PattayaJames

3 hours ago, placeholder said:

They just withdrew the one part of their lawsuit that could technically could have reversed the count in Pennsylvania. Do try to keep up.

Looks like just another Fake News story:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-campaign-pennsylvania-lawsuit-washington-post-report

Monday morning, Trump retweeted a message from Murtaugh that said the new complaint "absolutely still makes an issue of" more than 600,000 ballots that were allegedly processed without proper observation.

Murtaugh had called the Post's report "completely erroneous" and said that "to write that we had scrapped that argument requires not reading the amended complaint."

"They didn’t read para 132-150 which repeat all the allegations of the 680,777 mail in votes which were deliberately concealed from Republican inspectors," Giuliani said.

13 minutes ago, klauskunkel said:

 

He says that his cases are big and he will be filing them soon. 

And you believe this? Why would he lie to you? Maybe so you become outraged and chant "Stop the Steal" on the streets?

During his presidency one has heard so many lies, unfulfilled promises and head-shaking inducing statements, from the border wall to Kim Jong Un's nukes and back, that it seems conducive for one's own sake to take whatever he says with a grain of salt. Make that a shovel of salt.

Trumpism easily infects less critical minds.

Time will tell. 

Media Anti-Trumpism easily infects less critical minds

1 minute ago, ChouDoufu said:

 

be serious, man!

ya needs..........e-vi-dents..........ta builds a case.

something sorely lacking in their submissions.

As we were just discussing they have not submitted this case yet. Try to keep up.

8 minutes ago, Sujo said:

What fraud?

I don't know, Peter saw something about it on the news?

1 hour ago, Peter Denis said:

Saw a news-vid that Trumps lawyer's are contesting the results of two counties in Michigan because of voter-fraud.

Apart from the fact that Biden won that state with a more than comfortable margin, closer scrutiny of the claims revealed that these were two counties where Trump actually won...  Oops!

So far from the competent Trump team....

 

I think the details could be in the lawsuit? 

2 minutes ago, Peter Denis said:

Saw a news-vid that Trumps lawyer's are contesting the results of two counties in Michigan because of voter-fraud.

Apart from the fact that Biden won with a more than comfortable margin there, closer scrutiny of the claims revealed that these were two counties where Trump actually won...  Oops!

So far from the competent Trump team....

 

LOL he is so stupid.

Oh wait, could he increase his lead even if he already won a county despite fraud?

Could that still affect the state result???? 

5 hours ago, webfact said:

"Our big cases showing the unconstitutionality of the 2020 Election, & the outrage of things that were done to change the outcome, will soon be filed!," he tweeted.

 

 

2 hours ago, klauskunkel said:

Trump supporters: Do you ever critically examine the statements from your leader, or do you just absorb everything he says?

Well let me see, he seems to be saying that they have not filed their main cases yet.

You have a problem with that?

4 minutes ago, Phoenix Rising said:

Hat's off to you Sir, your hearing must must be extraordinary if you manage to confuse a lame fart for a bombshell!

I don't know Presidents have been impeached for less. 

1 hour ago, Phoenix Rising said:

Trump Has Reportedly Been Asking About Pardons for Himself, His Family, and More

 

As Soon as Trump Leaves Office, He Faces Greater Risk of Prosecution

How quickly the need for verification disappeared after the Hunter laptop bombshell. 

13 minutes ago, ChouDoufu said:

12th?  methinks thou doth meaneth the 25th.

of course that will require that trump first be "certified," something we can all agree is "the right thing to do."

You do NOT speak for all. In fact probably just a tiny percentage of sad muppets. 

1 minute ago, johnnybangkok said:

For Trump perhaps (he has got a lot to answer for after all) but not neccessarily his supporters. There's a realisation that over 70 million Americans still thought he was the best bet for another 4 years and that has to be addressed at some point. That realisation will require careful thought and understanding as you can't write off 70 million people as all right wing conspiracy theorists and red-knecks.

It would help though if people like yourself were not quite so sensative to any justifiable criticism and also understand that your man has indeed lost and it's now time to move on.

Not necessarily his supporters. Oh your too forgiving.

So sorry for being too sensitive to your justifiable criticisms. 

After the last 4 years, you now want sweetness and light. You are deluded.

5 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

You are trying desperately to find some sort of antagonism, gloating or derogatory statements (possibly as a reflection of your own behavious over the last 4 years) but are struggling to do so. As far as I can see, the vast majority of Biden fans (or anti-Trump people) posting on this site have just expressed relief and gratitude that the nightmare of the last 4 years is finally over and no amount of you trying to stir up an argument is going to change that.

Jingthing only commented that getting fired by Trump may not do a persons career too much harm (a very valid point). That's all. Nothing too harsh, nothing particularly upsetting but you are infering in a particiularly sarcastic manner that this is somehow not 'uniting and healing'.

Let it go. Please.

Absolute tosh.

The knives are very much out for Trump and his supporters.

11 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Nope, see this quote from the OP.

OK fair enough I was quoting the following part:

1 hour ago, webfact said:

But he did say he was authorizing prosecutors to "pursue substantial allegations" of irregularities of voting and the counting of ballots.

 

Richard Pilger, who for years has served as director of the Election Crimes Branch, announced in an internal email he was resigning from his post after he read "the new policy and its ramifications."

 

4 minutes ago, stevenl said:

You left out 'any,', which indicates no such allegations have been made yet.

On the contrary you have inserted it.

Barr authorises prosecutors to "pursue substantial allegations" of irregularities of voting and the counting of ballots.

Director of the Election Crimes Branch, resigns after he reading "the new policy and its ramifications."

Interesting!