Jump to content

PattayaJames

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PattayaJames

  1. Just now, Tie Dye Samurai said:

    OK James, I said that he was a 17 year old kid across state lines violating a curfew (breaking the law) looking to shoot his rifle at somebody and play Militia...he got what he wanted. He killed somebody, tried to run behind the cops for protection...got chased for what he did and shot up some more people....but he was not "defending property" and certainly not his own property.

     

     

    He worked in Kenosha, he was there to defend property.

    He was not looking to kill, he was attacked and defended himself.

    He immediately tried to surrender to police.

    He was chased down, attacked by an armed mob and defended himself again.

    He surrendered to the police.

     

    Strange how some are so happy to side with the violent mobs destroying property.

     

     

    • Confused 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. 1 hour ago, Tie Dye Samurai said:

    No, he was a 17 year old kid across state lines violating a curfew (breaking the law) looking to shoot his rifle at somebody and play Militia...he got what he wanted. He killed somebody, tried to run behind the cops for protection...got chased for what he did and shot up some more people....but he was not "defending property" and certainly not his own property.

     

    Your opinion and far from the facts.

    • Thanks 1
  3. 3 minutes ago, xylophone said:

    Trump to Pay $2 Million in Damages for Illegal Activity During 2016 Election 

     

    So stealing funds collected on behalf of a charity and using them to pay his own bills is not a crime? But it is illegal so "against the law".

     

    Phrase it any way you like, but it is the way that a crook operates, like it or not.

     

    You should look into Biden's Cancer Charity.

    • Confused 2
  4. 4 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

    So how close could the Dem observers get?  The same? How unfair!

     

    How about in FL?  Ohio? NC? How close could Dem observers get?

     

    And why isn't lindsey calling election officials in OH, FL, NC, etc., to ask them to invalidate ballots?

     

    The repubs are sitting back and allowing this attack against democracy all because they live in fear of 45's cult.

     

    All observers in all states should be close enough to be able to meaningfully observe, else what is the point?

    • Thanks 1
  5. 8 hours ago, CrunchWrapSupreme said:

    Were they allowed in the room? Yes. Could they see the ballots being counted? Yes. The only complaint is distance. How close do they want them? They cannot be breathing down the workers' necks. The cases are being dismissed.

     

    Close enough to be able to see and verify the ballots.

    If they cannot see the content of the ballots what are they observing? 

    • Like 2
    • Confused 1
  6. 22 minutes ago, joecoolfrog said:

    Many were devastated , rightly so in hindsight , but they sucked up the result, what however did NOT happen ;

    Clinton did NOT pretend she had won and refused to accept the result.

    Clinton did NOT say the election was rigged or stolen, nor did her supporters.

     

    She literally wrote a book about it: What Happened by Hillary Rodham Clinton.

     

    She lays out how the 2016 election was marked by an unprecedented assault on democracy by a foreign adversary. By analysing the evidence and connecting the dots, Hillary shows just how dangerous the forces are that shaped the outcome, and why Americans need to understand them to protect their values and democracy in the future.

     

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...