Chomper Higgot

I’ll refer you once again to the actual objective of TDOR, linked above. Edinburgh did not raise the flag to honor ‘Tiffany Scott’. You should ask yourself why you are so easily triggered by this obvious false representation of what TDOR is about.

I doubt the ICC are worried, their whole purpose to deal with criminals.

Sorry Laddie, just pointing out the ridiculous false premise that triggered Ms Rowling and the usual suspects on in this thread. I have provided the factual definition of what TDOR is about, complete with a quote from its founder. I guess we can look forward to the rest of the day being a stream of denial of the actual facts of what TDOR is about.

Perhaps Ms Rowling could appraise herself of what Transgender Day of Remembrance is actually about, she might then avoid grandstanding on such an obvious false premise. Here’s what TDOR is actually about: “Transgender Day of Remembrance (TDOR) is an annual observance on November 20 that honors the memory of the transgender people whose lives were lost in acts of anti-transgender violence.” “Transgender Day of Remembrance seeks to highlight the losses we face due to anti-transgender bigotry and violence. I am no stranger to the need to fight for our rights, and the right to simply exist is first and foremost. With so many seeking to erase transgender people — sometimes in the most brutal ways possible — it is vitally important that those we lose are remembered, and that we continue to fight for justice.” Transgender Day of Remembrance founder Gwendolyn Ann Smith. https://glaad.org/tdor/ Oh and well done Edinburgh.

Excellent post.

Jonny when you claim there is a two tier justice system it is for you to provide the evidence to back your claim. I, and others, have frequently posted facts that disprove claims of two tier justice that you make. I shall continue to do so.

How does that fill the gaping hole in nobody here knowing who ‘@Venuspeenis’ is, what their motivation is or what their political affiliation are? It would be so easy to admit you know non of these things, factual too. But you struggle to do so.

Ah a personal attack and baseless accusation of lying. We’ve been before haven’t we.

Or a caricature there of.

Jonny, I and others frequently provide facts that undermine your claims. I will continue to do so, I expect others will too.

Jonny, it’s not for me to prove your claims correct, there is no proof of something that does not exist. The swift crackdown on coordinated race riots across the country had the near a immediate affect of ending those race riots and the arson, looting, property damage and attacks on the entirely innocent community they were attacking. It was exactly the right response. Why you have a problem with it is a mystery.

By displaying your own intolerance and pejorative views of the left? I’m not sure you make the argument you think you make.

Arrested for breaking the law? I’m at a loss to why you have a problem with that.

That’s a rather Dandy flounce.

I don’t know why you are telling me that, I’ve suggested in response to suggestions that the British Police might not investigate, that, on the basis of the chosen victims, ‘@Venuspeenis’ might not be in the UK. Your anti leftist rant adds nothing of worth to the discussion.

Oh, a ripped meme. Sorry for pointing out you are speculating.

No I’m not suggesting anything of the sort, nor am I speculating.

It’s not an accusation Mokwit, it’s an observation of you doing exactly what I dated. Adjusting your imagined scenario to fit new facts (that were actually already available but you somehow missed).

And you scupper off when countless other examples are reported that undermine your self stroked grievance.

Because regulations prevent this kind of tragedy happening elsewhere. A regulation that is not enforced is pointless, I think you can work that out.

Loaded with assumptions.

That’s the problem with speculating, you need to keep adjusting your imagined scenario as facts are presented that undermine it.

Jonny, the very first mention of politics in this thread was from you. The regulation of food and drink for safety reasons is not a political issue, regardless of your attempts to make it so.

It’s not a Strawman Jonny, it’s the logic of the argument you yourself made. Nice attempt at wedging an off topic distraction, sorry Jonny I’m not biting.

There is no ‘2 tier justice’ Jonny, it’s a rightwing grievance myth.