dinsdale

If you can't tell the difference between positing a question and making a statement what I posted was the former and as such no supporting evidence is required.

An interesting point. Do boosters make a person more suseptable to getting covid?

This says it all. There are almost 12,000 beaches in Australia and I'll bet each and every one of them is better.

Please explain how the benefits outweigh the risks for anyone below 65. There's no significant difference. Why does the CDC still recommend jabs for 6 month olds when according to this there is no difference. 5-11. same. 18-29 same. 30-49 virtually no difference. 50-65 comorbidities start kicking in but still little difference. This whole thing is skewed by the 80+ group where age and severe comorbitities play a huge role. At this age a cold can be enough to kill you.

People vaccinated does not automatically equate to lives saved. How is this number aquired? What was and now is the death rate between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated? Why did and still do vaccinated people die from (not with) covid-19? How can it possibly be known if a vaccinated person who contracted covid was "saved" by the jab and not their own immune system? How do we know that delta would have killed more and it's only the vaccines that prevented this? Why weren't entire populations of the unvaccinated killed by the virus e.g. countries with very low vaccination rates like in Africa or Eastern Europe? These are valid questions. As for goverments approaving vaccines this is done after extensive testing. This was as you well know not the case this time around. As for risk benefit as it stands what do you think is a greater risk to a healthy 25 year old. Omicron or an mRNA booster?

Thank you once again for sharing the CDC information. It was the CDC that said the vaccines were safe in the 1st place was it not? Fairly sure the families of those who have died and those who have had or still suffer from serious injuries don't put too much faith in what the CDC says.

It would seem then that rare occurances were enough to get these vaccines withdrawn. Rare occurances of DEATH isn't enough to get mRNA vaccines withdrawn though. This I find difficult to understand. I also wonder why AZ is still available at all. Surely a global withdrawal is needed.

AZ withdrawn because of clots. This is a fact and an appropriate measure. Why else would it be withdrawn from the market if not deemed harmful to personal health? If I'm correct it never even made it into the US market. As for peer reviews I guess it's a question of who the peers are. Mind you blind faith will always be blind.

What about people who are guests on YT sites. Professors of immunology for example. What do they have to gain? Highly published and well respected. Are they conspiracy theorists? What about people that questioned the efficacy and safety of the vaccines? Conspiracy theorists? Why was AZ and J&J withdrawn? Was this a conspiracy or were the vaccines deemed to be dangerous? Can you answer these questions?

Yep. The CDC and WHO line. You believe in what you're being told by the WHO, big pharma, governments and the access media that's up to you. I don't believe it. If all was fine why for example is evedince of vaccine harm given to big pharma by the UK govt not shared for independent scrutiny? You think that evidence that goes against what the CDC and big pharma says is misinformation again that's up to you but one wonders which side the misinformation is coming from. You think the sites you quote are independent that also is up to you. The truth has been and is being supressed but will eventually come out.

I'm a bit confused why this thread on vaccine safety is only 2 pages so far. One just needs to Google "Covid-19 vaccine safety" and you'll get over 2 million hits, I imagine the majority of which will say that the jabs are overwhrelmingly safe. You know the pushed narrative. One must dig a lot deeper to start finding articles that challenge this narrative. Very difficult. Why would this be I wonder? Is information being supressed or pushed out of sight, information like vaccine injury and deaths or are the vaccines actually safe and have been scientifically tested in long term studies so nothing to worry about? The info we are fed supports one side of the story. There's another side and that side is bubbling to the surface with ever greater intensity.

The future hopefully will tell. The push against the narrative you believe is intensifying. The tenticles of big pharma are widespread and powerful but sooner or later the truth will come out.

I guess one could posit the question as to how many of those who have died from the jab would otherwise not have died? Fit young people for example.

Your friend Dr. Google is the friend of big pharma and the CDC. You can continue to believe what you're told or you can be sceptical. For me the last 4 yrs has increased my scepticism by a factor of 10 at the very least. Have you ever looked at videos banned on this site? Professors, immunologists, doctors and other health professional talking about what's happened and what's continuing to happen. Videos with cited scientific evidence. It's enlightening. Certaily broadened my knowledge and changed my opinion. Unfortunately I had had 2 AZ jabs before I became enlightened to the reality of this greatest of all crimes against humanity. Thankfully I am capable of rational and individual thought, just not at the beginning of this in relation to the greatest con of all cons. My apologies to all I opposed in relation to this at the beginning. You guys were right. I was a sheep who believed the narrative.

Something like this then....

Brilliant. An article about the extreme heat in April for mid-May. You can't make this idiocy up. I get the feeling that ChatGPT got constipated during the heat and has just shat this out.

You seem to have missed the bit, the very important bit, that being vaccinated doesn't stop transmission. Not for these vaccines that is.

Yes you do have to weigh up the risks but to do this all possible information should be freely available and the vaccine should be extensively tested with scientific rigour with results published for all tpo see. Tell me if this was the case for the covid-19 vaccines. Can you also tell me why AZ and J&J were withdrawn? Apart from that do you think death is a serious side effect? The safety of these vaccines is being called into question. Do you think governments and big pharma have some very big questions viz-a-viz safety and efficacy of the vaccine to answer? If you don't IMO you are on an ever decreasing list of blind followers.

I guess you could also look at very healthy people who have died or been injured by the jab and getting the jab wasn't their choice.

Chinese Tourists Revive Thailand Tourism Using ED Visa or Chinese and Russian Tourists Revive Thailand Tourism Using ED Visa Question: Is an Ed. Visa a tourist visa?

Covid jabs are good for you. mRNA is good tech. You have no right to dispute or challenge this. If you do you are an anti-vaxer and a cospiracy theorist. The rules have been made and you must abide bt them. Free thought and free speech on this subject is subject to censorship at the very least.

Vaccine harm is real and chances of dying from covid now it's Omicron is minimal for the majority of the World's population.

I'm missing all the CDC stats that are usually posted and being told that omicron is dangerous and the benefits of the jab outweigh the costs. Still, sure to be here sooner or later I guess.

Trust us!!!!! We are The WHO/The CDC/Big Pharma/Your Government/The Access Media.

You mean like African countries where vaccine uptake was very low. Decimated? No. Economic and social failure? No. Well no more than already exists.