Bkk Brian

You made a claim, stop the deflection: "Even a third would still be a war crime." Do you have a link to that?

No that's the forum rules: "Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source."

Your claims are worthless without a credible link to that in Gaza

Such a huge discrepancy is not nit picking, its updated factual UN satellite analysis that is now the given credible figure and the one quoted by UN. 35% OF BUILDINGS AFFECTED IN GAZA STRIP https://unitar.org/about/news-stories/press/35-buildings-affected-gaza-strip

The numbers of captured terrorists are huge for the Shifa Hospital operation, update just a few mins ago IDF: 480 of 800 detained suspects at Shifa Hospital are Hamas or Islamic Jihad members The IDF’s nearly weeklong operation continues at Gaza City’s Shifa Hospital, with the military saying that among some 800 suspects detained by troops, 480 of them have been confirmed to be members of the Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad terror groups. Troops also located infrastructure belonging to terror groups and caches of weapons over the past, the IDF says. Times of Israel

What do you mean by that? You know what I mean by that and yes its is just 35% of building that have been destroyed or damaged, not 85% as the poster claimed.

I posted a link yesterday from November, which says that 70% of Palestinian homes (not buildings) had been destroyed. Yes I know you did, you posted that to me, so why are you doing the same thing yet again?

Yes you are permitted, its more of his misinformation

Get a grip man and stop telling me what to do, I've already provided the same reuters link with no paywall https://archive.ph/Tz81E

Of course it is, whats wrong with you https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/satellite-images-show-35-gazas-building-destroyed-un-says-2024-03-21/

Some Reuters link paywall free Satellite images show 35% of Gaza's building destroyed, UN says https://archive.ph/Tz81E

Cherry picked? its the latest analysis by UN satellite..lol

Try offering something top the topic

Poor deflection, your unattributed claim that 85% of Gaza was leveled to the reality that I provided which is 35%

Modify your claim........lol Your link points to a claim of 70% of civilian buildings, your original claim was 85% of the whole of Gaza leveled. That is not modification that is a weak attempt at covering up a lie. The actual figure is 35% remember that for the future

I read all of it. A US veto is not a foregone conclusion. Waking up tomorrow is not a forgone conclusion either............ No you did give a link to that claim that is a clear lie, I even added the link to the post where I asked you for it. No further debates with a dishonest member. Here is the link again. Numerous times I stated that Palestine deserves its own statehood as does Israel now get that link or forget any further responses from me.

If the proposed resolution contains that language then there's no reason to think the US will veto it Did you read the link or even the title? "US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield told the council after Friday’s vote that the new resolution’s text “fails to support sensitive diplomacy in the region. Worse, it could actually give Hamas an excuse to walk away from the deal on the table.” “We should not move forward with any resolution that jeopardizes the ongoing negotiations” being carried out by the United States, Qatar and Egypt, she said, warning that if the diplomacy isn’t supported “we may once again find this council deadlocked.” “I truly hope that that does not come about,” Thomas-Greenfield said. The United States has vetoed three resolutions demanding a ceasefire in Gaza, the most recent an Arab-backed measure. That measure was supported by 13 members with one abstention in a February 20 vote." Still waiting for a specific link to your claim that Israel levelled 85% of Gaza..................

Another UN Security Council vote on Monday, this time the US will probably veto it. Russia and China appear to be backing it. UNSC vote set for Monday on new Gaza ceasefire resolution; US unlikely to back it The brief resolution scheduled for a vote Monday demands an immediate humanitarian ceasefire for Ramadan “leading to a permanent sustainable ceasefire.” It also demands “the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages” and emphasizes the urgent need to protect civilians and deliver humanitarian aid throughout the Gaza Strip. The draft does not include provisions supporting ongoing diplomatic efforts to secure a ceasefire — an element that was highlighted in the US resolution. US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield told the council after Friday’s vote that the new resolution’s text “fails to support sensitive diplomacy in the region. Worse, it could actually give Hamas an excuse to walk away from the deal on the table.” https://www.timesofisrael.com/unsc-vote-set-for-this-week-on-new-gaza-ceasefire-resolution-us-unlikely-to-back-it/

As expected after cutting through all the noise, aid to Israel and further suspension of funding to UNRWA Biden signs spending bill which halts UNRWA funding through 2025 The bill also forces the UN and other international organizations funded to assess and report on efforts to combat anti-Israel bias and antisemitism and to vet staff for connections to terrorists, the US Congress early on Saturday overwhelmingly passed a $1.2 trillion budget bill, which included a ban on US funding for UNRWA until 2025. The bill also eliminates funding for the UN Commission of Inquiry against Israel and fully funds the annual US security commitment of $3.3 billion for Israel, which allocates funding for the Iron Dome and other defensive systems. "The historic ban on US funding to @UNRWA that passed today with an overwhelming bipartisan support, demonstrates what we knew all along: UNRWA is part of the problem and can not be part of the solution. UNRWA will not be a part of Gaza's landscape in the aftermath of Hamas," Israel's Foreign Minister Israel Katz said in a post on X. https://www.jpost.com/international/article-793359

Talks ongoing in Qatar this coming week on hostage deal etc. Significant that Hamas's Gaza terrorist leader's Deputy has joined them. Israel has accepted a more generous deal with concessions to Hamas stricter demands on the Palestinian prisoners to be released but now again waiting for news. Report: Sinwar’s deputy is at hostage talks in Qatar; Israeli team set to stay several days The Israeli delegation is continuing negotiations tonight on a hostage-truce deal in Qatar, and the process is advancing, Channel 12 reports. The talks involve not only delegations from Israel, the US, Qatar and Egypt, but also a Hamas delegation including Ismail Haniyeh, Khaled Mashaal, and Khalil al-Haya, a deputy to Hamas’s Gaza chief Yahya Sinwar, the report says. Channel 12, echoing an earlier report from the Walla news site, says there are major differences on the issue of how many and which Palestinian security prisoners would be freed — prompting the US to present a compromise proposal. The original Paris framework from last month provided for 400 security prisoners to be freed for 40 hostages — women, children, the sick and elderly — in the first phase of a deal. The new US compromise is “more generous” for Hamas, but has been accepted by Israel, says Channel 12. The teams are now waiting for a response from Gaza, which could take hours or days. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/report-sinwars-deputy-is-at-hostage-talks-in-qatar-israeli-team-set-to-stay-several-days/

You were the one with no links first..............lol and you still have no link for that false claim that 85% of buildings in Gaza have been levelled. Waiting for it. Yes number of Hamas killed given by Israel, same as the number of Palestinians killed are given by Hamas Israel has said it killed some 13,000 Hamas members in Gaza fighting

Likewise....

Who told you 85% of buildings in Gaza have been levelled? over 13,000 terrorists killed how does that make at least 20,000 civilians killed?

No its you spreading conspiracy nonsense like I said. It will be the Jews did it next

Cherry picked you mean