
Eloquent pilgrim
Advanced Member-
Posts
3,206 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Eloquent pilgrim
-
Starmer’s Brexit Reset: A Strategic Shift or a Sacrifice?
Eloquent pilgrim replied to Social Media's topic in World News
Once again you demonstrate that the only tools in your armoury, and consequently your only contributions, are contradiction, personal insults, and cognitive incoherence. You behave like a kid in a ‘yes it is, no it isn’t’ playground exchange, continually under the misconception that as long as you are the last to speak, you have somehow won the exchange; this belief drives you to continually embarrass yourself, so keep it coming, it’s great entertainment. -
Starmer’s Brexit Reset: A Strategic Shift or a Sacrifice?
Eloquent pilgrim replied to Social Media's topic in World News
You now seem to be using incoherence as a debating tactic; a truly fascinating ploy ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -
Starmer’s Brexit Reset: A Strategic Shift or a Sacrifice?
Eloquent pilgrim replied to Social Media's topic in World News
Time for you to put the shovel down and stop embarrassing yourself. Didn’t even know the name of the Prime Minister of the UK …. ha ha ha haha ha -
Starmer’s Brexit Reset: A Strategic Shift or a Sacrifice?
Eloquent pilgrim replied to Social Media's topic in World News
You don't even know his name .... absolutely hilarious, most embarrassing comment on here so far this year. -
Starmer’s Brexit Reset: A Strategic Shift or a Sacrifice?
Eloquent pilgrim replied to Social Media's topic in World News
Extending the agreement by another 12 years with nothing tangible in return, is a disgraceful betrayal of the UK’s fishermen, but unfortunately, it is not the first, as we belatedly discovered in 2000 under the 30 year rule. With the release of Government papers under this rule, we now know that Geoffrey Rippon, fisheries minister at the time, told the treacherous Ted Heath, Tory Prime Minister at the time, "If we want to enter the EEC (as it was then known) under the terms stated by General De Gaulle, we will have to sacrifice Britain’s fishermen, which is exactly what he did. The Common Fisheries policy was hastily introduced by the original 6 members at the instigation of France, at the time that Britain was negotiating membership. It was a simple ploy by the members states to give all members equal fishing rights to UK territorial waters, reducing the protection zone of our fishermen’s rights to 12 miles from the coastline from its previous 200. It also introduced an absurd quota system that has not only seen millions upon millions of fish thrown back into the sea for gulls to feed on, but has resulted in our fishing industry, that was the largest in all of Europe, being completely decimated, leaving huge unemployment and poverty in towns like Hull and Grimsby, the latter once being the largest fishing port in the world. This is yet another sad betrayal of the UK’s fishermen, and the irony of the UK being an island nation, surrounded by bountiful supplies of fish should not be lost on anyone. -
Probably best to heed the advice that Sheryl has given, and more or less ignore anything else. You might find an MRI scan uncomfortable; lying motionless for an hour is not the doddle it sounds, if you are already in discomfort, but is probably a must do starting point for you.
-
Oh no, not another post for the bedwetting lefties and the crybaby democrats, who it transpires only like democracy when it produces a result they like …. give it a rest.
- 102 replies
-
- 16
-
-
-
-
-
Excellent; what she did was wilful, arrogant, and wrong, and against the interests of law abiding US citizens; and although I doubt if she will be convicted, she will think very carefully before any such future action
- 51 replies
-
- 13
-
-
-
-
-
The problem for you, is that you lost any credibility on this forum when you spitefully and completely incorrectly accused another poster of being a blind racist; you throw the racist card around like it was a Supermarket card that accrues in value the more often it is used. Despite being asked, you have not found the good grace to apologise for that nasty and completely undeserving slur, yet you call other people’s comments cowardly, whilst continually moralising to everyone. Your comments no longer have any value because nobody now knows if anything you say is genuine or fraudulent, like your slur to @ThreeCardMonte
-
And yet what you perceive as a problem, is entirely of your own making; because when you falsely accuse someone of being a ‘blind racist’ you devalue the term racist; it becomes meaningless when you throw it around like confetti and use it fraudulently as you have on this very topic. And you still have not summoned the good grace to apologise for that entirely false accusation, yet are prepared to call others cowardly.
-
This is a typical left wing default deflection tactic; you tell me that I should, like yourself, take the western propaganda machine with a pinch of salt. Fine, I am prepared to do that, and have asked you what news sources I should look at to gain a different perspective, and guess what, you can’t tell me. So I ask you again, which news outlets should I look at the get the truth … thanks And try to stay polite please
-
To say that you don’t have an opinion as to whether or not Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organisations is totally disingenuous; if you cannot, after what happened on 7 October 23, state unequivocally that Hamas are a terrorist organisation, then you are an apologist for terrorism. There is no grey area, and if you had watched “Surviving October 7th: We will dance again” on BBC iPlayer, you would have to be without humanity to think that Hamas were just freedom fighters; but maybe you wouldn’t even believe the documentary was authentic as it is broadcast by a mainstream outlet. And what exactly do you consider in your sweeping generalisation, the “western propaganda machine” to be; and more importantly, where do you therefor get all your news from, because I would be interested to read from your sources in order to give myself a different perspective.
-
Does that mean that you think the two aforementioned organisations, Hamas, and Hezbollah, are freedom fighters rather than terrorists ? Can’t think of any reason you would say it if you don’t.
-
I am extremely grateful to the UK intelligence agency, and the counterterrorism police for apprehending these would be Islamic terrorists, so why would I want to read anything from this left-wing, antisemitic, crackpot. I do not read anything that supporters of terrorism have to say, although you are obviously happy to. This man has been previously arrested for supporting two proscribed terrorist organisations, and yet here you are promoting his ramblings. I hope you are not a UK citizen, because if you are, you are an enormous part of the problem that both the UK and the rest of Europe face with the existential threat of Islam.
-
Would that be the same Craig Murray, the antisemite conspiracy theorist, that has been arrested by counterterrorism police for voicing his support for both Hamas, and Hezbollah ? Clear to see where your loyalties lie.