Chomper Higgot

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

In a thread where they talk about the Great Orange Weiner banging a blowsy slut. Bet you a lot of classy guys here are showering up to go to Nana, and the rest wanting to.

Feel free to point out examples of me using offensive language.

I don’t need to denigrate any of the witnesses or the defendant.

1 minute ago, G_Money said:

Surprise Surprise !  Threes weeks in and still no evidence Trump committed any crimes.

 

My prediction is the jury will acquit.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/da-bragg-stormy-daniels-save-trump-case-something-happened

It’s a possibility.

If possible I’ll watch the verdict announced on FOX.

I think it’s a fair balance between the risk of disappointment and the reward of an exquisitely enjoyable FOX reaction.

35 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Had he called a personal NDA a campaign expense, it would have been called illegal, and he'd be in court for it. 

 

Meanwhile, no one give a whit that Hillary Clinton hired the DNC to pay the Perkins Coie law firm to pay Fusions GPS to pay Christopher Steel who was a British subject, a foreign national who was forbidden by statute to work for a Presidential campaign to collect a false dossier and seed it, and then she wrote the whole thing off not a campaign expense, but as a legal expense. 

Is Hilary receiving free accommodation in your head a permissible campaign contribution I wonder?

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

He's not on trial for having an affair, he's on trial for having beaten Hillary Clinton. 

 

This lady’s and gentlemen is the alternate universe Trump supporters inhabit.

Just now, G_Money said:

Perhaps you should redirect your “depravity” lecture to a certain CNN individual.

 

He could certainly use it.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ex-cnn-producer-john-griffin-sentenced-19-years-child-sex-crimes
 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ex-cnn-producer-settles-lawsuit-sex-acts-9-year-old-girl

I see you’ve gone full blown whataboutary.

1 minute ago, G_Money said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-trial-judge-compared-corrupt-dictatorships-stormy-daniels-unleashes-salacious-testimony

 

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6352492195112

What was on display in court was Trump’s depravity.

4 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

I understand that it is a good show for the prosecutor to bring her to court and let her talk.

But is that really important?

He is accused of falsifying business records to influence the election.

Does anybody have to hear from her what he was wearing on that day and how he behaved to make up their mind if he falsified business records or not?

 

It's like when one person in a couple admits that they had extramarital sex. Is it really necessary to tell all the details of when and how? Or is it enough to admit that sex happened? Details are irrelevant.

 

 

For the jury to hear details of the affair and determine if that is credible motivation for the alleged crimes.

It must have been stomach turning to have to hear, but hearing it and watching the witness, watching the defendant as the testimony was given.

It seems very relevant to a full understanding of the case.

10 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Did Trump f her and give her money to keep it quiet? Most likely yes.

And now? Is that a reason that he should go to jail?

 

I don't like Trump and I would love to see him in jail. But please for a real crime and not paying a hooker for sex.

And the argument with influencing the election is just BS. Everybody in politics tries to persuade the voters to vote for them and their party friends and don't vote for those others. We are the good guys, they are the bad guys, look at this and that and whatever.

Some true stories, lots of lies, and lots of things which are swept under the carpet.

If that would be a crime than all politicians would be in jail.

 

He should be prosecuted for the real crimes which he (most likely) did. The list is long.

Or do you want that someone is not prosecuted for treason but goes to jail for paying a hooker? 

The real crimes are listed in the indictment.

Stormy Daniels’ testimony speaks to the motivation behind those crimes.

The Defence trying to shut  down the trial at precisely the point Daniels gives her testimony is confirmation that the Defendant really did not want the details of their affair to become known.

It’s very striking that the Defense hasn’t challenged the documentary evidence and testimony to the indicted crimes but are going on full assault to shutdown Daniels, who is not testifying on the matter of ‘crimes’.

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Anything he says

The stuff you can’t demonstrate to be incorrect.

Just now, jerrymahoney said:

Her testimony is just that. No corroborable evidence that the encounter was as she described.

Well apart from the phone logs.

And as you know, testimony is not always corroborated, Juries get to decide if it is credible, especially if other testimony recounts pattern behaviour.

Regardless, your slurring the witness is noted.

2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

What part of the post you quoted is incorrect?

There’s the reason for his anguish and personal attacks.

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Dude, when Im walking down the street in NYC and some homeless scruff yells at me to prove that the Moon isnt made of green cheese I just yawn and carry on.

 

I was merely pointing out to the casual readers of this fine forum that there are folks out there who spew utter nonsense based on a pathological condition. That wasnt an invite to debate. Go look it up yourself. 

Yet more ad hominem.

I look forward to you identifying what in my post you objected to is not aligned with US law or US court practice.

2 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

I believe in corroborable evidence which neither of them have.

What we have evidence of is you attempting to slur the sworn testimony of Daniels with the ‘women can’t be trusted’ trope.

4 minutes ago, morrobay said:

That's right she tells the truth: Like why o why are Billion$ going down this Ukraine rabbit hole* when the Southern "border" is wide open for millions of asian and middle east males . And physical and social infrastructure is decaying in the USA.  What is so baffling here are all these SAPS with their confused and joker responses. Are they really that confused? In denial/oblivious? All above. Unbelievable!

 

Perhaps you should take that up with the Republicans, who scuppered the Bi-Partisan Bordet Security Bill to please Trump.

4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Your lack of knowledge about US law is blatant, not baseless. The more you post, the more ignorance you spew.

Go back to the post you are objecting to and identify anything that is outside U.S. Law or U.S. court procedure.