German farang

6 minutes ago, simple1 said:

So you admit it is a false propaganda Rohingya were never citizens of Myanmar - one step forward. BTW collective punishment of civilians by any government is a criminal act, in the case of the Myanmar government, Crimes Against Humanity.

@ 1rst: I don't admit anything. 2nd: they belong to Bangladesh. 3rd:  violence & crime came from themselfs. 4th: it's a legit right of any govt to fight & deport such folks!

And at last but not least:  why don't you invit some of them for asylum into your own home??? ????????

4 hours ago, IAMHERE said:

Well then it is time to prosecute the prison guards.

So what about their current "leader in charge"? Wasn't he too a high-up Khmer Rouge?!?

A part of his history here;

"

Hun Sen came to power with the Khmer Rouge and served as a Battalion Commander in the Eastern Region of Democratic Kampuchea (the state name during the Khmer Rouge government). In 1977, during internal purges of the Khmer Rouge regime, Hun Sen and his battalion cadres fled to Vietnam.

Hun Sen became one of the leaders of the rebel army and government that the Vietnamese government sponsored when they prepared to invade Cambodia. When the Khmer Rouge was defeated, Hun Sen was appointed as Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of the Vietnamese-installed People's Republic of Kampuchea/State of Cambodia (PRK/SOC) in 1979."

2 hours ago, simple1 said:

Burma achieved independence in 1948, at the time Rohingya were a recognised ethnic group, with citizenship, including political representation by Rohingya MPs.

 

"the most significant inflection point came in 1982 when Burma’s junta passed a law that identified eight ethnicities entitled to citizenship.* The Rohingya were not among them, though they had enjoyed equal rights since Burma became independent from British rule in 1948. Almost overnight, they were stripped of their citizenship."

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/09/rohingyas-burma/540513/

Yep. By a reason!

45 minutes ago, yougivemebaby said:

Thaivisa detectives goooo! No one knows the true story. The victim (he dead-maybe boyfriend), the home owners story, and the news story. She could have cried (moaned) out could mean other things. It doesn’t mean he attacked the daughter. Maybe it was all consensual. Makes for a better story to add drama. If he was charged with himicide it could be because he was unarmed and illegally in the house. Or he was in the house with the consent of his daughter and found them in a compromised position. We may never know. 

Again: it doesn't matter. Good dad! Give him a medal ????????????????

6 hours ago, brucegoniners said:

If this guy did indeed break into his house into his daughter's room then the cops should pat him on the back and say "great job", not arrest him.

 

But the fact he threw the gun away tells me there may be more to this story.

 

Guess you can't ask the guy who was shot.

Doesn't matter. The fact:  climbing/sneaking by night into my daugter's room sure makes you pay the ultimate price! Period.

8 hours ago, weegee said:

The United Nations has no right to tell a country what they must do....unless it's to stop an escalating war.

They can advise...but not rule over a sovereignty completely.

The UN is out of control, and you will see more countries discuss pulling out of it in the next few years. It's obsolete, and not performing in the roll it was created for....

 

The bitter truth: now the U.N. starts to show its real face... to be continued much worse, I bet!

Resettle to Bangladesh where they truely belong to! But as regular 'refugies' (?) not! Let's be honesty: the very majority of them is the pain in the ass! Who want's them? Nobody, by a reason! 

If the U.N. is truelly such concernef, the send them into the Emirats! 

Period.

5 hours ago, CharlieH said:

Is what happens when "people" carry guns, worse when its people with a rank!

Should leave guns to evaluated trained professionals!

Gungrabber? Errrr....

On 11/6/2018 at 6:17 PM, HerbalEd said:

Still hurts, huh? Don't take it out on all Thai women.

Never all but many ????

51 minutes ago, Raymonddiaz said:

I am living in Thailand for many years and my experience is that it's better to fight with a tiger than having an argument with a Thai woman....

Thai women litteraly beat foreign men here so maybe they are just doing the opposite of what Thai men are doing to them...

Not only ones & by a reason I told to my Ex that I wish her dad (RIP) would have slaped her multible times the shit out of her ass... Never & nowhere else I experienced such stupid overdriven ego, arrogance & selfishness compared with lack of any moral education! 

I'll never forget her furious statement: "I am a THAI woman!"

Yep, synonym for a stupid, uneducated but endless arrogant bitch ????????????????????.

My last words to her: "wish you fun with an alcoholic violent thai male" ????????????

Quallity journalism:  "22 mm" & "32 mm" ammo ????

Anti-tank rifle? Anti-aircraft? Granade launcher? ????????????????????

Or did they mean "cal .22" (22 lfr?)& "cal .32" (7,65 acp?) - or as in another comment stated: 5,56 (Nato) & 7,62×39(AK?)?

Whatever, ensures him a pretty nice sentence.

TIT

42 minutes ago, BigC said:

Safer than UK. London is out of control 

Like Germany too... ????????????

2 hours ago, scorecard said:

Maybe you could tell her that it will be / could be a step by step arrangement:

 

- You buy, your name only on the chanut.

- Tell her that you respect your family at home and if you die they must receive some benefit.

- Tell her that at a later time you will decide what % of ownership goes to your family at home

   and what % might go to her.

- Tell her the above is not negotiable and refuse to discuss it further. If she votes with her feet

   there's a lesson for you.

 

Ooops, better to be carefull about an 'last will' if you intent to live a bit longer ????????????

On 11/2/2018 at 11:09 AM, ReMarKable said:

Mī khwām rạk means in love in Thai  - I guess it means the same as the western meaning of "in love."

Hmmm ????

I guess that to be "in love" (which is just a maybe romanticand or just only hormonal syptome) and "love" by the meaning of true & unconditional love are two very different things, isn't it?

What I experienced by myself & seen by so many other people around suggests that some kind real love (from Thai) can be messured only in $$$, but never in real love. Sure, many red sunglases using farang might try to convince me to the opposide, but: that's already some $$$ too late. ????????????

Maybe I'm a bit naive or just unaware, so please may someone can explain me please clear;

Many thanks in advance.

When I enter the country I give / write my correct residence address onto my arrival card. I do the same in any embassy when apply for my visa & on the immigration when I take an extention too. It's always the same address (condo of my GF).

Never anyone (specially at the immi) asked me for any report where I stay.

Now following theoretical case:

What when somewhere in the public any immi &/or police guys asking about such report?

Which law says that I have to waste one entire day after arrival to visit the immigration - just to tell them what already is documented???

On 10/31/2018 at 6:08 PM, owl sees all said:

Some of these Thai ladies have never known love.

 

Invite her back and be really nice to her.

 

Something sadly missing in her life. love, a hubby, a baby or money even?

???????????? Apart from typical thai tv dramas, I don't believe that the thai-definition of love is anyhow same like in the rest of the world. Does the word 'love' (by western meaning) even exist in thai language??? ????????????

2 hours ago, Catoni said:

      Very simple.  Its common because they take their example from their "prophet" Muhammad (peace be upon him) who married Aisha (peace be upon her) when she was six years old. He was apparently nice enough to wait until the child was nine years old before taking her virginity in bed. She served him for the rest of his life.. but he did have others also.

      Many of the "prophet" Muhammad's  (peace be upon him) lieutenants and followers at the time (peace be upon them) also took child brides and it continues to this day in many Muslim countries. 

       

Why "peace upon" such mentally ill pedophiles?!?

8 hours ago, MisterDM said:

I'm Black-American and I've been to the North, Northeast, South of Thailand and, I have been welcomed happily. So,.....There's that. The Northeast in particular has been VERY welcoming to me and, I appreciate their hospitality 

You're an american. Nice. Now where's your problem about the targeted african criminals?

Nothing new, experienced the same already 4 years ago in BKK as I still lived as visitor in my GF's condo.

At the time I refused to give her landlord any copy of passport or even my name!

Everything nice ????????

Dear Thai people, I have to say that this accusion is utterly Bu**sh*t!!!

You are the ones who trash your sh** everywhere, litterally! And you know that very well!

Yes, I love this country, but I als hate your stupidly arrogance about everything! You don't care about nothing, even not your own health - regarding to all this trash in the streets, klongs & even your own neighborship! Now I only miss to blame tourists for your billions of big fat rats all over Bangkok!

Oh yeah, the tourists & foreigners are guilty for your polluted poisoned beaches in Pattaya or Rayong - sorry, I forgot to admit that!

5 hours ago, JackThompson said:

(edit - see he had one METV only)

 

If you want more "what the <bleep> happened" info, you could ask at the visa-service inside the Lucky-Lucky Moto Shop (tuk-tuks should know where it is).  That is where I had all my PP Thai-Visas handled.

 

The "without prejudice" language should mean you are OK to apply again.  If you have time and money, maybe try HCMC?  Then you could still use your air-ticket within 60-days.

 

If coming back Visa-Exempt, I would do it via a land-border other than Poipet/Aranya.  You can take a shared-Taxi from Battambang to Ban Laem, which is how I return to Thailand from Cambodia.  I would never use Poipet or risk flying to deal with Thai airport IOs, even with my Non-O ME Visa - certainly not Visa-Exempt or Tourist, unless I had a very sparse history of stays in Thailand.

 

I would guess the same people who bought-off both Bangkok airport immigrations + Poipet/Aranya, are extending their purchases into MFA territory.  That consulate would have been a relatively cheap/easy purchase, given it's corrupt-history and relatively low-volume of late.  All it would take, is an offer paying more than the agents were already paying.

In February this year I had the same problem In HCM! SETV with the stamp "VOID"! Upon request only laughter between two 20ish thai guys. Extremely rude, no any answer!

I had all docs, more than enough $$$ & a payed air ticket out! Also seen "visa agents" with a bunch of passports & papers...

In the aftermath I heard a lot steange things about the consulate  there in HCM! I strongly recomment to use Hanoi (very friendly, no waiting que at all) or Vientiane.

Good luck!

Is Big Joke now a "TV" reader? ????

9 hours ago, Bonobojt said:

Ok a bit of hope, can’t do international transfer payments on the Santander smartphone app, but you can do it on the actual online banking website. I’ll try later.

only problem I’m worried about is not being able to make the payment transfer because my card is blocked.

You can transfer online independend of your card. As I stated already it needs time. Maybe better to transfer to someone back home & let them send you by Western Union.

Forget about your banking app. Just login to the web version of your online banking. There you can easy use any bangk account with SWIFT to transfer your money.

Please be aware that such transfer from Europe to Thailand usually needs 3 till 4 workingdays, very rarely only 2.

Regards