Bkk Brian

Do they also have the same impartiality rules as the BBC?

They are already offended and some have already left the union, read the links and stop your ignorant lame attempts at shooting the messenger, this story is in numerous outlets and no....not syndicated.

He didn't say you did. He was explaining facts however, unlike you.

Is this also desperate reporting? BBC journalists resign from union over Palestinian colors directive https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/399889

So only report after the event, not on the concerns of the Jewish staff and others that disagree and the imminent breaking of impartiality rules "if" it goes ahead? Got it, wait for the jews to froth first........

Reporting on a backlash from Jewish staff at the BBC and the possible breaking of the BBC's impartially rules if it goes ahead. Why is it desperate? Are the other outlets that report it also desperate?

It affects the BBC staff and the BBC impartiality rules. The fact its not a direct BBC proposal has no bearing on the rules that are in place.

Once upon a time, not now unfortunately. New Report from former BBC Director Criticizes Coverage of Israel-Hamas Conflict https://aseannow.com/topic/1341711-new-report-from-former-bbc-director-criticizes-coverage-of-israel-hamas-conflict Jeremy Bowen Defends BBC Amid Allegations of Bias Over Israel-Hamas Coverage https://aseannow.com/topic/1338211-jeremy-bowen-defends-bbc-amid-allegations-of-bias-over-israel-hamas-coverage/ BBC Accused of Bias in Israel-Hamas Coverage: Over 1,500 Breaches of Guidelines https://aseannow.com/topic/1337643-bbc-accused-of-bias-in-israel-hamas-coverage-over-1500-breaches-of-guidelines/ BBC Chairman Calls For a Thorough Review of Israel-Hamas War Bias https://aseannow.com/topic/1338006-bbc-chairman-calls-for-a-thorough-review-of-israel-hamas-war-bias/

No that's you saying it. The law needs to be clear in the first place and currently the legalities of how they went about getting the warrants and whether they are even legal remain unclear. France says 'immunities apply' to Netanyahu regarding ICC arrest warrant In a statement, the foreign ministry said France would 'respect its international obligations' but added that the Israeli leader was covered by immunity rules that apply to states that are not a party to the ICC. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/11/27/france-says-immunities-apply-to-netanyahu-regarding-icc-arrest-warrant_6734304_4.html Italy says clarity needed on ICC arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant Italy said on Tuesday it was ready to respect its obligations concerning the International Criminal Court’s warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant, but that clarity was needed on how it would work in Netanyahu’s case. “We always apply the obligations but we have to understand what the obligations are,” Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani told a news conference on Tuesday, saying it was not clear whether high state officials enjoyed immunity from prosecution. https://www.timesofisrael.com/italy-says-clarity-needed-on-icc-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant/ And as it has every right to do in the circumstances in which these warrants were issued: Israel to appeal against ICC warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm273g1jm51o But you go ahead and hang em high, we all know where you stand already

As I said, totally irrelevant to the actual arrest warrants issued and what they contain and no I was spinning nothing, there is no jury in an ICC trial. That is the fact. The spin is you saying its a jury nonetheless.

No sparking outrage from any law abiding citizen. There is no excuse for targeting innocent school girls and seriously injuring them. Your excuses are vile and disgusting along with totally off topic.

No there are NOT well documented war crimes being committed. There may well be allegations however whatever you claim on alleged documented war crimes is totally irrelevant to the ICC arrest warrants that have been issued that do not contain those allegations. Perhaps do a little research and see what the actual charges are. Further, the ICC does not have a jury when hearing cases so your legal comments on finding guilt or innocence are also faulty.

So no different to any other day then with their blatant anti Israel bias

He's not the only one expressing outrage at Australia's stance. Of course the pro Hamas supporters will ignore him and the OP Australia urged to take a stand on Israel Australia’s longest-serving foreign minister, Alexander Downer, says the Albanese government risks handing a propaganda win to terrorists by not rejecting an International Criminal Court arrest warrant for the Israeli prime minister, as Australia remained one of only a few countries not to declare its position. “This is a propaganda win for Hamas, for Hezbollah, for Iran and their fellow travellers. It has destroyed the credibility of the ICC,” he said. Mr Downer said Australia should make clear it would not arrest Mr Netanyahu should he visit the country. https://www.afr.com/world/middle-east/australia-urged-to-take-a-stand-on-israel-20241124-p5kt2n

Except it's not the same article. Syndicated news is normaly from Reuters and AP. Try again at deflection

Go away. This topic is not about that and you have already proved yourself to be dishonest

She was not in office on 7th Oct when Hamas attacked. FAIL

Its not just in the WSJ. Your attempt to kill the messenger is not working. Many outlets are carrying this: UN adviser leaves office ‘over refusal to accuse Israel of genocide’ Alice Wairimu Nderitu left her post after four years amid claims she was edged out by those critical of the war against Hamas https://www.thetimes.com/world/middle-east/article/un-adviser-genocide-israel-gaza-t058xrpcv Your comments on the ICJ case is also misleading

An old article from the Private Eye. The case against her was dropped and the police are reviewing their own procedures as a result. Read the OP

A speech from Haley a few years ago on her first meeting at the UN Security Council. Damning indictment of The UN's anti Israel bias and a clear indication of the Security Councils failure to address the issues of Hezbollah's build up of rockets and Iran. "U.S. is determined to stand up to the UN’s anti-Israel bias" - Nikki Haley

The UN is clearly not perfect, Well there's an understatement. Having Iran chair human rights meetings kinda say it all. Dismissing its own Genocide advisor as in the OP just tops it off when it keeps other advisors who are clearly antisemetic in place.

What proof are you looking for? Haley hit out at "the so-called UN Human Rights Council," which the U.S. withdrew from "because it tolerates and even celebrates antisemitism and blatant human rights abusers. We also pulled out of UNESCO, which denies Jewish heritage, even as it claims to protect diverse cultures. And then there’s UNRWA, which we stopped funding with American taxpayer money. UNRWA teaches Palestinian children to despise the Jews."

Yea sure it has, Hamas are getting more and more isolated as are its supporters. Well past time to release the hostages and let Gaza recover.

One of the Guardians finest.................. It's no secret that the @Guardian peddles antisemitism & visceral hatred of Israel, but their columnist Owen Jones is in a league of his own...

Antisemitism at the UN is rife. I always remember Nikki Haley the ex US, UN Ambassador: "The worst-kept secret at the UN is that antisemitism is operating just beneath the surface." Back to the OP. The UN would rather fire their Genocide Advisor than listen to reality.