer’s sentiments. “It does not represent who we are as Republicans or MAGA. This does not represent President Trump. This type of behavior should not be tolerated ever,” Greene stated. Loomer, unfazed by the criticism, retaliated by labeling Greene a “raging anti-semite” and downplayed her own tweet as a “funny joke about Kamala Harris,” claiming she was merely referencing Harris’s Indian heritage to avoid answering questions. The clash between these two controversial figures, both of whom have been criticized for promoting hate, highlights the ongoing tension within the far-right movement over the limits of acceptable discourse. Loomer’s history of inflammatory remarks is well-documented. She has made derogatory comments about Representative Ilhan Omar, a Somali-born Muslim congresswoman, and once advocated for a ridesharing service that would exclude Muslims. Despite these views, Loomer has received praise from Trump, who has acknowledged her on multiple occasions. Loomer even accompanied Trump to the recent presidential debate and remained by his side the following day, underscoring her close ties to the former president. Greene, for her part, is no stranger to controversy. Before her election to Congress, she propagated various conspiracy theories, including those related to 9/11, the Parkland school shooting, and even suggested that a prominent Jewish banking family had used a space laser to start wildfires in California. Greene has also targeted Muslim congresswomen, notably Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, questioning their legitimacy as members of Congress because they did not swear their oaths of office on a Bible. “I really want to go talk to these ladies and ask them what they are thinking, and why they are serving in our American government,” Greene once remarked. “They really should go back to the Middle East.” Greene's close association with Trump has been evident throughout her political career. She is a frequent presence at his campaign rallies, including a notable event in June where she compared Trump to Jesus Christ. Trump himself has not shied away from making racially charged comments about Harris, often mispronouncing her name and questioning her identity as a Black woman, despite her heritage and significant connections to the Black community. This recent exchange between Greene and Loomer highlights the complex dynamics within the far-right, as figures who are usually aligned on broader ideological grounds find themselves at odds over the boundaries of racial rhetoric. Credit: The Independent 2024-09-13 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Numerous off topic posts removed, next time it will be the poster aswell

Comments on moderation have been removed along with an off topic deflection from the same poster

In an era where misinformation can spread rapidly, a recent claim by former President Donald Trump during a televised debate with Kamala Harris has taken the political stage by storm. Trump's assertion that asylum seekers are abducting and eating pets was one of the most shocking moments of the debate, highlighting the polarizing issue of immigration in the current presidential campaign. Although ABC News moderator David Muir quickly pointed out that there was no credible evidence to support Trump's claim, the accusation is not entirely new to those familiar with U.S. politics. The narrative had been gaining traction, fueled by prominent Right-wing figures such as vice-presidential candidate JD Vance, Senator Ted Cruz, and billionaire Elon Musk, who insisted they had "proof." Surprisingly, the claim did not originate from a reliable source but from a single Facebook post by a resident in Springfield, Ohio. In a private community group, the individual warned others about Haitian immigrants allegedly butchering and eating a neighbor's missing cat. The post, which described the scene as akin to preparing a deer for butchering, went viral, spreading fear and misinformation. Springfield, a city of 58,000 people, has become a focal point in the immigration debate due to the influx of nearly 20,000 migrants from Haiti over the past four years. These migrants, fleeing gang violence and political instability in their home country, have filled blue-collar jobs that local residents were reluctant to take. However, their arrival has strained local resources, leading to heightened tensions, particularly after a Haitian immigrant was involved in a fatal school bus crash last year. In a world where a single social media post can influence national discourse, the spread of such unfounded claims is a troubling reminder of the power of misinformation. As the election approaches, the impact of these conspiracy theories on policymaking and public opinion remains to be seen. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-12 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

The European Union stands at a critical juncture: it must expand to survive. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has transformed EU enlargement from a sidelined issue to an urgent strategic priority. For years, EU expansion has been stagnant, with Croatia being the last country to join over a decade ago. However, recent geopolitical shifts have breathed new life into the enlargement debate. Speaking at a forum in Slovenia, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized that Europe’s security hinges on the EU expanding its membership. Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama echoed this sentiment, noting that thanks to Vladimir Putin, EU enlargement is once again on the agenda. While there is renewed momentum, admitting new members is not guaranteed. Two decades ago, six Western Balkan nations—Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, and Kosovo—were promised a path to EU membership, yet progress has been slow. Unlike Eastern European countries, the Western Balkans do not depend on the EU for security guarantees, as NATO plays a significant role in the region. Albania, Montenegro, and North Macedonia are NATO members, and Bosnia and Kosovo benefit from a substantial NATO presence. In contrast, Ukraine, Moldova, and the Caucasus, lacking NATO’s protection, see EU membership as a critical security alternative. The urgency of Ukraine’s EU membership bid has sparked concerns among Western Balkan countries about being left behind. Serbia, with its close ties to Moscow and aversion to NATO, faces additional hurdles in its EU accession process, particularly since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Despite these challenges, the renewed focus on enlargement has provided fresh opportunities for Balkan countries aspiring to join the EU. Without the invasion of Ukraine, Albania and North Macedonia would likely still be stuck in stalled negotiations, and Bosnia and Herzegovina might never have been recognized as an EU candidate. Furthermore, the EU’s new €6 billion growth plan for the Western Balkans, which ties European investments to necessary reforms, could help the region achieve economic convergence with the EU, offering financial support comparable to what full EU members receive under the cohesion fund. The integration of the Western Balkans into the EU is no longer just a distant dream; it is taking shape through initiatives like the inclusion of these countries in the European single Euro payments area. While skepticism about the EU’s intentions persists, there is a growing sense of optimism in the region. During a recent visit to Tirana, discussions revealed a shift beyond the usual grievances about Brussels’ perceived unfairness. However, much more needs to be done. The next EU Commissioner for Enlargement should elevate the ambitions of gradual integration, exploring possibilities like inclusion in the Schengen area. Upcoming negotiations over the EU’s seven-year budget, covering 2028 to 2034, should account for the financial implications of welcoming new members. Crucially, the EU must eliminate the toxic influence of member states exploiting enlargement for their national interests. Historically, existing members have hijacked the process, from Greece and Cyprus blocking Turkey to Hungary obstructing Ukraine. These political maneuvers have eroded the credibility of the EU’s enlargement policy by constantly shifting the goalposts. The process should revert to treating intermediary steps as technical matters managed by the Commission, rather than allowing member states to block progress at every stage. A first mover is needed to break this deadlock and build momentum. Germany and Slovenia have already proposed ways to streamline the process, and other supportive nations—Austria, Croatia, Italy, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic—should rally behind them. Countries with a vested interest in Ukraine and Moldova’s EU membership, like Poland and the Baltic states, alongside recent converts like France, must also lend their voices. While opposition from Hungary, Bulgaria, Greece, and Cyprus may persist, European integration history shows that once a critical mass forms, resistance becomes increasingly difficult. If proponents of an expanded EU truly believe in the project, they must back their words with decisive action. The future of the EU depends on embracing new members, and now is the time to commit to this vital expansion. Credit: The Guardian 2024-09-12 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, known for his ambitious plans to colonize Mars, has firmly aligned himself with the Republican camp for the 2024 U.S. presidential election. The SpaceX CEO recently made headlines with his claim that the success of a mission to Mars hinges on the outcome of the upcoming election. In a pointed critique, Musk stated, "Trump supports a government efficiency commission to allow great things to be done, Kamala does not," adding, "We will never reach Mars if Kamala wins." Musk's comments were made on X, the social media platform he owns, following the first U.S. presidential debate, where Vice President Kamala Harris was widely perceived to have outperformed former President Donald Trump, whom Musk openly supports. In a series of posts, Musk expressed his dissatisfaction with the debate, arguing that the hosts were "not fair" to Trump, further demonstrating his alignment with the former president. Musk's longstanding dream of sending humans to Mars has been a central focus of his career, with his company SpaceX leading the charge in space exploration. On Saturday, Musk announced his intention to launch his Starships to Mars without a crew in just two years. If this mission proves successful, he aims to send the first crewed flight to the Red Planet in four years. This timeline underscores Musk's sense of urgency and the importance he places on the 2024 presidential election. His comments suggest that he believes the policies of the current administration, particularly those of Vice President Harris, could hinder his plans to achieve this monumental feat. The outspoken billionaire's criticism of Harris reflects his broader concerns about government efficiency and support for space exploration, issues he views as critical to the future of humanity's presence on Mars. Credit: Politico 2024-09-12 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

During the debate with former President Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris highlighted a lesser-known aspect of her personal life: she is a gun owner. This revelation, which might catch some of her progressive supporters by surprise, underscores her strategic shift towards appealing to moderates and conservatives who are wary of Trump. Harris’s admission is part of a broader effort to position herself and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, as centrist candidates who understand the complexities of gun ownership while advocating for common-sense gun reforms. Harris has previously acknowledged owning a firearm, but she seldom discusses it publicly and has consistently supported stricter gun control measures. Addressing the debate stage, Harris emphasized that she and Walz do not intend to confiscate firearms, directly countering claims often made by opponents. "This business about taking everybody's guns away, Tim Walz and I are both gun owners," Harris stated firmly. "So stop with the continuous lying." Harris’s gun ownership was first brought to public attention during her 2019 bid for the Democratic presidential nomination, where she openly discussed her reasons for having a firearm. "I am a gun owner, and I own a gun for probably the reason a lot of people do — for personal safety. I was a career prosecutor," she explained at the time, highlighting her background in law enforcement and the need for personal protection. Despite owning a gun herself, Harris has long been an advocate for tighter regulations. She supports red-flag laws, which allow courts to temporarily remove guns from individuals deemed a threat, and universal background checks for all gun purchases, measures she argues are critical for public safety. Her stance reflects a nuanced approach that seeks to balance individual gun rights with the need to address gun violence, a pressing issue in America. The debate over gun laws took on renewed urgency following a tragic shooting at a school in Georgia that left four people dead. The incident has reignited discussions about gun control, adding weight to Harris’s comments and policy positions. By reminding the public of her personal connection to the issue, Harris is working to build trust among voters who may be skeptical of her party’s stance on gun rights, presenting herself as a leader who respects the Second Amendment while pushing for sensible reforms. Harris’s strategy appears aimed at reassuring moderate voters that gun control does not equate to gun confiscation, a fear often stoked by conservative critics. By sharing her own experience as a gun owner, she hopes to dismantle misconceptions and foster a more balanced conversation on the role of firearms in American society. Credit: Vice 2024-09-12 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

As the 2024 general election approaches, more than 210,000 transgender voters may encounter difficulties casting their ballots due to restrictive voter identification laws in several states. A report released by the Williams Institute highlights the challenges faced by transgender Americans, particularly those who lack identity documents that match their gender. These challenges are most pronounced in states with strict voter ID laws, which could disenfranchise a significant portion of the transgender voting population. According to the report, approximately 91,300 transgender adults could be at risk of disenfranchisement in states with rigid photo ID requirements. Overall, 36 states require or request voters to present some form of identification at the polls, including nine states—Kansas, Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, Arkansas, Tennessee, North Carolina, Mississippi, and Georgia—where photo identification is mandatory. In these states, voters without acceptable identification must cast a provisional ballot, which may only be counted if they submit a valid photo ID after Election Day. The report also reveals that voters in 27 states will face new restrictions in the 2024 election that were not present in 2020. Nearly 173,000 transgender adults live in states with the strictest voter ID laws, accounting for roughly 20% of transgender Americans eligible to vote in the upcoming election. Additionally, an estimated 276,500 transgender adults lack identity documents that accurately reflect their chosen name or gender identity, although not all of them reside in states with voter ID laws. Jody L. Herman, a senior public policy scholar at the Williams Institute and co-author of the report, emphasized the significant impact of these laws: “Voter ID laws can create a unique barrier to voting for a substantial number of transgender people, which is particularly impactful in elections decided by a small number of votes.” The report notes that three key battleground states—Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Georgia—have restrictive voter ID laws, potentially affecting the ability of approximately 135,500 transgender adults to vote in the presidential election. Despite these challenges, LGBTQ voters, including transgender individuals, remain highly motivated to participate in the 2024 election. A March survey by the LGBTQ media advocacy organization GLAAD found that 83% of LGBTQ respondents are “definitely” voting, with 88% rating their motivation to vote between seven and ten on a ten-point scale. Additionally, a July survey of over 1,200 transgender adults found that 32% are “enthusiastic” about the upcoming presidential election, particularly with Vice President Harris as the Democratic nominee. Historically, transgender Americans have demonstrated high levels of political engagement. A 2020 survey by Advocates for Trans Equality reported that over 80% of voting-eligible transgender respondents were registered to vote, with 75% casting ballots in that year’s presidential election, compared to 67% nationwide, according to the Census Bureau. Herman suggests that there are steps states can take to improve voting access for transgender Americans, including revising voter ID laws and making the process of obtaining accurate identification documents less burdensome and more affordable. However, in Republican-led states like Texas and Florida, transgender individuals face significant barriers to changing the gender marker on their driver’s licenses or birth certificates and may struggle to legally change their name, further complicating their ability to vote. The 2024 election will be a critical test of whether the voices of transgender voters can be heard despite these formidable challenges. Credit: The Hill 2024-09-12 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

A recent study has brought to light the potential benefits of statin therapy for individuals over 70, advocating its consideration as a cost-effective treatment that could enhance health outcomes in this age group. Researchers emphasize that statins, widely recognized for reducing the risk of heart disease and stroke by lowering "bad" cholesterol, should not be overlooked by older adults, a demographic in which they are less commonly prescribed. Heart disease and stroke remain leading causes of death and disability worldwide, and the risk of these conditions increases with age. Statins, which reduce levels of low-density lipoproteins in the blood, have been proven to mitigate this risk, yet their use among those over 70 has been less frequent compared to middle-aged patients. The study, conducted by Oxford Population Health, underscores the importance of expanding access to statins for older adults. Borislava Mihaylova, an associate professor at Oxford Population Health and the lead author of the study, highlighted the issue: “Many people around the world are suffering from preventable heart disease and stroke due to insufficient access to effective low-cost treatments such as statins.” She added that improving access to statins for older adults could enhance their health significantly and be cost-effective. The study, published in the journal *Heart*, evaluated the health benefits of statins for older individuals in the UK. It found that statins were not only cost-effective but also linked to better health outcomes for those over 70, regardless of whether they had a history of cardiovascular disease. By analyzing data from large-scale UK statin trials, the researchers predicted the impact of statin therapy on the likelihood of developing heart disease, health-related quality of life, and healthcare costs over a patient's lifetime. Their analysis, which included over 20,000 older people with and without a history of cardiovascular disease, revealed that taking statins could significantly increase quality-adjusted life years, a measure used by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice) to determine the value of treatments. Statin therapy, particularly at higher intensity doses, proved to be well below the Nice threshold for cost-effectiveness, with standard statins costing less than £3,500 per quality-adjusted life year gained and higher-intensity therapy costing below £12,000. However, the study's authors cautioned that as an observational study, it could not establish a definitive cause and effect. Nonetheless, the findings have sparked interest among medical professionals. Prof Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the Royal College of GPs, remarked: “It’s encouraging to see further evidence that the use of statins is safe and effective for patients over 70, and it is important this evidence is taken on board as clinical guidelines are updated.” She noted that while statins may not be suitable for everyone, GPs would prescribe them where appropriate, alongside advising older patients to maintain a healthy lifestyle through diet, exercise, and smoking cessation. Dr. Sonya Babu-Narayan, the associate medical director at the British Heart Foundation, commented on the significance of the study, stating, “Statins have transformed the prevention of future heart attacks and strokes.” She emphasized the potential benefits for older individuals, particularly given the UK's aging population, suggesting that there could be "lifetime benefits for the over-70s." Dr. Mashkur Khan, president of the geriatrics and gerontology section of the Royal Society of Medicine, added that “Cardiovascular risk in the frail elderly can be significantly reduced with the newer statins, which also have a positive effect on cognitive abilities and the prevention of dementia.” He advocated for the early introduction of statins, noting their anti-inflammatory effects on blood vessels and their role in preventing strokes and heart attacks, even in those with normal cholesterol levels, while also helping to prevent diabetes complications. Credit: The Guardian 2024-09-12 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Carol Vorderman, known for her long-standing role on the Channel 4 game show Countdown, has called on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to issue an apology for the recent cut to winter fuel payments for pensioners. The policy, which was passed by Parliament despite a significant number of Labour MPs abstaining from the vote, has sparked widespread criticism. Ministers have defended the decision, arguing that "tough decisions" are necessary to repair the public finances, but the move has left many pensioners worried about how they will manage financially during the winter months. In an appearance on Sky News' Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge, Vorderman expressed her astonishment at Labour's decision to pursue the cut. When asked what Sir Keir Starmer should do in response, Vorderman stated, "I think he should apologize. I absolutely do." She has become increasingly vocal about her political views in recent years and was notably active in the run-up to July's general election, supporting a tactical voting initiative aimed at preventing a Conservative victory. Vorderman highlighted the significant role the tactical voting website played during the election, noting that nearly two million postcodes were entered, demonstrating its influence. She expressed disappointment that millions of people who "loaned their vote to Labour" in the hope of addressing the growing inequality over the past 14 years were now facing the reality of this controversial cut. "This [cutting the winter fuel allowance] is the first thing," Vorderman lamented, pointing out the stark contrast between the public's expectations and the government's actions. She acknowledged that there might be justification for removing the payment, which can be worth up to £300, from wealthier pensioners who receive it regardless of their financial situation. "I'll be one of those in two years' time," Vorderman noted, adding, "So I wouldn't need the winter fuel allowance payment." However, she argued that reducing the number of eligible pensioners from 12 million to less than two million was a drastic and insufficient measure. "I'm shocked by it because they could raise that money in so many other ways," she said. When asked if she believed the government had "duped" the public before coming into power, Vorderman responded emphatically, "I do, I really do. And I am shocked because, even extracting the fact that many pensioners will be suffering because of it… it is unbelievable that this new Labour government, the first thing they do is that? It is not, I don't believe, what they were voted in to do, it is quite astonishing really." In response, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones defended the government's actions during an interview with Sophy Ridge. Jones argued that the Labour government had a mandate from the election to manage public finances responsibly. He claimed that the previous Conservative government had concealed the fact that there were £22 billion in bills due this year for essential services like healthcare, education, and law enforcement, with no funds allocated to cover these costs. "That's about resetting the budget so that at the Labour Budget on 30 October, we can start to invest in fixing the foundations and then start to deliver on our manifesto to rebuild Britain," Jones concluded. Credit: Sky News 2024-09-12 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

The International Criminal Court (ICC) is determined to bring justice for crimes committed during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, according to its chief prosecutor, Karim Khan. On a recent visit to Ukraine’s largest children’s hospital, Ohmatdyt, in Kyiv, which was struck by a missile in July, Khan underscored the ICC’s commitment to addressing these atrocities. The attack on the hospital resulted in the deaths of two adults and a young boy. Khan, the first British prosecutor of the ICC, stated during his visit, “We're here for a purpose. It's not a sightseeing visit. It's to move forward... to make sure we pierce the veil of impunity and make sure the law is felt." Touring the hospital’s shattered intensive care unit, he met with doctors and patients and was shown fragments of what Ukrainian investigators identified as a Russian Kh-101 cruise missile. While Russia has claimed that the explosion was caused by a misfiring Ukrainian air defense missile, the United Nations has stated it is “highly likely” that Moscow was responsible. When pressed on this point, Khan affirmed his duty to investigate all evidence, both incriminating and exonerating, noting that his team was meticulously examining missile remnants bearing serial numbers. The missile strike on Ohmatdyt occurred amid a series of Russian missile and drone attacks across Ukraine, which left at least 46 people dead, including 33 in Kyiv, and nearly 200 injured. At the time of the attack, around 1,200 patients and staff were inside the hospital complex. Among the survivors was 16-year-old Solomia Fomeniuk, who was receiving kidney dialysis for chronic renal failure. After the attack, which destroyed her specialist unit, she was transferred to a hospital in Lviv, 470 km from Kyiv. Reflecting on the attack, Solomia recounted her fear: “It was very scary, but I tried not to listen to the explosions and kept calm. But when the rocket hit, I didn't immediately understand what had happened.” She vividly remembered a doctor, covered in blood, pulling her and another young patient from the rubble. Solomia’s mother, Oksana, described their survival as miraculous, lamenting the deep impact the attack had on their lives. During his visit, Khan was privately briefed by Ukraine’s Prosecutor General, Andriy Kostin, who oversees the country’s court prosecution system and has urged the ICC to investigate the hospital attack as a war crime. The briefing detailed the missile type used, with fragments carefully cataloged and displayed. Ohmatdyt’s director previously informed the UN Security Council that the attack severely damaged the hospital’s intensive care units, oncology and surgical wings, and completely destroyed the toxicology and traumatology departments. Kostin stressed the importance of holding perpetrators accountable, stating, “Ukrainians live in a very difficult time... every day between hope and belief for the better future. But on the accountability and justice track, I think that we can give belief, we can provide belief because justice will be served.” He emphasized that beyond issuing arrest warrants, the goal was to see individuals responsible for these crimes behind bars in The Hague. In March 2023, the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin, followed by warrants for former Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Chief of General Staff Valery Gerasimov. Kostin noted that all legal avenues would be explored, acknowledging that the path to justice might take years or even decades. “There is no statute of limitations for the time,” he said. “Our commitment is to do it as soon as it is possible.” Meanwhile, Solomia continues to seek a kidney donor, which would vastly improve her quality of life by allowing her to cease dialysis and drink more than one glass of water a day. Despite the ongoing investigation, her mother Oksana remains skeptical of the ICC’s ability to bring about real change. “The ICC finds Putin guilty - and what next? There are international organizations in the world that could prevent all this happening in Ukraine. But no one has done anything so far.” When asked what his message to Oksana would be, Khan acknowledged the limitations of the ICC’s work. “While our efforts will not bring the dead back to life, we are doing our best. If everybody plays their part, hopefully it can mitigate some of the harrowing stories that we're hearing around the world and also here in Ukraine.” Credit: BBC 2024-09-12 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Elon Musk, the billionaire owner of social media platform X, could soon be asked to testify before the UK parliament about the platform’s operations. Dawn Butler, a Labour politician and a leading candidate to chair the House of Commons science and technology select committee, revealed plans to invite Musk to provide evidence, highlighting the growing scrutiny of social media giants. Butler told the Financial Times, “It is vital for the committee to formally examine the use of algorithms in pushing hateful material — and the moderation of such content — on X and other social media platforms.” Her comments underscore the committee’s intent to investigate how algorithms may contribute to the spread of harmful and misleading content. Another contender for the committee chair, Labour MP Chi Onwurah, also supports an inquiry into the role of algorithms in social media, particularly their influence on misinformation and profitability. The focus on algorithms reflects a broader concern among global authorities about the impact of Musk’s platform on public discourse and democratic processes. Recently, British officials expressed frustration over X’s resistance to removing posts that were considered threats to national security during some of the most severe riots in England in over a decade. During the unrest, Musk publicly taunted Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer on X, warning that “civil war is inevitable” in the UK. Despite repeated inquiries, Musk did not immediately respond to Butler’s statements or the broader concerns raised by officials. Elections for committee chairs in the Commons are highly competitive, with nominations closing recently and voting set to take place soon. There are 26 select committees in the House of Commons, responsible for scrutinizing ministers, civil servants, and influential figures from relevant sectors. Although MPs cannot compel witnesses to attend hearings, they can declare individuals “in contempt” of parliament if they refuse a formal summons, though the consequences are mostly symbolic. Notable figures like Rupert Murdoch and Sir Philip Green initially resisted appearing before parliamentary committees but eventually complied, demonstrating the pressure such inquiries can exert on high-profile individuals. Committee chair positions are coveted in parliament, offering a significant boost in both prestige and salary. They are seen as valuable platforms for ambitious MPs to advance their careers or for seasoned politicians to continue influencing policy. Chairs receive an additional £18,309 on top of the basic MP salary of £91,346, making these roles not only influential but also financially rewarding. The distribution of committee chair roles is determined by the results of the most recent general election, with Labour securing the majority after their decisive victory in July. As a result, Labour now leads many key committees, including those overseeing Treasury, business, defence, education, and energy. Meanwhile, the Conservatives have retained control over committees dealing with culture, home affairs, and constitutional affairs, and the Liberal Democrats are set to chair committees focused on health, social care, environment, food, and rural affairs. With mounting concerns about the influence of social media and the potential for harmful content to shape public opinion, Musk’s potential appearance before the UK parliament could mark a significant moment in the ongoing debate over tech regulation and corporate responsibility. Credit: FT 2024-09-12 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Melania Trump has publicly called for answers regarding the July assassination attempt on her husband, former President Donald Trump. In a video posted on her X account, the former first lady expressed her deep concern, stating, “We need to uncover the truth” behind the attack. The incident, which occurred nearly two months ago at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, left the former president injured and resulted in the deaths of the assassin and a rally attendee. Melania first spoke out about the attack a day after it occurred, sharing her immediate reaction to the violent event. “When I watched that violent bullet strike my husband, Donald, I realized my life, and Barron’s life, were on the brink of devastating change,” she said in a statement at the time. Her words captured the fear and uncertainty that gripped her family in the aftermath of the attack. She also expressed her gratitude for those who protected her husband during the attack. “I am grateful to the brave Secret Service agents and law enforcement officials who risked their own lives to protect my husband,” she said, acknowledging the efforts of those who intervened to prevent a greater tragedy. In her recent video, Melania Trump made it clear that she is still seeking answers. “There’s definitely more to this story,” she asserted, leaving viewers with a sense that the full truth behind the assassination attempt remains elusive. As the investigation continues, her call for transparency and justice underscores the gravity of the situation and the lingering questions that surround one of the most shocking moments in recent political history. Credit: The Hill 2024-09-12 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

The recent decision to release thousands of prisoners early has sparked widespread concern and debate. The move, described by the chief inspector of prisons as potentially bringing "mayhem" to communities, is seen as a necessary but risky measure. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood defended the decision, emphasizing that the alternative—leaving judges unable to sentence offenders due to a lack of space—would be "unthinkable." Today's release offers hundreds of prisoners a chance to either reform their lives or fall back into old habits. The urgent need to address the overcrowded conditions in England and Wales's prisons has led to this controversial decision. Tuesday's cohort includes those serving sentences of less than five years, with another wave of releases scheduled for 22 October, targeting those with sentences of five years or more. However, the government has assured the public that this policy will not apply to the most serious offenders, such as killers, rapists, and terrorists. Despite its unpopularity, the early release scheme is seen as necessary to alleviate the overcrowded prison system. Prisons in England and Wales are operating at near-full capacity, with official figures from 6 September 2024 showing a total prison population of 88,521, just shy of the system's useable operational capacity of 89,619. Most prisons are already overburdened, with some, like Durham, operating at a staggering 172% of their certified normal accommodation (CNA), the standard for safe and decent housing. This overcrowding has contributed to a deteriorating situation within prisons, marked by rising violence, drug use, and self-harm, as highlighted in the annual report by the chief inspector of prisons, Charlie Taylor. Taylor described a "devastating picture" of a system failing to rehabilitate prisoners, leading to what he termed a "revolving door" of incarceration. Many prisoners leave prison with untreated mental health issues and drug problems, often with nowhere to go, only to re-offend and end up back behind bars. Taylor warned, "That, of course, just creates more victims of crime, more mayhem in communities, and a prison population that is now almost unmanageable." One prisoner released early admitted there was a "99% chance" he would be recalled due to bail conditions, while another faced homelessness upon release. The early release of 5,500 prisoners may offer some relief, but the prison system remains stretched, under-resourced, and plagued by high re-offending rates. With current statistics suggesting that around 1,375 of those released will re-offend, the long-term effectiveness of this measure is in question. The Institute for Government points to longer sentences, a growing backlog in the courts, and an increase in the number of people on remand and recalled to prison as factors driving the rise in the prison population. Since 2019, the number of people on remand has increased by 84%, now accounting for nearly 20% of the total prison population. Similarly, the number of people released on parole and then recalled has risen by 72% over the same period. In an interview with Ms. Mahmood, it was clear that she does not support shorter sentences for offenders. To address these complex and long-standing issues, the government must invest in speeding up the courts, improving the prison and probation services, and building more prisons. However, the question remains: where will the money come from, and how long will it take to see real change? Even with investment, solving these problems will require time, leaving the effectiveness of the early release strategy in doubt. Credit: Sky News 2024-09-12 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

As the upcoming debate draws near, former President Donald J. Trump, now 78, is facing increasing scrutiny regarding his age and mental capacity. With President Biden no longer in the race, Trump would become the oldest person ever to serve in the Oval Office if elected. However, concerns have grown among voters due to Trump's erratic public statements, which have raised questions about his cognitive health. The last time a presidential debate held such high stakes, it involved a candidate nearing his eighties who struggled to convince the public that he was fit for the job. Now, Trump, approaching the same age, must demonstrate that he has not diminished with time. His ability to pass this test could significantly impact who occupies the White House next. Trump, often known for his high energy levels and forceful speech, has recently displayed signs of confusion, mixing up names, facts, and losing track of his points. These incidents, coupled with his often incoherent speeches, have stirred doubt among many voters. Polls reflect this unease, showing a growing concern about his cognitive abilities. The political landscape has shifted dramatically with Biden's exit. Trump is now the oldest candidate to run on a major party ticket, and if victorious, would end his term at 82. In the upcoming debate, he will face Vice President Kamala Harris, who, at 59, is nearly two decades younger. This generational difference could prove significant as Trump’s recent public appearances have been marked by incoherent and disjointed responses, most notably at the Economic Club of New York. When asked about affordable child care, Trump delivered a rambling answer, wandering through incomplete sentences and illogical connections, which eventually linked the issue to tariffs on imports. His response was so bewildering that it quickly went viral, drawing widespread criticism. "He couldn’t string together a coherent sentence," said Representative Katherine M. Clark, reflecting a sentiment shared by many. Kathleen Hall Jamieson, a scholar of presidential communication, noted that this incident has placed Trump under similar scrutiny to Biden's previous challenges with coherence. Trump's tendency to drift off-topic during speeches is not new, but his age has intensified concerns about his mental sharpness. His discursive style, often jumping from one subject to another, leaves listeners baffled, struggling to find a clear point. During a rally in Nevada, Trump’s bizarre speculation about being on a sinking boat and whether he would prefer electrocution over a shark attack further highlighted this issue. "I’ll take electrocution every single time," he quipped, in a statement that left many scratching their heads. Adding to the concern, Trump has recently made several far-fetched claims, including suggesting that schools are sponsoring transgender transition surgeries without parental consent. His offhand comment about past allegations of molestation on an airplane, which he spontaneously brought up without prompting, has only fueled the perception of a candidate increasingly disconnected from reality. Stephanie Grisham, a former White House press secretary under Trump, commented on his current state, suggesting that while he can be disciplined, his ramblings have worsened. "I don’t know if it’s his age or some kind of mental decline," she said, adding that the public and his supporters have become desensitized to his erratic behavior. Trump's campaign, however, dismisses these concerns. Spokesman Steven Cheung asserted that Trump possesses more energy and stamina than anyone else in politics. Cheung argued that the real issue lies with the Democrats and Kamala Harris, who he claimed are diminished due to the harm they have caused the country. Despite his unconventional speaking style, which Trump now refers to as "the weave," claiming it artfully connects disparate topics, doubts about his capacity persist. As millions prepare to watch the debate, Trump faces the challenge of proving that he is not only energetic but also focused and capable of addressing the nation's issues. His ability to do so may well determine the outcome of the election. Credit: The Hill 2024-09-11 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Calls have intensified to halt council funding for a monthly "climate café" hosted by Extinction Rebellion (XR) in Bolton, sparking debate over public money being used to support the group’s activities. Conservative leaders in Bolton argue that council taxpayers should not have to finance the efforts of a pressure group known for its controversial environmental activism. The café, held at the Albert Halls since September last year, is run by Extinction Rebellion’s Bolton branch and is open to all residents. Recently, the café received a £1,134 grant from the council’s Queens Park and Central ward area working budget, a fund managed by ward councillors to support community projects. The Saturday morning events have featured discussions and guest speakers on topics like food waste, fast fashion, and sustainable gardening. Queens Park Labour councillor Richard Silvester praised the funding approval, highlighting that the café aims to educate the public about climate change and its effects on people, other species, and the environment. He described the group as “a good group of people” whose mission to reduce carbon emissions aligns with the council’s objectives. Extinction Rebellion Bolton emphasized that the café offers a relaxed atmosphere for residents to learn about climate and environmental issues. However, at a council meeting on September 4, Conservative leader Martyn Cox criticized the funding decision, accusing the Labour group of using taxpayers’ money to support XR’s activities. Cox argued, “While campaigning groups have a right to pursue their aims, it is not the responsibility of council tax payers to fund their activities. We call on the Labour group to stop funding.” In a statement earlier this year, Extinction Rebellion announced a shift away from disruptive direct actions, focusing instead on building relationships and prioritizing attendance at events. However, other environmental groups, such as Just Stop Oil, have continued with direct actions despite XR’s new approach. Conservative councillor Anne Galloway also raised concerns about the funding, noting that while the grant met council criteria, Extinction Rebellion remains a controversial organization. Council leader Nick Peel defended the funding, stating that the climate café provides education on environmental issues and encourages residents to adopt greener behaviors. Peel acknowledged the complexities of funding such groups, noting, “There’s a fine line between what an organization is trying to achieve through education and whether that organization is political.” Peel further pointed out that the council funds other community groups like Bolton Green Umbrella, which organizes environmental volunteer activities, and noted that many funded groups have agendas that could be seen as political or social. He warned against being overly critical of funding decisions, arguing that the café’s educational purpose was supported by ward councillors. Peel also mentioned that Cllr Cox had previously attended an Extinction Rebellion-organized meeting as a guest speaker, highlighting that the group’s involvement in community education aligned with funding criteria. Vicki Attenborough, a representative of Extinction Rebellion Bolton, defended the café, stating that the sessions have been well received by the community. She highlighted that topics covered include active travel, upcycling, climate change, and waste reduction. Attenborough stressed the importance of such initiatives, particularly as climate concerns increasingly impact mental health, especially among young people. “The climate café provides a space for them to share thoughts and ideas as well as support their own resilience,” she said, adding that engaging in positive actions with others can help counteract climate anxiety. As the debate continues, the row over the climate café funding reflects broader tensions about the role of public funding in supporting activism and community education, especially when it involves polarizing groups like Extinction Rebellion. Credit: Bolton News 2024-09-11 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

SpaceX has embarked on its most daring mission yet, launching a crew of four private astronauts on a groundbreaking journey that will include the first-ever spacewalk by civilians. The mission, which blasted off from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, is a significant milestone in private space exploration, traditionally the domain of highly trained government astronauts. The Polaris Dawn mission features a diverse crew: billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman, a retired military fighter pilot, and two SpaceX employees. This mission marks a bold step forward in space exploration, as the crew will use SpaceX's newly designed spacesuits and a redesigned spacecraft. The mission had faced delays, including a last-minute postponement due to a helium leak on the launchpad and subsequent grounding by U.S. regulators following an unrelated booster recovery failure. Despite these setbacks, the mission is now in orbit around Earth. This journey is filled with unprecedented risks. Only one crew member has previously been to space, and the SpaceX Dragon capsule will take them farther from Earth than any human has traveled since the Apollo missions, venturing through the planet’s radiation belts. The crew is set to attempt the first private spacewalk, testing new spacesuits in the vacuum of space from a spacecraft that lacks an airlock. The mission’s high level of risk raises questions about its insurability, but it is moving forward with determination. Jared Isaacman, who commands and funds the mission, is a passionate advocate for humanity’s exploration beyond Earth. He views the experiments and technological advancements on this flight as crucial steps in this journey. Isaacman has already paid for three Polaris missions, with the hope that the third will involve SpaceX's Starship, the mega-rocket envisioned by Elon Musk to one day carry humans to Mars. Musk has optimistically projected that uncrewed Starship flights could occur within two years, with crewed missions following two years later, and the establishment of a self-sustaining city on Mars within 20 years. While this timeline may seem ambitious, missions like Polaris Dawn are seen as essential in making such goals a reality. Elon Musk emphasized the mission's importance and inherent risks, noting that "crew safety is absolutely paramount and this mission carries more risk than usual, as it will be the furthest humans have traveled from Earth since Apollo and the first commercial spacewalk." Spacewalks have been a routine part of space missions, with around 270 conducted on the International Space Station since its inception in 2000, and 16 by Chinese astronauts on the Tiangong space station. However, the Polaris Dawn mission represents a new chapter in space exploration, as it is driven by private enterprise rather than government agencies. The mission, which will last about five days, follows an elliptical orbit ranging from 190 km (118 miles) to 1,400 km (870 miles) from Earth, making it the furthest human space mission since the Apollo moon landings ended in 1972. As the spacecraft continues its journey, the crew is preparing for their historic spacewalk with a "two-day pre-breathe process" to acclimate them to the conditions they will face on Thursday. This mission not only pushes the boundaries of what private space exploration can achieve but also brings humanity one step closer to realizing the dream of interplanetary travel. The success of Polaris Dawn could pave the way for even more ambitious missions in the future, inching closer to the possibility of human settlement on Mars. Credit: Sky News 2024-09-11 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

A new wave of American populism is attempting to rewrite the history of Winston Churchill, painting the wartime Prime Minister as a villain rather than a hero. Traditionally, the critique of Churchill’s legacy has come from the Left, which often portrays him as a racist imperialist and the architect of controversial events such as the Bengal famine, the Tonypandy Riots, and the suppression of independence movements from India to Ireland. However, recent efforts to rebrand Churchill as a warmonger are emerging from a surprising source: Right-wing American populists. This shift was brought into sharp focus when Darryl Cooper, a Right-wing American historian, sat down with Tucker Carlson for an interview in which he labeled Churchill the “chief villain of the Second World War.” Cooper’s claims included the argument that Churchill was responsible for spreading the war beyond Poland in 1939, refusing to negotiate with Hitler in 1940, and ordering the bombing of German cities. Carlson, a former Fox News presenter and Donald Trump supporter, amplified these controversial views to his vast audience, sparking outrage. Churchill biographer Sir Max Hastings dismissed Cooper as a “know-nothing” who seeks attention rather than historical accuracy, advising the public to ignore him. However, the interview quickly gained traction online, with Elon Musk briefly endorsing it and a show that normally attracts 800,000 viewers reaching over 33 million views on social media platform X. As the debate raged on, prominent historians and biographers, including Sir Niall Ferguson and Andrew Roberts, stepped forward to defend Churchill’s legacy, describing Cooper’s portrayal as a “pack of lies.” Ferguson and Roberts emphasized that Hitler, not Churchill, remains the widely accepted villain of the Second World War. Roberts argued that Churchill spent much of his career fighting against totalitarian threats, including Nazism, Communism, and Wilhelminism, ultimately preserving the freedoms that allowed such criticisms of him to flourish. Victor Davis Hanson, another military historian, noted that Britain entered the war to defend the territorial integrity of other nations, unlike any of the other major powers at the time. Any suggestion that Churchill should have negotiated peace with Hitler, Hanson argued, ignores the real threat of Nazi tyranny and the genocidal horrors that followed. Despite widespread condemnation of Cooper’s views, his comments have reignited discussions about Churchill’s legacy and reflect a broader trend in contemporary American politics. Some Right-wing critics argue that Churchill’s wartime decisions weakened the West, a perspective that echoes earlier, more academic critiques from the 1990s by British historian John Charmley. Charmley argued that Churchill’s refusal to negotiate with Hitler doomed the British Empire, allowed socialism to take root in Britain, and paved the way for Soviet dominance in Europe. Historian Dominic Sandbrook notes that while Charmley’s perspective never gained significant traction in Britain, the idea of criticizing Churchill from the Right has deeper roots in American populism, dating back to the isolationist sentiments of the 1920s and 1930s. Churchill’s aristocratic demeanor and close ties with European elites made him an easy target for American populists suspicious of foreign entanglements and conspiracies. Michelle Goldberg of The New York Times warns that the resurgence of anti-Churchill sentiment reflects a broader attempt to undermine established narratives about the Second World War. Some commentators, like Marc Johnson, even suggest that these efforts are part of a disinformation campaign aimed at discrediting Western democracy and rewriting history in favor of authoritarian ideologies. While some, like political consultant Frank Luntz, argue that Cooper’s views are unlikely to gain mainstream acceptance, the attention they have received highlights the influence of a loose network of internet provocateurs, contrarians, and self-styled historians. Sohrab Ahmari, a conservative columnist, refers to this phenomenon as the rise of the “Barbarian Right,” a group that glorifies strength, rejects egalitarian values, and often flirts with racist and anti-Semitic ideas. In the end, the recent controversy surrounding Churchill’s legacy is less about historical revisionism and more about the cultural battles of today. By questioning widely accepted historical narratives, figures like Cooper and Carlson aim to provoke rather than inform, exploiting the complexities of history to fuel modern political agendas. As historian Megan Garber aptly puts it, the true targets of this campaign are not the historical figures themselves but the cultural and political opponents of the present. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-11 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

A senior officer from Scotland Yard has admitted that the Metropolitan Police made mistakes in their approach to policing the recent pro-Palestine protests. Matt Twist, the assistant commissioner responsible for public order policing, conceded that the force "didn’t get everything right," particularly in the initial stages of the demonstrations in October. The Policy Exchange report, released ahead of a government review of protest policing, revealed that many town and city centers targeted for protests had effectively become “no-go” zones for the general public. The report found that over two-thirds of 1,500 adults surveyed would avoid traveling into towns or city centers with young children, elderly, or disabled relatives if a major protest was taking place. Additionally, more than six in ten respondents indicated they would abandon plans to visit tourist attractions or go shopping if a protest were scheduled. The report criticized the police, prosecutors, the government, and the courts for often failing to prioritize the rights of ordinary citizens over the “rights” of disruptive protesters. It found that more than 80 percent of those polled believed police should intervene when protesters damaged private property, threatened passersby, or displayed banners with racist or derogatory slogans. Furthermore, more than three-quarters agreed that police should act when protesters obstructed roads, blocked access to public transport or workplaces, or climbed on buildings or monuments. The cost of policing these protests in London from October 2023 to June 2024 was revealed to be £42.9 million. The protests required 51,799 police officer shifts, which were diverted from addressing other crimes such as knife crime, violence against women, and antisocial behavior in London. Additionally, 9,639 police officer shifts were diverted into London from other parts of the country. Each major march, which has been regularly held in the capital since October 2023, has typically taken over 3.6 kilometers of major London streets for an average of five hours at a time. The Policy Exchange report made over 20 recommendations, including granting police greater powers to prohibit protests if there is a risk of serious public disorder. It also suggested that protesters be required to provide 28 days' notice before demonstrations to allow more time for police and other agencies to prepare. Credit: BBC | X 2024-09-11 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

A person in Missouri has been infected with H5N1 bird flu, despite having no known contact with sick animals. This case has sparked concern among experts, who are racing to determine how the virus was transmitted to the patient. One theory is that the individual may have consumed raw milk infected with H5N1, which has been circulating among U.S. cattle. Another possibility is that the person unknowingly came into contact with an infected animal. This case is particularly alarming because it marks the first time a patient in the ongoing H5N1 outbreak in the U.S. has become sick without known exposure to infected animals. Previously, all 13 reported human cases in the U.S. this year were among farm workers who had direct contact with sick cattle or birds. The patient in Missouri was hospitalized on August 22 and has since recovered, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The case was detected through the state’s seasonal flu surveillance system, raising concerns that there could be other cases that have gone undetected. The H5N1 virus, a deadly pathogen that has killed hundreds of millions of birds worldwide, has also been found in mammals such as foxes and otters in Britain. Some experts fear that such "spillover events" could ignite the next global pandemic. The avian flu began spreading in U.S. dairy cattle last December, and over 200 herds across 14 states have since been infected, although none have been reported in Missouri. However, Missouri has seen cases of H5N1 in wild birds and poultry, suggesting a possible route of infection. The primary concern among experts is that this unexplained H5 infection could signal the beginning of human-to-human transmission, which the World Health Organization (WHO) has warned would be of “enormous concern” due to its potential to trigger a global pandemic. "This is how pandemics start," said Kruitka Kuppali, a spokesperson for the Infectious Disease Society of America and a former WHO medical officer. "We need to scale up preparedness and response efforts." The 2009 swine flu pandemic was first detected in a similar manner when two children in California, who had no known contact with pigs or each other, were diagnosed with an H1N1 flu infection that had been circulating in swine. Another theory being considered is that the patient may have consumed raw milk infected with H5N1, a pathogen that has already killed several barnyard cats in the U.S. this year. Approximately three percent of the U.S. population, or around 10 million people, consume raw dairy, which some consider a "superfood," according to the National Institutes of Health. Thomas Peacock, an influenza virologist at the Pirbright Institute, questioned whether the patient might have consumed raw milk, stating, "The obvious question I would ask is: Have you ruled out that they’re not someone who’s got a big tub of raw milk in their fridge? Because that just seems like such an obvious route for a cryptic infection." However, Lisa Cox, a spokesperson for the Missouri Health Department, noted that the patient had not reported consuming raw milk. Dr. Peacock added that people aren’t always completely reliable in epidemiological investigations, so the possibility cannot be entirely ruled out. Dr. Kuppali emphasized the importance of conducting a thorough epidemiological investigation to determine any potential exposures the patient may have had in the community, at home, or at work. The CDC has confirmed that Missouri health officials are conducting an on-the-ground investigation to identify the source of the infection, although it is unclear when the findings will be made public. Scientists are eager to sequence the virus and upload it to GISAID, an international database that tracks dangerous new flu strains. This could provide clues as to whether the patient was infected with the variant circulating in cattle or if the virus has undergone adaptations that make it more capable of spreading between humans. So far, contact tracing has not revealed any additional cases, and the CDC continues to consider the risk to the general public as low. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-11 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Vice President Kamala Harris's campaign has strategically updated its website to present detailed policy positions, drawing a clear line between her vision for the future and that of former President Donald Trump. This move comes just one day before their anticipated presidential debate, emphasizing the stark differences in their proposed policies. The newly added page, titled "A New Way Forward," emphasizes Harris's commitment to building what she describes as an "opportunity economy" aimed at lowering costs for American families. The economy remains a top concern for voters, and Harris has faced criticism from the GOP, which argues that her administration would merely extend the economic challenges of the Biden years. Many Americans have expressed frustration with the rising costs of essentials such as groceries, gas, rent, and child care during this period. Harris’s economic proposals include plans to cut taxes for middle-class families, make rent more affordable, and promote homeownership. Additionally, her campaign highlights efforts to support small businesses and invest in entrepreneurs. The page concludes with a pointed critique of "Trump’s Project 2025 agenda," claiming that it would "jack up prices" and further burden American families. Although Trump has attempted to distance himself from Project 2025—a conservative policy blueprint developed by the Heritage Foundation—Harris’s campaign clearly seeks to tie him to the initiative. Another key section of Harris’s policy platform focuses on "fundamental freedoms," where she outlines her commitment to restoring and protecting reproductive rights and safeguarding civil liberties. The campaign contrasts this with the Project 2025 agenda, which it notes includes a national abortion ban, underscoring the potential rollback of rights under a Trump presidency. Harris also addresses public safety, promising to make communities safer from gun violence, reform the immigration system, and tackle the opioid and fentanyl crises. She firmly states that her administration would "ensure no one is above the law," a statement likely aimed at distinguishing her approach to justice from that of her opponent. The final section of her platform, titled "Keep America Safe, Secure, and Prosperous," outlines plans to stand with allies, confront dictators, and lead on the global stage. Harris emphasizes investing in America's strengths and supporting service members and veterans. In contrast, Trump's platform page highlights 20 key issues, leading with border security and ending inflation. As the campaign progresses and the debates unfold, the stark differences between Harris’s and Trump’s visions for America will likely be a focal point for voters seeking a clear direction for the country's future. Credit: The Hill 2024-09-11 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe