Chomper Higgot

10 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Did Trump f her and give her money to keep it quiet? Most likely yes.

And now? Is that a reason that he should go to jail?

 

I don't like Trump and I would love to see him in jail. But please for a real crime and not paying a hooker for sex.

And the argument with influencing the election is just BS. Everybody in politics tries to persuade the voters to vote for them and their party friends and don't vote for those others. We are the good guys, they are the bad guys, look at this and that and whatever.

Some true stories, lots of lies, and lots of things which are swept under the carpet.

If that would be a crime than all politicians would be in jail.

 

He should be prosecuted for the real crimes which he (most likely) did. The list is long.

Or do you want that someone is not prosecuted for treason but goes to jail for paying a hooker? 

The real crimes are listed in the indictment.

Stormy Daniels’ testimony speaks to the motivation behind those crimes.

The Defence trying to shut  down the trial at precisely the point Daniels gives her testimony is confirmation that the Defendant really did not want the details of their affair to become known.

It’s very striking that the Defense hasn’t challenged the documentary evidence and testimony to the indicted crimes but are going on full assault to shutdown Daniels, who is not testifying on the matter of ‘crimes’.

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Anything he says

The stuff you can’t demonstrate to be incorrect.

Just now, jerrymahoney said:

Her testimony is just that. No corroborable evidence that the encounter was as she described.

Well apart from the phone logs.

And as you know, testimony is not always corroborated, Juries get to decide if it is credible, especially if other testimony recounts pattern behaviour.

Regardless, your slurring the witness is noted.

2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

What part of the post you quoted is incorrect?

There’s the reason for his anguish and personal attacks.

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Dude, when Im walking down the street in NYC and some homeless scruff yells at me to prove that the Moon isnt made of green cheese I just yawn and carry on.

 

I was merely pointing out to the casual readers of this fine forum that there are folks out there who spew utter nonsense based on a pathological condition. That wasnt an invite to debate. Go look it up yourself. 

Yet more ad hominem.

I look forward to you identifying what in my post you objected to is not aligned with US law or US court practice.

2 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

I believe in corroborable evidence which neither of them have.

What we have evidence of is you attempting to slur the sworn testimony of Daniels with the ‘women can’t be trusted’ trope.

4 minutes ago, morrobay said:

That's right she tells the truth: Like why o why are Billion$ going down this Ukraine rabbit hole* when the Southern "border" is wide open for millions of asian and middle east males . And physical and social infrastructure is decaying in the USA.  What is so baffling here are all these SAPS with their confused and joker responses. Are they really that confused? In denial/oblivious? All above. Unbelievable!

 

Perhaps you should take that up with the Republicans, who scuppered the Bi-Partisan Bordet Security Bill to please Trump.

4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Your lack of knowledge about US law is blatant, not baseless. The more you post, the more ignorance you spew.

Go back to the post you are objecting to and identify anything that is outside U.S. Law or U.S. court procedure. 

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

I loove it when folks with no knowledge of US law pontificate.

I’m sure you do.

I love it when Trump fans run out of arguments and resort to making baseless assumptions about those whose opinion they can’t deal with.

There needs to be a medal to recognize this level of stupid amongst serving members of the military.

So Daniels gives sworn testimony on the sexual encounter that Defendant Trump denied took place and that the Prosecution allege was the facts that the Defendant conspired to hide from voters.

The Defense are given the opportunity to cross examine and of course Defendant Trump can himself take the stand.

What the Defense choose to do is put on a performance for their client.

20 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

 what a joke, howard stern calls biden the 'grandpa everyone needs...basically a demented ol fool... drew barrymore... calls cackilin kamila.. 'momula', no wonder Trumpo gets votes, you follow that <deleted>e you are part of the problem, walker, lancit & chomper..get a grip on reality, jeez!

 

Is that the same Howard Stern who said:

“The oddity in all of this is the people Trump despises most, love him the most,” said Stern on Tuesday. “The people who are voting for Trump, for the most part … He wouldn’t even let them in a f*****g hotel. He’d be disgusted by them.”
 

And:
 

“I don’t hate Donald,” Stern said. “I hate you for voting for him, for not having intelligence.”

https://deadline.com/2020/05/howard-stern-donald-trump-despises-maga-supporters-1202933838/

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

so, in your head you are making a tongue in cheek comment into fact, similar to the 'bloodbath' comment when referring to the auto industry.

Trump who already tried to overthrow the result of an election, promises to be a dictator on Day 1 is not ‘tongue in cheeks’ anything.

It’s a warning from the would be dictator’s own mouth.