Yellowtail

Yet the same people elected a black man as President, and the percentage of both black and what people that thought race relations were good continued to increase until after President Obama was reelected, and then it plummeted. So the same people that elected him and reelected him suddenly turned into white supremacists. That makes perfect sense.

So, it is your position that the United States is characterized by racial inequality and injustice, and by your definition, indeed the forklift driver making $12 dollars an hour in my example is privileged because they are white, and both Oprah and President Obama are deprived of that, because they are black.

You did not suggest anything.

They'll pay me or the doctor one...

What's the plot?

So you agree, thanks.

The way Kamala was jumping up and down, she looked like she was at a Catholic wedding...

To the left, a forklift driver making $12 dollars an hour is privileged because they are white, while Oprah and President Obama are oppressed, because they are black.

a young child is having difficulty swimming in the water off Mar-A-Lago. Afraid the child is going to drown, yet not wanting to get his suit wet, Trump runs across the water and saves the child. The next day, the New York Times headline: "TRUMP CAN'T SWIM"

Yes, I am seriously asking why a majority of both white and black Americans felt race relations in the US were good prior to the Obama Administration, and what that number seemed to be increasing until halfway though the Obama's Administration at which point it nosedived. Any ideas?

You watch Fox? He did a lot better than I expected, but there was not much he said that I support. Mostly pandering for votes and attacking Trump.

Why do you want a refund, are you no longer going? Another good reason to use a credit card for bookings.

No, clearly lowest in June year of the Biden's first year, and still dropping. Did you notice that the precipitous drop started in the middle of the Obama Administration, long before Trump was on the scene? Why do you think that is?

Whose?

I did not ask you what you know, I asked you what you thought. You seem to want to be perceived as a military export, yet waffle on a pretty simple question. How does this translate to Trump throwing nuclear deterrence into doubt? Do you not think it is in NATO's best interest to have the members meeting their financial commitments? Didn't some NATO members actually increase their spending during the Trump administration? But as expected, the headline in the Trump-hating "Atlantic" hit-piece was: "Trump Encourages Putin to Attack NATO Members". which the article in no way supports but has you here regurgitating it as fact. Of course, anyone that does not agree with you is stupid and needs to be sent for reeducation, yes? I support having US troops on the ground in South Korea and Europe. The article cherry-picks half of a sentence out of context out of what was likely a lengthy response, and then writes a whole article designed to make reader believe Trump wants to abandon South Korea, and here you are regurgitation it as fact. The border bill would have only further facilitated Biden's open boarder policies. That the union supported it means nothing. Do you think the union members had any idea what was in it or voted on it? Why has Chuck Schumer refuse to even bring: "H.R. 2: Secure the Border Act of 2023" to the floor for a vote? Because he wants to keep the border open. Summary of H.R. 2: Secure the Border Act of 2023 - GovTrack.us And it is horrendous that the aid for Ukraine, Israel and the boarder are tied together. These should be bought up and voted on separately, but as always, the only things that matter are reelection and more power. Lorries? Who's writing this? The article is behind a paywall. Claiming the bill was killed at "...the behest of Donald Trump..." is ridiculous. The bill was worse than nothing, was written secret, and would have died once it hit the floor. I asked you what you thought Biden's end plan was, and you say Biden's plan it to continue funding it until the end. That's hilarious. What does the end/victory look like? I was pleasantly surprised that you also see Biden as being too weak. What is your fantasy based on? The Trump administration started providing Ukraine with defensive weapons long before the conflict, weapons that the previous administration refused to provide. I think Trump also sanctioned construction of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline that Biden ultimately lifted. Has Ukraine not had the defensive weapons provided by the Trump Administration, Putin would have taken Kyiv in a week. 1. What is your claim that "Trump wants to give Putin that success." based on? 2. Why do you think that Trump demanding NATO members meet their financial obligations translates to Trump throwing nuclear deterrence into doubt? 3. Do think it is the United States and NATO's best interest to have NATO members meet their financial commitments? 4. Why do you think at least some NATO members increase their spending significantly during the Trump administration? 5. How do you support your position that Trump wants to abandon South Korea? 6. Why do you think Biden reversed the Trump Administrations border polices, "Remain in Mexico" for example? 7. What does a victory in Ukraine look like to you? 8. Why do you Chuck Schumer has refused to bring: "H.R. 2: Secure the Border Act of 2023" to the floor for a vote? 9. Why do you think Ukraine, Israel and the boarder were all are tied together by Chuck Schumer? 10. Do you think bills for Ukraine, Israel and the boarder should be brought and voted on separately? 11. Do you agree the situation would likely be worse in Ukraine had the Trump Administration not provided them with defensive weapons that had been denied them under the previous administration?

Why do you think providing the names would the names be a dealbreaker for them?

Saw "Imaginary" yesterday. US horror, I thought it boring and ridiculous. Imaginary (2024) - IMDb

Saw "The Bricklayer" yesterday. About as expected. US spy-drama. It had it's moments and if you like this kind of thing, you should like this. The Bricklayer (2023) - IMDb

I've done it at home and at the hospital, and at the hospital is much, much better.

He does that a lot.

That's hilarious. Race Relations | Gallup Historical Trends

I thought we were discussing commercial studies. But even in academia, funding is required, and the funders drive the studies. I guess boys in the UK are different in the UK, but I would not expect the majority of boys in the US to respond truthfully about the extent of their sexual experiences. Do we agree that the minimum standardized test score to get into a particular university program should be the same for everyone? Unfortunately, at least in the US, "recourses" just means money, but it sounds good in the press, and like we're really going to do something, but we're not. We're going to keep doing everything the same way we've been doing it but were going to spend more money. Youve claimed that: "Equity before equality is justified sometimes and, in my example, race/ creed is not the driver behind the policy.", and you claimed you provide examples, but I missed them. What were the again? You're right, and British culture was no better than German culture in late '30s. Not to the Indians I worked with. Most of that describes the hard left.

Do you believe the country is more racially divided now than it was prior to the Obama Administration?

While I think we all agree that the rich are absolutely getting richer under Biden. Higg inflation drives investors into equities and the market goes up.

That's like saying that because social surveys are not 100% unbiased, they aren't useful or not accurate. I am only saying that any study presented to the public is suspect. Someone is paying for the study, and you would not be seeing it if it's not what they wanted you to see. If you saw a study that surveyed 1,000 15-year-old boys about their sexual activity, how credible would you expect the results to be? It's really no different. It is difficult, that's why it's ignored. It's easy to disallow an Asian with a 1500 score on the SAT in favor of a black with a 1400. How? What are the public policies whereby a less qualified individual should be favored over a more qualified individual due to their skin color? I think it's only difficult for some. I think American culture is superior Chinese culture. India would not be what is but for Briton. How do you define the extreme right?