Bkk Brian

You keep blaming murdoch muck spreading. It's not only in murdoch outlets. Are they all muck spreading?

About as serious as you were or perhaps it really did go straight over your head

Growing list of countries now questioning the warrants. International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant for Israeli officials is wrong, does not help solve problem: Greece The International Criminal Court’s (ICC) decision to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense chief Yaov Gallant is wrong and does not help to solve problems, Greece argued Tuesday. "These decisions do not help. We cannot equate a state that suffered a terrorist attack, in this case by Hamas, with nations that initiated attacks, such as Russia in Ukraine” https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/international-criminal-court-s-arrest-warrant-for-israeli-officials-is-wrong-does-not-help-solve-problem-greece/3405624

Not surprising you came up with that one.

No clarification needed, I can read, love this bit from your previous post. BBC haters hoping that this transitions from a nothing to something they can really froth about. Some of the journalists have already left the union concerned, they must have been frothing already eh. I wonder if they were Jewish? Does this outlet also belong to a Murdoch agenda? One BBC staff member told Jewish News that this “hypocritical and antisemitic” suggestion was a breach of the BBC’s commitment to impartial reporting, saying, “BBC journalists, who pride themselves on impartiality and who fought to keep their NUJ free of politics, are being encouraged to break the BBC’s editorial guidelines by supporting a political cause.” https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-831079

No the Telegraph is not only whining about a possible breach of the rules. You are just not reading it or the other links. Total ignorance to the facts.

Do they also have the same impartiality rules as the BBC?

They are already offended and some have already left the union, read the links and stop your ignorant lame attempts at shooting the messenger, this story is in numerous outlets and no....not syndicated.

He didn't say you did. He was explaining facts however, unlike you.

Is this also desperate reporting? BBC journalists resign from union over Palestinian colors directive https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/399889

So only report after the event, not on the concerns of the Jewish staff and others that disagree and the imminent breaking of impartiality rules "if" it goes ahead? Got it, wait for the jews to froth first........

Reporting on a backlash from Jewish staff at the BBC and the possible breaking of the BBC's impartially rules if it goes ahead. Why is it desperate? Are the other outlets that report it also desperate?

It affects the BBC staff and the BBC impartiality rules. The fact its not a direct BBC proposal has no bearing on the rules that are in place.

Once upon a time, not now unfortunately. New Report from former BBC Director Criticizes Coverage of Israel-Hamas Conflict https://aseannow.com/topic/1341711-new-report-from-former-bbc-director-criticizes-coverage-of-israel-hamas-conflict Jeremy Bowen Defends BBC Amid Allegations of Bias Over Israel-Hamas Coverage https://aseannow.com/topic/1338211-jeremy-bowen-defends-bbc-amid-allegations-of-bias-over-israel-hamas-coverage/ BBC Accused of Bias in Israel-Hamas Coverage: Over 1,500 Breaches of Guidelines https://aseannow.com/topic/1337643-bbc-accused-of-bias-in-israel-hamas-coverage-over-1500-breaches-of-guidelines/ BBC Chairman Calls For a Thorough Review of Israel-Hamas War Bias https://aseannow.com/topic/1338006-bbc-chairman-calls-for-a-thorough-review-of-israel-hamas-war-bias/

No that's you saying it. The law needs to be clear in the first place and currently the legalities of how they went about getting the warrants and whether they are even legal remain unclear. France says 'immunities apply' to Netanyahu regarding ICC arrest warrant In a statement, the foreign ministry said France would 'respect its international obligations' but added that the Israeli leader was covered by immunity rules that apply to states that are not a party to the ICC. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/11/27/france-says-immunities-apply-to-netanyahu-regarding-icc-arrest-warrant_6734304_4.html Italy says clarity needed on ICC arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant Italy said on Tuesday it was ready to respect its obligations concerning the International Criminal Court’s warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant, but that clarity was needed on how it would work in Netanyahu’s case. “We always apply the obligations but we have to understand what the obligations are,” Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani told a news conference on Tuesday, saying it was not clear whether high state officials enjoyed immunity from prosecution. https://www.timesofisrael.com/italy-says-clarity-needed-on-icc-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant/ And as it has every right to do in the circumstances in which these warrants were issued: Israel to appeal against ICC warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm273g1jm51o But you go ahead and hang em high, we all know where you stand already

As I said, totally irrelevant to the actual arrest warrants issued and what they contain and no I was spinning nothing, there is no jury in an ICC trial. That is the fact. The spin is you saying its a jury nonetheless.

No sparking outrage from any law abiding citizen. There is no excuse for targeting innocent school girls and seriously injuring them. Your excuses are vile and disgusting along with totally off topic.

No there are NOT well documented war crimes being committed. There may well be allegations however whatever you claim on alleged documented war crimes is totally irrelevant to the ICC arrest warrants that have been issued that do not contain those allegations. Perhaps do a little research and see what the actual charges are. Further, the ICC does not have a jury when hearing cases so your legal comments on finding guilt or innocence are also faulty.

So no different to any other day then with their blatant anti Israel bias

He's not the only one expressing outrage at Australia's stance. Of course the pro Hamas supporters will ignore him and the OP Australia urged to take a stand on Israel Australia’s longest-serving foreign minister, Alexander Downer, says the Albanese government risks handing a propaganda win to terrorists by not rejecting an International Criminal Court arrest warrant for the Israeli prime minister, as Australia remained one of only a few countries not to declare its position. “This is a propaganda win for Hamas, for Hezbollah, for Iran and their fellow travellers. It has destroyed the credibility of the ICC,” he said. Mr Downer said Australia should make clear it would not arrest Mr Netanyahu should he visit the country. https://www.afr.com/world/middle-east/australia-urged-to-take-a-stand-on-israel-20241124-p5kt2n

Except it's not the same article. Syndicated news is normaly from Reuters and AP. Try again at deflection

Go away. This topic is not about that and you have already proved yourself to be dishonest

She was not in office on 7th Oct when Hamas attacked. FAIL

Its not just in the WSJ. Your attempt to kill the messenger is not working. Many outlets are carrying this: UN adviser leaves office ‘over refusal to accuse Israel of genocide’ Alice Wairimu Nderitu left her post after four years amid claims she was edged out by those critical of the war against Hamas https://www.thetimes.com/world/middle-east/article/un-adviser-genocide-israel-gaza-t058xrpcv Your comments on the ICJ case is also misleading

An old article from the Private Eye. The case against her was dropped and the police are reviewing their own procedures as a result. Read the OP