Yellowtail

No

Well, let's hope Israel is able to eradicate Hamas as quickly as possible, while minimizing the number of civilian casualties.

Because Trump

Then you should be calling for Hamas to release the hostages and surrender.

No

What did he do last time that you did not like?

Yup, Trump's fault. Next!

You started with the emojis, I hate them. I guess we need a clear definition of what open boarder means. Okay, you are right, and I am wrong about whether or not the border is open, closed, partially opened or partially closed. Okay, my mistake, border security is great. I clicked it, and I really do not know what you're talking about. I said nothing about robots, and when you said somthng about needing workers I said we don't. Again, I don't know what you're talking about. What's with all the giant fonts and whatnot? I am sorry I called you a liar, my bad. Now would you please explain how with a labor force participation rate of about 60%, low wages, and rents at or just off of all-time how millions of people that do not share the language and culture, will likely never assimilate, are often illiterate in their native language and will immediately be put on public assistance, given free medical care and education with benefit working class Americans? Again, I've seen your links and I understand how it will benefit the rich and why the left loves it. What I'd like you to explain is how it will benefit poor and working-class Americans. You can't, because it won't, it only hurts them.

Four Iraqi civilians for every one combatant. How many civilian casualties do you think are acceptable in a war?

It's always a tell when the leftist elites condescend to the working class. What is wrong with collecting garbage?

Only a fifth of the Chinese killed in WW2 were combatants, so a third seems acceptable.

Thank you, hope springs eternal.

So trans men aren't real men? It's a pretty straight forward yes or no question.

It is interesting that the article mentions "...the onset of the Israel-Hamas conflict..." and "...the rise in anti-Muslim hate crimes..." and the "...detrimental impact on social cohesion in the UK." as well as the "surge in antisemitic attacks targeting the Jewish community in the UK", but it says nothing of the pro Hamas/Palestine protests in the UK. Why do you guys suppose that is?

So trans men aren't men? Finally, some common ground.

Do you have any sources from outside your echo chamber for that one?

I don't drink, I don't live in a condo, I do like the tum-yum Mama noodles now and then, I keep the AC at 23 and I'm on a marriage visa, so I don't think It costs me much to stay here visa wise. PS: Do you not like those Mama Noodles? I know they're cr*p, but they are tasty. PSS: Bush Mountain? That right there is funny!

Yes, but (unlike you) I read and comprehend them, and I am reassured.

For transgender men, pain of menstruation is more than just physical (nbcnews.com)

I'm a little short, can you let me hold something until my brother gets straightened out? Go with God brother, you show them!

We're going to miss you, Write if you find work.

The money is to get them in and voting as quickly as possible.

Exactly. Right now, it is open for the people that cross illegally, and closed to people (like me) that cross legally. I would like it closed to everyone without a legal reason to cross. Really? You asked "...why the heck do we need workers?" You're lying again. Why is it hilarious? because as it typical, you have no real response, so you throw out a silly line. You're either confused or lying again. I said nothing of robots, with or without penises. I want you to explain how with a labor force participation rate of about 60%, low wages, and rents at or just off of all-time how millions of people that do not share the language and culture, will likely never assimilate, are often illiterate in their native language and will immediately be put on public assistance, given free medical care and education with benefit working class Americans. I've seen your links and I understand how it will benefit the rich and why the left loves it. What I'd like you to explain is how it will benefit poor and working-class Americans. You can't, because it won't, it only hurts them.

I think pedophile (or paedophile depending on where you are from) refers more specifically to creeps that are sexually attracted to prepubescent children. Sadly, the left is so stupid it has become common to use it to describe anyone sexually attracted to a minor, so per your definition, anyone attracted to a 17-year-old, would be a pedophile. Being sexually attracted to children is not illegal, but adult having sex with a child/minor would legally be a child molester. In the event the victim was a prepubescent child/minor, the perpetrator would be a child molester (a crime) and a pedophile. (not a crime)