Chomper Higgot

11 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Back on topic, this is an interesting one. I was following it myself as it unfolded and witnessing the media bias and misinformation happening.

 

Unearthing the Story Behind the Gazan Mass Graves

Over the past week, Palestinian teams have been unearthing mass graves outside two Gaza medical complexes, Nasser hospital in Khan Yunis and Al Shifa hospital in Gaza City, following the withdrawal of Israeli forces who were conducting counter-terrorism operations in the area.

With the opening of these mass graves, social media and some traditional news outlets have been abuzz with claims that these graves are evidence of mass killings of Palestinians by Israelis and that some of those found inside the graves show signs of being tortured and killed execution-style with their hands tied behind their backs.

https://honestreporting.com/unearthing-the-story-behind-the-gazan-mass-graves/

 

The above reminds me a little of the alleged bombing in the hospital car park that was supposedly carried out by Israel and killed up to 800 people. 

This ‘honestreporting.org’?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HonestReporting

Weisselberg, a $750,000 bung got mentioned in court right at the end of Friday’s session.

Defendant Trump’s lawyers let out out a  bit of a tell with their objections as the Judged declared he’ll spend at least some of the weekend considering hauling Weisselberg in for a chat.

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/05/10/trump-hush-money-criminal-trial/weisselberg-in-court-00157368

2 minutes ago, retarius said:

But the Western and English language media is totally biased in favour of Israel's genocide. The west endorse the genocide reflected the type of people their leaders are, and the global south rejects that narrative and calls it as it is. A vile breach of humanity by Israel. 

The allegations against Israel of genocide are just that, allegations, they are, along with allegations of war crimes, under investigation.

12 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

Have you read the facts they’ve checked and as a result the BBC and numerous other media outlets have apologized and corrected?

I did.

Have you read the factual criticisms of CAMERA?

3 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

This OP is about an award winning journalist experiencing first hand how the media is anti Israel bias. the Camera website provide evidence of that and as a result of their actions false facts are corrected. You are in complete denial. 

 

Of course the author of one article having celebrated Oct 7th then is allowed to contribute articles in the Guardian. No bias there is there.

You’ve added CAMERA who are an organization founded to engage in pro-Israeli news activism. Topically founded in response to news reports of an earlier Israeli incursion into somebody else’s land.
 

The link I provided includes criticism of CAMERA, they are not without their own faults.
 

There is a war, there is obviously a battle over reporting of the war as demonstrated by organizations involved in Pro-Israeli news activism and very definitely by the exclusion of international news organization reporters from Gaza.
 

2 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

Deflection. It’s fact checking. Something you deliberately ignore. 

CAMERA are involved in a great deal more than ‘fact checking’.

And that ignore thing, does it apply to ‘why CAMERA were established and under what circumstances’?

11 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

     Terrorist groups continuously attack Israel .

Israel goes to fight the terror groups to stop the attacks .

Israel gets blamed for starting a war .

I don’t know if anyone who is blaming Israel for ‘starting this war’.

12 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Another problem is that the October 7 attack was a long time ago. Modern media has an incredibly short memory.  So now the only current images are the ones of the war on Hamas. The photos of raped and kidnapped teenage girls don't make the news any more. 

 

Plus the war very neatly mimics the neo-Marxist view of settler/colonial violence, racial animus, etc.

And of course the world’s news organizations are not permitted into Gaza to report on what is happening there.

6 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

Why deflect from the fact checks it carries out and that the Guardian changes as a result. I see a pattern emerging from you…..

I’m not deflecting’ Camera are engaging in exact behavior as Josh Levs, refer my criticism of that above.

That Camera were established in response to news reports of earlier Israeli incursion somebody rise’s land simply underscores the point.

3 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

Strange. What do you think? Of course there is. It’s set up to fight anti Israel bias…..lol Now check the facts that the media had to correct

“The group says it was founded in 1982 "to respond to The Washington Post's coverage of Israel's Lebanon incursion", and to respond to what it considers the media's "general anti-Israel bias".

Oddly in response to news reporting of Israeli incursion into somebody else’s land.

A pattern is emerging.

5 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

List of media corrections the Guardian did after being pulled up about them, Probably one of the most bias anti Israel news in the UK

https://camera-uk.org/topic/guardian/

 

Camera.

No bias there?!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_Accuracy_in_Middle_East_Reporting_in_America

8 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Peaceful?

 

I think you mean "largely" peaceful.😆

 

Much like the "mostly"peaceful BLM riots. 

 

 

https://news.sky.com/story/police-actively-looking-for-individuals-over-antisemitic-signs-at-pro-palestinian-march-13005665

At it again Jonny.

Posting completely irrelevant nonsense.

Proof of your claims regarding protests in Malmo this week is what, stuff from London that was reported back last November?!

What a desperate mess your arguments are becoming.

Just now, Bkk Brian said:

Actually I thought it was funny I wasn't shocked or filled with horror at all

 

 

OK, fixated.

9 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Oh look who's there....lol

 

Shock horror.

Young woman, who a disturbingly large number of old men fixate on, exercises her democratic right to join a peaceful protest.

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

Certainly not publicly...

 

 

Not doubt with Hamas influencing government policy...

Jonny,

I think we’ve had this discussion before.

Deal with the views and arguments I actually express and not those your fetid imagination dreams up on my behalf.

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

You mean keep voting until you get the "correct" result. How Democratic. 😃

 

 

The marches (including calls for Jihad/Genocide) have been going on for months, it's not just one photo. I am not misrepresenting reality, I am providing evidence of reality. Inconvenient for people like you who seek to deny/justify it. 

 

 

There is nothing bright about Khan being re-elected by his cohort of anti-semites. I can see how you might see it that way though...

Democracy doesn’t give everyone everything they want, but you’ll get over it eventually Jonny.

Eurovision, don’t forget to vote.

1 hour ago, 2baht said:

Netanyahoo is the greatest recruiter anti Semites have ever had!

I wouldn’t make that argument, but I do think he’s providing very good grounds for the foundation and international recognition of an independent Palestinian State.

Just now, Bkk Brian said:

Like this idiot in London who did get arrested:

 

Hamas-supporter makes things clear at the anti-Israel protest taking place in London right now. “I fully support Hamas. They are resisting occupation, just like the French did against the Germans”

 

 

Not even Sweden, let alone Malmo or the Eurovision Song Contest.

7 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Huge fan. I seem to recall you were the one eager to overturn the Brexit vote, not me. 

 

 

The images do not lie. 

 

London is full of white Liberals and has a huge Muslim population. So his two tiered policing where Jews are forbidden from walking freely due to being "openly Jewish" and Pro Palestine protestors are allowed to openly call for Jihad are obviously popular with that Demographic.

 

Many tyrants have been elected. 

Your memory is not as reliable as you think.

I have never argued to overturn the Brexit vote other than by democratic vote. 
 

Your pejorative view of why people voted for Sadiq Khan is based on a photo and your own misrepresentation of reality.

But look on the bright side Jonny, he’s again the London Mayor, available for you to insert into any topic regardless of what the topic is.

Wherever you post, Sadiq Khan is at hand ready and available to be wedged into any topic you choose.

1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said:

CH I know there is terrible carnage. Why? & why do you keep avoiding why?

We’ve discussed the why’s at length elsewhere Brian, they are not the topic here.
 

But I get your point, the carnage should just continue under the cover of shouting Antisemitism at anyone who protests.

As I said earlier, Josh Levs has given us a perfect example of how media is manipulated.

Just count the articles.