Bkk Brian

Are you telling me there's never been any series of events that has caused a loss of Jewish life more than 1,200 since WWII? That's hard for me to believe. Yes I am telling you that, its a fact I don't care if you believe it or not. Hamas would have preferred much more though Worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust still not enough for some

Well, I don't know about the numbers and how they compare with other massacres of Jews The Jews do, that's why they will not let this happen again, no circles here It was the worst atrocity committed against the Jewish people in a single day since the Holocaust https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/01/26/statement-from-president-joe-biden-international-holocaust-remembrance-day-statement-2024/

No, Oct 7th was the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. Israel will not let this happen again. You are dreaming

That makes no sense, only a court can decide once all evidence is reviewed. Fact Whistleblower from Human Rights Watch: “HRW has so little credibility for most Israelis they do not even trust it with their corpses“ When I joined Human Rights Watch over 13 years ago as senior editor, I did so with years of experience in journalism covering the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and time in academia. But as the organization grew and its composition shifted, so too did the focus, tone, and framing of its Israel-Palestine work. Following the Hamas massacres in Israel on October 7, years of institutional creep culminated in organizational responses that shattered professionalism, abandoned principles of accuracy and fairness, and surrendered its duty to stand for the human rights of all. https://unwatch.org/whistleblower-from-human-rights-watch-hrw-has-so-little-credibility-for-most-israelis-they-do-not-even-trust-it-with-their-corpses/

I don't even know what you're talking about. whatever

Deflection, there is no rule on the numbers for proportionality, only a court can decide after looking at the evidence of each case. HRW’s Demonization, BDS, and Downplaying Antisemitism Examining the Human Rights Watch Agenda Following the Hamas Pogrom Part 2 https://www.ngo-monitor.org/reports/hrws-demonization-bds-and-downplaying-antisemitism/

Opinion written by Robert Inlakesh who was today spreading false claims of IDF mass raping civilians at Shifa hospital that have even now been debunked by Al Jazeera after they were also spreading them

To comply with international humanitarian law Can you tell me what they are not complying with? The Lawful Killing of Civilians Under International Humanitarian Law https://www.e-ir.info/2022/05/27/the-lawful-killing-of-civilians-under-international-humanitarian-law https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule14

Yes you did, stop lying, they are nowhere in the post referenced

No its not actually there are hostages that Hamas has taken and the IDF is also looking for them, you keep forgetting about them.

Its baiting, we discussed this before

The IDF do everything they can to avoid killing them: The reality is that when it comes to avoiding civilian harm, there is no modern comparison to Israel's war against Hamas. Israel is not fighting a battle like Fallujah, Mosul, or Raqqa; it is fighting a war involving synchronous major urban battles. No military in modern history has faced over 30,000 urban defenders in more than seven cities using human shields and hiding in hundreds of miles of underground networks purposely built under civilian sites, while holding hundreds of hostages. Despite the unique challenges Israel faces in its war against Hamas, it has implemented more measures to prevent civilian casualties than any other military in history. https://www.newsweek.com/israel-implemented-more-measures-prevent-civilian-casualties-any-other-nation-history-opinion-1865613

tedious baiting, if they were not there then they would not be harmed, its Hamas malicious intend to sacrifice them, this has already been discussed

Correct, you should tell Hamas to stop using them

This topic is not about you or me though or how much time we spend on it.

New vote at the UN today UN Security Council to vote on new resolution calling for immediate Gaza ceasefire, release of hostages The UN Security Council is set to vote on a new draft resolution on an “immediate” ceasefire in Gaza, after Russia and China vetoed an earlier text proposed by the United States. The new text, according to the version seen by AFP, “demands an immediate ceasefire” for the ongoing Muslim holy month of Ramadan, “leading to a permanent sustainable ceasefire.” It also “demands the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages as well as the “lifting of all barriers to the provision of humanitarian assistance at scale.” https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/un-security-council-to-vote-on-new-resolution-calling-for-immediate-gaza-ceasefire-release-of-hostages/ Senator Rick Scott https://twitter.com/SenRickScott/status/1772049827389444519

No the UN does.

Yes, it might have been No it was

Ok, I have memories of when they were discussed nearly 2 years ago

What? A history lesson from you? No, the analysis and map by the UN was released just a few days ago.

Mozart group was discussed here numerous times. We have also finished discussing Wagner. This is more a daily events topic

Damage to buildings in wars: 🔸Raqqa Syria - 40% 🔸Mosul Iraq - 65% 🔸Gaza - 35% Israel is setting a professional standard unprecedented in modern urban warfare. Hamas have used the last 17 years to weaponize the urban environment intentionally planting their command and control capabilities, weapons manufacturing facilities and rocket launch pads from within, around and beneath the homes and buildings of Gaza. This is a precise war, but it is war nevertheless. https://twitter.com/LTCPeterLerner/status/1771458623991930900

"Latest developments and discussion of events in the Israel-Hamas War."

Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit (I-Unit)

Why don't you ask him instead of talking about him, there's a word for what you are.