Jump to content

PattayaJames

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PattayaJames

  1. 2 minutes ago, placeholder said:

    You probably remember wrongly. The gripes were about the electoral college. But even if some posters here did question the honesty of the vote, it wasn't echoed by Democratic leaders and it certainly wasn't instigated by Hillary Clinton. The hypocrisy here is monumental. Trump supporters accused those who didn't vote for Trump of not accepting the results of the 2016 election. But there was no huge cry of fraud. Now we have Trump supporters doing exactly what they falsely accused Trump's opponents of doing.  

     

    No huge cry of fraud? I think someone may have mentioned the possibility of Russian interference, not sure? It faded away quickly LOL 

  2. 16 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

    It would obviously take a long time. 45s end game is provoke enough uncertainty and chaos to rationalize having Republican controlled legislatures send electors to vote the opposite of how their state voted. There is a remote chance that could happen. Its impossible to predict how the people would react to such an anti democracy outrage.

     

    In case you're wondering yes that would be legal. Outrageous, not done, but legal and could.be done.

     

    I seem to remember posters on here arguing for the exact thing after Trump won in 2016.

    • Like 2
  3. 2 hours ago, placeholder said:

    “STOP THE COUNT,” Trump bellowed on Twitter, a missive he quickly retweeted just over an hour later. “ANY VOTE THAT CAME IN AFTER ELECTION DAY WILL NOT BE COUNTED!” he added.

    The only problem: If the vote-counting stopped at that moment, Trump would lose.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-mood-election/2020/11/05/57fabc34-1f9c-11eb-b532-05c751cd5dc2_story.html

     

    He want's observers in, as is legally allowed.

    Strange that they don't want to let them in, what do they have to hide?

    • Confused 1
    • Sad 1
  4. 37 minutes ago, placeholder said:

    And Jesus is ultimately going to return.

    "Ultimately" is one of those flabby words that render a statement unimpeachable because unfalsifiable. 

    We already have had a Horowitz investigation, a Huber investigation, and a Bash investigation turn up nothing. Now the true believers are pinning their hopes on the Durham investigation which so far has found one low level lawyer guilty of falsifying a document. I can remember not long ago when certain parties were claiming that there would be a huge number of indictments and convictions of traitorous Deep State criminals resulting from these investigations. You still have high hopes for the Durham investigation?

     

    I was clearly talking about how history would record this time. 

    Not about current affairs. 

    You can understand the difference?

     

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  5. 18 minutes ago, Morch said:

    What, exactly, was 'misrepresented', in your opinion?

     

    Well the headline for a start: Trump says he'll go to Supreme Court to stop votes from being counted.

     

    While their own quotes show he never said this:  "We want all voting to stop. We don’t want them to find any ballots at four o’clock in the morning and add them to the list."

     

    “We are up BIG, but they are trying to STEAL the Election. We will never let them do it. Votes cannot be cast after the Polls are closed!” Trump tweeted shortly after Biden’s remarks. His tweet was later labeled by Twitter as containing misleading content.

     

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...