Yellowtail

It is only obvious to people that do not think things through. When six people buy insurance, only six people are covered. When 100 people buy insurance, 100 people have to be covered. The people already buying insurance generally have assets they stand to lose. The people that go without insurance, often do not. Right now, you pay the money and get the travel insurance. You (apparently) want to compel people to provide a lot of personal information that the insurance company has to verify, which would take weeks and add cost.

I think the easiest/best thing to do is to make the rental companies liable.

To a lot of people, it is pretty black and white. The side that in intentionally targeting civilians is evil and needs to be eradicated. The only people that see a lot of grey, are the people claiming the intentional targeting of civilians is justified.

So be it.

You're not answering, you're just repeating your claim. You previously claimed: "The election was in 2006, and the US & Israel have not permitted another election or the emergence of younger moderates to contest new Palestinian elections." What are the US and Israel doing to prevent elections?

Looks like the Ranger

Some American families call Joe Biden, Donald Trump and Abraham Lincon traitors,

The hostages are worth a lot more to hamas than the Palestinians.

Unless maybe she lost control and slid in front of him. The article in not clear enough to do anything but guess. In any evet, even is another motorcyclist was at fault, it is not likely they have the money to cover it,

How have the US and Israel disallowed elections?

Of course, mandating insurance and forcing insurers to cover anything that happens will absolutely drive the cost down, great thinking. How will you determine which travelers are higher risk?

Of course, nothing that puts hamas in a negative light is factual.

So how many babies does hamas have to decapitate before it becomes unacceptable? And why are armed 17-year-olds always referred to a children by the left?

So that's a no then. Thanks.

Wikipedia, that's hilarious.

Just like the suckers that work and save their money are compelled to pay for those that don't...

Right, good luck with that.

Mostly from Afghanistan, yes?

I am fine with paying for insurance. I just do not want to pay to for coverage of risky behavior I have no interest in participating in. Let the people that want to participate in those behaviors pay for that coverage. Your plan to mandate all travel insurance covers people riding motorcycles, getting drunk and climbing on balconies drives the cost up significantly for everyone.

So you were making it up, that's what I thought. Compelling everyone to pay for coverage of reckless behavior they have no intention of participating in, subsidizes the coverage for people that do participate in that kind of behavior.

For travel insurance? I'm from the US, I've purchase travel insurance any number of times and I think you're just making it up.

Clearly

Protesting for chickensh*ts. It's like taking a knee at a ballgame.

The Jews bought in...

Yes, they all raised the rent and forced everyone out of business. The coved shutdown had nothing to do with it and was just a coincidence.