Chomper Higgot

I can’t help you with your separation anxiety but I can at least provide you with some reading to help you understand the issue you should be discussing is not as black and white as you evidently believe: https://www.ftadviser.com/gilts/2025/1/9/why-are-uk-government-bond-yields-rising/

Since you seem to know what the topic of discussion is and insisting staying on topic. Why are you discussing me?

It seems you too don’t understand how Parliament functions. The Tories, aided by Reform, voted against the Children’s Welfare and Schools Bill at its second reading. There was no possibility of a second inquiry being added to the Bill. Pure knee jerk reaction and grandstanding in response to Musk trolling on X.

Not getting the attention you crave?

I think marrying a basic understanding of Venn diagrams to members posting history might help you overcome your irony.

Do you ever get tired of quoting out of context? My full post that you cropped torpedoes your ridiculous and baseless assertion. Which almost certainly why you cropped my post to remove context.

She’s pan handling. Musk’s offer of huge sums of cash to a rightwing political party has caught her attention.

While the actions of both parties in this long conflict deserve critical examination, stating ‘Hamas are doing nothing different to what Ukraine is doing in Russia’ is a twist of absurdity, and quite frankly offensive, perhaps deliberately so.

A disgusting comment calling for vigilante justice. The means to achieve a second inquiry is to present a bill calling for a second inquiry in Parliament. Any MP can raise a Private Members Bill, any party can raise a party sponsored Bill. To date non have done so.

And very rightly so. The Tory ‘proposal’ was an attempt to block the Children's Welfare and Schools Bill. The Bill has now passed its second reading which implements many of the protections and policies recommended by the first inquiry that the Tories ignored and failed to act upon. The call for a second inquiry can now be presented in Parliament without risking blocking the protections for children in the Children’s Welfare and schools Bill.

A step in the far right direction.

I read H.R.8282. Tail wagging the dog was my impression.

Voting against a Parliamentary Bill that provides increased protections for children and lying about it. Not a good look. I’m glad I’m not excusing it. Fortunately Labour have a significant majority and the bill passed its second reading.

It seems the lies and misinformation are indeed rife. We've been assailed for days with news of the Tories submitting an amendment to the Second Reading of the Child Welfare and Schools Bill. The fat lie included has been that the Tories were demanding the Bill include setting up an inquiry into the grooming gangs. The liars who spread this nonsense have a couple of problems to navigate. 1. Amendments are not added to Second Readings, the vote is passed the bill into law or ‘kill it’. 2. The text of the Tory ‘amendment’ has been published on ‘’X” The Tories and Reform UK we’re not voting to add an inquiry, they were voting to kill the Child Welfare and Schools Bill. What bunch of stinking liars:

And you don’t meet the height requirement?

It’s pretty obvious he’s trolling.

What’s ‘diversity’ got to do with retirement age? Give it your best go.

That mud you mention obviously got I the way of you understanding this; Anyway thanks for confirming you have zero evidence of me defending these criminals.

Who do I defend? I'm very clear on my support for law, order and prosecuting criminals, regardless of who they are.

Explain this having to work seven years longer claim.

What does the court record say? Check that out, you’ll get the actual facts.

I’ve already commented on the treatment of this child rapists case, I find it baffling and I need of an explanation. I’ve a feeling you are misrepresenting the other case you refer to.

Between the two of you might figure I’m not the topic of the thread.

Struggling with the very easy to use quote function Jonny, or is it just you don’t like presenting my comments in the context they were made, complete with link to a credible news report?

Prosecution of the criminals you choose to defend hasn’t been swift in every case, this criminal has only just been sentenced: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jan/06/key-architect-of-riots-after-southport-attack-jailed-for-seven-and-a-half-years