mikeymike100

In LA, deploying the national Guard was the right thing to do, Newsom had lost it!

Smuggling 20 kilograms of marijuana could result in 7 years to life imprisonment, with a likely sentence closer to 15–20 years or more, depending on judicial discretion, the defendant’s role (e.g., organizer vs. courier), and aggravating factors like intent to distribute. A 2025 case in Phnom Penh involving a British national caught with 20 kilograms of cannabis, reported on , June 20, 2025), faced charges that could lead to life imprisonment, indicating 20 kilograms is treated as a serious trafficking offense. Fines: Courts may impose fines ranging from 10 million to 50 million Cambodian riel (approximately $2,500 to $12,500 USD), alongside asset seizure related to the crime. No Death Penalty: Unlike some Southeast Asian countries (e.g., Indonesia, Malaysia), Cambodia does not impose the death penalty for drug trafficking, as confirmed by legal sources and the absence of such penalties in reported cases.

Well if I could that, I wouldn't be asking for an explanation!

Can you elucidate?

Well let's see looks like some folks want President Trump to 'hurry up' and make his mind up on a decision that could have global effects, to say nothing of WW3. Surely waiting to see if this can be worked out 'peacefully' would be more prudent?

Crazy, risking maybe 10 years in a Cambodian prison, at least he won't get the death penalty!

Absolutely.... The Mahagitsiris are often called the “Nescafé godfather” family in Thai media due to their long-standing coffee empire. Their wealth and political ties (e.g., Prayudh’s Thai Rak Thai role) make them influential but controversial, with critics noting their legal troubles as evidence of systemic corruption among Thailand’s elite. In summary, the Mahagitsiri family is a powerful Thai business clan with a $2.5 billion fortune, rooted in coffee, shipping, real estate, and franchises, led by Prayudh and his children Chalermchai and Ausana

I suppose this is all about money?

Not just in in the hotel room, I have seen them do it in Singapore Airport!

In fairness, Harris raised 1.6x more overall, 2.5x more by campaign committee. Kamala Harris Campaign: Raised $2.9 billion total, $997.2 million by campaign committee. Donald Trump Campaign: Raised $1.8 billion total, $388 million by campaign committee. So if money was a factor, Kamala should of won????? Money didn’t overcome voter discontent, bias, or Trump’s messaging.

i wonder what an 'ordinary' person would get, for carrying a firearm and high on meth?

Makes perfect sense!

Common sense prevails...again!

Very sad. Its the 21st century and this still goes on...crazy!

"The all-female shortlist was designed to level the playing field, given that women made up only 37% of MI6 staff in 2016, with even lower representation in senior roles. By 2025, MI6 aimed for 47% female staff quota, showing a structural effort to create equitable pathways." Putting people in jobs to fill quotas, instead of merit, is DEI, in a nutshell.! Another red flag..."The all-female shortlist was designed to level the playing field, given that women made up only 37% of MI6 staff in 2016, with even lower representation in senior roles" If it read to put the best person in with the ability to do the job, OK fair enough, but clearly this is not what is said.

Correct, so are you suggesting profits come before affordable medical care?

And the number of treatments!

"Artistic expression".........as is they know what that is? "the investigation was initiated in accordance with the law after concerns were raised over potentially inflammatory and illegal conduct during a public event." So if found guilty.... a few years in prison??

Acosta was and will always will be a P O S!

And a 10 year ban!

If an X ray couldn't detect that, was there a malfunction, or was the malfunction in the doctor looking at it?

Where did I state she is unsuitable for the role?

MI6’s leadership, under Sir Richard Moore, explicitly aimed to diversify its senior ranks. The agency’s male-only leadership history (116 years without a female chief) prompted Moore’s 2023 pledge to avoid all-male shortlists. This aligns with DEI principles, which prioritize representation of underrepresented groups, in this case, women in high-level intelligence roles. The all-female shortlist was designed to level the playing field, given that women made up only 37% of MI6 staff in 2016, with even lower representation in senior roles. By 2025, MI6 aimed for 47% female staff quota, showing a structural effort to create equitable pathways. So you can see that MI6 was aiming for a 47% female staff QUOTA? So all this is evidence it was potentially a DEI appointment!

So I guess the TM30 and 90 day reports don't work?

Dream on.......