Bkk Brian

What part of "The medical examiner noted Sicknick was among the officers who engaged the mob and said “all that transpired played a role in his condition.”" Do you not understand?

You keep player the doctors and ignoring the professionals, Basilar artery thrombosis is a deviating stroke that can also be brought on by a high stress situation as already posted. Still waiting for you to substantiate your claim.................. Again: “Stress is the body’s natural response to a real or perceived threat. A riot is an example of an acute stressor, and this type of event could trigger the heart to work harder, by increasing heart rate and blood pressure, which could conceivably trigger the formation of a clot that travels to the brain and causes a stroke,” Again: The medical examiner noted Sicknick was among the officers who engaged the mob and said “all that transpired played a role in his condition.” Again: Sicknick death ruled ‘natural’ but experts say stress can set off strokes

You keep missing he also said: The medical examiner noted Sicknick was among the officers who engaged the mob and said “all that transpired played a role in his condition.” Where in any of the reports did anyone claim this above apart from you? "The medical examiner’s office did not disclose if Sicknick had any underlying conditions." “Stress is the body’s natural response to a real or perceived threat. A riot is an example of an acute stressor, and this type of event could trigger the heart to work harder, by increasing heart rate and blood pressure, which could conceivably trigger the formation of a clot that travels to the brain and causes a stroke,”

"but there is no connection to his actins on January 6." Since when are you the medical examiner now? You are contradicting entirely what he said. So now we are clear it was not a political statement, lets also be clear that this is not about any other incident. Its about what the police and medical examiner said about the 6th Jan riots. I've no need to explain your last sentence you've wrongly attributed it to me, apologies accepted..........

Musk's tweets coming back to haunt him again, this time with the TESLA case. In what the judge has stated were his false and reckless tweets. Musk says he can’t get fair trial in California, wants Texas WASHINGTON — Elon Musk has urged a federal judge to shift a trial in a shareholder lawsuit out of San Francisco because he says negative local media coverage has biased potential jurors against him. Instead, in a filing submitted late Friday — less than two weeks before the trial was set to begin on Jan. 17 — Musk’s lawyers argue it should be moved to the federal court in the western district of Texas. If moving the trial isn’t possible, Musk’s lawyers want it postponed until negative publicity regarding the billionaire’s purchase of Twitter has died down. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/california/story/2023-01-07/musk-says-he-cant-get-fair-trial-in-california-wants-texas

The medical examiner noted Sicknick was among the officers who engaged the mob and said “all that transpired played a role in his condition.” Sounds inline with the medical examiner's statement to me, not political at all.

The anti vaxxers who are dead are saying nothing

If I were Sicknick's family or girlfriend I would be doing exactly the same as them. Its not going to be easy to win the case but their lawyers obviously feel there is a case for wrongful death. Good luck to them as I also believe this would not have happened had the riots not occurred. While the medical examiner, Francisco J. Diaz stated he died of natural causes that does not rule out what else he said. "Diaz’s ruling does not mean Sicknick was not assaulted or that the violent events at the Capitol did not contribute to his death. The medical examiner noted Sicknick was among the officers who engaged the mob and said “all that transpired played a role in his condition.”" The crowd were vicious and watching the scenes of Sicknick being sprayed and later trying to wash the pepper from his eyes was a stark reminder just how violent this day was, he collapsed just a few hours later. Its not unusual to suffer a stroke from this form of experience and stress. Unfortunately this stroke also led to his death the following day.

They have TV and vids games in all countries, this has little to do with that and all to do with the US and how it treats gun ownership as a sign of masculinity, virility and freedom.

The Republican witch seems pleased............???? https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1611722223026315269

Another concession revealed. "sweeping investigatory powers that include explicit authority to review “ongoing criminal investigations.” Proposed GOP select panel would be empowered to review ‘ongoing criminal investigations’ A proposed subcommittee to investigate “weaponization” of the federal government — a key demand of House conservatives who delivered Speaker Kevin McCarthy the gavel — would be given sweeping investigatory powers that include explicit authority to review “ongoing criminal investigations.” The language of the proposed “select subcommittee,” which would operate under the Judiciary Committee expected to be chaired by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), also gives the panel power to access any information shared with the House Intelligence Committee. That panel typically receives the highest-level classified intelligence and briefings of any committee in Congress. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/07/gop-panel-criminal-investigations-00076890

Twitter Promised Them Severance. They Got Nothing Staff laid off by Elon Musk were assured they would be compensated following mass cuts. As the deadline passes, the silence has been deafening. SHORTLY AFTER TAKING over Twitter, Elon Musk laid off around 50 percent of the company’s staff, on the same day, he tweeted that all those laid off would receive three months of severance pay. But, after two months of waiting for the company to say what kind of severance and benefits will be available, several former Twitter employees say they’ve heard nothing. As weeks of waiting turn into months, former staffers in the US are filing arbitration suits, while some in the UK are trying to negotiate terms, in other countries where Twitter laid off staff, people have heard nothing. https://www.wired.com/story/twitter-employees-severance/

Fidelity downsizes value of its Twitter holdings Fidelity has downsized the value of its investment in Twitter by more than half its initial stake in Elon Musk’s takeover of the social media platform. Fidelity holds its Twitter investments through its mutual funds in X Holdings I Inc., a holding company that Musk used as part of his Twitter takeover bid. Musk’s takeover has been a controversial topic, marred by layoffs of staff and a plethora of operational changes at the social media giant. Various reports speculate that other investment firms may follow suit in writing down the value of their Twitter holdings. https://cointelegraph.com/news/fidelity-downsizes-value-of-its-twitter-holdings

Editing my post and taking out of context where it shows you what you've missed does nothing to make your case aside from being blind to the the actual results of the study https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307112 Study conclusions Conclusions. The significantly lower rates of all-cause ED visits, hospitalizations, and mortality in the vaccinated highlight the real-world benefits of vaccination. The data raise questions about the wisdom of reliance on natural immunity when safe and effective vaccines are available. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(1):96–104. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307112)

There is no video scene in the first link, its a description of the events. You bringing up claims with no links to back them up is exactly why people have spent worthless time on you.

The study shows your wrong. Oh and don't forget to add in that the unvaccinated cohort were previously infected and take into account the hospitalization rates when that occured.

I've already given you the link to the study, try the maths again

A lesson to be had when making claims in the news section is to have a link to hand to substantiate them. Its the rules. The first link given by @ThailandRyan described what you said. However as is always the case, people spend time on you providing links only for you to dismiss them.

The yearly flu virus changes, sometimes it becomes more virulent and deadly. “antigenic shift.”

The study rather than your out of context snippet: Large, real-world study finds COVID-19 vaccination more effective than natural immunity in protecting against all causes of death, hospitalization and emergency department visits Significantly, the all-cause death and hospital admission rates for vaccinated individuals were 37 percent lower than the rates for those with natural immunity acquired from previous COVID infection. "This large population study of the entire state of Indiana should encourage individuals everywhere to get themselves and their children vaccinated and not rely on natural immunity. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/12/221215120738.htm

He knows that of course but chooses to ignore that particular link.

I suggest you read it rather than relying on second hand accounts. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/

If its at the point you'd rather not have a vaccine and miss the opportunity to see your parents for the last time then that's your choice and shows where your priorities are at.

The madness goes on: U.S. appeals court to reconsider ban on nonviolent felons owning guns (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Friday said it would reconsider next month whether a federal law prohibiting nonviolent felons from owning firearms is constitutional in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision last year expanding gun rights. The Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals voted to have the full court rehear the case of a Pennsylvania man convicted of welfare fraud who argued the ban violates the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment right to bear arms. https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-appeals-court-reconsider-ban-nonviolent-felons-owning-guns-2023-01-06

How?