Social Media

The October 7 attacks last year, where Hamas terrorists brutally murdered over 1,200 people and kidnapped 250 more, shocked the world. For many in the UK, the event might seem distant, but the reality is that the threat posed by Hamas, backed by Iran, is much closer to home. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), with its £5 billion budget, is not only a menace in the Middle East but also in the UK. Iran seeks to destabilize the West, and the IRGC plays a significant role in advancing these goals. The Iranian regime, with its leadership regularly referring to the UK as "Little Satan" in comparison to the U.S., has made it clear that they wish to undermine British values and society. Iranian agents, with their connections to the IRGC, are actively involved in spreading division within British communities. The IRGC, responsible for global terrorism, has supported groups that intimidate Jewish people and others in the UK, making it essential for the British government to take decisive action. Iran is not just a local threat in the Middle East. The Houthis, backed by Iran, are attacking ships near the Suez Canal, vital for global trade, including Britain’s access to goods. More recently, Iran supplied 200 ballistic missiles to Russia, furthering Russia's war against Ukraine. Meanwhile, Russia is suspected of sharing nuclear knowledge with Iran, a regime openly calling for the destruction of Israel. The situation is made worse by China’s involvement, as it purchases large amounts of Iranian oil and provides economic backing to both Iran and Russia. China’s growing global influence and its economic maneuvers threaten democratic values around the world. Its strategy of indebting smaller nations and taking control of strategic assets, such as ports, poses a danger to global security. Keir Starmer, as the newly elected Prime Minister, has been faced with these immense global challenges. However, his early actions have raised concerns. Despite warnings from MI5 about the scale of Chinese espionage, his government has not labeled China a security threat. Labour’s talk of potentially handing over the Chagos Islands, a key strategic asset in the Indian Ocean, to Mauritius—a nation heavily influenced by China—adds to these worries. Reversing protections for free speech in universities and delaying defense spending increases are further signs of a troubling approach. On Iran, Starmer's government has been indecisive. In opposition, Labour promised repeatedly to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organization, with prominent figures like David Lammy affirming this stance. But now, they claim that climate change is a bigger threat than terrorism. To argue this to the victims of terrorism would be a hard sell. Instead of spending £11 billion on overseas climate aid, the government should focus on strengthening the military and boosting defense spending. As a former minister, I argued strongly for the proscription of the IRGC, alongside others like Sir Iain Duncan Smith. Unfortunately, internal opposition and Foreign Office resistance meant that these moves were blocked. But now Labour must follow through on its promise to proscribe the IRGC, for the sake of national security. In the UK, the IRGC has been linked to groups that promote division, radicalize communities, and intimidate people, including journalists. British security services have thwarted 15 assassination plots by Iran against UK residents in the last year. Banning the IRGC would give UK authorities the power to crack down on those affiliated with this terrorist organization, ensuring the safety of British citizens. Proscribing the IRGC is essential. It would send a clear message that Iran’s actions, both in the UK and globally, are unacceptable. The UK cannot afford to be passive. A failure to confront Iran now will only lead to greater challenges in the future, as history has repeatedly shown. The time for action is now. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-20

A couple of blatant anti-semitic rants have been removed along with a reply

Iranian hackers reportedly distributed stolen information from Donald Trump’s electoral campaign to people linked with Joe Biden’s team, according to the FBI and US intelligence agencies. In late June and early July, the hackers sent unsolicited emails containing Trump campaign data to individuals associated with the Biden campaign, though there is no evidence these emails were acknowledged or responded to. This activity occurred before Biden dropped out of the presidential race, raising concerns about foreign interference in US elections. In August, US officials warned that Iran aimed to "stoke discord" and erode public trust in US institutions ahead of the November election. They reported that Iran, using social engineering tactics, had sought access to both Democratic and Republican campaigns, similar to methods employed by both Iran and Russia in other international elections. The FBI released a statement on Wednesday acknowledging that "Iranian malicious actors have continued their efforts since June to send stolen, non-public material associated with former President Trump’s campaign to US media organisations." Trump campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt, when contacted by the BBC, claimed the hack was clear evidence of Iran’s interference in favor of Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. She added, "President Trump will restore his tough sanctions and stand against their reign of terror." Leavitt further called for Biden and Harris to clarify what they knew about the material sent to their associates. “What did they know and when did they know it?” she asked. Morgan Finkelstein, a spokesperson for the Harris-Walz campaign, responded that the campaign had cooperated with authorities from the moment they became aware of the hacks. She clarified that no material had been sent directly to the campaign, and what was received appeared to be a phishing attempt targeting personal emails. Finkelstein also condemned foreign interference, stating the campaign "condemns in the strongest terms" such activities. The FBI, having contacted the victims of the hack, is continuing its investigation to track and disrupt those responsible for the attack. This development comes amid renewed scrutiny over Trump’s security, following what appeared to be a second assassination attempt against him at his Mar-a-Lago golf club in Florida. Speaking about the incident, Trump told reporters, "I just have to lead my life" and expressed his determination to not let threats stop him from continuing his activities. The incident follows a previous attack in July, during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where Trump was wounded by a gunman. US officials had cited an Iranian threat against Trump's life, prompting tighter security measures. Trump supporters expressed anger and concern over these incidents. At a rally in Long Island, Dina Glazer blamed Democrats and their rhetoric for the threats, while another supporter, Michelle Christ, voiced her fear that Trump was in "constant danger." As tensions rise and investigations continue, the situation remains fluid, with more details expected to emerge. Credit: BBC 2024-09-19

A fresh wave of explosions has shaken southern Beirut’s Dahiyeh district, a stronghold of Hezbollah, just as crowds gathered to mourn the victims of Tuesday’s devastating pager-bomb attacks. The latest explosion, captured in a chilling video, showed a man lying on the ground as panicked crowds fled, screaming in terror. The death toll from walkie-talkie blasts has risen to 20 so far – Lebanese health ministry says. We have not received an updated figure for how many have been injured, but Lebanon's health ministry earlier said it was at least 450 people. It is suspected that the pagers had been rigged with explosives and detonated remotely. Hezbollah distributed the devices over concerns that Israeli intelligence was using smartphones to track and target their members. As of Wednesday, it remains unclear how the second wave of walkie-talkie explosions was executed, but Hezbollah has openly blamed Israel, vowing retaliation. Israel, as is typical in these situations, has not commented. The tension between Hezbollah and Israel continues to escalate, with concerns that the violence could lead to an all-out war. Hezbollah, whose attacks on Israel began almost a year ago, claims to be acting in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza. A ceasefire, however, remains a distant hope. At the funeral in Dahiyeh, mourners echoed a defiant sentiment despite the growing violence. One young man expressed his grief and resolve: “The pain is huge, physical and in the heart. But this is something we are used to, and we will continue with our resistance.” A 45-year-old woman was equally resolute, stating, “This will make us stronger. Whoever has lost an eye will fight with the other, and we are all standing together.” In response to the mounting violence, Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant said the country was “at the start of a new phase in the war.” This statement came as the Israeli army’s 98th division was relocated from Gaza to Israel’s northern region, signaling potential further escalation with Hezbollah. Despite Hezbollah’s stated reluctance to engage in a full-scale conflict, Lebanon's ongoing economic crisis has left the country vulnerable, with many fearing a war is not in the nation's best interest. Nevertheless, many will be watching closely for Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah’s public response, expected Thursday, which may give insight into the group’s next move. Credit: BBC 2024-09-19

A number of off topic, unsubstantiated, baiting and bickering posts have been removed along with the replies. There is additionally separate topics on the pager and walkie talkie explosions in Lebanon here: Pager Explosions in Lebanon Target Hezbollah Members 9 Dead Thousands Injured https://aseannow.com/topic/1338459-pager-explosions-in-lebanon-target-hezbollah-members-9-dead-thousands-injured/ Chaos Erupts in Lebanon as Walkie-Talkie Explosions Adds to Yesterdays Pager Blasts https://aseannow.com/topic/1338545-chaos-erupts-in-lebanon-as-walkie-talkie-explosions-adds-to-yesterdays-pager-blasts/

Russian propagandists have escalated their attacks on the presidential campaign of Vice President Kamala Harris, spreading disinformation through viral social media videos, according to Microsoft researchers. One particularly damaging video featured an actor falsely accusing Harris of a hit-and-run that paralyzed a young girl. Although the incident never happened, the video spread widely on X (formerly Twitter), reaching as many as 7 million views and gaining further traction on platforms like Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube. The video originated from a newly created San Francisco-based news outlet, which quickly disappeared after the video gained popularity. Despite its short lifespan, the false narrative resonated with social media users, shared by accounts with hundreds of thousands of followers. Another fabricated video promoted the idea that Harris had commissioned vulgar billboards in New York advocating for children to change their gender. This video also gained substantial attention, amassing hundreds of thousands of views. Microsoft researchers identified three Russian government-backed groups as the source of these smear campaigns. The groups have a history of creating provocative, fake content designed to generate outrage and sway public opinion. One of the groups, Microsoft noted, is particularly adept at creating scandalous claims and videos that dominate headlines. Another is expected to ramp up its targeting of the Harris campaign as the election approaches. These findings were part of Microsoft’s regular report on foreign attempts to influence U.S. elections. The company has warned that Russia’s disinformation efforts have not diminished despite previous exposure and attempts to disrupt their operations. In fact, the Kremlin seems undeterred by international scrutiny, even as Russian President Vladimir Putin has publicly claimed to support Harris. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, recently took action by banning pages affiliated with the Russian state-controlled media outlet RT (formerly Russia Today). The U.S. government has imposed sanctions on RT, accusing it of engaging in intelligence and propaganda activities. Two RT employees were indicted by the Department of Justice for laundering millions of dollars through shell companies to covertly run a media firm in Tennessee, which posted videos by conservative influencers in an effort to undermine support for Ukraine. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has been vocal about the threat posed by Russian media outlets like RT, stating that they are no longer merely spreading propaganda but are actively involved in covert operations to influence elections. "They are engaged in covert influence activities aimed at undermining American elections and democracies, functioning like a de facto arm of Russia’s intelligence apparatus," Blinken said. In addition to disinformation campaigns, Microsoft’s report also detailed the activities of six Russian hacktivist groups believed to be working in collaboration with Russian intelligence agencies, such as the FSB and GRU. These groups, while claiming independence, seem to coordinate closely with the Russian government and offer a means of disseminating compromised information from hacking operations while maintaining plausible deniability. The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the FBI have also raised alarms, warning that foreign actors might attempt to falsely claim hacks of voter rolls or election-related materials to undermine public trust in the election process. Microsoft echoed this concern, urging caution in inflating the perceived threat posed by these groups, while also emphasizing the need for vigilance. In addition to Russian interference, the report highlighted the activities of a Chinese influence group. This group appears more focused on dividing Americans and creating confusion rather than backing a specific candidate. Microsoft pointed to a notable example following the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. After the incident, Chinese-operated accounts began rapidly sharing content from right-wing influencers and commentators, pushing narratives that implicated Democrats in the attack. These revelations underscore the ongoing threat of foreign interference in U.S. elections, as Russia and other countries continue to exploit social media and other platforms to spread disinformation, inflame tensions, and erode trust in democratic institutions. Credit: WP 2024-09-19

In a public hearing on the 2023 Titan submersible tragedy, a former employee of OceanGate, the company behind the ill-fated vessel, claimed the disaster was "inevitable" due to the company bypassing safety protocols. David Lochridge, OceanGate’s former operations director, testified before U.S. Coast Guard investigators, stating that he had raised concerns about potential safety issues before being dismissed in 2018. His warnings were ignored, culminating in the tragedy that claimed five lives when the Titan imploded during a descent to the Titanic wreck in June 2023. Investigators disclosed additional details, including communications between the Titan and its mother ship, the Polar Prince. Notably, one of the last messages from the submersible before it imploded read, "all good here." Officials also revealed that during its earlier dives to the Titanic in 2021 and 2022, the submersible had experienced 118 equipment issues. Specific incidents included its batteries dying, leaving passengers stranded inside the sub for 27 hours. The Titan tragedy claimed the lives of OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush, British explorer Hamish Harding, veteran French diver Paul Henri Nargeolet, British-Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood, and his 19-year-old son, Suleman. Following the incident, OceanGate suspended all exploration and commercial operations. Credit: BBC 2024-09-19

In a rare departure from his usual fiery rhetoric, Donald Trump appeared to embrace a more tempered tone during a rally in Flint, Michigan. With weeks left until the election, the likelihood of attacks ramping up remains, but for the moment, the former president seemed focused on lowering the political heat. "It’s a dangerous business being president," Trump remarked to loud applause inside the Dort Financial Center. The event marked Trump's first public appearance since his Florida golf course was the site of a dramatic security incident. Interviewed by Sarah Huckabee Sanders, his former press secretary and now the governor of Arkansas, Trump recounted the tense moments when shots were fired between holes five and six at his course in West Palm Beach. "I have to say, Secret Service did a hell of a job," he said, explaining how one agent spotted the suspect with a rifle. Trump then lightened the atmosphere by quipping, "Women are smarter than men," in reference to a female witness who snapped photos of the fleeing suspect's vehicle. As Trump retold the story, Secret Service agents stood vigilant on either side of the stage, carefully scanning the crowd for any signs of danger. At one point, Trump eagerly asked the agent who identified the gunman to stand up and be recognized by the crowd but quickly decided against it. Despite initially blaming Joe Biden and Kamala Harris for fueling violent rhetoric—an accusation made without evidence—Trump refrained from such claims during this rally. Instead, he spoke almost warmly about recent conversations with both the president and vice president. "President Biden was so nice," Trump shared. "I do feel he’s so, so nice." Regarding Kamala Harris, Trump said, "I got a very nice call from Kamala. It was very nice." Though some in the crowd shouted, “She’s a liar,” Trump dismissed the comment with a shake of his head. Brian Menasco, a local from Columbiaville, believes Trump was making an effort to lower the political temperature. "I think so," Menasco said. "I've wanted him to do that since 2016. He's amazing but sometimes I think, 'why has he said that?'" Trump's decision to hold the rally in Flint was deliberate. He had planned to visit Michigan before the apparent assassination attempt and sees the state as critical to his path back to the White House. After winning Michigan in 2016 and losing it to Biden four years later, regaining support in key swing states like Michigan is essential for Trump’s campaign. Flint, about an hour from Detroit, is infamous for its water crisis, which began in 2014 when lead contaminated the city’s water supply, resulting in at least 12 deaths and leaving lasting scars on the community. Known as "Vehicle City" due to its history with the auto industry, Flint's economy has suffered as manufacturing jobs declined. The North Dort Highway is still lined with businesses tied to cars, including repair shops and scrap metal yards. Gary Grundy, an independent voter, was at Trevor’s Tires, loading tyres into his SUV when asked about Trump's rally. He believes both Republicans and Democrats share the responsibility for dialing down political rhetoric. "When I heard, I was like, that's two attempts on his life, that’s kind of crazy," he said. "But the talk on both sides needs to be dialed down. So the rhetoric on both sides needs to calm down, it's collective responsibility." Not all attendees shared this view. Kristin Martinez, a Trump supporter, argued that Democrats bear some responsibility for inciting violence against Trump. "I really do think that they are responsible for, you know, maybe not calling out somebody to do it, but, you know, their words triggered somebody." Despite Trump's gestures towards civility, with less than two months until the election and political tensions high, the threat of further violence remains palpable. Credit: Sky News 2024-09-19

BBC Director-General Tim Davie has acknowledged that television stars have, in the past, been allowed to get away with "certain behaviours" within the workplace, an issue the corporation is actively working to address. This admission follows a series of high-profile scandals involving prominent figures within the organization. Davie made these remarks while addressing concerns that famous personalities receiving large salaries were being "indulged," with their actions often overlooked or excused. One of the most notable incidents involves Huw Edwards, once the BBC’s highest-paid news presenter, who was recently sentenced for child sex offences. Prior to this, complaints had surfaced from younger employees who alleged that Edwards had sent them inappropriate messages. Another BBC figure, Jermaine Jenas, known for his appearances on *Match of the Day* and *The One Show*, was recently dismissed after complaints surfaced about inappropriate messages he had sent. Additionally, Graziano Di Prima, a professional dancer on *Strictly Come Dancing*, departed the BBC following allegations that he had kicked his celebrity partner, raising concerns about a broader culture of bullying on the show. During an interview with the BBC’s Amol Rajan at the Royal Television Society conference, Davie reflected on the impact of these scandals. "There is no doubt that an affair like this impacts our reputation. We’re very mindful that people’s trust in the BBC is absolutely essential," he said. When questioned about the perception of preferential treatment for high-profile stars, Davie conceded that a disciplinary investigation into Edwards was halted after the presenter resigned. However, a broader review of the BBC’s workplace culture has been initiated. Davie acknowledged that, historically, the BBC may have excused the behaviour of certain creative talents. "There is still something about businesses where you’ve got these people... we often say that a person is creatively brilliant but it comes with certain behaviours," he remarked. He expressed a desire to shift the culture beyond excusing such conduct, stating, "One of the things I want to do in the next stage of this voyage as director-general – I really would love to be at a point where we really get beyond this. You use crisis to move yourself on." Pressed on whether star performers' bad behaviour was still being "indulged and excused," Davie admitted it remained "a constant work in progress." However, he emphasized that the workplace environment had evolved significantly, noting that over 50 percent of the BBC’s workforce is now female. "The environment is different. This is why it hurts so much when these things happen," he said. Davie also addressed the future of Edwards, making it clear that the disgraced presenter would not return to the BBC. "This man has just been convicted of appalling crimes and it’s pretty straightforward in my mind that I can’t see him working at the BBC again. It’s not a difficult question," he stated. While shocked by the revelations surrounding Edwards' "secret life," Davie clarified that the BBC would not entirely erase Edwards from its archives, given his significant role in covering major national events, including the announcement of Queen Elizabeth II’s death. "We never completely ban and rip someone out of the archive," he explained. Although Edwards’ material may not appear in day-to-day programming, Davie emphasized that removing all traces of such a prominent figure "doesn’t pass the common sense test." The BBC is also conducting a review into claims made by actress Amanda Abbington regarding her experiences on *Strictly Come Dancing*. Abbington has accused her dance partner, Giovanni Pernice, of being "abusive, cruel and mean" during rehearsals, allegations Pernice strongly denies. Davie indicated that the review was nearing completion, although it was not finalized before the new season of the dance show began. "Many things in life would be useful," Davie said wryly when asked if the review’s timing could have been better aligned with the show’s schedule. As the BBC faces scrutiny and works to rebuild trust, Davie’s comments highlight the ongoing effort to address misconduct and foster a safer, more accountable workplace culture. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-19

In response to a crippling drought, Zimbabwe and Namibia have announced plans to slaughter hundreds of wild elephants and other animals to provide much-needed food for their struggling citizens. The devastating drought, worsened by the El Niño weather phenomenon, has left many communities in these southern African countries facing severe hunger. On Monday, Zimbabwe's government disclosed its decision to allow the culling of 200 elephants, with the meat being distributed to vulnerable communities. Similarly, Namibia has begun killing over 700 wild animals, including 83 elephants, as part of a strategy revealed three weeks ago to address the food crisis. Tinashe Farawo, spokesperson for the Zimbabwe National Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, confirmed that permits would be issued to affected communities to hunt elephants. Additionally, the parks authority itself would conduct culling to meet the quota of 200 elephants. "We will start culling as soon as we have finished issuing out permits," Farawo stated. Farawo explained that the elephants will be taken from areas where their numbers have surpassed the capacity the environment can support. One such region is Hwange National Park in the arid western part of Zimbabwe, where humans and wildlife increasingly compete for scarce resources like food and water. The park currently hosts over 45,000 elephants but only has the capacity to sustain 15,000. Zimbabwe as a whole is home to roughly 100,000 elephants, double the population the country’s national parks can handle, according to park officials. In December, Zimbabwe's parks agency revealed that more than 100 elephants had already died due to the severe drought. Farawo warned that many more animals could perish from thirst and starvation as the country enters its hottest season. The drought situation, exacerbated by rising temperatures, has put immense pressure on wildlife and human populations alike. Zimbabwe's Environment Minister, Sithembiso Nyoni, voiced her support for the culling program during a Parliamentary session last week. “Indeed, Zimbabwe has more elephants than we need, more elephants than our forestry can accommodate,” Nyoni said. She added that the government was preparing to implement the culling and involve women in the process of drying and packaging the meat to ensure it reaches communities in need of protein. Namibia has also embarked on a large-scale culling operation. The Namibian government recently approved the killing of 723 animals, which includes not only elephants but also hippos, buffalos, zebras, impalas, and elands. These animals are sourced from five national parks, where the population of wildlife has grown beyond sustainable levels and has led to increased conflicts between humans and animals. Romeo Muyunda, spokesperson for Namibia's environment department, explained that the decision aligns with the country’s constitutional mandate to use natural resources for the benefit of its citizens. "This is necessary and is in line with our constitutional mandate where our natural resources are used for the benefit of Namibian citizens," Muyunda said. He emphasized that this action demonstrates how wildlife conservation can directly benefit people. While neighboring Botswana has the world’s largest elephant population at 130,000, it has not followed Zimbabwe and Namibia's lead in culling elephants to feed its population. However, Botswana's approach remains a notable contrast amid the region's broader struggle with drought. Guyo Roba, a food security and agricultural expert from the Jameel Observatory, a Kenya-based environmental think tank, commented on the difficult decisions facing both Zimbabwe and Namibia. "They are working against a wildlife population that is above their carrying capacity," Roba said. He acknowledged that the measures might appear controversial at first glance, but stressed that the governments face a tough balancing act. "The governments are torn between remaining faithful to some of their obligations at an international level in terms of conservation and supporting the population,” Roba said. As the drought continues to ravage southern Africa, the decision to cull elephants and other wildlife has become a desperate measure to address immediate food shortages. While controversial, it underscores the complex challenges these nations face as they seek to protect both their citizens and their natural heritage. Credit: ABC 2024-09-19

Former special counsel Robert Mueller, who led the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, has issued a stark warning: the United States is still not adequately prepared to combat Russian attacks on its democratic process. This caution comes in the preface to *Interference: The Inside Story of Trump, Russia, and the Mueller Investigation*, a new book by Aaron Zebley, James Quarles, and Andrew Goldstein, all of whom served as prosecutors under Mueller during his investigation from 2017 to 2019. “It is … evident that Americans have not learned the lessons of Russia’s attack on our democracy in 2016,” Mueller writes. He points out that the evidence was undeniable in his report, which detailed how the Russian government systematically targeted the U.S. electoral process to undermine democracy and boost one candidate over another. That candidate was Donald Trump, the Republican who won the presidency over Democrat Hillary Clinton. Despite efforts by various government officials, Mueller states that the country remains ill-prepared for future Russian interference, echoing a grave concern that “Russia attacked us before and will do so again.” Mueller’s warning underscores the importance of vigilance from all Americans, as well as the need for heightened governmental readiness. The book *Interference* explores the Mueller investigation in depth, from its origins following the firing of FBI Director James Comey to its eventual conclusion in March 2019. The investigation did not find conclusive evidence of collusion between Trump and Moscow, but it did lead to indictments against three Russian entities and 34 individuals. One of those convicted was Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, who was jailed. Mueller also identified 10 potential instances of obstruction of justice by Trump, though he refrained from indicting the sitting president due to Justice Department guidelines. Mueller praises Zebley, Quarles, and Goldstein, writing that they “care deeply about the rule of law and know the importance of making decisions with integrity and humility.” He highlights the value of these principles, particularly when facing those who are unwilling to play by the rules. The book also reveals behind-the-scenes moments, including a meeting at the White House, where Mueller was considered for a return to his previous position as FBI director. According to the authors, Trump dominated the conversation, but Mueller declined the offer, despite Trump’s later claims to the contrary. In the lead-up to the 2016 election, an “October surprise” came in the form of WikiLeaks' release of hacked Democratic emails, attributed to Russian interference. This event coincided with the fallout from Trump’s infamous *Access Hollywood* tape, in which he boasted about sexual assault. The Mueller team’s investigation confirmed that Russia’s actions were aimed at tipping the scales in Trump’s favor. However, attempts to interview Trump himself were blocked by his attorneys, including Rudy Giuliani, who breached confidentiality agreements, leading Mueller to cut ties with him permanently. As the book examines the aftermath of the 2016 election, it also reflects on the broader legal challenges Trump faced during his presidency. Giuliani is now embroiled in criminal and civil proceedings linked to efforts to overturn Trump’s 2020 election loss, while Trump faces multiple charges himself, including 34 criminal counts related to hush-money payments before the 2016 election. The authors express concern over recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings that could complicate future investigations into presidential misconduct. They highlight cases such as *Trump v. United States*, which grants a president "presumptive immunity" for official actions, thereby limiting the scope of potential prosecution for presidential abuses of power. Mueller’s investigation may not have resulted in Trump’s punishment, but it played a significant role in shaping public discourse on the integrity of American elections. As the nation heads toward another presidential race, the warnings from Mueller and his team resonate even more urgently. Their book arrives at a time when new reports suggest that Russian influence operations, this time targeting Vice President Kamala Harris, are already underway. Mueller’s warning is clear: while the U.S. may have learned from the past, it remains unprepared for the challenges of tomorrow. Credit: The Guardian 2024-09-19

Kamala Harris, the vice president of the United States and a candidate for the 2024 presidential election, has indicated she is open to exploring reparations for slavery, marking a potential shift in national discourse on racial justice. During an interview with reporters from the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) in Philadelphia, Harris emphasized the importance of confronting the long-lasting effects of America’s historical injustices, including slavery, redlining, and Jim Crow laws. Harris’s stance on reparations could influence her standing among Black voters, a demographic that polls suggest has grown increasingly disillusioned with the Democratic Party. Some of her allies believe that embracing reparations could help win back these voters. However, others fear that the topic could alienate more voters than it attracts, given the stark racial divide on the issue. Throughout her career, Harris has largely avoided engaging in debates centered on identity politics. As the first Black woman to lead a major party’s presidential ticket, she has often navigated discussions about race with care. During the NABJ interview, she underscored the importance of not assuming support from Black voters based solely on her heritage. “I think it’s very important to not operate from the assumption that Black men are in anybody’s pocket,” she said. “Black men are like any other voting group, you’ve gotta earn their vote. So I’m working to earn the vote, not assuming I’m going to have it because I am Black.” Her comments reflect the delicate balance she must strike as she seeks to unite a broad coalition of voters in the 2024 election, particularly at a time when Republican candidate Donald Trump has been gaining traction among Black men. In contrast to Harris, Trump has consistently focused on identity politics, taking aim at Harris’s dual heritage. In his own address to the NABJ, Trump controversially claimed that Harris had only recently “happened to turn Black.” His remarks highlight the growing tensions surrounding race in the upcoming election. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-19

As tensions between Russia and the West intensify, the Biden administration is reportedly considering a move that could push the world to the edge of nuclear disaster. According to The New York Times, there is growing discussion about allowing Ukraine to use NATO-supplied long-range precision weapons to target Russian territories. This decision, if pursued, would bring the world closer to the threat of nuclear conflict than at any time since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Instead of prioritizing a diplomatic solution to end the war, which many argue should never have started, the current administration seems to be adopting a strategy that Russia has explicitly warned against. Russian President Vladimir Putin has made it clear that any such attack on Russian territory would be viewed as a direct act of war by NATO. “Long-range strikes in Russia will mean that NATO countries — the United States and European countries — are at war with Russia,” Putin warned. However, some American analysts dismiss this as a bluff. As The Times noted, “17 former ambassadors and generals wrote in a letter to the administration this week, ‘Easing the restrictions on Western weapons will not cause Moscow to escalate… Moscow’s response remains unchanged despite Ukraine striking Crimea and Kursk.’” These voices are advocating a dangerous form of brinksmanship, mistaking Russia’s restraint for weakness. They propose pushing the envelope further, with each escalation — from HIMARS to cluster munitions, tanks, fighter jets, and now long-range missiles — inching the world ever closer to a catastrophic nuclear war. The assumption seems to be that if a provocation doesn’t trigger a response, it’s safe to push harder. But this thinking ignores a critical factor: Russia is a nuclear power. President John F. Kennedy understood the precarious balance of nuclear deterrence. In 1963, he warned, “Nuclear powers must avert those confrontations which bring an adversary to a choice of either a humiliating retreat or a nuclear war.” This wisdom seems to have been forgotten. Putin has repeatedly signaled that Russia could use nuclear weapons if its territorial integrity is threatened. In September 2022, he declared, “If the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, we will without doubt use all available means to protect Russia and our people — this is not a bluff.” Putin’s deal with Belarus to station tactical nuclear weapons there and Russia’s recent revision of its nuclear doctrine should be taken seriously. It is hard to imagine how the United States would react if a foreign power were arming its enemies with missiles and providing training to strike deep within its territory. The U.S. would never tolerate such actions. Why, then, should anyone expect Russia to accept these provocations? This dangerous game of nuclear brinksmanship must end. There is no further step between launching U.S.-provided missiles into Russian territory and a potential nuclear exchange. The risks could not be higher. And for what? To weaken Russia? To control Ukraine’s natural resources? No vital American interest is at stake that justifies risking nuclear conflict. The pursuit of global dominance at the cost of such peril is nothing short of madness. The war fever gripping Washington has reached alarming levels. In last Tuesday’s debate, Vice President Kamala Harris evoked the possibility of Russian forces advancing across Europe, a scenario that strains credulity. Russia has struggled to make headway in Ukraine, a country far from Europe’s greatest military powers. It is clear that Russia’s war aims, stated early on, revolved around Ukrainian neutrality and halting NATO’s expansion eastward. After so many lives lost and resources spent, no party involved in this conflict is better off. It is time to recognize the catastrophic implications of continuing down this path. A nuclear war would mean the end of civilization, and perhaps humanity itself. Former President Donald Trump has pledged to end this war, but by the time he takes office, it might be too late. The time for diplomacy is now. President Biden and Vice President Harris must reverse their current course and engage in direct negotiations with Moscow to prevent an unspeakable disaster. The stakes could not be higher, and the time to act is rapidly running out. Opinion Donald Trump Jr & Robert F. Kennedy Jr Credit: The Hill 2024-09-19

Posts derailing the topic with unsubstainitated Gaza related claims have been removed along with a reply.

A post containing an unapproved video source (Scott Ritter) Has been removed

A nonsense troll post has been removed giving a spoof location on Google maps to a missile strike. Try that again and be prepared for another posting holiday. @beautifulthailand99 An off topic post on the Trump shooting suspect which has its own topic has additionaly been removed from the same poster.

A post making a number of unsubstaniated claims has been removed.

Sean “Diddy” Combs will remain behind bars as his legal battle over sex trafficking and racketeering charges continues. On Tuesday, a federal judge denied the hip-hop mogul's request for bail, rejecting a proposal from his legal team that would have allowed him to await trial under home detention. Combs’ lawyers had pitched a $50 million bond, secured by his Miami property, as part of the deal to keep him under house arrest. However, the court sided with prosecutors, who argued that the 54-year-old entertainer was a significant flight risk and had already attempted to contact witnesses and victims in the case. According to prosecutors, some of those individuals remain fearful of Combs, adding to concerns over his release. Combs pleaded not guilty to the charges brought against him, which include sex trafficking, racketeering, and other serious offenses. The indictment, unveiled earlier on Tuesday, lays out a disturbing picture of the alleged criminal enterprise Combs is accused of operating. Prosecutors claim that he used drugs, violence, and coercion to force women into sexual exploitation, all to serve his personal desires. The 14-page indictment describes how Combs "abused, threatened, and coerced women and others around him to fulfill his sexual desires, protect his reputation, and conceal his conduct." As Combs awaits his trial, his legal team is expected to continue fighting for his release, while prosecutors push forward with what promises to be a highly publicized case. Credit: BBC 2024-09-18

Pager explosions rocked Lebanon, targeting Hezbollah members and leading to the deaths of nine people and injuries to thousands more. Fatalities are expected to rise significantly. The exact cause of the explosions is still under investigation, but experts who spoke to CNN believe that the blasts were the result of hardware tampering rather than a cybersecurity breach. However, this has yet to be confirmed by authorities. Watch The use of low-tech devices like pagers reflects Hezbollah's long-standing focus on avoiding high-tech gadgets, which could expose them to surveillance. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah had earlier urged members and their families to avoid cell phones, calling them a security risk. "Shut it off, bury it, put it in an iron chest and lock it up," he declared in a speech, warning that cell phones could be exploited by adversaries. The explosions, which have been attributed to Israeli involvement by both Iranian and Hamas officials, have rattled Hezbollah and its supporters. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused Israel of orchestrating the attack, labeling it as "Israeli terrorism" during a phone conversation with Lebanese Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib. Hamas also condemned the attack, blaming "Zionist terrorist aggression" and expressing solidarity with Hezbollah and the Lebanese people. This latest incident highlights the deepening tensions in the region. The attack, striking at the heart of Hezbollah’s communication network, has shaken the group and may lead to further escalation in an already fragile situation. Credit: CNN 2024-09-18

In a heartbreaking incident that shocked the community, 26-year-old Kyle Clifford has been charged with the murders of Carol Hunt, 61, and her two daughters, Hannah, 28, and Louise, 25. The tragic event, which unfolded on July 9 at the family’s home in Bushey, Hertfordshire, involved a brutal crossbow attack. Clifford, who has been in custody since July 10, is now set to appear in Westminster Magistrates' Court to face multiple charges, including three counts of murder, false imprisonment, and possession of offensive weapons. Hertfordshire Police had been unable to question Clifford immediately after the attack, as he was receiving medical treatment for an injury. However, with Clifford now charged, the judicial process can move forward, offering some hope of justice to the grieving family. Detective Chief Inspector Nick Gardner of the Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, and Hertfordshire Major Crime Unit reflected on the gravity of the situation: “Our thoughts remain with the Hunt family and their loved ones as they continue to come to terms with their loss. Over the past couple of months, we have been working hard to gather as much evidence as possible and establish the full circumstances of what happened that day. Today, we have managed to secure charges against Kyle Clifford in connection with the murders of Carol, Hannah, and Louise Hunt. Although it has taken some time to reach this stage, we can now move forward with the judicial process and seek justice for their family.” Carol Hunt, the wife of BBC racing commentator John Hunt, and their two daughters were found gravely injured in their Ashlyn Close home, leaving the close-knit family in unimaginable pain. In a statement released in July, John Hunt and his surviving daughter, Amy, expressed their profound grief, stating that their devastation "cannot be put into words." They further described the aftermath of the attack as "an extremely difficult time for us." Tributes poured in from friends, family, and colleagues, highlighting the impact the Hunt family had on those who knew them. Many described them as a "gentle, beautiful family," whose loss is deeply felt across their community. Hannah’s boyfriend, Alex Klein, took to social media to share his sorrow, posting a heartfelt message alongside a photo of the couple. He wrote: “RIP the love of my life, I will never forget you, stolen from me too soon. The brightest light in my life. My brave queen for life. Until we meet again... I love you Hansy.” Support for John Hunt and his family extended beyond their immediate circle, with colleagues from BBC and ITV publicly expressing their sympathies. BBC Radio 5 Live host Mark Chapman, visibly emotional, shared his thoughts ahead of the coverage of England’s Euro 2024 semi-final, dedicating a moment to Hunt. He said: “John Hunt is our colleague and our friend, not just to the current 5 Live sports team, but to all of those who’ve worked here with him over the past 20 years, and also to all of you who have enjoyed his superb commentaries. So, on behalf of everybody connected to 5 Live Sports, our love and thoughts and support are with John and his family.” Clifford, who hails from Rendlesham Road in Enfield, north London, will make a remote appearance in court. As the legal process begins, there remains a strong sense of grief and solidarity among those affected by this unspeakable tragedy. Lisa Ramsarran, chief crown prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in Thames and Chiltern, reiterated this sentiment, stating: “Our thoughts remain with the Hunt family and all those who have been affected by this tragic incident.” The pain of the Hunt family and the broader community will be long-lasting, but there is hope that justice will be served as the case proceeds. Credit: The Independent 2024-09-18

Vice President Kamala Harris surged ahead with a six-point lead over former President Donald Trump after last week's presidential debate, according to a new poll released by Morning Consult. This latest poll marks a significant shift in the race, which had previously been a close contest between the two candidates. Prior to the debate, most polls had shown Harris and Trump in a near tie. However, Harris’ strong performance on various key issues seems to have altered the political landscape. Eli Yokley, a political analyst at Morning Consult, stated in an email that “a majority of likely voters — including 1 in 5 Republicans — believe Harris won the debate, and [her] performance appears to be crystalizing her national lead over the former president.” The Morning Consult poll was conducted between September 13 and 15, surveying 11,022 likely U.S. voters. The poll, which has an unweighted margin of error of +/-1 percentage point, revealed Harris with 51% of support compared to 45% for Trump. Morning Consult described this as a "new record" for Harris, making her the first Democratic presidential nominee to reach this level of support. "Her 51% of support among likely voters, which is also at a record high, is driven largely by her best figures to date among Democrats, Biden 2020 voters, liberals, women, 18- to 34-year-olds, and millennials," the poll noted. The poll's methodology focused on registered voters likely to participate in the upcoming election. Respondents were asked to rate their likelihood of voting on a scale of 1 to 10, with "1" representing those who would definitely not vote and "10" indicating those certain to vote. Only individuals who rated themselves as an "8" or higher were considered likely voters. The poll did not account for voters who were initially undecided but were later asked to indicate which candidate they were leaning toward. Both Harris and Trump are targeting young voters, a group that includes many undecided or persuadable individuals. While Trump has been trying to appeal to younger male voters through appearances on popular podcasts and at UFC events, Harris has focused on young women, many of whom have become more politically engaged in recent years, especially around issues like reproductive rights. Harris’ momentum was further boosted when pop star Taylor Swift publicly endorsed her on Instagram, where Swift has a massive following of 284 million. The singer's post encouraging voter registration led to 338,000 visits to Vote.gov within 15 hours, potentially increasing Harris’ support among young voters. According to Yokley, Harris "is enjoying a positive news cycle among the likely electorate this year that's earning her positive marks and aligns with her best numbers yet in the head-to-head contest" against Trump. Credit: AXIOS 2024-09-18

The New Tolerance Campaign (NTC), a watchdog organization, has announced it will donate $1 million to any US-based LGBTQ advocacy group willing to host a Pride parade in Gaza or the West Bank. The offer is open to groups like “Queers for Palestine,” which have gained visibility in the wake of the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel, despite homosexuality remaining highly taboo in Palestinian territories. Gay and transgender individuals in Gaza and the West Bank face severe persecution, including acts of violence. Gregory T. Angelo, president of the NTC and former leader of the Log Cabin Republicans, emphasized that the campaign serves as a wake-up call to those advocating LGBTQ equality in Palestinian regions. "This campaign emerged to call out these purported advocates of LGBT equality and put our money where their mouths are,” he said. Angelo expressed hope that the campaign would either highlight the dangers faced by LGBTQ individuals in Palestinian territories or create an opportunity for peace and pluralism in the region. NTC has secured the $1 million prize and is publicizing the offer through mobile billboards near locations like Columbia University in New York, the headquarters of the Human Rights Campaign in Washington, D.C., and UCLA in Los Angeles. Angelo noted that the flashy prize was designed to capture attention, but the core objective is to advance equality and human rights. The campaign also allows Americans to send direct messages to senior leadership at organizations like GLAAD and the LGBTQ Task Force, urging them to advocate for LGBTQ rights in Palestinian territories. Angelo pointed out that in the U.S., anti-Israel protesters often claim that LGBTQ people are mistreated domestically. However, he countered that by stating the U.S. offers significant legal protections, including anti-discrimination laws and nationwide same-sex marriage, which stand in stark contrast to the treatment of LGBTQ individuals in the Palestinian territories. “Contrast that with what you see over in the Palestinian territories where same-sex marriage isn’t something that’s even a possibility or discussed. There are no protections in terms of employment for sexual orientation or gender,” he said. In 2019, Palestinian Authority police banned LGBTQ events in the West Bank, threatening to arrest anyone participating. Meanwhile, Israel promotes itself as a safe haven for LGBTQ rights, with Tel Aviv celebrated as a top destination for gay and lesbian travelers. Angelo, who visited the West Bank in 2013, said he was stunned by the difference in human rights between Israel and the Palestinian territories. The NTC describes itself as a group that holds institutions accountable for violating their stated values of tolerance. Through campaigns like this, the organization seeks to confront double standards and promote a consistent commitment to tolerance and human rights. Credit: NYP 2024-09-18

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has commended Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni for her success in tackling illegal migration. During a visit to Italy, Starmer noted that Italy has seen a 60% drop in the number of illegal migrants arriving by sea, attributing this to Meloni’s efforts to target the criminal gangs profiting from illegal immigration. He emphasized the importance of cross-border cooperation and stated that the UK and Italy would work closely together on this issue, sharing data and intelligence. Starmer also expressed interest in Italy's offshore asylum processing plan, which involves opening two centres in Albania to handle asylum claims. In a joint press conference with Meloni in Rome, Starmer praised Italy’s approach. "You've made remarkable progress working with countries along migration routes as equals to address the drivers of migration at the source and to tackle the gangs," he said. He highlighted that irregular arrivals to Italy by sea have significantly reduced since 2022 and stressed his commitment to addressing illegal migration in the UK. Starmer visited Italy's national immigration coordination centre with Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi, where the discussion centred on the tragic consequences of illegal migration, including the recent shipwreck in the Channel that claimed eight lives, bringing the total death toll this year to 46. Starmer also addressed his rejection of the previous UK government's controversial plan to send undocumented migrants to Rwanda while their asylum claims were processed. Drawing from his background as a chief prosecutor, he underlined the need for international collaboration to fight smuggling gangs. "I've never accepted... that we can't do the same with smuggling gangs. And now of course Italy has shown that we can," he said. During the visit, Starmer expressed his admiration for Italy’s agreement with Albania, which involves the establishment of migrant centres where undocumented migrants will be housed while their asylum claims are processed. Starmer noted that the centres are not yet operational but highlighted the potential of such a plan. He added that the reduction in migrant arrivals to Italy could be credited to Italy's deals with Tunisia and Libya, where financial assistance is exchanged for cooperation in stopping migrant departures. Starmer emphasized that preventing people from leaving their countries in the first place is more effective than dealing with those who have already arrived. Starmer's visit did not come without criticism. Labour MP Kim Johnson expressed concern, telling The Guardian that it was "disturbing that Starmer is seeking to learn lessons from a neo-fascist government, particularly after the anti-refugee riots and far-right racist terrorism that swept Britain this summer." Nevertheless, Starmer maintained his pragmatic stance, stating, "We are pragmatists first and foremost. When we see a challenge, we discuss with our friends and allies the different approaches that are being taken." Italy’s hard-right government has recently renewed a deal with Libya, initially signed in 2017, which provides the Libyan coastguard with training and funding to help deter migrants from leaving or to return those caught at sea. As a result of these measures, Italy’s interior ministry reported a significant drop in sea arrivals. Between January 1 and September 13, 44,675 people arrived in Italy, compared to 125,806 during the same period the previous year. While the EU as a whole has seen a 39% decrease in illegal migrant crossings, experts note that many migrants are simply changing their routes, with Channel crossings up 13% this year, according to the EU’s border agency, Frontex. Credit: France 24. 2024-09-18

Amber Nicole Thurman’s story is one of tragedy and loss. The 28-year-old medical assistant from Georgia lost her life due to complications that could have been prevented. After taking abortion pills, Thurman experienced a rare complication where some fetal tissue remained in her body. She sought medical help at Piedmont Henry Hospital in suburban Atlanta, needing a dilation and curettage (D&C) procedure, which would have removed the remaining tissue and treated her infection. However, in the summer of 2022, Georgia passed a law criminalizing abortions with limited exceptions. The hospital delayed providing the D&C for 20 hours, and by the time they finally performed the procedure, it was too late. Thurman’s infection had spread, her organs were failing, and she died. This death, according to an official state committee, was preventable. Tasked with reviewing pregnancy-related deaths to improve maternal health, the committee determined that the hospital’s delay in providing the necessary medical care played a significant role in Thurman’s death. “There is a good chance” that performing a D&C earlier could have saved her life, the committee concluded. Thurman’s case is one of at least two in Georgia where women have died due to delays in accessing abortion care, according to ProPublica. As abortion bans take effect across the U.S., similar cases are coming to light. Doctors and advocates have long warned that such laws, with their vague and non-medical language, would force healthcare providers to choose between protecting their patients’ health and avoiding prosecution. Dr. Melissa Kottke, an OB-GYN at Emory University, cautioned legislators in 2019, saying doctors would feel compelled to wait for their patients to get sicker before intervening. The law in Georgia does allow exceptions to save the mother’s life, but critics argue that the wording of these exceptions is unclear and difficult to interpret. Medical professionals, fearful of facing up to 10 years in prison, may delay necessary treatment. In Thurman’s case, although she presented with severe symptoms of sepsis, including critically low blood pressure, the hospital chose to wait, testing her for sexually transmitted infections and pneumonia instead of performing the D&C. Thurman’s death occurred two weeks after Georgia’s abortion ban went into effect. Her mother and six-year-old son now live with the painful absence of a woman who loved being a mother. Her son, who was at the center of her world, now faces life without her. Amber Thurman’s story is a sobering reminder of the real-life consequences of abortion bans. As states across the country continue to restrict access to abortion, stories like hers are becoming more frequent, shining a light on the dangers of political interference in medical care. Credit: ProPublica 2024-09-18

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has indicated that he will continue accepting donations from Lord Alli, a prominent Labour donor, despite controversy over clothing provided to his wife. The Prime Minister faced questions about gifts from the peer, including clothes and alterations for Lady Starmer following Labour's election victory in July. Starmer acknowledged receiving gifts but stated he would follow parliamentary rules regarding their declaration. The Prime Minister’s actions have drawn scrutiny, as it is alleged that he failed to declare the donations within the required timeframe, breaching parliamentary regulations. The donations, including clothing and personal shopping services from Lord Alli, were not initially registered in the MPs’ interests, but Starmer made a late declaration after seeking advice from parliamentary authorities. Lord Alli has been a longstanding supporter of Starmer, previously donating various items such as spectacles and accommodation. While questioned on the matter during a trip to Italy, Starmer downplayed the controversy, asserting that “all Members of Parliament get gifts” and emphasizing a distinction between declarations and corruption. He added, "The rules say, over a certain value, you’ve got to declare the gifts, so everybody can see what it was, how much it was, who it came from… that’s a good framework." The Conservative Party has called for an investigation, with a formal request sent to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner. Tory MP Daniel Greenberg raised concerns over Starmer's delayed declaration and referenced a report suggesting that Lord Alli, despite holding no formal government role, had been granted a temporary Downing Street security pass and played an influential role in key Cabinet appointments. Starmer defended his actions, explaining that his team sought advice following the election on the proper procedure for declarations, and any delay was part of a “genuine and proper exercise.” He maintained that he had complied with all necessary rules and continued to argue that the issue at hand was one of transparency, not corruption. "There’s a massive difference between declarations and corruption," he told reporters. Starmer also addressed his receipt of complimentary football tickets, which he has accepted more than 20 times during his time in Parliament. These included tickets to Arsenal matches, where he is a regular supporter. Starmer explained that due to security concerns, he cannot sit in the stands and therefore must accept hospitality. "Never going to an Arsenal game again because I can’t accept hospitality is pushing it a bit far," he remarked. Foreign Secretary David Lammy defended the Prime Minister, arguing that donations helped ensure that Starmer and his wife could "look their best" while representing the country. Lammy compared the situation to that of the U.S., where presidents and first ladies are provided with a taxpayer-funded wardrobe. However, Starmer made it clear that he did not support such a system in the UK. The matter continues to stir debate, with calls for clarity on the Prime Minister's future handling of donations and the broader issue of transparency within the government. Despite the backlash, Starmer insists he will follow the rules, stating, “Wherever there are gifts from anyone, I’m going to comply with the rules.” Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-09-18