Dagnabbit

I would, I love the characteristics of a diesel engine.

Yes I have 3M crystaline on my car. CR70 all round and CR40 on the sunroof.
It may not be dark enough for some people. But I'm more concerned about being able to see at night than ultimate privacy. It does a good job at keeping the heat out.

 

I am a bit lost.

Is this thread about the idiots baring their <deleted> on a national religious monument? Or is it about Jingthing???

Sent from my SM-A720F using Tapatalk

The press are the most racist organizations on the planet - be they anti black, anti white or in this case desperately seeing the need to associate a dark skinned person with Britishness.

Meghan is not a descendant of Shakespeare or Churchill. Why they have the need to make an association where there is none beggars belief.

She polishes Harry's knob - that's all that matters. 

16 hours ago, gbswales said:

I still wonder why in the 21st century that we still consider parts of the human body to be disgusting or offensive - I also find it hard to understand why religion still exists, but that is a whole other issue.

So you think that if someone wants to expose their penis in front of some schoolchildren, that should be allowed?

Of course not - so there are boundaries.

One of those, is not climbing half way up a famous religious landmark and dropping your shorts for a 'fun' picture.

I certainly would have had a word with them if I'd been there with my kids. Absolutely no class that pair. No consideration for others whatsoever. Well - they do now of course, they are learning what 99% of humanity already knows - just the hard way.

Got off lightly, didn't the farang who was arrested in chiangmai for not wearing a shirt do 2 days in prison and receive a 5k fine.

Butt-Baring Tourists Charged With Indecency
By Chayanit Itthipongmaetee, Staff Reporter
 

  
BANGKOK — Butts. Everyone’s got one – but that doesn’t mean everyone wants to see them.
 
Dropping drawers to bare one’s bottom at famous tourist attractions may be a trend online – but Bangkok is having none of it. Two Americans who posed for photos of their bare backsides last week at Wat Arun and posted them online were tracked down and charged with indecency, police said Wednesday.
 
Full story:  http://www.khaosodenglish.com/news/crimecourtscalamity/crime-crime/2017/11/29/butt-baring-tourists-charged-indecency/
  -- [emoji767] Copyright Khaosod English 2017-11-29

14 hours ago, Jingthing said:

More average than butt ugly. Bless their dear hearts.

It's kind of a funny thing about butts. Someone can have an ugly face but a super hot butt and vice versa. I reckon the paper bag industry banks on that ... 

Amazing insights!

Who would have thought that a person could have some attractive bodyparts but not others?

I wonder if a woman could have nice tits but a bad face? It's never occurred to me before Jing made this statement of the bleedin obvious!

There's a proportion of gay men for whom being gay is the single only interesting thing about them. 

So their whole lives revolve around their gayness. It's not just their sexual preference - it's their entire life.

I suspect these 2 are of that ilk.

They are best ignored.  They are worse than vegans for boorishness...

Merkel should step down & they should have another election./

31 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

He was elected to do a job.  The voters can un-elect him if they're not satisfied with the job he's doing.  He can also be removed if he's broken any laws. 

 

In the meantime, he's got a job to do, given to him by his constituents, who should be the ones deciding whether his behavior merits being fired.  Not a PC media or a bunch of crusaders for all things pure and virtuous.

 

Agreed - otherwise every time the opposition (on either side) want to oust someone - they just have to find a few women to claim their bums got squeezed.

AKA - the end of democracy.

1 hour ago, selftaopath said:

The irredeemable Russian collaborator does not abide by rule of law - b/c in his mind he is above the law. He has been tarnishing the U.S. Constitution from the day he swore not to. But his enabler clan of power mongers don't care.... but I suspect they will. 

And in other news - how to spot a retard....

Liberal Federal court judges have overruled much of what Trump proposed.

It just delays it till the Supreme Court hears the case.

1 hour ago, overherebc said:

Don't think anyone is argueing that point.

All I can say is that I don't hero worship and talented or not talented people in the music world have absolutely no effect on my life. Good luck to them if they make millions.

All the concerts I went to were freebies and I honestly never bought a recording of anything by anyone. Copied a few though. ?

Very classy... so you've only ever stolen music.

How would you feel if you got to work and someone had cleaned all the toilets already and you couldn't earn anything that day?

Same thing.

3 hours ago, overherebc said:

So everyone who doesn't agree with your taste in music must be clueless. What a strange statement to make.

If Einstein disagreed with you on your musical taste or knowledge no doubt you would call him clueless as well.

Cohen never seemed to be great voclist but his music was good and I still enjoy listening to it. 

Anyone can sit and explain to me what I should listen to and why I should listen to it and when they are finished my answer will always be the same, I'll decide. In the words of Cat Stevens ' It's them they know, not me.'

'You' enjoy what you like and my only comment on that is 'happy for you that you like it.'

Not at all - but anyone who calls someone 'talentless' because it doesn't tickle their tasted buds is a retard.

I can recognize talent in a musician even if I don't like the music.

Go back a few posts and you'll see I'm having a wee laugh.
I don't take any music seriously, I either like it or I don't.
I certainly don't spend time checking on the backgrounds and life styles of the artists, how many hits they have had etc etc, can't think why anyone would.
If I like any piece of music I'll say I like it, if I don't like it I'll say, quess what? Yep, I don't like it.
Why should that be a problem? Does it mean if one artist records a song and has a 'hit' with it I should automatically like everything they do?

12 hours ago, sklmeeera said:

I dont care what he looks like but IMO he is not even remotely talented . I have been forced to list to him by my kids always putting that crap on the youtube channel . Drives me <deleted> nuts .

What would he have to do to be talented in your opinion? Write songs that you like?

Because he's a songwriter, singer, performer, award winner, MBE holder - certainly it seems that all this is indicative of talent.

If not - what specifically would he have to do in order to qualify as talented in your view?

On 11/18/2017 at 8:46 PM, overherebc said:

Only because people are stupid enough to spend their money buying his 'music.'

Let's be honest the only things that make successfull songs nowadays are the videos.

Stand these so called stars on a stage and get them to carry a song through without a loud group or half naked female backing singers/dancing girls to cover up their bad singing and it would probably be the last time anyone paid to see them.

Yet Ed Sheeran stood on stage last week on his own - just him and his guitar.

He utilizes a loop pedal - so as he goes, he actually records guitar riffs and vocals and loops them back as backing tracks for himself. He does it all live. 

So not only is he a great songwriter, a great singer - he's also an amazing performer.

You can see how he lays down the loops in this video -

You make some presumptions about crappy pop which cannot be applied to Ed - he's a really talented individual. 

The world will always be producing talented individuals - sure Freddie Mercury was very talented - but there have been many since...

It's been said, for 20 months, that Trump can do anything (Trump himself said; "I could shoot someone on 5th Avenue, and I wouldn't lose any fans") and his die-hard fans will still stand behind him.  Boon Mee's post backs that up.  
 
Trump can sexually assault over a dozen women, brag about it, and his fans have no problems with that.
 
It gets one to wonder; what could Trump do which would turn off his die-hard fans?  Rape Ivanka on the WH lawn?  Nuke Scandinavia?   

He died doing what he loved.  How many are that fortunate? 
 

 
He was not caught out or wrong footed, he was talking SOP :
 
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 809[890].ART.90 (20), makes it clear that military personnel need to obey the "lawful command of his superior officer," 891.ART.91 (2), the "lawful order of a warrant officer", 892.ART.92 (1) the "lawful general order", 892.ART.92 (2) "lawful order". In each case, military personnel have an obligation and a duty to only obey Lawful orders and indeed have an obligation to disobey Unlawful orders, including orders by the president that do not comply with the UCMJ. The moral and legal obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the Constitution and the UCMJ.
 
 
 
 
 

Yeah, laugh it up, it's all the fault of the 'Trump haters'. Apparently you haven't noticed that your precious President, the doofus in charge, has been lying through his teeth ever since he's been in office. I'm glad there still seems to be at least one sane person in the the chain of command, because the thought of tangerine 45 having his paws on the red button makes me sick to my stomach.

That 'general' needs to be fired.