Chomper Higgot

12 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

And again, none of you screechers can give any facts, or even the statute that was violated.

 

How do you know the case will even go to the jury?

I’ve linked the indictment on at least two occasions since Defendant Trump was placed on trial.

7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

What does that have to do with anyhting other than his credibility

It demonstrates he is able and willing to man-up and admit to his wrong doing.

Definitely more credible than someone who denies responsibility, blames everyone else and refuses to defend himself under oath.

11 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Huh? Not President Trumps place to explain anyhting. Why shift a way from the real issue: facts supporting each and every element of the offense, which nobody has shown.

Reminding you once again.

The Jury will decide what has and has not been proven.

It won’t be long now until they do.

27 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Nothing!

But you are making him out to be some downtrodden pro bono lawyer who scaped his way up the the legal and political gravy train!

He is a multimillionaire and the Starmer family live together in £1.75 million home in Camden, London!

He is just another so called labour politician with his snout in the political trough!

There’s that green envy of yours again.

‘Snout in the political trough’.

Do you have evidence that Starmer has obtained any of his money other than by wholly legal and above board means?

Or are you engaging in green envy driven baseless innuendo?

53 minutes ago, NoshowJones said:

I have hated every Labour PM in my adult lifetime, all Liars and Hypocrites worse than the Tories towards the working man.

There’s a good boy, doing as you are told.

12 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

And make a fortune for himself on the way!

True Labour, my @rse! 😃

He is no more labour than Blair was!

Putting aside what looks like a big broad stipe of green envy running through your posts, what’s wrong with making money by working for it?

5 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Not quite!

Starmer was born in London and raised in Surrey, where he attended the selective state Reigate Grammar School, which became a private school while he was a student. He graduated with a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Leeds in 1985 and gained a postgraduate Bachelor of Civil Law degree at St Edmund Hall at the University of Oxford in 1986. Starmer practised predominantly in criminal defence work, specialising in human rights matters. Becoming a member of Doughty Street Chambers in 1990, he was appointed as Queen's Counsel (QC) in 2002. In 2008, he became Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and Head of the Crown Prosecution Service, holding these positions until 2013. On conclusion of his five-year term as DPP, he was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath (KCB) in the 2014 New Year Honours.

So he earned his place at this selective grammar school.

And then received earned a bursary.

Then went on to demonstrate academic excellence.

While the PM cons the gullible with ‘Stop the boats’ from his lectern, the gap between his words and the Government’s actual policies grows wider in the background:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/may/14/home-office-department-processing-rwanda-deportations-told-to-cut-jobs

On 5/14/2024 at 1:03 PM, Purdey said:

Unfortunately, the LibDems offer nothing as an alternative, though picking up local seats wont mean they will ever be the government.

The way the polls are headed the LibDens might wind up as the Opposition.

2 hours ago, NoshowJones said:

Rishi is bad enough, but are the British working class people really wanting to vote for a multimillionaire "Sir" as the PM? Do they really think that this "Sir" is going to be interested in them?

The ‘Sir’, a life long member of the Labour Party, son of ordinary working people who cut his legal teeth as a young lawyer working pro-bono cases and worked for everything he has, including his knighthood, and who has consistently demonstrated his commitment to improving the lives of ordinary working people.

You‘ll get an answer to your question once Rishi has stopped hiding from the electorate.

3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Reverting to the usual glib replies when you have nothing to support your position .

 

Well noted 😄.

Your posting history of grossly generalized pejorative views direct at immigrants, in your latest offering extending to generations of their offspring, is all the explanation I need of the cause behind your ‘strange logic’.

We can of course come back to this the next time you kick off about immigrants, I doubt it will be long coming.

6 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I can't believe that Trump would allow his lawyers to not call a witness.

I can believe he himself will not take the stand.

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

When the jury hands down the guilty verdict. You stocked up on tissue? 

 

I will accept the jury verdict whatever that verdict is, you can hold me to that.

You on the other hand will not.

All we are hearing from Defendant Trump’s supporters right now is them lining up their excuses for not accepting the verdict in the event the jury hands down a conviction.

31 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Judgement entered. Appeals finished. She will pay her flabby arsed Orange Lover a percentage of every trick she turns forever. And then his kids, and his grandkids, until she heads to that big brothel in the sky and then whats left of her pitiable life will be sold to Thrift stores and the few pennies realized will go to them too.

 

Poetic justice

Got your hate bubbling in that one.

53 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Bet you cant name one case where a Prosecutor presented a witness who was an adjudicated perjurer.

 

The People of New York State 

against 

Donald J Trump 

                                    Defendant.

https://manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Not really. It actually makes sense if you would open your mind for a second (unlikely). 

 

1st gen immigrants chose to come for a better life. They appreciate what the UK gives them and know the reality of the country they came from. A lot of second and third gen immigrants seem to resent the UK and build up an idealized view of their 'country of origin' that they know nothing about. 

 

The likes of Anthony Joshua always banging on about how great Nigeria is when he's never lived there full time and made hundreds of millions in the UK on the back of Team GB at the olympics. Making speeches with BLM, telling people not to buy from non-black owned businesses (even though he works for Eddie Hearn and DAZN 😃).

 

Americans do it too. Markle and her recent tour of Nigeria, declaring she is 'home' because she claims to be 43% Nigerian. A self declared feminist so complimentary of a country that multilates girls genitalia and forces them to marry in their early teens. Merching herself on the back of royal titles given to her by marrying a British Prince. A true feminist if ever I saw one. 

 

So yes, immigration can cause issues beyond the first generation. Even though you inevitably won't like the anecdotal examples above, the stats I provided from the UK government clearly back that up. 

From strange to even more strange.

You’re on a roll.

The Prosecution have listed only one more witness, which suggests this case might very well go forward to jury deliberations within the next week.

14 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

All your argument is proving is that second and third gen immigrants are probably more of a problem than first gen. So it's a long term problem as well as short term. Maybe more so. An interesting argument for someone who is pro immigration  

That’s some strange kind of logic.

Knife crime has been tackled in the UK before; Glasgow, once known as the murder capital of Europe took a different approach to blaming immigrants or ‘blacks’ and it worked:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13624806231208432