Social Media

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has recently refuted claims made in an upcoming biography of Queen Elizabeth II, which alleges that he was "very rude" to the late monarch during their meetings. Trump insists that the opposite is true, declaring that he was, in fact, her favorite president. The controversy arose from excerpts of the biography *Voyage Around the Queen* by Craig Brown, currently being serialized in the *Daily Mail*. The book recounts a series of events and interactions between Trump and Queen Elizabeth II, including a particularly striking incident in which the Queen reportedly confided to a guest that she found Trump’s behavior during their meeting to be quite rude. According to the book, she was especially displeased with how Trump seemed distracted, looking over her shoulder as if searching for someone more interesting to engage with. In response to these claims, Trump vehemently denied the characterization of his behavior, telling the *Daily Mail* that he and the Queen actually got along very well during their encounters. "It was totally false. I have no idea who the writer is, but it was really just the opposite," Trump stated in defense of his conduct. He went on to add, "I heard I was her favorite president." The book also suggests that the Queen harbored suspicions about Trump’s personal life, particularly his marriage to Melania Trump. It alleges that the Queen speculated to a guest about the nature of their relationship, wondering aloud if Trump and his wife had some sort of arrangement, given the challenges that their marriage might face. Despite these supposed private doubts, Trump remains confident that he left a positive impression on the Queen and was one of her favored guests. Trump’s interactions with the British Royal Family have often been a subject of media attention and public scrutiny. His admiration for the Royal Family is something he frequently mentions, attributing it to his Scottish mother’s fondness for the monarchy. This affection, however, did not shield him from controversy during his visits to the United Kingdom as president. In 2018, Trump met Queen Elizabeth II during an informal trip to the UK, a visit that sparked widespread protests across London. A year later, during an official state visit, Trump found himself at the center of a minor diplomatic faux pas when he placed his hand on the Queen's back, a gesture that broke royal protocol. Despite this breach of etiquette, Trump praised the Queen, referring to her as a “great, great woman.” As Trump campaigns for a return to the White House in the upcoming November election, his past interactions with international figures, including Queen Elizabeth II, are likely to continue to be a topic of discussion and analysis. While Trump remains confident in the positive nature of his relationship with the late monarch, the differing recollections presented in the biography suggest that the true nature of their interactions may remain a matter of debate. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Former President Donald Trump made headlines once again by promising to impose harsh penalties on illegal migrants found guilty of serious crimes. During a news conference in Cochise County, Arizona, near the US-Mexico border, Trump outlined his vision for a more stringent legal framework targeting illegal migrants who commit heinous acts. Among his proposals was the introduction of mandatory minimum sentences, life imprisonment, and even the death penalty for the most egregious offenses. “We will impose tough new sentences on illegal alien criminals, including 10-year mandatory minimum sentences for anyone found guilty of human smuggling; a guaranteed life sentence for anyone found guilty of child trafficking; and a death penalty for anyone guilty of child or woman sex trafficking,” Trump declared. His remarks underscored his belief that current laws are insufficient to deter crime and protect American citizens from the dangers posed by illegal migrants. Trump's commitment to harsher penalties didn't stop at human traffickers. He also vowed to extend the death penalty to major drug dealers and traffickers, drawing a direct line between the illegal drug trade and the violence that often accompanies it. The former president, who has been a vocal supporter of law enforcement throughout his political career, also called for capital punishment for anyone convicted of killing law enforcement officials, including police, sheriffs, border patrol agents, and ICE officers. “The death penalty with a quicker trial,” Trump emphasized, “not a trial that lasts for 15 years and everyone gets exhausted.” In his remarks, Trump also highlighted the challenges law enforcement faces in maintaining security along the southern border, describing the situation as increasingly dangerous. “The amount of injuries sustained in fights and shootings is just incredible,” Trump said, acknowledging the physical and mental toll on those tasked with guarding the border. Trump’s visit to Arizona also included a tour of the remnants of a border wall project that he had approved during his presidency. The project, however, was halted once the Biden administration took over. Trump inspected the heaps of steel that lay unused, rusting in the desert sun. “It could have been put up in a matter of weeks. It was all set to go,” Trump lamented, referring to the stalled construction efforts. Describing the unbuilt sections as the “Rolls-Royce” of walls, Trump criticized President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris for not completing the project, accusing them of favoring open borders. He further claimed that much of the unused paneling had been sold off “for five cents on the dollar.” The news conference also provided a platform for grieving families, often referred to as “Angel Moms,” who have lost loved ones to crimes committed by illegal migrants. Among them was Patty Morin, whose 37-year-old daughter Rachel was brutally murdered last year while jogging on a trail in Bel Air, Maryland. The suspect, a 23-year-old illegal migrant from El Salvador, is also accused of other heinous crimes. Speaking to the press, Patty expressed her strong support for Trump’s plan to secure the border and crack down on migrant crime. “We are 1,800 miles from the border,” Patty noted, emphasizing the far-reaching impact of what she described as an open border policy. “And because of this open border, we’ve had two [cases] in the same county where illegal immigrants have come in and raped and murdered our citizens.” Patty’s words were a powerful reminder of the personal toll of migrant crime, as she pleaded, “I really want our words to be heard. We’re here because we are losing our moms, our daughters, our children to criminals – and that shouldn’t happen.” Patty’s sentiment was echoed by Alexis Nungaray, the mother of 12-year-old Jocelyn, who was assaulted and murdered in Houston by illegal migrants. Nungaray criticized the system that allowed her daughter’s alleged killers to remain free. “There were over 300 detention beds they should have been at,” Nungaray said, pointing out that one of the suspects was wearing an ICE ankle bracelet at the time of the crime. “They were detained and released when they shouldn’t have been released,” she argued, expressing frustration at the failure of immigration enforcement to prevent such tragedies. “We are losing very innocent people to heinous crimes that shouldn’t be happening in the first place,” Nungaray added, her anger and grief palpable as she addressed the gathering. The former president’s tough stance on migrant crime received support from within the Republican Party. JD Vance, the Republican Vice Presidential nominee, echoed Trump’s message during a news conference in Georgia, held just before Trump’s border speech. Vance praised Trump’s proposed agenda, saying, “Donald Trump believes that we ought to make our law enforcement lives easier by closing down that southern border and getting the drug cartels out of our communities.” Vance also expressed concern about changes to immigration laws supported by some Democrats and Republicans, which Trump opposed. He warned that these changes would enshrine policies like “catch and release” into law. “This is where a person comes into our country, they claim asylum, and then they’re released into our country with no follow up. Sometimes they don’t come back for five years. Sometimes they don’t come back for 10 years,” Vance explained, criticizing the current administration’s approach to border security. “Kamala Harris and Joe Biden implemented catch and release through executive order, their so-called border security package would have made catch and release the law of the land. So even if you have a guy like Donald Trump come in, he can’t undo it,” he added, highlighting the potential long-term consequences of such legislation. Former GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy also weighed in, offering a sharp critique of the Democratic Party’s stance on border security. Speaking on the sidelines of the Democratic National Convention, Ramaswamy pointed out the irony of the heavy security measures surrounding the event. “I’m grateful that Democrats appear to now agree with Donald Trump’s policy of building a wall,” Ramaswamy quipped. “If only they cared as much about keeping illegals out of our country as they do keeping their own left-wing protesters out of their own convention, our border crisis would actually be behind us.” His comments underscored the deep divisions between the two major political parties on the issue of immigration and border security. As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Trump’s proposals and the broader Republican agenda on immigration and crime will likely continue to be central topics of debate. With passionate support from those affected by migrant crime and backing from prominent Republicans, Trump’s tough-on-crime message resonates with a significant portion of the electorate. However, it also raises questions about the balance between law enforcement, human rights, and the complexities of the immigration system. As the nation grapples with these issues, the former president’s call for harsher penalties for illegal migrants sets the stage for what promises to be a contentious and closely watched election season. Credit: NYP 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

In a shocking and violent incident that has left the military community and the public reeling, a highly experienced and respected Lieutenant Colonel in the British Army was brutally attacked outside his home. The victim, identified as Lieutenant Colonel Mark Teeton, was left seriously injured after being stabbed repeatedly in what authorities have described as an attempted murder. Lt Col Mark Teeton, who has served the British Army for over two decades, is a long-standing and dedicated officer. For the past six years, he has held the position of course manager at the 1 Royal School of Military Engineering Regiment. His contributions to the military have been significant, and he has earned a reputation as a committed leader and a dedicated servant to his country. The attack occurred on a quiet Tuesday evening near Lt Col Teeton's residence, which is located close to Brompton Barracks. As he was heading home, a man reportedly ran up behind him, pulled him to the ground, and began stabbing him repeatedly. The assailant, later identified as 24-year-old Anthony Esan, was arrested shortly after the incident near his home in Rochester, which is not far from the scene of the crime. The horrifying nature of the attack has stunned the local community and the nation at large. Lt Col Teeton, who is in his 40s and a father of two, was airlifted to a nearby hospital where he remains in a serious but stable condition. The quick response by emergency services undoubtedly played a crucial role in saving his life, but the psychological and emotional toll of such a violent assault will likely be long-lasting. Anthony Esan, the man accused of carrying out this brutal attack, has been charged with the attempted murder of Lt Col Teeton. He has also been charged with possessing an offensive weapon in a public place. Esan made his first appearance in Medway Magistrates’ Court on Thursday, where he was seen wearing a grey T-shirt. During the hearing, the details of the vicious attack were laid bare, with Prosecutor Rajni Prashar providing a chilling account of what transpired that evening. “A member of the public called 999 to report a male had been stabbed. It was then reported that the victim was a soldier in uniform,” Prashar told the court. She went on to describe how Esan was seen “running up behind” Lt Col Teeton before pulling him to the ground and stabbing him “repeatedly.” Esan was remanded in custody following his court appearance and is scheduled to appear next at Maidstone Crown Court on August 22. As the legal process continues, there is a palpable sense of shock and disbelief that such a horrific act could occur, especially against a member of the armed forces who has dedicated his life to serving his country. Lt Col Teeton's career in the military is marked by a series of achievements and contributions that have earned him respect and admiration among his peers. According to his LinkedIn profile, his service in the armed forces dates back to 2001, and over the years, he has taken on various roles that have showcased his leadership skills and commitment to the military's mission. Earlier this year, Lt Col Teeton participated in the D-Day Challenge in Normandy, a grueling event that commemorates the bravery and sacrifice of soldiers during World War II. The challenge also serves as a fundraiser, and Lt Col Teeton managed to raise nearly £2,500 for Combat Stress, a charity dedicated to providing mental health support for veterans. In the lead-up to the event, he expressed his deep respect for both past and present servicemen, writing: “In honour of our forefathers as well as current servicemen who have bravely fought to protect our way of life, I will be taking on the D-Day Challenge to raise vital funds for life-changing mental health treatment for veterans.” After completing the challenging event, Lt Col Teeton posted a video in which he humorously recounted how he nearly passed out at the finish line, but emphasized that it was all worth it. “It was worthwhile... it’s a good amount of money to a fantastic charity,” he said, highlighting his unwavering commitment to supporting his fellow servicemen and women. The attack on Lt Col Teeton has elicited strong reactions from military leaders and political figures alike. General Sir Roly Walker, the head of the Army, condemned the stabbing in the strongest possible terms, calling it “horrific.” His sentiments were echoed by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who expressed his deep shock and outrage at the incident, stating that he was “shocked and appalled” by the senseless act of violence. As Lt Col Teeton continues to recover in the hospital, the thoughts and prayers of many are with him and his family during this difficult time. The military community, in particular, has rallied around one of its own, offering support and solidarity in the face of this tragic event. The case against Anthony Esan will proceed through the legal system, with many hoping that justice will be served for the heinous act committed against Lt Col Teeton. In the meantime, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the risks and dangers faced by those who serve in the armed forces, even when they are off-duty and away from the battlefield. The attack has also sparked conversations about the need for greater protection and support for military personnel, both during and after their service. As the nation grapples with the implications of this incident, the focus remains on Lt Col Teeton’s recovery and the pursuit of justice for the crime committed against him. Credit: The Independent 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

In a grim and troubling turn of events, weapons dealers in Yemen are leveraging the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, to openly market and sell a range of deadly arms. The offerings include everything from Kalashnikovs and pistols to grenades and grenade launchers, with these transactions occurring in broad daylight on a platform accessible to millions worldwide. These dealers, operating primarily in the Yemeni capital of Sana’a and other territories under the control of the Houthis, are not just selling weapons but are doing so with apparent impunity. The Houthis, a rebel group with backing from Iran, have been labeled as terrorists by both the United States and Australian governments. The fact that such transactions are taking place so openly has raised serious concerns about the Houthis' involvement in these sales. Edmund Fitton-Brown, a former British Ambassador to Yemen who now works with the Counter Extremism Project, voiced his alarm about the situation, stating, "It is inconceivable that they [the weapons dealers] are not operating on the Houthis’ behalf." Fitton-Brown's comments highlight the likelihood that these arms dealers are not independent operators but are likely working under the auspices or with the tacit approval of the Houthi leadership. He further suggested that any purely private dealers attempting to supply weapons to other entities, such as the Yemeni government, would likely face swift retribution and be shut down. The scope of this illegal arms trade was uncovered by an investigation conducted by The Times, which found several Yemeni accounts on X, some of which bore the platform’s blue tick of verification. The verification symbol, once a marker of authenticity and credibility, is now being used by arms dealers to lend legitimacy to their operations, a development that is as ironic as it is alarming. Both The Times and the BBC have reached out to X for a response regarding these findings, but as of yet, the social media platform has remained silent. This silence is particularly concerning given that most of X's content moderation team was laid off following Elon Musk's acquisition of the company in 2022. The lack of moderation has seemingly turned X into a haven for illicit activities, including the sale of weapons in war-torn regions like Yemen. The advertisements posted by these Yemeni weapons dealers are predominantly in Arabic, targeting local customers in a country where firearms are ubiquitous. It is often said that in Yemen, the number of guns outnumbers the population by a ratio of three to one. The BBC found numerous online advertisements offering weapons at prices listed in both Yemeni and Saudi riyals. These advertisements are not shy about the products they are selling. Instead, they use persuasive language to attract buyers, boasting of the quality and reliability of their merchandise. One advertisement proclaims, "Premium craftsmanship and top-notch warranty," while promoting a modified AK-47 as "your best choice." Another ad includes a demonstration video, shot at night, showing a seller firing a 30-round magazine on full automatic. Yet another listing offers sand-colored Glock pistols, produced in Pakistan, for around $900 each. These ads, designed to entice potential buyers, are not hidden away in obscure corners of the internet or the Dark Web, where illegal transactions typically occur. Instead, they are in plain sight on X, visible and accessible to anyone with an internet connection. The blatant visibility of these weapons ads on a major social media platform has sparked calls for urgent action. Tech Against Terrorism, a UK-based NGO, has issued a plea to technology platforms, urging them to take immediate and decisive action to remove Houthi-supporting content from the internet and social media. The organization's concern is not just about the sale of weapons but also about the broader implications of allowing terrorist groups to use these platforms to spread their influence and fund their operations. The Houthis, a tribal minority based in Yemen's mountainous regions, seized power in 2014, toppling the UN-recognized government. Since then, Yemen has been plunged into a devastating civil war, with a Saudi-led military campaign failing to dislodge the Houthis from power. The conflict has resulted in widespread suffering, with Yemen experiencing one of the world's worst humanitarian crises. In late 2023, the Houthis, who possess a significant arsenal of drones and missiles, many of which are supplied by Iran, escalated their operations by targeting commercial and naval shipping in the Red Sea. These attacks, they claim, are in support of Palestinians in Gaza. However, many of the targeted vessels have no direct connection to Israel, leading to widespread condemnation of the Houthis' actions. The US-led maritime force stationed offshore has been unable to prevent these attacks, which have severely disrupted trade routes through the Suez Canal, a vital artery for global commerce. The revelation that weapons dealers in Yemen are using X to facilitate their trade adds another layer of complexity to an already dire situation. It raises serious questions about the responsibility of social media platforms in preventing the spread of violence and terrorism. The ease with which these dealers can operate on X, coupled with the platform’s apparent lack of oversight, suggests a troubling trend where digital spaces are being exploited by those who seek to profit from chaos and conflict. As Yemen continues to grapple with the consequences of a protracted civil war, the international community must confront the reality that social media platforms, once heralded as tools for connection and communication, are now being used to fuel violence and instability. The need for robust and effective regulation of these platforms has never been more urgent. Without decisive action, the situation in Yemen could serve as a grim precedent for how technology can be misused in conflict zones, with devastating consequences for peace and security. Credit: BBC 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, previously known as Twitter, has recently disclosed a comprehensive list of its investors due to a lawsuit brought by former employees. These employees are seeking the payment of arbitration fees incurred after Musk’s acquisition of the platform. X had initially argued that its investors should remain confidential as part of their "routine practice and policy." However, a federal judge in California ordered the unsealing of the list, revealing a diverse and sometimes surprising group of stakeholders. Among the nearly 100 owners of X are several well-known figures, both from the world of high finance and the social media ecosystem itself. High-profile investors like Fidelity have long been associated with X, particularly after reports suggested that the platform's value had dropped by 72% since Musk took control. This newly unsealed document confirms Fidelity's substantial involvement, with almost 30 separate entities linked to Fidelity holding stakes in X. The list also uncovers some lesser-known stakeholders who, until now, were not widely recognized as being connected to Musk's venture. For instance, the Pershing Square Foundation, led by billionaire investor Bill Ackman and his wife, Neri Oxman, is listed as one of the owners. Ackman, known for his vocal presence on social media, often uses X to engage in public debates with high-profile individuals like Mark Cuban and to voice his opinions on various issues, including those related to his alma mater, Harvard University. Another significant name on the list is Oracle founder Larry Ellison, who owns a stake in X through the Lawrence J. Ellison Revocable Trust. Despite Ellison’s substantial wealth and influence, he is not a frequent user of the platform. In fact, he has only posted on X twice—once in 2012 and again in 2023—despite having over 130,000 followers. Sean “Diddy” Combs, the American rapper and entrepreneur, also appears among the owners. His stake in X is tied to Sean Combs Capital, a company that aligns with his broader business ventures under the Combs Global umbrella. Over the years, Combs has launched multiple businesses, including the Sean Combs Foundation and Combs Investments, solidifying his status as a prominent figure in both entertainment and business. Musk's ambitious project has also caught the attention of royalty. HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud, a Saudi prince with a net worth close to $19 billion, holds a stake in X. Prince Alwaleed’s investments extend beyond social media, as he also owns shares in luxury hotels like the Four Seasons and the Savoy, as well as other technology companies such as Lyft. Interestingly, despite his public criticism of Musk’s leadership, Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey still retains shares in the platform through the Jack Dorsey Remainder LLC. Dorsey initially supported Musk's takeover of Twitter but later distanced himself from the platform’s direction, expressing his discontent on a rival social media site, Bluesky, where he remarked, "It all went south." In addition to these well-known figures, the unsealed documents also highlight a number of individual investors and organizations that have a stake in X. These include Danilo Kawasaki and Ross Gerber, leaders of the wealth and investment management firm Gerber Kawasaki, who are listed as both individual investors and representatives of their firm. Silicon Valley venture capital firms such as 8VC, Andreessen Horowitz, and Sequoia are also prominent stakeholders in the platform. Of course, the list would be incomplete without mention of Musk himself. The SpaceX founder is listed as a major stakeholder through the Elon Musk Revocable Trust. Musk acquired X for $44 billion in 2022, a move that has since been fraught with challenges, including the departure of key advertisers, significant layoffs, and widespread criticism of Musk’s strategic decisions. Despite the controversies surrounding Musk's management, the release of this list provides a rare glimpse into the diverse and influential group of individuals and entities that have backed his ambitious social media venture. As the platform continues to evolve under Musk's leadership, the roles and influence of these stakeholders may come under greater scrutiny, particularly as X navigates the complex landscape of digital media and communication in the coming years. The full list 8VC Opportunities Fund II, L.P. ADREM X LLC ADREM Y LLC Afshar Partners, LP Andrea Stroppa Andreessen Horowitz LSV Fund III, L.P. Anthem Ventures, LLC ARK Venture Private Holdings LLC BAMCO, Inc. Bandera Fund LLC Baron Opportunity Fund Baron Partners Fund Binance Capital Management Co., Ltd Brookfield Project X L.P.•CCM 2020 Investments LLC Cheng and Chen Family Trust CNK Fund IV, L.P. Danilo Kawasaki Dayton Family Enterprises, LLC Dayton Family Investments, LLC DFJ GROWTH IV, L.P. DFJ GROWTH IV PARALLEL FUND, LLC DFJ GROWTH X-I, L.P. Eden Relationship Capital L.P. Elon Musk as Trustee of the Elon Musk Revocable Trust dated July 22, 2003 FIAM Target Date Blue Chip Growth Commingled Pool By: Fidelity InstitutionalAsset Management Trust Company as Trustee Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Commingled Pool By: Fidelity Management TrustCompany, as Trustee Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Institutional Trust By its manager Fidelity InvestmentsCanada ULC Fidelity Canadian Growth Company Fund by its manager Fidelity InvestmentsCanada ULC Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios LLC: Fidelity U.S. Equity Central Fund -Communication Services Sub Fidelity Contrafund: Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund – Sub A Fidelity Contrafund: Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund – Sub B Fidelity Contrafund: Fidelity Contrafund•Fidelity Contrafund: Fidelity Contrafund K6 Fidelity Contrafund: Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund Fidelity Contrafund Commingled Pool By: Fidelity Management Trust Company,as Trustee Fidelity Destiny Portfolios: Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Fidelity Global Growth and Value Investment Trust – Sub A By its manager Fidelity Investments Canada Fidelity Global Innovators Investment Trust by its manager Fidelity InvestmentsCanada ULC Fidelity Growth Company Commingled Pool By: Fidelity Management TrustCompany, as Trustee Fidelity Insights Investment Trust By its manager Fidelity Investments CanadaULC Fidelity Mt. Vernon Street Trust: Fidelity Growth Company Fund Fidelity Mt. Vernon Street Trust : Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund Fidelity Mt. Vernon Street Trust: Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund Fidelity OTC Commingled Pool By: Fidelity Management Trust Company, as Trustee Fidelity Puritan Trust: Fidelity Puritan Fund – Equity Sub B Fidelity Puritan Trust: Puritan K6 Fund – Equity Subportfolio•Fidelity Securities Fund: Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Fidelity Securities Fund: Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund Fidelity Securities Fund: Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio Fidelity Securities Fund: Fidelity OTC Portfolio Fidelity Select Portfolios : Select Communication Services Portfolio•G64 Ventures LLC Gerber Kawasaki Inc. GFNCI LLC Gigafund 0.21, LP Glacier Ventures LLC Go Mav, LLC HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud IMG US, LLC Jack Dorsey Remainder LLC Jack Dorsey Tr Ua 12/08/2010 Jack Dorsey Revocable Trust Kingdom Holding Company Lawrence J. Ellison Revocable Trust Linda Ye and Robin Ren Family Foundation Litani Ventures•Luchi Fiduciaria SR POS. 365 Manhattan Venture Partners X LLC Mirae Asset Innovation X ONE, LLC Mirae Asset Project X Fund I, LP•Olivier Janssens Q Tetris Holding LLC Ross Gerber Santo Lira LLC SC CDA1 LLC SCGE Fund, L.P.•SCGGF III – U.S./India Management, L.P. SCHF (M) PV, L.P. Scott Nolan SC US/E Expansion Fund I Management, L.P. Sean Combs Capital, LLC Sequent (Schweiz) AG as Trustee of the Debala Trust Sequioa Capital Fund, L.P. Series N Dis, a series of Atreides Special Circumstances Fund, LLC Shahidi Tactic Group, LLC Steve Davis T. One Holdings LLC The Pershing Square Foundation TM33 Partner Holdings Tresser Blvd 402 LLC UnipolSai S.P.A. Variable Insurance Products Fund II: VIP Contrafund Portfolio – Subportfolio A VYC25 Limited X Holdings I Investment, LLC Credit: Fortune 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

The Department for Education (DfE) has recently introduced a significant change in its guidance on pupil absences, particularly concerning children from traveller families. In the latest update, the term "mobile children" has replaced previous references to traveller pupils, a move aimed at focusing on the mobility of the child rather than their ethnicity. This change is part of the DfE's ongoing efforts to clarify the application of exemptions related to school absences and ensure that these exemptions are applied equitably. The new guidance, which came into effect earlier this week, has removed all references to gipsy, Roma, or traveller families. Instead, it introduces the term "mobile children" to describe pupils "of no fixed abode" who are absent from school because their parents are "travelling in the course of their trade or business." The Telegraph reports that this rebranding is intended to encompass not only children from traveller families but also other children whose families might travel for occupational reasons. Under the current legal framework, children from traveller families have long been recognized as having legitimate reasons for missing school. These absences are categorized under the "T code" in school registers, which signifies an authorized absence due to parental travel for work. This code is part of a broader system that includes other types of authorized absences, such as the "H code" for approved holidays, "M" for medical absences, and "R" for religious observances. The previous guidance, which had been in place since May 2022, specified that the "T code" was applicable to various groups under the umbrella term "traveller." This included "Roma, English and Welsh gipsies, Irish and Scottish travellers, showmen (fairground people), circus people, bargees (occupational boat dwellers), and new travellers." However, the updated guidance no longer makes any mention of these specific demographics, instead broadening the "T code" to apply to any situation where a "parent is travelling for occupational purposes." Baroness Smith of Malvern, an education minister, has explained that the new term "mobile children" was introduced to make it clear that the exemption is related to the child's mobility rather than their ethnicity. This change aims to prevent any potential confusion or misapplication of the exemption, ensuring that it is based solely on the circumstances of the child's life rather than their ethnic background. Despite the DfE's rationale for the change, the rebranding has raised questions among advocacy groups. The Advisory Council for the Education of Romany and other Travellers has expressed concern, stating that the purpose of the new terminology is "unclear" given that the laws concerning school absence for traveller families have not been altered. This group has a history of campaigning against efforts to repeal specific sections of the Education Act 1996, which protect travelling parents from being prosecuted for school attendance offenses if their child misses school due to the family's nomadic lifestyle. The Advisory Council previously argued against a 2011 proposal by the former coalition government to eliminate this exemption, warning that such a move "would increase the difficulties faced by nomadic families and would not improve attendance." The group's concerns highlight the ongoing tension between ensuring educational access for all children and accommodating the unique circumstances of traveller families. Data from the DfE underscores the prevalence of school absences among traveller children. In the 2023-24 autumn term alone, nearly 79,000 absences were recorded using the "T code." Of these, approximately 55 percent were for gipsy Roma pupils and those identified as travellers of Irish heritage. An additional 43 percent of the absences were recorded for children classified as white British, white Irish, or of other white heritage, amounting to over 31,000 absences. The statistics also reveal that pupils of Irish traveller heritage had the highest overall absence rates last year, with an alarming 22.9 percent. This was followed closely by gipsy or Roma pupils, who had an absence rate of 18.2 percent. Furthermore, nearly three-quarters (72 percent) of Irish traveller pupils were classified as persistent absentees in the 2022-23 school year, meaning they missed at least 10 percent of the academic year. For gipsy or Roma pupils, the figure was 65 percent. The updated guidance also advises schools not to "unnecessarily ask for proof that the parent is travelling for occupational purposes" when applying the "T code" to mark a child's absence. Schools are instructed to request proof only when there is "genuine and reasonable doubt about the authenticity of the reason for absence given." This provision is likely an attempt to balance the need for accountability with respect for the circumstances of mobile children and their families. The challenges faced by traveller children in the education system extend beyond attendance. A 2020 study by The Traveller Movement revealed that one in five traveller pupils felt compelled to leave school due to bullying, and two-thirds of those surveyed reported feeling bullied by their teachers. These findings highlight the broader issues of discrimination and exclusion that traveller children often face within the school environment, which may contribute to their high rates of absence. The DfE has been approached for comment on the new guidance and the concerns raised by advocacy groups. However, the department's position appears to be that the changes are intended to provide clarity and fairness in the application of school absence exemptions. The rebranding of traveller pupils as "mobile children" reflects a broader trend within the education sector to focus on the circumstances of the child rather than their ethnic background, in an effort to ensure that all pupils receive equitable treatment. As the education system continues to evolve, it will be essential to monitor the impact of these changes on traveller children and their families. Ensuring that the needs of mobile children are met without compromising their access to education will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration between the DfE, schools, and advocacy groups. Only by addressing the root causes of absenteeism and providing adequate support can we hope to improve educational outcomes for all children, regardless of their background or lifestyle. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

In recent weeks, the question of when it is appropriate to allow teenagers to embark on their first parent-free adventure has sparked heated debate among parents, especially after TV presenter Kirstie Allsopp revealed that she allowed her 15-year-old son to go Interrailing across Europe with a friend. While some see such experiences as crucial for building independence and confidence, others worry about the risks involved in letting their children venture out into the world without adult supervision. Dan Gregson, a 49-year-old teacher, faced this dilemma when his sons, aged 18 and 15, asked to go on their first trip without adults. Gregson admits he felt "very worried" even when they simply wanted to visit a skatepark in central London, and trips abroad were out of the question until now. His eldest son, who is 18, is planning to travel to Barcelona with friends next month, a prospect that still makes Gregson uneasy. "I know he’s sensible, it’s just other people I worry about," he says. "I worry that someone around him will start an argument. I went to Spain when I was 16, but it feels like the world has changed. There’s more aggression in the air now." The debate about the appropriate age for parent-free holidays has been reignited by Allsopp's recent decision, which she defended on social media. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Allsopp shared, "My little boy has returned from 3 weeks inter-railing, he’ll be 16 on Wednesday so he went with a mate who’s already 16 due to hostel/travel restrictions, but they organised the whole thing; Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam, Berlin, Munich, Marseille, Toulouse, Barcelona & Madrid." She emphasized the importance of fostering independence in children, writing, "In this increasingly risk-averse world it’s vital that we find any ways we can to give our children the confidence that only comes from trusting them. If we’re afraid, our children will also be afraid. If we let go, they will fly." Gregson takes a more cautious approach, questioning why his children want to travel alone in the first place. He believes in gradually building up to such experiences to reduce anxiety for both the parents and the child. For him, 17 is the youngest age at which a child should be allowed to leave the country without an adult, with 18 being even better. He plans to enforce strict rules for his son, such as daily texts, something that is already part of their routine at home. However, not all parents share Gregson's cautious stance. Kate Row-Ham, a 48-year-old personal trainer from Brighton, allowed her eldest son to go to Newquay with six friends when he was just 15. "I think it all depends on the person and their level of maturity and how far they are going," she says. Row-Ham believes that a confident, streetwise teenager could be ready to travel independently as early as 13. Although she was nervous when her son first went away after his GCSEs, the availability of apps like Snapchat and Life360 made it easier for her to stay in touch. Since then, she has allowed her son to travel to Ibiza and Mallorca with friends, and she is now preparing to let her 15-year-old daughter go to Newquay with her mates next summer. Row-Ham offers her children practical advice for staying safe while traveling: "I’ll give her the same advice I give my son which is to keep her phone on, call me if you have any issues, never let anyone buy you drinks, and to never leave your wingman/woman. I also remind them how important it is to enjoy themselves and have a good time. It’s good to give kids confidence and let them know you trust them." Legally, children over the age of 12 can fly with parental consent, but there is no minimum age for traveling alone by train within the UK or on an Interrail pass in Europe. This leaves the decision of when to allow independent travel largely in the hands of parents. Psychologist Anna Mathur, who specializes in parenting and is the author of "How To Raise A Happier Mother," acknowledges that there is no definitive age at which it becomes appropriate for a child to travel alone. "It all comes down to the individual child and parent, and the relationship between them," Mathur explains. Mathur suggests that parents consider several factors when making this decision, including their child’s friendship group, how far away they will be traveling, and their child’s personality and life experiences. "If it were a teenager with a large group of friends who I didn’t know and who is quite immature and might not cope when those relationships come under pressure on holiday, I wouldn’t feel comfortable letting them go," she says. However, Mathur also encourages parents to examine their own anxieties and determine whether their fears are based on valid concerns or on past experiences. "Is it a valid fear or is it a projection of something that happened to you?" she asks. "It’s important not to let your own hang-ups stop your child from enjoying freedoms which they might actually deal well with." While ground rules are important, Mathur advises against making them too restrictive. "It has to be a collaborative agreement otherwise you’ll just get pushback," she warns. Some parents find ways to compromise, as Harriet Morley from Hampshire did when she allowed her 16-year-old daughter to go away with three friends to a house in Wales. Morley felt comfortable with the arrangement because she knew the owner of the house and there were people nearby who could keep an eye on the group. However, she admits that she might not extend the same freedom to her son when he reaches the same age. "My daughter is very sensible, and I knew that her and her friends would respect the house," Morley explains. "They’ve earned our trust to allow us to let them have this adventure." For parents who decide to say no to a post-exams trip, psychologist Mathur advises that they prepare for their teenager to be angry and upset. "Even if you explain to your teenager really clearly why they can’t go, they’ll probably still be angry and upset," she says. "But that’s OK – it’s important to hold those boundaries for your child. And to know that you’re not saying ‘no, never’ you’re saying ‘not yet’." Kate Row-Ham reflects on her own teenage holidays to Cornwall as "amazing experiences" and feels it would be a shame to deprive her children of similar opportunities. "They have to learn some life lessons themselves," she concludes. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Rachael Gunn, known by her stage name "Raygun," has recently signed with a talent agency, marking a new chapter in her unexpected rise to fame. Gunn, who gained attention during her breakdancing performance at the Paris Olympic Games, has been a subject of both media fascination and public scrutiny. Despite the mixed reactions to her Olympic appearance, Gunn's presence in the Australian media continues to grow. At 36, Gunn's journey has taken a surprising turn. She has been linked with a potential appearance on the popular reality show "I’m a Celebrity… Get me out of here!" and has officially signed with Born Bred Talent, an influencer marketing agency. With her Instagram following now at an impressive 197,000, Gunn has embraced her newfound notoriety by adding a contact from the agency to her social media bio. The old adage that "all publicity is good publicity" seems to apply here, as Gunn has received a flood of media attention both in Australia and internationally since her memorable Olympic performance. Her breakdancing routine, which included moves like "the sprinkler," a snake impression, and a kangaroo hop, left audiences both shocked and amused. Celebrities such as Adele, Jimmy Fallon, and DJ Fatboy Slim have all referenced Gunn since her Olympic appearance, with Fatboy Slim humorously remarking, "we would have given you 10 out of 10, Rachael," in a video that compared her moves to those in his iconic "Praise You" music video. Gunn remained silent in the immediate aftermath of her Olympic performance but eventually broke her silence with a social media post last week. She followed this up with a cameo appearance at the TV Week Logies Awards. However, some in the industry believe that Gunn may have missed an opportunity to fully capitalize on her sudden fame. A public relations expert expressed concern that Gunn may have waited too long to translate her widespread media coverage into lucrative deals. "If she was taking this seriously, she should have already done five international talk shows by now," the expert told Daily Mail Australia. The expert also noted that despite having some of the biggest stars in the world talking about her, Gunn's management has only managed to secure a pre-recorded message on the Logies. In her social media post, Gunn addressed her Olympic experience, insisting that she gave her all in the competition. She also called for an end to the harassment directed at her "family, friends, and the breaking community" in the wake of her performance. Despite the challenges, Gunn's journey appears to be far from over. Reports suggest that she has caught the attention of the producers of "I’m a Celebrity… Get me out of here!" The show, known for placing celebrities in a rugged campsite environment and subjecting them to a series of challenges and eliminations, seems to have identified Gunn as a potential contestant for its next season. This opportunity could prove to be a significant and profitable move for Gunn, who might need to act quickly if she wants to make the most of her rapid rise to fame. While her Olympic performance did not win over the judges—Gunn failed to win a single round in her three appearances in Paris—she did manage to win a new legion of fans with her self-deprecating humor and unique style. However, the judges and much of the world saw things differently, which only adds to the complexity of Gunn's public image. As Gunn navigates her newfound fame, the coming months will reveal whether she can turn her 15 minutes of fame into a lasting career. Her decision to join a talent agency and potentially appear on a major reality TV show suggests that she is serious about making the most of her moment in the spotlight. Whether or not she can sustain this momentum remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: Raygun's journey is far from ordinary, and the world is watching to see what she does next. Credit: NYP 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

In the ongoing Conservative leadership contest, Robert Jenrick has made it clear that he would be "delighted" to have Boris Johnson in his shadow cabinet if he were to win the race. Jenrick, the former immigration minister, believes that the Conservative Party needs to bring its best talent to the forefront if it hopes to become an effective Opposition and eventually regain power. Jenrick’s endorsement of a possible return for Johnson highlights his belief that the Conservatives must capitalize on the strengths of their most prominent figures. Despite Johnson’s controversial exit from Number 10 in July 2022, Jenrick sees the former prime minister as a valuable asset. Johnson was forced out after the Chris Pincher scandal triggered a wave of resignations within his government. Later, Johnson resigned as an MP for Uxbridge and South Ruislip after a Commons inquiry concluded that he had misled Parliament over the notorious partygate affair. When asked about the prospect of including Johnson in his top team, Jenrick expressed his openness to the idea. "I think what we need are the best people who are available in the Conservative family to be on the pitch, supporting us to be a strong Opposition, holding Keir Starmer to account for all of the failings that we already see, and ultimately winning the next general election," Jenrick told The Telegraph. He added that he would be "delighted" to have Johnson involved if the former prime minister wished to return to frontline politics. Boris Johnson, for his part, has consistently denied any wrongdoing in connection with the Downing Street parties. He has accused the Commons of conducting a "witch hunt" against him. Although Johnson briefly considered a return to politics when Liz Truss's government collapsed, he ultimately decided not to pursue it, recognizing that he might struggle to unify the party. Since stepping down, Johnson has been far from idle. He has amassed a significant fortune through speaking engagements and continues to write a column for the Daily Mail. Although he chose not to stand in the July general election, he has not ruled out a return to politics in the future, leaving the door open for another chapter in his political career. Jenrick’s leadership bid comes after he resigned from his role as Rishi Sunak's immigration minister last year. He now faces stiff competition from other high-profile Conservatives, including Kemi Badenoch, James Cleverly, Dame Priti Patel, Mel Stride, and Tom Tugendhat. The winner of this contest will be tasked with the monumental challenge of uniting the Conservative Party, which has been fractured by internal conflicts and struggles to regain public support following its worst general election defeat in history. A recent poll of 805 Tory party members conducted between August 2 and August 12 revealed James Cleverly as the most popular candidate, with 26% backing him. He is followed by Priti Patel with 20%, Kemi Badenoch with 14%, Tom Tugendhat with 11%, Robert Jenrick with 10%, and Mel Stride with 4%. However, previous surveys have produced different results, and a clear frontrunner has yet to emerge. As the leadership contest progresses, Tory MPs will vote to narrow down the field of candidates. Once only two candidates remain, the final decision will be made by the Tory membership, who will cast their votes to determine the next leader of the Conservative Party. The outcome of this contest will not only decide the party’s future leadership but also its strategy in opposing the Labour government led by Keir Starmer and its chances of reclaiming power in the next general election. Credit: Sky News 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

As Ukraine marks 33 years of independence on August 24, 2024, the occasion is shadowed by the grim reality of an ongoing war with Russia. This is the third consecutive Independence Day that Ukrainians have observed under the dark clouds of conflict, with the nation locked in an existential struggle against a determined aggressor. Despite immense sacrifices and remarkable resilience, Ukraine faces a formidable adversary that remains relentless in its pursuit to dismantle Ukrainian statehood. Mykola Bielieskov, a Research Fellow at the National Institute for Strategic Studies and Senior Analyst at the Ukrainian NGO "Come Back Alive," reflects on this dual milestone—the celebration of independence and the somber commemoration of 30 months of Russia's full-scale invasion. Despite suffering significant losses, estimated at 500,000, Russia continues to press forward with its objective of eradicating Ukraine as a sovereign state. However, instead of succumbing to what many anticipated would be a swift Russian victory, Ukraine has shown extraordinary courage and tactical innovation. Ukrainian forces have not only repelled Russian advances but have also conducted bold offensives, including a recent operation in Russia's Kursk region. The Ukrainian navy, military intelligence, and security services have secured the Black Sea, ensuring freedom of navigation while pioneering the use of unmanned surface vehicles in combat. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian Air Force has begun transitioning to F-16 fighter jets, an essential move that, alongside indigenous long-range firepower capabilities, has enabled Ukraine to strike Russian military installations and oil depots effectively. These achievements are even more impressive considering the delays and complications in receiving military support from the United States and Europe. Yet, despite these military successes, Ukraine has not yet achieved its primary strategic goal: forcing Russia to reassess its ability to win the war. Russian President Vladimir Putin remains confident in Russia's capacity to outlast Western support for Ukraine and to exploit any divisions within Ukrainian society. Bielieskov argues that this precarious situation calls for a well-resourced and comprehensive Western strategy that goes beyond the current ad hoc crisis management approach. Western nations must commit to providing Ukraine with the necessary military and technological advantages to shift the balance on the battlefield decisively. Moreover, Ukraine's integration into Euro-Atlantic institutions is essential for a lasting resolution to the conflict and to counter Russia's theory of victory. Such an investment by the West in Ukraine's future will ultimately prove worthwhile, as Ukraine has demonstrated its capability to deliver on its promises. Mariana Budjeryn, a Fellow at the Global Europe Program, emphasizes the extraordinary journey Ukraine has undertaken in its 33 years of independence. For Ukraine, these years have been marked by constant change, often driven by crises and upheavals as much as by periods of stability and growth. Despite the challenges of post-Soviet economic and political transitions, which gave rise to oligarchy and corruption, Ukraine has managed to cultivate a resilient civil society, maintain an independent press, and foster political plurality with regular transitions of power—an exception rather than the rule in the post-Soviet space. These achievements, Budjeryn notes, often came at the cost of instability, as they were forged in the crucible of mass protests, such as the 2004 Orange Revolution and the 2014 Revolution of Dignity. Democracy in Ukraine has been a messy and hard-fought process, but it reflects the values that Ukrainians hold dear: an open society governed by laws, respect for human rights, and a government accountable to its people. The widespread desire among Ukrainians for integration with Euro-Atlantic structures is a testament to the governance model they aspire to emulate. In contrast, Russia, another post-Soviet state, has taken a markedly different path. Under the autocratic rule of Vladimir Putin, Russia has become a neo-feudal hierarchy, where state power is unaccountable, and society is subjected to relentless propaganda by state-controlled media. This is the model of governance that few Ukrainians wish for their country. Instead, Ukraine is now engaged in an existential battle, defending its right to pursue a path different from Russia's, at a tremendous cost in lives and resources. As Ukraine continues to fight, Budjeryn urges the international community not to forget the remarkable progress Ukrainians have made in just 33 years. The determination and resilience of ordinary Ukrainians have brought about profound historical changes, and their struggle today is a continuation of that fight for a better future. Tetiana Khutor, Chairwoman of the Institute of Legislative Ideas, highlights the staggering costs of Ukraine's reconstruction, which a joint assessment in February 2024 estimated at $486 billion, with potential losses reaching up to a trillion. Currently, the financial burden falls on Western and Ukrainian taxpayers, while the aggressor state and its enablers evade responsibility. Khutor stresses the urgent need for consistent funding and calls for Western countries to hold those responsible for the war accountable. One critical step in this direction is using proceeds from frozen Russian assets as collateral for a $50 billion loan, a move that should be just the beginning. The ultimate goal is to leverage the full $300 billion in frozen assets as the primary source of compensation for the victims of Russian aggression. Anything less would be inadequate in making the aggressor pay for the devastation it has caused. Khutor also points to the complicity of international corporations that continue to operate in Russia, contributing approximately $20 billion annually in taxes to the Russian state and thus financing the ongoing atrocities. While 409 businesses have exited Russia, over 2,000 remain, undermining Western support for Ukraine. Forcing these companies to leave the Russian market or imposing a "Continued Operations Sanction Toll" could help offset the damages inflicted by the war. Additionally, Khutor suggests that investigations into sanction evasion across Europe and the United States, which generate billions in fines and confiscated assets, could provide a sustainable financial support source for Ukraine. By implementing these measures, the financial burden would be shifted onto Russia and its enablers, deterring future aggression, further isolating Russia economically, and ensuring that wars of aggression do not go unpunished. Dr. Iren Marinova from Colorado State University reflects on the seismic shifts in the EU’s security and defense landscape triggered by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. This invasion shattered the illusion of a peaceful continent under the protection of a normative power Europe and forced European leaders to reevaluate the EU's security needs in a rapidly changing geopolitical environment. It quickly became clear that Ukraine is an integral part of Europe’s future, and the EU has rallied around this notion over the past two years. However, the conflict has also exposed significant deficiencies in the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), particularly the requirement for unanimity voting, which often leads to stalemates when quick, decisive action is needed. The debate over the implementation of qualified majority voting (QMV) in CFSP has gained traction, with EU High Representative Josep Borrell identifying it as essential for the EU to function as a geopolitical player capable of presenting a unified position in times of crisis. The path to implementing QMV is fraught with challenges, as many member states view it as a threat to their national interests. A balance must be struck between sovereignty concerns and European unity, with the possibility of a "sovereignty safety net" that would reassure skeptical member states that their national interests would still be protected. Despite these challenges, EU leaders have made it clear that a future Europe without Ukraine is inconceivable. Nevertheless, the EU faces a difficult road ahead in terms of political will and policy reforms, with the CFSP being one policy area to watch closely as the region enters the third year of the full-scale invasion and moves closer to Ukrainian EU membership. Oleksandr Merezhko, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, emphasizes the existential threat Ukraine faces as it endures its "darkest hour." Putin's ultimate goal, Merezhko argues, is to restore the Soviet empire by depriving Ukrainians of their statehood and national identity through a full-scale imperialist war. This war is not just a conflict between two states; it is enabled by a coalition of aggressive totalitarian regimes, including Russia, Belarus, Iran, and North Korea. For Ukraine to survive, Merezhko insists, solidarity among the free democratic world and strong American leadership are crucial. The best security guarantee for Ukraine is its membership in NATO. Russia's narrative that it is waging war against Ukraine because of "NATO enlargement" is both contrary to international law and fundamentally illogical. The reality, as Merezhko sees it, is that Russia views its neighbors as either enemies or vassals, and these countries seek NATO membership not as an act of aggression but as a means of preserving their independence in the face of Russian aggression. To ensure that Russia no longer poses a threat to global order and security, Merezhko argues that Russia must undergo decolonization, demilitarization, and de-Putinization. Only through these processes can Europe and the world become safer. The recent decades have seen a global backsliding of democracy and the rise of authoritarianism, and Merezhko believes that a decisive victory for democratic Ukraine over totalitarian Russia is essential to reversing this trend. Such a victory would reinforce the principles of freedom over tyranny and international law over might, sending a clear message to potential aggressors that international crime does not pay. Mykhailo Minakov, a Senior Advisor at the Kennan Institute, reflects on the profound impact the war has had on Ukrainian studies and scholarly perspectives. In 2021, to mark the 30th anniversary of Ukrainian independence, the Kennan Institute published a scholarly history of contemporary Ukraine that analyzed the country's development in democratic politics, market economy, and other areas. At that time, despite ongoing conflicts in the Donbas, Ukraine was viewed through a lens of peaceful progress and a hopeful future. However, three years later, the war has fundamentally changed how Ukrainian history and development are understood. The conflict has brought about a shift in priorities and perspectives, with Ukrainian studies now focused on issues of survival, resilience, and the existential struggle for national identity and sovereignty. The war has also fostered a deeper appreciation of Ukraine's place in global history, as the nation's fight against Russian aggression has come to symbolize a broader struggle for democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. As Ukraine continues to endure the hardships of war, its people remain steadfast in their commitment to defending their independence and sovereignty. The 33rd anniversary of Ukraine's independence is a testament to the resilience and determination of a nation that refuses to be subdued. As the world watches, the outcome of this conflict will not only shape the future of Ukraine but also have far-reaching implications for the global order and the principles that underpin it. Credit: Wilson Center 2024-08-24 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Kamala Harris took the stage on Thursday night to formally accept the Democratic presidential nomination, marking a historic moment as the first woman of color to achieve such a milestone. Her speech, while hitting all the critical notes her campaign aimed to cover, was largely marked by its lack of groundbreaking rhetoric and its adherence to established themes. For approximately 45 minutes, Harris shared her personal background, her vision for the future, and her stance on key issues, offering a glimpse into what her leadership would look like if she were to win the White House. One of the primary objectives of Harris’s speech was to connect with voters by highlighting her middle-class roots. While many Americans are familiar with who she is, fewer know the details of her upbringing and the values that shaped her. Harris took the opportunity to recount her mother’s journey as an immigrant from India and shared how her parents met and eventually divorced. She emphasized her childhood in a working-class neighborhood in Oakland, California, painting a picture of a modest but fulfilling upbringing. “The middle class is where I come from,” Harris stated, reflecting on the discipline and frugality instilled by her mother. “My mother kept a strict budget. We lived within our means. Yet, we wanted for little. And she expected us to make the most of the opportunities that were available to us.” Harris also touched on her decision to pursue a career in law, framing it as a natural progression from her early days in the courtroom to her role as a public servant. “My entire career, I have only had one client,” she said. “The people.” While Harris outlined her personal story, she also attempted to present a vision for America’s future. She called for unity and a move beyond the “bitterness, cynicism and divisive battles” that have come to define modern American politics. However, the speech provided few concrete details about how this vision would be realized. Vague calls for unity and a new path forward are common in political speeches, but Harris’s remarks did little to differentiate her policy proposals from those of past candidates. When she did address specific issues, she did so in broad terms, mentioning a focus on lowering the costs of “everyday needs” such as healthcare, housing, and groceries. She also highlighted the importance of abortion rights, framing the issue as essential to preserving individual freedom—a theme that has been recurrent throughout the Democratic convention. Despite these mentions, Harris positioned herself as a center-left moderate, aligning closely with the policies of her predecessor and current boss, Joe Biden. “Everywhere I go, in everyone I meet, I see a nation ready to move forward,” she said. “Ready for the next step, in the incredible journey that is America.” Yet, the specifics of that next step remain undefined. In addressing foreign policy, Harris devoted particular attention to the ongoing Gaza war, a topic that has drawn significant controversy. Pro-Palestinian protesters outside the convention underscored the contentious nature of this issue. In her speech, Harris reiterated the Biden administration’s stance, pledging to work around the clock to secure a hostage deal and ceasefire. “President Biden and I are working around the clock,” she said, “because now is the time to get a hostage deal and ceasefire done.” Harris also reaffirmed her commitment to ensuring that Israel has the means to defend itself, while acknowledging the suffering of Palestinians. “The scale of their suffering is heartbreaking,” she noted, though her comments were unlikely to appease the protesters outside. For them, Harris’s speech may have reinforced the belief that her presidency would represent a continuation of Biden’s policies on the Gaza conflict. Finally, Harris did not shy away from addressing the threat posed by her Republican opponent, Donald Trump. Echoing the sentiments of former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama, who had criticized Trump earlier in the week, Harris described Trump as an “unserious man” whose return to the White House would have “extremely serious” consequences. She referenced the January 6th attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters and mentioned his criminal convictions. Harris also took aim at the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 blueprint, a plan for a future Republican presidency that Trump has disavowed but which was drafted by his advisers. According to Harris, the plan seeks to “pull our country back into the past,” a contrast that she used to draw a clear line between the future she envisions and the one Trump represents. This theme of the future versus the past has been central to Harris’s campaign, allowing her to distinguish herself not only from Trump but also from the less popular aspects of Biden’s presidency. In conclusion, Kamala Harris’s convention speech was a blend of personal storytelling and political messaging. While it succeeded in presenting her as a relatable figure with a compelling personal history, it fell short in offering detailed policy proposals or bold new ideas. Harris’s rhetoric was largely in line with the broader Democratic agenda, leaving little room for surprise or innovation. As the campaign progresses, it remains to be seen whether this approach will resonate with voters or if they will seek more substantive answers to the challenges facing the nation. Credit: BBC 2024-08-23 Get the ASEAN NOW daily NEWSLETTER - Click HERE to subscribe

Mutiple posts containg false claims removed from the same poster along with a misquoted post.

Taylor Swift recently opened up about the emotions she experienced following the cancellation of her Vienna concerts earlier this month due to a foiled terrorist plot. In a heartfelt post shared on Instagram, the global pop sensation expressed the profound impact the situation had on her, admitting that the incident filled her with fear and a deep sense of guilt, even as she found solace in the support of her fans. Swift had been scheduled to perform at Vienna’s Ernst Happel Stadium from August 8 to 10 as part of her highly anticipated Eras Tour, which has drawn massive crowds worldwide. The shows were expected to attract around 170,000 fans, eager to see the superstar live. However, just a day before the first performance, Austrian authorities announced that they had thwarted a terrorist attack aimed at the concert, forcing the cancellation of all three shows. The news was met with shock and disappointment by fans, but Swift remained silent on the matter for nearly two weeks. It wasn’t until after her final European tour date in London’s Wembley Stadium that she felt safe enough to publicly address the situation. "Having our Vienna shows cancelled was devastating," Swift shared in her Instagram post, reflecting on the emotional toll the cancellation took on her. "The reason for the cancellations filled me with a new sense of fear, and a tremendous amount of guilt because so many people had planned on coming to those shows." The decision to cancel the shows was not taken lightly. Barracuda Music, the event organizer, stated that they had "no choice but to cancel" in the interest of "everyone’s safety." The message was echoed by Swift’s team, who reassured fans that their tickets would be refunded. Despite the frustration and sadness of the moment, Swift noted that she was heartened by the outpouring of love and unity from her fans in the aftermath. "In cases like this one, ‘silence’ is actually showing restraint, and waiting to express yourself at a time when it’s right to," Swift explained, addressing her delay in speaking out. She emphasized that her primary concern during the ordeal was the safety of her fans and team. "My priority was finishing our European tour safely, and it is with great relief that I can say we did that." Details of the foiled plot revealed a chilling scheme, uncovered thanks to an alert from the U.S. intelligence community. Austrian officials disclosed that the main suspect, a 19-year-old Austrian national with North Macedonian roots, had confessed to planning an attack using knives and explosives. Authorities found radical Islamist propaganda from groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda on the suspect’s devices, along with bomb-making materials in his possession. A second suspect, a 17-year-old with Turkish and Croatian roots, was also implicated, having been arrested near the stadium where he had been employed by a company providing services at the concert. Both suspects had connections to terrorist material, and a third teenager was later arrested in connection with the plot. The situation brought to light Swift’s longstanding concerns about security at her concerts, fears that were exacerbated by previous attacks on music events, such as the Manchester Arena bombing and the Las Vegas concert shooting. In a 2019 interview with Elle magazine, Swift admitted that these tragedies had made her "completely terrified" to go on tour, knowing the challenges of ensuring the safety of millions of fans over an extended period. Her worries were so severe that she even began carrying military-grade bandage dressings designed for traumatic wounds. Swift’s father, Scott Swift, shared these concerns, as documented in her 2020 Netflix documentary "Miss Americana." In the film, he expressed his fear for her safety, particularly as she became more outspoken politically. Swift, however, was resolute in her decision to use her platform, despite the risks involved. In her recent Instagram post, Swift extended her gratitude to the authorities who worked tirelessly to protect her and her fans, ensuring that her European tour could conclude without further incident. "My team and I worked hand in hand with stadium staff and British authorities every day in pursuit of that goal, and I want to thank them for everything they did for us," she wrote. The Eras Tour has been a monumental success, with Swift making history as the first solo performer to sell out London’s Wembley Stadium eight times in a single tour. Performing to crowds of 92,000 each night, Swift praised her fans for the joy and energy they brought to the shows, which helped her regain a sense of "carefree calm" despite the underlying tensions. "To the fans who have seen us this summer, you’ll always have the most sparkling place in my memories," Swift concluded. "You were a dream to perform for, dance with, and share those magical moments with." As Swift looks back on the challenges and triumphs of her European tour, her reflections serve as a poignant reminder of the complexities artists face in an era where the threat of violence looms large, even in spaces meant for celebration and joy. Credit: NBC News 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

During a week intended to celebrate the successes of the Democratic Party, Democrats sought to confront and reframe one of their most significant political vulnerabilities: immigration. At the Democratic National Convention (DNC), speakers attempted to reverse the narrative on Republican criticisms of the Biden administration’s immigration record, commending the administration’s efforts and portraying Vice President Kamala Harris as "tough as nails" on the issue. Republican leaders, including former President Donald Trump, have consistently focused their attacks on the Biden administration's handling of the border. They have particularly targeted Vice President Harris, labeling her as a "failed border czar" due to her role in managing the immigration crisis. While the Biden administration did witness record numbers of migrant detentions at the border, recent data shows that the number of unlawful crossings has decreased for five consecutive months. Democrats have attributed this decline to the administration’s recent actions to curb illegal immigration, including an executive order signed by President Joe Biden in June that empowers U.S. immigration officials to deport migrants without processing their asylum claims. A recent poll conducted by CBS, the BBC’s U.S. partner, revealed that 48% of likely voters believe that border crossings will increase if Kamala Harris becomes president. In contrast, a significant 72% of respondents said they believe crossings would decrease under a Trump administration. This issue took center stage at the DNC, where several speakers defended Harris's record and criticized Trump for obstructing a bipartisan border security deal that failed to pass in Congress earlier this year. “Let’s be clear, the border is broken,” stated New York Congressman Tom Suozzi, who has been a vocal advocate for stricter border security and more rigorous asylum laws. Suozzi’s remarks echoed a sentiment often expressed by Republicans who have criticized Biden's immigration policies. His comments, along with those of other Democrats, indicated a shift in the party's messaging toward a tougher stance on immigration—an issue historically seen as a political weakness for them. Suozzi further praised Harris, stating that she "joyfully accepts the challenge to work across party lines, to secure our border, to treat people like human beings." The Trump campaign has relentlessly attacked Harris for her role in shaping the administration’s immigration policy, branding her as an ineffective "border czar." As Vice President, one of Harris’s initial diplomatic assignments was to address the economic conditions in Central America that were driving a surge of migrants to the U.S.-Mexico border. Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy, who led the Democratic efforts to negotiate the failed border security measure in Congress, lauded Harris as being "tough as nails" on illegal immigration. He refuted Republican accusations that Harris had "opened the border" to unchecked migration. "Kamala Harris knows we can be a nation of immigrants and immigration laws," Murphy said. "That's why, when she's president, she will bring that border bill back, and she'll pass it." Murphy placed the blame for the country’s immigration issues squarely on Trump, accusing him of sabotaging the border security bill to maintain his political leverage. "Trump killed that bill because he knew if we fixed the border, he'd lose his ability to divide us, his ability to fan the flames of fear about people who come from different places," Murphy asserted. His sentiments were echoed by California Representative Pete Aguilar, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, who emphasized that voters should not have to "choose between a secure border and building an America for all." Aguilar added, "Under President Harris, we can and will do both." The DNC also showcased a video that highlighted the stricter border policies proposed in the failed bill, which would have provided funding for new border agents and technologies aimed at combating fentanyl trafficking. However, on the convention floor, some delegates expressed skepticism about the importance of immigration as an electoral issue, suggesting that many voters are more concerned with day-to-day challenges, despite polling data consistently indicating that immigration remains a top concern for many Americans. "Immigration is certainly an important issue," said Julie Johnson, a Texas delegate, state representative, and candidate for the House of Representatives in Washington. "But other people’s immigration does not affect whether they can go see a doctor, afford a home, or whether they have a good-paying job." Others were more cautious in their assessment. Illinois Democratic Representative Jonathan Jackson, the son of famed civil rights activist Jesse Jackson, told the BBC that while progress has been made, there is still much work to be done. He expressed hope that Harris would take immediate action on immigration if she were to win the presidency. "We’re going to have to deal with these migrant issues," Jackson stated, noting that economically depressed communities of color often bear the brunt of migrant influxes. "People don’t like to leave their dwellings without clothes or water or cash. But if the conditions are unbearable, they have to leave. I think she has to deal with [it on] day one," he added. In Chicago, a city that has received tens of thousands of migrants over the last two years, residents voiced mixed feelings. While many expressed sympathy for the migrants, there were also concerns about the strain on local resources. Naaman Martin, an elderly Chicago resident who plans to vote for Harris, acknowledged the government’s efforts to support migrants, saying, "They [the government] provided food, they provided housing, provided clothing. But for the homeless, they claim they can’t do nothing. It is what it is. It is not a voting issue for me." Alexandra Willis, a 29-year-old store owner and Harris supporter, shared her perspective, expressing empathy for the migrants while also lamenting the lack of legal pathways for them. "They made it all the way here from another country," she said. "They’re very talented. I’d hire them, but legally I can’t." For the migrants themselves, the ongoing political debate over immigration has been a source of frustration. As the DNC unfolded, several dozen predominantly Venezuelan migrants gathered at a shelter just a few miles away, waiting for volunteers to distribute donated snacks. Although they were only vaguely aware of the convention taking place, they were acutely familiar with the debates surrounding immigration, the border, and the portrayal of "migrant crime" in U.S. politics. Yelitza, a Venezuelan mother of four who fled her country after one of her sons was killed during a protest, expressed her frustration with the way migrants are often demonized by politicians. "The trip was extremely hard. The jungle. Criminals in Mexico. Cartel members wanted to rape my niece. I did the trip with four little kids," she said. "We’re not here because we like it, or because I want to. Everyone needs to understand that. My country is in a disastrous situation. We only came here to give our children a future." Credit: BBC 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has made a resolute commitment to intensify the UK's efforts against illegal immigration, pledging to detain more illegal migrants and execute a record number of deportations. This initiative marks a significant shift in the government’s approach, as Cooper aims to expand immigration detention centres to facilitate the removal of over 14,500 illegal migrants within the next six months. This ambitious target surpasses the removal rates seen since Theresa May’s tenure as prime minister in 2018. As part of this intensified effort, nearly 300 additional spaces will be created at two controversial immigration removal centres, where illegal migrants and foreign criminals are held prior to their deportation. The Home Secretary has already redeployed some 300 Home Office caseworkers since the election, specifically to track down, detain, and return illegal migrants. Moreover, up to 100 new specialist intelligence and investigations officers are being recruited to the National Crime Agency (NCA). These officers will collaborate closely with European agencies to target and dismantle people-smuggling gangs. The announcement of these measures on Wednesday is perceived as a strategic response to criticism regarding the government’s decision to discontinue the Rwanda deportation scheme. The scheme's termination had raised concerns that the UK lacked a deterrent against the increasing number of small boat crossings. However, Labour sources claim that their ongoing efforts to curb Channel crossings have already yielded positive results, with fewer migrants reaching British shores in small boats in the six weeks since the election compared to the same period in 2022 and 2021. A senior party source credited this reduction to the successful disruption of people-smuggling gangs' supply lines for boats, more aggressive tactics by French police on the beaches, and enhanced cooperation with European law enforcement agencies. Yvette Cooper stated, “We are taking strong and clear steps to boost our border security and ensure the rules are respected and enforced. Our new Border Security Command is already gearing up, with new staff being urgently recruited and additional staff already stationed across Europe. They will work with European enforcement agencies to find every route into smashing the criminal smuggling gangs organizing dangerous boat crossings which undermine our border security and put lives at risk. And by increasing enforcement capabilities and returns, we will establish a system that is better controlled and managed, in place of the chaos that has blighted the system for far too long.” The Home Office has confirmed that the additional 290 detention spaces will be created at the immigration removal centres in Campsfield, Kidlington, Oxon, and Haslar in Gosport, Hants. This expansion is intended to support the higher pace of removals. Officials are also exploring options for further increases in detention capacity, which currently stands at 2,300 spaces. These centres were reopened by the Conservative government despite local opposition and accusations that the practice of detention was “immoral.” Left-wing Labour MPs, including John McDonnell, the former shadow chancellor, and Diane Abbott, the former shadow home secretary, have signed a Commons motion condemning the “inhumane” detention of migrants at these facilities. Nevertheless, the Home Office asserted that Yvette Cooper is resolute in her determination to expand detention space to facilitate a “major increase in returns and enforcement of immigration and asylum rules.” Her goal is to achieve the highest rate of removals over the next six months, exceeding the two previous six-month highs of 13,410 in 2018 and 14,389 last year. The Home Office has reported that nine flights have already returned migrants since Labour assumed power, including the largest-ever chartered removal flight of 200 illegal migrants. Additionally, new returns agreements have been established with several countries, including Vietnam, which has seen the largest increase in Channel migrants, as well as Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Serbia, and Georgia. These agreements follow the fast-track removal deal previously struck with Albania. The Home Secretary has yet to appoint the new head of the Home Office’s Border Security Command, which will integrate officers from the NCA, Border Force, and MI5 to combat people-smuggling gangs. The first tranche of 100 new NCA officers, announced on Wednesday, represents the initial phase of a broader recruitment drive aiming to enlist up to 1,000 officers. Hundreds of these officers will be stationed across Europe to collaborate with Europol and other agencies in dismantling people-smuggling operations at their source. This initiative is being funded by approximately £75 million saved from the cancellation of the Rwanda deportation scheme in its first year. According to Labour, the number of migrants crossing the Channel since the election, totaling 5,720, is 14 percent lower than the same period last year, which saw 6,524 crossings. It is also more than 47 percent lower than the same period in 2022, when 8,444 migrants made the crossing. The Home Office has also pledged to intensify its crackdown on companies employing illegal migrants, with fines of up to £60,000 per worker, criminal prosecutions carrying maximum penalties of five-year jail sentences, and business closure orders. However, James Cleverly, the shadow home secretary, has voiced criticism of these measures. “While more NCA resources and detention capacity are welcome, this is not nearly ambitious enough. Paired with their moves to cancel our deterrent, give an effective amnesty to thousands of illegal migrants, and failure to hire a head of their phantom border command, it doesn’t scratch the surface. It is time Labour offered a credible solution that will cut immigration and stop the boats,” Cleverly remarked, underscoring the ongoing political debate surrounding the UK’s approach to immigration and border control. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The Church of England, a cornerstone of British religious life for centuries, is undergoing a subtle yet significant transformation in how it communicates and identifies new worshipping communities. A recent report suggests that the word "church" is being increasingly replaced with terms that are perceived to be more relevant and modern, such as "community" and "worship." This change, while seemingly minor, reflects deeper currents within the Anglican Church as it seeks to navigate the complexities of faith in a contemporary context. The Centre for Church Planting Theology and Research conducted an insightful study into the language used by 11 dioceses to describe new worshipping communities. Traditionally, the establishment of a new group within the Church has been referred to as a "church plant." However, the report reveals that although 900 new churches have been initiated by these dioceses in the last decade, none of them have used the term "church plant" as their primary descriptor. Instead, there is a marked preference for language that emphasizes "worship," "congregation," and most notably, "community." Rev Dr. Will Foulger, the vicar of St Nicholas in Durham and the author of the report, observed that out of the 11 dioceses studied, six primarily used the term "worship" to describe their new projects, two used "congregation," and seven preferred "community." This shift in terminology suggests a deliberate move towards language that resonates more with modern sensibilities, potentially broadening the appeal of these new initiatives. However, this trend has not been without its critics. Dr Giles Fraser, the vicar of St Anne’s in Kew, expressed concern over what he sees as a "misplaced desire to be relevant and modern-sounding." In a candid critique published on UnHerd, Dr Fraser lamented, "It is as if the Church has given up on church. Not since Prince became Squiggle has there been such a daft revision." His remarks highlight the tension between embracing modernity and maintaining the rich traditions that have long defined the Church of England. Dr Fraser also warned that the adoption of these new forms of worship has been "ruinously expensive" for the Church, cautioning against the abandonment of traditional parish churches in the pursuit of modern relevance. The report further uncovered that 10 out of the 11 dioceses involved in the study employed the concept of "culture change" to describe the integration of these new initiatives within their diocesan framework. This suggests that the Church of England may be intentionally moving away from using the word "church" as part of a broader cultural rejuvenation. Dr Foulger posited that the term "church" might no longer be comprehensive enough to capture the essence of what these dioceses are trying to achieve. He suggested that the phrase "new things" might better reflect the innovative nature of these projects. A spokesman for the Church of England provided further context for this linguistic shift, explaining that one reason why the term "church" appears less frequently in descriptions of "new worshipping communities" is that these forms of worship often exist outside of traditional church buildings. This evolution is evident across the country, where new communities have emerged in diverse and sometimes unconventional settings. For instance, at St Barnabas in Ealing, a "Shh free" mass welcomes families with young children, allowing them to participate in worship without the usual expectations of silence. In east London, All Hallows Bow has introduced a "silent disco worship" within an existing church, attracting young adults to a new form of communal worship. Meanwhile, the Diocese of Worcester has embraced outdoor worship, with congregants in the Teme Valley South opting for countryside walks that include Bible readings and prayer rather than traditional church services. Despite these innovations, the Church of England maintains that these communities are as much a "church" as any other form of worship. "These communities often meet in existing church buildings, attracting additional worshippers alongside traditional congregations, but they are as much 'church' as any other form of worship," a Church of England spokesman stated. He added that, theologically, a church is defined as "a community of people who, together, live in relationship with God through Jesus Christ." This definition underscores the idea that the essence of a church lies in the communal pursuit of faith, regardless of the physical or linguistic form it takes. In his report, Dr Foulger acknowledged that this change in language is compelling the Church to "redefine what we think a church is in the Church of England." He also recognized that this shift has led to a sense of alienation among certain parts of the Church, particularly those for whom fidelity to traditional ecclesial forms and practices is central. This ongoing debate reflects the broader challenge faced by the Church of England as it seeks to balance tradition with innovation in a rapidly changing world. Financially, the Church of England has invested heavily in these new initiatives. Since 2014, the Church Commissioners have awarded £82.7 million to dioceses specifically for the purpose of starting new churches and religious communities. This investment is set to continue, with the Church announcing plans in 2021 to establish more than 10,000 new worshipping communities over the next decade. A Church of England spokesman defended this funding strategy, noting that "significant investment has supported parish renewals, front-line ministry roles, and children’s and youth workers across various church traditions." This commitment to funding both traditional and new forms of worship highlights the Church's dual approach to maintaining its historical roots while also adapting to contemporary needs. In conclusion, the Church of England's evolving language around the concept of "church" reflects a broader cultural shift within the institution. As the Church seeks to engage with modern society, it is experimenting with new forms of worship and community that challenge traditional notions of what it means to be a church. While this transformation is not without its critics, it also represents an opportunity for the Church to reach new audiences and remain a vital part of British spiritual life in the 21st century. The debate over the use of the word "church" is emblematic of the broader struggle to balance tradition and modernity in a rapidly changing world, a challenge that the Church of England will continue to navigate in the years to come. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a chilling case that has haunted Australia for decades, a cult member who brutally killed her two-year-old daughter over an inability to properly complete chores has been sentenced to nine years in prison. The tragic story of Tillie Craig, who vanished from a remote religious commune in 1987, has only recently come to light, leading to justice for a crime long buried by the secrecy of a cult. Tillie Craig disappeared from the Ministry of God farm in New South Wales (NSW) in 1987, igniting a desperate, decades-long search by her father, Gerard Stanhope, who had been told his daughter was adopted. The heartbreaking reality was far more sinister. Tillie had been beaten to death with a plastic pipe by her own mother, Ellen Rachel Craig, when she was just two years old. Her small body was then allegedly cremated by the cult’s leader, her ashes scattered across the commune, erasing nearly all traces of her existence. Ellen Craig, now 62, was charged with her daughter’s murder in 2022 after a tip-off to police finally brought the truth to light. She later pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of manslaughter. When sentencing Craig on Wednesday, Justice Natalie Adams of the NSW Supreme Court expressed the profound tragedy of the case, stating that to call Tillie’s death a tragedy would be "a gross understatement." Justice Adams emphasized the grave betrayal inherent in the act, noting that Tillie "died at the hands of someone whose role it was to protect her." The grim details of Tillie’s last moments were recounted in court, revealing a disturbing culture of discipline within the commune. According to the agreed facts, children at the Ministry of God farm were required to perform chores regardless of their age. Punishment for perceived failings was harsh, often involving a piece of black pipe. On July 7, 1987, Tillie had been sweeping when her mother, unhappy with the quality of the work, beat her to death. Craig, then 25 years old, later brought her lifeless daughter inside, uttering in horror, "She’s stopped breathing" and "Oh no, no she’s gone." The court heard that after the brutal beating, Craig laid Tillie in a bathtub and waited for the cult’s leader, known as Alexander Wilon or "Papa," to return. When he did, Wilon prayed for the resurrection of the little girl, a futile and macabre ritual. Wilon then allegedly cremated Tillie’s body and scattered her ashes, forbidding the other cult members from ever speaking of what had happened. This act of silencing, combined with the destruction of evidence, ensured that the truth remained hidden for more than three decades. Wilon was later charged with being an accessory to murder, along with separate charges related to sexual assault allegations. However, due to his terminal illness, he has been declared unfit to stand trial, escaping legal accountability for his role in Tillie’s death. Following Tillie’s murder, Ellen Craig was expelled from the cult by November 1987. She fled to her home country of New Zealand, where she lived under several aliases for more than 30 years. Her past finally caught up with her in 2021 when she was arrested and extradited to Australia to face justice for her crime. During her sentencing, a segment of a letter written by Craig was read aloud in court, offering a glimpse into her remorse. In the letter, Craig apologized for her actions, stating, "something happened" to her as a mother while living at the farm. She expressed deep regret, writing, "My actions were horrible, terrible, horrific. I will never forgive myself for what I have done." Craig also acknowledged her guilt and the need for accountability, adding that she wanted "justice" for her daughter and was "at peace" with her imprisonment. For Tillie’s father, Gerard Stanhope, the sentencing marked the end of a long, painful chapter of uncertainty and grief. In a victim impact statement read to the court, Stanhope described the torment of not knowing his daughter’s fate for so many years. "I spent years... waking up every day with the hope in my heart that I would find her, and going to bed devastated that I was unable to do so," he recalled. The devastating truth—that his daughter had been dead all along—only came to light more than 30 years later, when Craig was arrested. The court’s decision will see Ellen Craig eligible for parole after six years in custody, in November 2027. While the legal proceedings have concluded, the sorrow and horror of Tillie’s story remain, a stark reminder of the destructive power of cults and the unimaginable suffering they can inflict on the innocent. Credit: BBC 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Lancashire Police have euthanized an XL bully dog after it fatally attacked its owner, David Daintree, 53, in Accrington. The tragic incident occurred at a residence on Ashley Court, where police were called around 9:30 PM on Tuesday following reports of a dog attack. Upon arrival, officers found Mr. Daintree deceased and determined that the dog, still presenting a significant threat, needed to be destroyed to prevent further harm. Supt Marie Jackson expressed her condolences, stating, “This is a heartbreaking event, and our thoughts are with the victim’s family. We are thoroughly investigating the circumstances surrounding this incident and encourage anyone with relevant information to come forward.” Police have increased their presence in the area to conduct inquiries and address any concerns from the community. Specially trained officers are providing support to Mr. Daintree’s family during this difficult time. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A disturbing new report reveals that the Biden-Harris administration has lost track of more than 320,000 migrant children who crossed the U.S. border unaccompanied by parents. The Homeland Security Inspector General’s report, released on Monday, warns that these children, placed with "qualified sponsors" within the U.S., may now be at risk of sex trafficking, forced labor, and other forms of exploitation. As of May 2024, 291,000 of these children, who arrived in the U.S. as unaccompanied minors, were released without a scheduled immigration court date, making it nearly impossible to monitor their whereabouts. An additional 32,000 children, who were given hearing dates upon release by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), also failed to appear in court, as highlighted in the 14-page report covering the period from October 2018 to September 2023. Federal whistleblower Tara Rodas, who was initially recruited to assist the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with the surge of migrant children in 2021, expressed grave concerns about the situation. Rodas recounted her shock upon realizing that she was, in fact, placing these vulnerable children into the hands of traffickers and other dangerous individuals. "At the very beginning of the Biden administration, they stripped all the vetting out of the process," she stated, highlighting cases where sponsors, claiming to be relatives, were actually exploiting the children. In one particularly troubling case, Rodas encountered a 16-year-old girl whose sponsor falsely claimed to be her older brother. The girl appeared drugged, and her sponsor's social media posts suggested she was being exploited. Concerns are further heightened by reports that some non-family sponsors are hosting multiple migrant children, which Rodas describes as a major "red flag." In 2023 alone, 344 unaccompanied children were found living with non-family sponsors who were each responsible for at least three children. Dr. Jason Piccolo, a retired federal agent who previously exposed the government's release of children to potential criminals, described the situation as "deeply concerning." He called for immediate reforms, stating, "There needs to be an immediate standard operating procedure to track the status and whereabouts of every single unaccompanied migrant child across all involved agencies." The report also highlighted cases where children, released by the federal government, ended up working in exploitative conditions in slaughterhouses and factories. Rodas and other critics argue that a systemic failure within the government has allowed this situation to unfold. In one tragic instance, an MS-13 gang member, released into the U.S. as a minor, was accused of brutally raping and murdering Kayla Hamilton, a young autistic woman in Maryland, in July 2022. Hamilton's mother, Tammy Nobles, has blamed the federal government for failing to properly vet the alleged killer, noting that a simple check with El Salvadoran authorities would have revealed his gang affiliations. Nobles testified before Congress, criticizing HHS for its "operational neglect" and alleging that this neglect contributed to her daughter's death. She further condemned the agency for allowing the MS-13 member to live unsupervised with another illegal immigrant in a trailer park. Despite the alarming findings, the government watchdog report noted that only one of eight audited ICE offices made any attempts to locate the missing children. Rodas and others continue to raise the alarm, calling for urgent action to protect these vulnerable minors from further harm. Credit: NYP 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Colin Cowan, the brother of a Jewish man murdered during the brutal October 7 attacks by Hamas, has leveled serious accusations of anti-Semitism against the Scottish National Party (SNP) following a recent decision by the Scottish government to suspend meetings with Israeli diplomats. Cowan, whose brother, Bernard Cowan, was killed by Hamas militants at his home in Kibbutz Sufa in southern Israel, expressed profound disappointment and outrage over the SNP's actions. He asserted that there was "no doubt" in his mind that the suspension was driven by anti-Semitic motives. The Scottish government's announcement on Monday that ministers would halt all diplomatic talks with Israel unless certain demands were met has sparked significant controversy. Colin Cowan accused Scotland’s First Minister, Humza Yousaf, of exploiting his grieving mother for a "photo opportunity" during a memorial service for the October 7 victims, where Yousaf was photographed embracing Mrs. Cowan. Cowan described this gesture as an "act of Jew-washing," pointing to what he perceives as a "blatant double standard" in the SNP's diplomatic conduct, particularly in comparison to the treatment of Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Erdoğan's government has faced international criticism for its harsh crackdown on the Kurdish community and severe restrictions on judicial independence, freedom of speech, and women's rights in Turkey. Thousands of individuals have been prosecuted and sentenced for the crime of insulting the president. Despite these human rights concerns, Yousaf previously invited Erdoğan to Scotland, a move that has intensified Cowan's belief that the SNP's recent actions against Israel are rooted in anti-Semitism. Bernard Cowan was one of over 1,200 people killed in the surprise Hamas attack on October 7, which also saw around 250 hostages seized, according to Israeli officials. More than 100 hostages remain in captivity. In the aftermath of his brother's death, Colin Cowan has been vocal in his criticism of the SNP, particularly following the apology issued by Angus Robertson, Scotland's External Affairs Secretary, after he met with a senior Israeli diplomat earlier this month. Robertson was compelled to apologize after SNP MPs, MSPs, and party members expressed anger over the meeting, arguing that it undermined the party's condemnation of Israel’s actions in Gaza and its support for a separate Palestinian state. Some even called for Robertson's dismissal. In his apology, Robertson acknowledged that his decision to meet with Daniela Grudsky, Israel's deputy ambassador, was mistakenly interpreted by many as a normalization of relations between Scotland and Israel. He clarified that no further meetings with Israeli officials would occur "until such time as real progress has been made towards peace, unimpeded access to humanitarian assistance is provided, and Israel cooperates fully with its international obligations on the investigation of genocide and war crimes." Despite this, SNP ministers will continue to engage with Palestinian officials. First Minister John Swinney defended the decision, stating that Israel's conduct left "no further dialogue" possible. In an article published in The Herald, Colin Cowan criticized Yousaf's invitation to President Erdoğan during the COP28 summit in December, particularly given Erdoğan’s past statements labeling Israel as a "terror state" and Hamas as a "liberation group." Cowan also condemned the Scottish Government's decision to allocate £250,000 of taxpayers' money to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNWRA), an organization he claimed had "directly supported the massacre on October 7 which killed my brother." Cowan's grievances extend beyond these specific incidents, as he questions the SNP's broader stance towards Israel, asking, "What is so objectionable about the world’s only Jewish state that leads so many to criticize it above that of any other country? For me, as with many in Scotland’s Jewish communities, there is no doubt about the answer." He firmly believes that anti-Semitism is at the root of the SNP's actions and lamented that the issue was "the worst it's ever been" in Scotland during his lifetime. Cowan revealed that his nephew, Bernard's son, has even asked him if he would consider moving to Israel due to the growing "anti-Jew hatred" in Scotland. "That may seem absurd, that Scottish Jews would consider leaving Scotland for Israel amid safety fears, but I assure you that it’s a conversation taking place in Jewish communities across our country," he added. The Scottish Council of Jewish Communities (SCoJeC) also weighed in on the issue, emphasizing that the Scottish Government "cannot in conscience deny the right of the victims to prevent the promised repetition of the atrocities of Oct 7." SCoJeC stressed that if the Scottish Government aspires to contribute to a resolution of the long-running Israeli-Palestinian conflict and supports a two-state solution, it must engage with both parties. A Scottish Government spokesperson responded to Cowan’s criticisms by expressing the First Minister's deepest condolences for Cowan’s loss. The spokesperson added that Yousaf would be grateful for the opportunity to meet with Cowan and his family. The spokesperson reiterated the Scottish Government's condemnation of Hamas' attacks on October 7 and expressed support for an immediate ceasefire and a two-state solution where Israelis and Palestinians can live in peace. Additionally, they confirmed that Swinney had held talks with SCoJeC and assured that the Scottish Government takes issues of anti-Semitism "extremely seriously." Humza Yousaf himself also responded to the controversy, stating, "My thoughts continue to be with families who are suffering due to the horrific terror attack by Hamas on October 7th, including the Cowan family, and families in Gaza who have been devastated by Israel’s horrendous actions, resulting in tens of thousands of innocent people being killed." Yousaf defended his participation in the October memorial service, where he embraced Cowan's mother, saying, "I am proud of my lifelong campaigning against hatred in all of its forms, and believe that Islamophobia and anti-Semitism are two sides of the same coin." However, Yousaf stood by the Scottish Government's decision to suspend diplomatic relations with Israel, insisting that "there are not normal diplomatic relationships with the government of Israel until they comply with their international obligations and cease killing civilians with impunity." This stance has further fueled the debate over the SNP's approach to Israel and the underlying reasons for the recent diplomatic freeze. As tensions continue to rise, the accusations of anti-Semitism have added a complex and emotionally charged dimension to the already contentious issue of Scotland's foreign policy towards Israel. Credit: The Times 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In an unexpected moment during a rally in Asheboro, North Carolina, former President Donald Trump stepped out of a bulletproof enclosure set up by the Secret Service to personally attend to a supporter who had fallen ill due to the intense heat. The rally, which marked Trump's first outdoor event since the July 13 assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, featured heightened security measures, including a ballistics-glass panel at the podium and additional protective barriers flanking the former president's back and sides. The incident occurred mid-speech when Trump, 78, was interrupted by calls for medical assistance from the crowd. “What’s wrong?” Trump asked, directing his attention toward the disturbance. Upon realizing that a rally-goer required medical attention, Trump immediately requested assistance, saying, “A doctor, please,” and acknowledging the challenging conditions by noting, “It is very hot here.” As medical personnel moved to help a white-haired woman who had collapsed in the stands, Trump did something that surprised many—he left the safety of the bulletproof enclosure to offer the woman a comforting embrace. The moment was brief, but it was enough to prompt a swift response from the Secret Service, who quickly surrounded Trump as he moved toward the crowd, ensuring his protection as he broke protocol to connect with his supporter. Returning to the podium, Trump reflected on the dedication of his followers. “You know, they come two days, three days early, and it’s a lot. It’s a lot of stress,” he remarked, acknowledging the effort and devotion of those who attend his rallies. This rally was particularly significant given the recent assassination attempt, which had reportedly led the Secret Service to advise Trump against holding outdoor events. Despite the concerns, Trump’s affinity for open-air rallies remains strong, as they have become a hallmark of his presidential campaigns, drawing large crowds and allowing for a direct connection with his supporters. The event underscored the tension between ensuring the safety of a former president and maintaining the intimate, personal connection that Trump’s rallies are known for. As he continues to campaign, the balance between security and accessibility will likely remain a focal point for both Trump and his security team. Credit: NYP 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The U.S. Department of Justice has launched a comprehensive criminal investigation into Americans who have collaborated with Russia's state television networks, reflecting a concerted effort to thwart the Kremlin's attempts to influence the upcoming presidential election in November. This investigation, which underscores growing concern over foreign interference in U.S. elections, has led to significant actions, including FBI raids on the homes of individuals connected to Russian media. Earlier this month, FBI agents executed search warrants at the residences of two high-profile figures associated with Russian state television: Scott Ritter, a former United Nations weapons inspector and vocal critic of U.S. foreign policy, and Dimitri K. Simes, an adviser to former President Donald J. Trump's 2016 campaign. Although no charges have been filed against either man, the searches suggest that the investigation could soon yield criminal charges, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity. This investigation follows the Biden administration's official intelligence assessments, which indicate that Russia's state-run news organizations, including the global broadcaster RT, are collaborating with Russian intelligence agencies to influence elections worldwide. The Kremlin's efforts, which include disinformation campaigns targeting the November election between Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, have alarmed U.S. officials. For the third time, Russia's propaganda apparatus has aligned itself with Trump's candidacy, utilizing online news outlets and fake videos to undermine President Joe Biden and Vice President Harris. The investigation is particularly focused on potential violations of economic sanctions imposed on Russia following its invasion of Ukraine, as well as breaches of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), which mandates the disclosure of lobbying activities on behalf of foreign governments. The Department of Justice's actions are politically charged, echoing the contentious debates over Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election. Moreover, the investigation's focus on Americans working with state-run news organizations raises potential First Amendment concerns, particularly regarding the protection of free speech. On July 29, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a warning that Russia was exploiting both "witting and unwitting Americans" to disseminate narratives favorable to President Vladimir Putin's government. The statement highlighted that these individuals "post content on social media, write for various websites with overt and covert ties to the Russian government, and conduct other media efforts." However, the investigation is not targeting ordinary Americans who consume or share Russian state media content online; rather, it is concentrating on those who are intentionally spreading disinformation on behalf of Moscow. Scott Ritter, who has contributed writings to RT and other news organizations, described the hours-long search of his Delmar, New York, home on August 7 as an attempt to intimidate him for his political views on the United States, Russia, and the ongoing war in Ukraine. FBI agents and state police seized mobile phones, computers, and hard drives during the raid but did not arrest Ritter. "It's an absolute frontal assault on the Constitution of the United States," Ritter said in a phone interview, expressing his frustration and disbelief. The scope of the investigation remains unclear, as the Justice Department and other officials in Washington have declined to comment on its progress or future actions. However, the Biden administration's growing alarm over Russia's influence operations has led to an increased willingness to take decisive action. Last month, the Justice Department, in collaboration with Canadian and Dutch governments and Elon Musk's social media platform X, successfully dismantled a covert Russian campaign designed to sow discord in the United States and other countries. The operation resulted in the takedown of 968 inauthentic accounts that were operated using commercially available artificial intelligence tools. The FBI linked these accounts to Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) and RT, underscoring the deep connections between Russian state media and the Kremlin's intelligence apparatus. Russia's state television networks, which broadcast in English and other languages, serve as a global platform for Putin's views, often portraying the United States and its allies as imperialist powers bent on global domination. Ritter, who traveled to Russia and occupied parts of Ukraine in January, noted that the warrant to search his home referenced an investigation related to FARA. This federal law requires Americans engaged in lobbying or political activities on behalf of foreign governments to disclose their work. Dimitri K. Simes, a Soviet-born American citizen, is also under investigation for possible violations of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which provides the legal basis for imposing economic sanctions. On August 13, FBI agents raided a 132-acre estate near the Blue Ridge Mountains in Virginia that Simes and his wife had purchased in July 2021. Simes, 76, has been a prominent figure in American foreign policy circles since emigrating from the Soviet Union in 1973. He served as an informal adviser on Soviet affairs to President Richard Nixon and later became the head of a think tank now known as the Center for the National Interest. In 2016, Simes hosted a speech by Trump, then a presidential candidate, in which Trump called for improved relations with Russia. Simes also introduced Trump to the Russian ambassador at the time and passed on what he believed to be compromising information about former President Bill Clinton to Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, during the 2016 campaign. Although Simes was interviewed by special counsel Robert Mueller's team during the investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election, he was not accused of any wrongdoing. Simes stepped down from the Center for the National Interest in 2022 and has been in Russia since October of that year, according to an interview he gave on Sputnik, another Russian state television network. During the interview, Simes speculated that the FBI's search of his property was an attempt to silence anyone advocating for improved U.S.-Russia relations. He revealed that his bank accounts had been frozen, except for one used to deposit his Social Security checks, and expressed concern that the FBI had seized valuable paintings by Soviet and Russian avant-garde artists from his home. "It clearly is an attempt to intimidate, not only somebody from Russia, but just anyone who goes against official policies and particularly against the deep state," Simes said during the interview. Since 2017, the Department of Justice has required RT to register as a foreign agent under FARA, rather than as a news organization, reflecting the U.S. government's view of RT as an instrument of Russian state control. There is no established legal precedent that clearly defines whether journalists working for such organizations fall under the requirements of FARA. Ritter, in his interview, stated that he had been contributing articles to RT since 2020 and was compensated per article, earning between $150 and $300, which he described as the industry norm. He emphasized that the editorial control exerted by RT was no different from that of other news organizations, and he strongly defended his work as a journalist. However, Ritter's outspoken defense of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which began in 2022, has drawn significant scrutiny. He has frequently echoed Russia's narrative that blames the United States and NATO for the conflict, a position that has only deepened suspicions about his motivations and affiliations. "The only reason why I can believe that they’re doing this," Ritter said, "is if there’s some national security interest where they believe somehow I am actively conspiring with Russia against the interests of the United States, that I have become more than just a propagandist, that I become something more like, you know, a weapon of disinformation." As the investigation continues, the legal and political ramifications of targeting individuals associated with foreign state media will likely intensify the debate over election security, free speech, and the appropriate measures to counter foreign influence in American democracy. The outcome of this investigation could have far-reaching implications, not only for the individuals involved but also for the broader landscape of U.S. foreign policy and domestic political discourse. Credit: NYT 2024-08-23 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Troll post and personal attack removed. Please keep to the topic @beautifulthailand99 A reported misinformation post also removed

A post making false claims has been removed. From the landing page: "Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source." An off topic video has also been removed along with a trolling meme. The topic here is: The Democratic Convention and the Gaza Debate: Unity Under Threat

Divers searching the wreckage of a superyacht that sank off the coast of Sicily have found the bodies of five of the six missing passengers. The tragic discovery comes after days of intense search efforts following the sinking of the yacht, known as the Bayesian, on Monday. The yacht was carrying 22 people when it capsized and sank in freak weather conditions. The Italian Coastguard has not yet formally identified the bodies recovered from the wreck, but the search has focused on locating four Britons and two Americans who were aboard the yacht. Among those missing are Mike Lynch, the UK tech entrepreneur whose wife owns the Bayesian yacht, his daughter Hannah Lynch, Jonathan Bloomer, the chairman of Morgan Stanley Bank International, and his wife Judy Bloomer. The first two bodies were brought ashore at Porticello harbor on Wednesday afternoon, with two more bodies recovered later that evening before the search was paused as night fell. The search for the remaining missing passenger continues. The Bayesian sank in the early hours of Monday, about 700 meters off the coast of Sicily. It is believed that the vessel was struck by a waterspout—a tornado over the water—which caused it to capsize and sink to a depth of 50 meters (164 feet) on the seabed. The violent weather event caught the yacht and its passengers by surprise, leading to the tragic incident that has now claimed multiple lives. Throughout Wednesday, a steady stream of boats ferried divers to and from the search site as the recovery operation continued. The small quayside at Porticello was lined with emergency services personnel as the bodies of the missing were returned to shore. One body bag was seen being placed in the back of an ambulance before the sound of sirens filled the harbor as the vehicle, escorted by two police cars, departed from the port. Italian authorities have not yet identified the recovered bodies, despite media reports speculating on the identities of the victims. This delay is likely due to the ongoing search for the remaining passenger, as well as the legal requirement in Italy for the deceased to be formally identified by a family member or someone close to the victims before the deaths can be officially certified. Salvatore Cocina, the head of Sicily's civil protection agency, emphasized that while an investigation into the incident would take place, the immediate priority was to locate everyone who was on board the Bayesian vessel. The yacht, which was 56 meters long and flying a British flag, was carrying 10 crew members and 12 passengers when it sank. Of the 22 people on board, 15 survived, including a British mother who described holding her baby girl above the surface of the sea to save her from drowning. The first body to be recovered from the wreck was that of the yacht's chef, Recaldo Thomas, a Canadian-Antiguan national. His body was found on Monday, shortly after the incident. Gareth Williams, a friend of Mr. Thomas, spoke to the BBC, sharing that he had known the chef for 30 years as they had grown up together in Antigua, where Mr. Thomas lived during yachting’s off-season. The passengers aboard the Bayesian were guests of Mike Lynch, the founder of the software giant Autonomy. The group was reportedly on the yacht to celebrate Lynch's acquittal in a massive U.S. fraud case. In June, Lynch was acquitted of multiple fraud charges related to the $11 billion (£8.6 billion) sale of Autonomy to U.S. computing giant Hewlett-Packard in 2011. In addition to the recovery efforts, inspections of the yacht's internal hull were conducted on Wednesday morning. A team of four British inspectors from the Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) arrived in Sicily to assist with the investigation. The depth of the wreckage has posed significant challenges to the rescue teams, as the yacht is lying on its side at the bottom of the seabed, with its access points blocked by debris. Italian rescue services have reported that the team of specialist divers has been hampered by these difficult conditions. The wreck is located at a depth where ambient light is minimal, making the situation even more perilous for the divers. Professional diver Andy Goddard, speaking before the bodies were recovered, described the conditions as "pretty dark," with limited visibility and debris floating around, creating an environment akin to being in a washing machine. "It's really dangerous for the diver," he told BBC Radio 5 Live. As the search continues for the final missing passenger, the tragedy has cast a somber shadow over the region. The investigation into the cause of the accident is expected to take time, with authorities focusing on ensuring that all those affected by the disaster are accounted for. The loss of life has been deeply felt by those who knew the victims and by the wider community, as the full impact of this maritime tragedy becomes apparent. Credit: BBC 2024-08-22 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe